LiLSpeedy's Blog

447-744-577-775-557-766-677-883-338-772-227-773-377-373-    854-375-687-678-697-794-062

874*-729*-587*-581**

541 145 415 154 514 451 471 147 741 174 417 714 518 815 158 851 581 185 431 143 134 341 413 314 179 917 719 971 791 197 935 359 593 395 539 953 950 905 059 509 590 095 609 960 069 906 690 096 513 315 269 296 629 692 962 926 142 124 412 132 977 818 123 135 922

• Reasons why Mitt Romney lost the election

1. He was a flip-flopper. He said whatever a particular crowd wanted to hear without meaning a word of it.
2. He was a habitual liar. He told so many until he could not remember them all.
3. He was a carpet-bagger in the South. (GI)
4. He tried to portray himself as severely conservative in order to appease the so-called right-wing tea-party.
5. He did not respect the abilities of women…huge mistake.
6. He did not take the minority vote serious…was a major factor to his losing key states.
7. He never explained his belief as a Mormon. This made many Christians uneasy since he spent millions of dollars on TV ads identifying Mormons as a separate group of believers that had similar beliefs of a Christian, but didn’t called themselves one.
8. He was trying to accomplish something that his daddy couldn’t.
9. He failed to connect with Middle America.

It won't be long before Mitt go back to his money and mansion as a LOSER! I told all of you that President Obama would win.

http://youtu.be/EQwrB1vu74c

151 558 525 386 201 556 352 332 333 605 888 666 132

899 073 370 195 164 146 439 604 864 161 286 191 312 936 611 166 616 333 132 108 659 565 859 845 548 395 539 229 992 607 289 638 836 127 157 825 517 335

By Andres Oppenheimer                                                                                                                                            aoppenheimer@MiamiHerald.com

Judging from what President Barack Obama campaign manager David Axelrod has told me in an interview this week, early voting figures show that Latinos nationwide are turning out in larger numbers than in 2008, which is great news for Obama’s reelection bid.

But will that be enough for Obama to win the election? Before we get to that question, let’s see what Axelrod said.

Asked about the latest NBC/Wall Street Journal poll of all likely voters — including Latinos — showing that Republican candidate Mitt Romney is leading Obama nationwide by 50 to 46 percent of the vote, Axelrod responded that he could cite several other polls showing that Obama is leading the race.

“I believe we are ahead, and we are ahead particularly in these battleground states that are going to decide the election,” Axelrod said. “One of the reasons we are ahead is on the strength of the strong support we are getting among Latino voters, who I think are going to be decisive in this election.”

He added that “in the early votes that have been cast already in Florida, in Nevada and Colorado, Latino voters are outstripping the pace that they set four years ago. So I’m very confident that we are going to win this election.”

Axelrod’s assertion surprised me, because — while Obama is beating Romney by a whopping 70 percent to 25 percent among Hispanic voters nationwide, according to most polls — the surveys also show that there may be a decline in Latino enthusiasm to vote this time. I reminded Axelrod about the NBC/Telemundo/Wall Street Journal poll released last week, which shows that only 65 percent of Latinos are motivated to vote this time, as opposed to 76 percent in 2008.

Are you sure about these early vote figures? I asked. “Yes, what I’m telling you is that based on the early votes — millions of votes have been cast across the country — Latinos are participating at a higher percentage than they did four years ago,” Axelrod said.

Romney campaign spokesman Alberto Martinez disputed these estimates, saying that virtually all polls show Obama suffering from an enthusiasm gap among Hispanics. And regardless of whether the number of Hispanic registered voters increased in recent years, that does not mean that all will vote for Obama, he added.

The Romney campaign says that three out of four recent surveys taken in Florida show Romney winning the Hispanic vote in the state, although that’s largely because of the heavily Conservative Cuban-American vote. Even if you accept the claim that early voting shows that more Hispanics are turning out this time, that’s not necessarily good news for Obama, because many Hispanics are voting for Romney, Martinez said.

In Florida — a key swing state with a huge Hispanic population — 2.7 million people have already cast their ballots in early voting or absentee ballots. That amounts to about 30 percent of the state’s registered voters.

According to The Miami Herald’s Naked Politics blog, 43 percent of those who have already voted are registered Democrats, while 41 percent are registered Republicans, and 17 percent are independents. The early voting and absentee voting figures are not broken down by ethnic groups, but Democratic Florida state director Ashley Walker has claimed that early turnout among Hispanics is up 50 percent from 2008.

As for absentee votes in Florida, which went for Republicans by a 16 percent margin in 2008, Democrats have narrowed that lead to 5 percent so far in this election, the figures show.

My opinion: It’s not clear that a high Latino turnout in early voting will translate into a big Latino turnout on Election Day, because it may respond to an Obama campaign effort to get its most motivated Hispanic activists to vote early in hopes of boosting the overall Latino enthusiasm ahead of Election Day.

But if more Democrats than in 2008 are turning out to vote early , as Axelrod says, that would be indeed be good news for Obama, if anything else because a low turnout would have allowed Romney to claim a Democratic debacle among Latino voters.

If the polls are right and Obama leads Romney by 70 to 25 percent among Latino voters, this will be the most lopsided Hispanic vote in two decades.

If Obama wins, Latinos will have had their biggest impact ever in a presidential election. Conversely, if Romney wins, it will be seen as evidence that the Latino vote has been over-rated, and that it’s not essential to win an election. A lot will be at stake Tuesday for the future of Latinos as a bloc.

0255 0225 0200 9994 5050 2154 5054 4555

1111 4444 9999 2221 3336 4944 9996(These C4 numbers have never fallen in GA)

127 108 223 313 412 432 132 851 581 333 976 679 157 825 240 224 315 513 351 091 459 588

MEYONR SLESO GBI  BERNMOVE XSI

 

Good Luck!

 

 

 

NOTE: PLEASE DON'T COPY ME...COME UP WITH YOUR OWN IDEA...YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE! EVERYONE WILL KNOW IF YOU DO.

635 594 315 513 859 638 404 917 385 078 087 708

The British reaction to Mitt Romney has gone from openness, to skepticism, to mocking, to concluding that Mitt Romney is worse than Sarah Palin.

Daily Mail Political Editor James Chapman has been providing the world a play by play of Romney’s British implosion via his Twitter account. Romney started things off by criticizing London’s preparedness for the Olympics. He then forgot the name of British Labour Leader Ed Miliband, and then he admitted that he had been given a secret briefing by MI6. This led the British to ask aloud if they have another George W. Bush on their hands, “Romney blunders again by revealing he’s had (supposedly) top secret briefing by John Sawers, MI6 boss. Do we have a new Dubya on our hands?”

After his visit to Whitehall, Chapman offered two of the kinder reviews of Mitt Romney, “Serious dismay in Whitehall at Romney debut. ‘Worse than Sarah Palin.’ ‘Total car crash’. Two of the kinder verdicts.” Chapman also reported another verdict from British meet and greet with Mitt, “Another verdict from one Romney meeting: ‘Apparently devoid of charm, warmth, humour or sincerity’”

Getting compared to Sarah Palin is one thing, but being called worse than Palin is an indication of the epic display of fail that Romney is putting on in London.

If you thought things couldn’t possibly get worse for Mitt Romney, you were wrong. How does one top being unfavorably compared to Sarah Palin? If you’re Mitt Romney, you get mocked in front of 60,000 people.

The Telegraph is reporting that London Mayor Boris Johnson mocked Romney’s readiness comment, “Quite a moment from the Mayor of London Boris Johnson. Shortly after Rix had lit the flame he really went for it in Hyde Park. He referenced Mitt Romney’s ‘London isn’t ready’ quip and shot back in style. “Are we ready?” he called and the crowd went wild. There may even have been a hint of the Obama-friendly “Yes we can!” in there – he may have jumped into a winning scenario but I’ve not heard a politician get that reaction before.”

For their part, the White House rubbed salt in Romney’s wounds by pointing out that President Obama has full confidence in Britain’s ability to provide a secure Olympics. White House Spokesman Jay Carney said, “In keeping with our special relationship, the president also made it clear that he has the utmost confidence in our close friend and ally, the United Kingdom, as they finalize preparations to host the London Olympics.”

That special relationship is being put in jeopardy by a Republican nominee who can’t stop insulting the British people while making an ass out of himself. Instead of proving that he is Commander in Chief material, Romney is justifying John McCain’s 2008 selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate. To think, that the Romney campaign actually agreed to foreign policy being the topic of the third presidential debate. Be careful what you ask for.

 

          Trust me…I’m the man with the plan!

 

 

    Charging in to oblivion?