Coin Toss's Blog

Obma classmate reveals why college records sealed

Why would anyone spend millions of dollars to have their college records sealed if they didn’t have something to hide?  That’s the question that Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and every American citizen should be asking Barack Obama.

The Democrats, especially Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have made a big deal of Mitt Romney’s not releasing more than two years of his income tax records.  Harry Reid accused Romney of hiding a questionable past and he did it on the Senate floor which made it a matter of Senate record.

But what is Obama hiding in his college records that he doesn’t want anyone to find out about?  I also have to wonder how much he has paid those who do know to keep it quiet?  Or were they threatened rather than paid off as it wouldn’t be the first time that has happened.  Just ask Sheriff Joe Arpaio or former President Bill Clinton.

With his college records securely sealed away, we may never know what deep dark career ending secrets they may hold, but there is someone who has a pretty good idea of just what they may be hiding.

Wayne Allyn Root is a staunch conservative who ran for Vice President of the United States in 2008 on the Libertarian Party ticket.  He also happens to have attended Columbia University at the same time that Barack Obama claims to have attended.  Not only did Root attend the same school at the same time, but they had the same major which means that they should have known each other.  But Root says he has no recollection of every meeting Obama at school and he has talked to a number of other classmates in the same major and none of them remember him either.

Root, a successful millionaire and entrepreneur, suggests through circumstantial evidence that Obama’s college records are sealed because he attended as a foreign student under his adopted name of Soetero.  He wonders how a poor person who had mediocre grades in high school and described as a pot smoking Marxist radical, could afford to get into top and expensive colleges like Columbia and Harvard without incurring huge student loans.  However, Root points out that foreign nationals are given admission because of their fulfilling a quota for the schools.  They receive federal grant money that is not available to American students, meaning that you and I pay for their education at prestigious colleges and universities.

If Root is correct, the reason Obama has spent millions to seal his college records is that they prove that he was an Indonesian citizen when he attended college here in the United States.  If true, that would be sufficient grounds to end his presidency and aspirations of becoming dictator of America.

I believe Root has a very good case and I wish Romney and Ryan would make this a major campaign issue and demand to see Obama’s records.  Root even urges Romney to challenge Obama to a show me yours and I’ll show you mine debate.

Watch and listen to Wayne Allyn Root as he presents his case and then you decide how accurate his conclusion is.

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/6923/obama-classmate-reveals-why-college-records-sealed/#ixzz25jFBSIiF
Entry #316

Democrats boo mentioning God

Delegates to the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte today booed, jeered and shook their fists when the chairman at the time, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, declared that an amendment to the party’s platform – adding a mention of God – had been adopted.

It took him calling for the vote three times before he could make the declaration that in his opinion, the ayes made up two-thirds of the vote.

After the first vote, which sounded like a dead heat between the yes and no votes, he said, “In the opinion of the …. Let me do that again.”

The second vote sounded the same, and Villaraigosa looked offstage for help and advice.

A woman is seen coming up behind him, and says, “Let them do what they’re going to do.”

On the third vote, Villaraigosa was prepared and launched into the statement that in his opinion, two-thirds of the voters said “aye,” apparently without considering the volume of the voice vote.

Shaking fists and jeers followed erupted even as he was speaking.

The platform of the party drew nationwide astonishment just a day earlier when it failed to even mention God. It also failed to mention Jerusalem.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/democrats-boo-idea-of-mentioning-god/

The amendment, proposed by former Gov. Ted Strickland, chief of the platform committee, added the notation that Americans were encouraged to reach their “God-given potential.”

It also recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

Strickland didn’t offer an explanation for why God and Jerusalem were not in the original platform, explaining only that “our belief in God is central to our American story” and “the president recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and our party’s platform should as well.”

Radio host Michael Savage said the scenario could be the turning point in the 2012 presidential campaign.

“This is a big moment,” Savage said. “America is disgusted with this party of atheists and America haters.”

David Brody reported on the Brody File in CBN,“This has become a disaster for the Democrats and a boon to the Romney campaign. The DNC has now added God back into their platform language after originally taking it out. They have also added language back in that says Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. When they tried to change the language on the convention floor, there were boos! Oy-Gevalt.”

He said notwithstanding any corrections the Democrats have tried to make, “The Romney campaign can now argue that the Democrats don’t know what they believe on two very important topics. They can also argue that the Democrats only did this because of the pushback. That’s true.”

Romney told Fox, “It’s a very sad say when we have our best friend in the Middle East …. for us at a stage like this to take an action of that nature, to cease calling Jerusalem the capital of Israel, this is a very troubling development.”

He also said the Democrats’ initial decision to remove “God” from its 2012 platform “suggests a party which is increasingly out of touch with the mainstream of American people. I think this party is veering further and further away to an extreme wing that Americans don’t recognize it.”

The AP described the Democrats as “embarrassed” over the issue, and explained that the language resurrected simply said, “We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values and interests of working people and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential.”

Several Democrats said the attempt to fix the platform was a mistake. Noor Ul-Hasan, a Muslim from Salt Lake City, told AP, “There are people who don’t’ believe in God and you have to respect that as well.”

Another delegate from Utah, Angela Urrea, told AP, “The majority spoke last night. We shouldn’t be declaring Jerusalem the capital of Israel.”

The Foreign Policy column at The Cable said Obama himself intervened to push the changes.

And CBS New York said of the president before today’s reversal, “Obama handed the Republicans a new avenue of attack on a silver platter when he supported a Democratic Party platform change that does not state that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.”

The platform earlier had been adopted with the statement, “We gather to reclaim the basic bargain that built the largest middle class and the most prosperous nation on Earth – the simple principle that in America, hard work should pay off, responsibility should be rewarded, and each one of us should be able to go as far as our talent and drive take us.”

GOP vice presidential candidate Rep. Paul Ryan told Fox, “I guess I would just put the onus and the burden on them to explain why they did all this, the purges of God.”

At U.S. News, Peter Roff accompanied his commentary with a cartoon of a car carrying a “What Would Jesus do?” bumper sticker. Only “Jesus” is crossed out and “Obama” written in.

“There are no doubt other examples but the message is clear,” he wrote. “One candidate, Romney, stands for the proposition that religious freedom is paramount to American liberty. The other, Barack Obama, seems to believe it is subservient to the desires of the state. For most of us, this would seem to be the more important issue upon which to base a vote for president.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/democrats-boo-idea-of-mentioning-god/

Entry #315

Cusack: Obama just another Ivy League A-hole

Hollywood star John Cusack is raising eyebrows today as he lashes into Barack Obama with the question: “Is the president just another Ivy League A–hole shredding civil liberties and due process and sending people to die in some sh-thole for purely political reasons?”

Cusack, who is well-known for his roles in films including “The Sure Thing,” “Better Off Dead” and “Being John Malkovich,” seriously questions Obama in an article published in Truthout:

“Mr. Obama, the Christian president with the Muslim-sounding name, would heed the admonitions of neither religion’s prophets about making war and do what no empire or leader, including Alexander the Great, could do: he would, he assured us ‘get the job done in Afghanistan.’ And so we have our democratic president receiving the Nobel Peace Prize as he sends 30,000 more troops to a ten-year-old conflict in a country that’s been war-torn for 5,000 years.

“Why? We’ll never fully know. Instead, we got a speech that was stone bullsh– and an insult to the very idea of peace.

“We can’t have it both ways. Hope means endless war? Obama has metaphorically pushed all in with the usual international and institutional killers; and in the case of war and peace, literally.

“To sum it up: more war. So thousands die or are maimed; generations of families and veterans are damaged beyond imagination; sons and daughters come home in rubber bags. But he and his satellites get their four more years.”

Cusack also has some criticism for the national news media for complicity with Obama, saying, “Under Obama do we continue to call the thousands of mercenaries in Afghanistan ‘general contractors’ now that Bush is gone? No, we don’t talk about them … not a story anymore. …

“There will be a historical record. ‘Change we can believe in’ is not using the other guys’ mob to clean up your own tracks while continuing to feed at the trough. Human nature is human nature, and when people find out they’re being hustled, they will seek revenge, sooner or later, and it will be ugly and savage.

In a country with desperation growing everywhere, everyday – despite the ‘Oh, things are getting better’ press releases – how could one think otherwise?”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/actor-obama-another-ivy-league-a-hole/

Entry #314

God replaced, not removed from DNC platform

God was NOT Removed from the DNC Platform — He Was Replaced

You’ve been reading that God’s name was removed from the Democratic National Committee platform.

This is how the 2008 platform read in its reference to God:

“We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values, and interests of working people, and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential.”

In the 2012 platform “God-given” has been removed. The paragraph reads as follows:

We gather to reclaim the basic bargain that built the largest middle class and the most prosperous nation on Earth — the simple principle that in America, hard work should pay off, responsibility should be rewarded, and each one of us should be able to go as far as our talent and drive take us.”

Here’s what a lot of people do not understand. There is no such thing as religious neutrality. The rejection of the true God means that a new god replaces Him. In the case of the Democrats (and some Republicans) government is the new God. Rousas J. Rushdoony makes this point in his book Foundation of Social Order:

When the State claims religious neutrality, it is either self-deception or a deception of the people, and it merely means a neutrality towards its old faith in order to prepare the way for the establishment of the new faith.

The State is no less a religious organization than the church, and in some societies more so. In Christian society, church and State are both religious orders, the church as a ministry of grace and the State as a ministry of justice.

In pagan society, the State takes priority as the religious order: the temple or the shrine then become aspects of the state’s life and function. Religion can no more be abstracted from the State than from the church. Churches and States may forsake a religion and abandon their creed, but only in order to adopt a new one.

This is exactly what the Democrats have done. Not to let the Republicans off the hook, but too many of them give lip service to the true God while worshiping at the altar of their new god — the Messianic State.

The statement in a DNC video that “The Government is the only thing we all belong to” pretty much sums up the creed of the Democrat Party. I should add, however, that striking at the image of God by promoting abortion on demand and redefining marriage are also indicators that the Democrats have become their own God.

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/09/god-was-not-removed-from-the-dnc-platform-he-was-replaced/#ixzz25dPo7Ffe


Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/09/god-was-not-removed-from-the-dnc-platform-he-was-replaced/#ixzz25dPhbG6n
Entry #313

Obama' Cult of Personality" Promotes...

Obama 3:16 calendars.......

This is PATHETIC:

Obama ‘Cult Of Personality’ Promotes “Obama 3:16″ Calendars

 

The Obama Idolators haven’t been fervent in their veneration of him and lauding him as the Messiah. Now they have gone even further in their blasphemy of attempting to deify Barack Hussein Obama. Hold on to your hats folks, for this is what blasphemy looks like, up close and personal. In Charlotte, North Carolina, just miles from where I live they are actually selling photo calendars that contain a direct parallel to Barack Obama’s birth and John 3:16 which speaks of God sending His only begotten Son into the World. In fact, it cannot be more explicit that this is the parallel being drawn that the picture for August, with the biblical reference has the alleged birth certificate of Barack Obama, indicating that he is God’s Son.


Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/09/obama-cult-of-personality-promotes-obama-316-calendars/#ixzz25ZBYJN64
2120903heavensent



Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/09/obama-cult-of-personality-promotes-obama-316-calendars/#ixzz25Z9CC9Jy

Entry #312

Police state creep: DHS checkpoints

Police State creep: DHS to run local sobriety checkpoints

by Joel McDurmon on Sep 3, 2012

They have the power to stop, arrest, and even draw blood from those they suspect of DWI. So much for the “Volunteer State.”

Teri Webster writes for Examiner.com:

The Department of Homeland Security is sending out its state watchdogs to arrest drunk drivers and draw their blood over Labor Day weekend.

It echoes of a national trend of the increasing presence of federal police and military troops on our streets. And the state of Tennessee is a pioneer in the ghastly movement.

In Tennessee, suspected drunk drivers will be subject to forced testing for blood alcohol levels. A new law allows police to get warrants and draw blood samples from people who appear to be driving impaired. Additionally, drivers can expect  to see more sobriety checkpoints over the Labor Day weekend.

Tennessee has touted itself as the first state in the nation to have Transportation Security Administration (TSA) workers conducting random searches on its streets. Echoing DHS’s “See Something, Say Something” program, drivers are also urged to call authorities if they see something suspicious. . . .

No one wants drunk drivers on the road. But whether we need a zealous arm of the federal Department of Homeland Security involved in local police patrols is another issue.

Continue Reading on www.examiner.com

http://americanvisionnews.com/4447/police-state-creep-dhs-to-run-local-sobriety-checkpoints

http://www.examiner.com/article/homeland-security-to-assist-with-dwi-arrests-over-labor-day-weekend

Entry #311

Feds willing to destroy millions of vital records...

...just to protect obama

There are numerous reasons for law enforcement and professional organizations to request copies of records from the Selective Service System.  Sometimes the request is for a background check for a job or security clearance.  Other requests are made because of individuals who have made unsubstantiated claims about their backgrounds and qualifications.  Yet others are prompted by someone running for political office.

For decades the Selective Service has readily complied with the requests and furnished the desired documents.  That is until they heard that they would be receiving an official subpoena for copies of Barack Hussein Obama’s records.

On September 16, 2011, the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office announced that their Cold Case Posse was launching an investigation into the birth certificate and Selective Service documents.  World Net Daily picked up the announcement and made it known nationally.

On September 20, 2011, The Selective Service System announced new policy changes to the privacy rules, handling and preservation of existing documents.  Under the new guidelines, draft registration records would be considered as nonrecord copies instead of record copies.  Record copies must be kept on file, but nonrecord copies can be disposed of and destroyed.  That means that any and all draft registration cards and microfilm copies are now subject to being destroyed, including the one belonging to Obama.

Incidentally, the Selective Service System’s policies on privacy and preservation of records had not been changed in over 11 years, but we are to believe that it is mere coincidence that it was suddenly changed at this moment of time.

The only public record of Obama’s draft registration was a copy of a Selective Service registration card that was obtained by Stephen Coffman just prior to the 2008 election.  Coffman is a retired immigration officer who placed the request for the card after his retirement from Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Michael Zullo, the lead investigator of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse, and his team, examined the draft registration card obtained by Coffman and determined that it was a forgery.  Sheriff Arpaio has sent two official letters to the Selective Service System and as yet has never received any of the records requested.

The reason the Selective Service record is so important is to determine if Barack Obama actually did register for the draft as a US citizen or if in fact he was a foreign student who attended Occidental College in Los Angeles.  Only US citizens are required to register with the Selective Service System on their 18th birthday, foreign nationals are not so required.

If Obama was a US citizen as he claims, then there would have to have been a record of his Selective Service registration and status.  Since the copy obtained by Coffman has been shown to be a forgery, that means the only way to prove that he had registered would be to obtain copies of his paperwork and records.  But if they have been conveniently destroyed under the new policy, then there is no way to officially verify his draft registration and citizenship.

Many Americans are asking the same question about Obama’s citizenship.  If he truly is a US citizen, then why is he trying to so hard to hide the documentation to prove it?  It seems that he would want to exonerate himself and end all of the controversy once and for all.  His constant refusal to make his records available only makes him look as guilty as sin and pours fuel on the fires of doubt and conspiracy.

So like so many others, I say, Mr Obama, either verify your eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States or get the heck out of OUR White House!

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/5158/feds-willing-to-destroy-millions-of-vital-records-just-to-protect-obama/#ixzz25TPnL72W
Entry #310

Did obama campaign threaten life of Chelsea...

Clinton?

The real origin of the birther movement:

Most people in the US, especially Democrats, believe that the Obama Birther Movement was started by Republicans and or the Tea Party. They believe it is a smear campaign aimed to tarnish the image of their hero of change. But they may be shocked to learn that the Birther Movement was actually started by former President Bill Clinton and Hillary back in 2008.

In an exclusive interview by WND, Bettina Viviano was a vice president with Amblin Enterntainment, Steven Spielberg’s company, before launching her own film production company in 1990. In 2008, Viviano was asked to produce a documentary about voter fraud within the Democratic Party. At the time, she says she was not a Democrat or a Republican and in fact had never voted in an election. She went into the project with the sole purpose of producing the best and most accurate documentary possible.

During the documentary process, Viviano says that she quickly became aware of just how dangerous and insidious the Obama campaign was. A number of the Democrats she interviewed refused to appear on camera and told her that their lives and property had been threatened by people working with the Obama campaign.

She also heard former President Bill Clinton say that Obama was not eligible to be president because of his lack of birth records. In fact, she said it was common knowledge around many top Democrats. Bill Clinton has often said that he would go public with the information when the time was right.

Before that could happen, his close friend and head of the Arkansas Democratic Party, Bill Gwatney was murdered in his office and then someone told Bill that he was next if he said anything about Obama’s eligibility. In the video below, she said that Clinton was not intimidated until someone associated with the Obama campaign told him that his daughter Chelsea would be next if he opened his mouth. From that point on, the Clinton’s remained silent about Obama’s birth certificate or lack thereof.

Continues:

Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/4506/obama-campaign-threaten-life-of-chelsea-clinton-to-keep-parents-silent-on-obamas-ineligibility/#ixzz25ReF9wox

Entry #309

Lawsuit: obama legally thwarting offshore drilling

In his effort to diminish the United States' standing, obama give billions to develop Brazil's offshore drilling while restricting ours. 
 
 Lawsuit: Obama Is ‘Illegally’ Thwarting Offshore Drilling
A new lawsuit filed by an independent American oil and gas company charges that the Obama administration is blocking legitimate efforts to find and produce oil from offshore wells.
“Given the challenges still facing the U.S. economy, the government needs to move aside and let private industry do what private industry does best: create jobs and increase our oil supply to help lower the price at the pump,” a report from the Heritage Foundation states.
“And yet the Obama administration remains committed to strangling America’s economic revival by doing everything in its power to prevent companies that obtain offshore leases from actually drilling and producing oil — a fact evidenced by a new lawsuit just filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims by an independent U.S. oil and gas company.”
By March 2010, ATP Oil & Gas Corporation received oil leases and necessary permits to drill in the Gulf of Mexico, and installed state-of-the-art drilling and processing equipment to safely access already-penetrated oil reservoirs, according to the report. The project was financed with $1.5 billion from J.P. Morgan.
Then in April 2010, the BP-operated Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf exploded while drilling a well into a previously unexplored reservoir. In response, the Obama administration ordered moratoria on deep-water drilling and barred consideration of new permits.
As a result, the ATP operation was shut down.
ATP has now struck back by filing a lawsuit alleging that the Interior Department “improperly and illegally suspended all deep-water offshore drilling activities and imposed two illegal moratoria on the deep-water drilling permit application process and then unreasonably and unlawfully delayed the issuance of drilling permits after the lifting of the formal moratoria.”
ATP is essentially asserting that the government breached its offshore leases with ATP by violating the Administrative Procedure Act in two ways, according to the Heritage Foundation report written by Hans von Spakovsky and Nicolas Loris: “By issuing overbroad moratoria, and by manipulating seven experts from the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) to bolster a recommendation for the moratoria.”
They also point out that all seven NAE experts denied supporting moratoria recommendations, and a previous court case concluded that a White House official had changed the report used to justify the moratoria.
The authors write: “ATP’s lawsuit provides a revealing glimpse into the capital-intensive oil and gas industry where unfair and illegal actions by a government agency can cost companies (and the U.S. economy) enormous sums of money.”
Opening the outer continental shelf to drilling, they add, “would generate hundreds of thousands of new jobs, generate hundreds of billions of dollars in government revenue, and bring more oil to the world market, thereby lowering gas prices.”
Entry #308

Boomers retiring to rural areas won't ...

....find doctors.

GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) — Nina Musselman had no trouble finding a family doctor when she retired to rural Oregon nine years ago to be closer to her children. But then that doctor moved away, leaving her to search for another who would take Medicare.

After a year of going from doctor to doctor, she finally found one who stuck.

As record numbers of baby boomers go into retirement, many are thinking about moving from the places they needed to live to make a living, and going someplace warmer, quieter or prettier.

If they choose small towns like Grants Pass, 250 miles south of Portland, they could well have a hard time finding a family doctor willing to take Medicare, even supplemental plans, rather than private insurance.

"It's a sad situation for seniors," she said.

There are several reasons boomers, the 78 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964, could face difficulties finding a doctor if they retire to small towns over the next 20 years.

First, many primary care doctors prefer to live and work in urban areas because of greater cultural opportunities, better schools and job opportunities for spouses.

Also, Medicare pays rural doctors less per procedure than urban physicians because their operating costs are supposedly less. That makes rural doctors less likely to accept Medicare patients.

With cuts to Medicare reimbursement for doctors targeted under the federal health care overhaul, the shortage is likely to get even worse, said Mark Pauly, professor of health care management at the University of Pennsylvania.

That is, unless increasing reimbursements for nurse practitioners and physicians' assistants encourages those providers to take up the slack, Pauly said.

If the Medicare cuts go through, "the doctors are saying: "We're out of here,'" Pauly said. "The least they are saying is: 'We'll treat Medicare patients like we treat Medicaid patients,' which is mostly not."

Still, there is some good news, depending on where you live.

Pauly said the Affordable Care Act "puts a lot of emphasis on wellness programs and primary care. Nurses, especially nurse practitioners, are intended to play a major role there."

In Oregon, Washington and 14 other states, nurses and nurse practioners "can operate independently of doctors, writing prescriptions, ordering tests, and even running clinics," Pauly said.

Nationwide, the 22.5 percent of primary care doctors who practice in rural areas roughly matches the 24 percent of Medicare patients living there, said Dr. Roland Goertz, chairman of the American Academy of Family Physicians board.

A survey of academy members nationwide shows 83 percent take new Medicare patients. But there is an overall shortage of primary care physicians that still makes it hard for retirees to find a family doctor.

The real problem, he said, is that the health care system "has not supported a robust, adequate primary care workforce for over 30 years."

According to the American Association of Medical Colleges, rural areas need about 20,000 primary care doctors to make up for the shortages, but only about 16,500 medical doctors and 3,500 doctors of osteopathy graduate yearly.

"We are always trying to recruit doctors. We are barely keeping even," said Lyle Jackson, the medical director at the Mid-Rogue Independent Physician Association, a cooperative of doctors in Josephine County, where Musselman lives.

Taking part in the Medicare Advantage program, which pays a higher rate to doctors than standard Medicare, helps, but is still not enough, said Jackson, a former family physician.

A 2009 survey of doctors in the Oregon Medical Association showed concern over Medicare reimbursement rates topping the list of 23 issues, with 79 percent rating it as very important, said Joy Conklin, an official at the association.

The survey showed 19.1 percent of Oregon doctors had closed their practices to Medicare, and 28.1 percent had restricted the numbers of Medicare patients.

That really becomes evident in Josephine County, which attracted retirees after the timber industry collapsed.

Low taxes, cheap housing, wineries, a symphony and low traffic put it in top 10 lists for retirement communities. The 2010 census puts the number of people older than 65 at 23 percent, compared to 14 percent for the state.

But the website County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, which gathers a wide range of health care data nationwide, shows 933 patients for every primary care physician in the county, nearly 50 percent higher than the national 631-to-one rate.

At the Grants Pass Clinic, Dr. Bruce Stowell said they are no longer taking new Medicare patients. Medicare pays about 45 percent of what commercial insurance pays.

As it is, their proportion of Medicare patients is double that of a similar Portland practice.

"We used to get a steady stream of high-quality (resumes) from U.S.-trained and U.S.-born physicians," he said. "Over the last year, that stream has declined into a trickle. Very few (doctors) are choosing to go into primary care."

Schools are turning out more nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

How well they fill the doctor gap will depend largely on how much independence states give them to practice, said Tay Kopanos, director of health care policy for state affairs at the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

Meanwhile, overall demand for primary care will be increasing as more people can afford it under the Affordable Care Act, said Joanne Spetz, a health care policy professor at the University of California, San Francisco.

Dr. Atul Grover, chief of public policy for the American Association of Medical Colleges, said the nation is facing a tough time recruiting for primary care as well as other specialties that treat Medicare patients, such as oncologists.

When he decided to become a primary care doctor in the 1990s, it was because of a widespread belief that health maintenance organizations were going to be hiring all the doctors.

He said they wanted primary care doctors to emphasize wellness and prevention. Now, many graduates are moving into specialties that do procedures, such as surgery, because Medicare pays more for them than plain-old office visits.

Also, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 capped the number of residencies paid by Medicare, so there is no quick way to increase the numbers of doctors in general, let alone in rural areas, he said.

"An entire year's worth of doctor production is needed to deal with the (rural-area) shortage just today," he said.

http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/ap/boomers-retiring-to-rural-areas-won-t-find-doctors

Entry #307

Odds of winning the same in small towns, large...

....cities

If you've ever thought that where you bought a lottery ticket would make a difference in whether you'd win or lose, it's time to rethink your lottery strategy. No matter where you play the lottery, the odds of winning are the same.

It's all random. It's all luck, experts said.

In 2012, three out of 11 Mega million jackpot winners hailed from the top 10 U.S. metro areas. But mixed in with winners from Los Angeles, New York City and Atlanta were winners from areas with much smaller populations, such as Red Bud, Ill., Milford Mill, Md., Pomona, Calif., Ottawa, Kan.

"It's probably that much of the country does live in small towns and small cities, and maybe they are just more predisposed to buy more lottery tickets than people who live in big cities," Michael Shackleford, who operates the gaming site Wizard of Odds, told ABC News.

"I really don't think there's a conspiracy here. I think everyone has the same chances," Schackleford said.

Lottery tickets can be bought at more than 240,000 locations in North America. According to fiscal sales of lottery tickets for 2005, the last year for which data were available, "New York led the U.S. with sales of $6.2 billion, followed by Massachusetts with sales of $4.5 billion," according to the North American Association of State and Provincial Lotteries, which represents 52 lottery organizations.

In the past five years, the Mega Millions jackpot has twice been won by people buying tickets in Brooklyn, N.Y., which counts 2.5 million residents. But Kalamazoo, in southwest Michigan, whose population is about 74,000 people, tied with Brooklyn when it came to winning those pots of money.

And earlier this month, a winning Powerball ticket was sold in Lapeer, Mich..

Another Powerball winner for 2012 came from Seymour, Conn., which has a population of about 16,000 people. And, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, is not only the hometown of Ashton Kutcher and Elijah Wood but of the Shipping 20, the group of 20 co-workers who hit the $240 million jackpot in June.

While it's become common to see little-known cities, such as Sharpsburg, Ga., and Piqua, Ohio, make the news after a big jackpot, winning all comes down to chance.

"Every ticket has an equal chance of winning. The drawing is completely random. There's no way to bias a random drawing toward particular locations. If there were it wouldn't be random, which would mean that the lottery is cheating," Mark Chu-Carroll, a math blogger, wrote in an email to ABC News.

"True randomness frequently produces what looks like patterns," Chu-Caroll continued. "If you flip a fair coin 10,000 times, at some point in the sequence of flips, you'll probably see 10 heads in a row. Taken by itself, that seems very unlikely, but as a part of the larger, random sequence, if you didn't see something like that, it's a sign that there's something fishy going on."

When Richard Lustig, a multi-time lottery winner, offered ways to increase one's chances of winning the game, critics countered,

"The lottery works randomly. Unlike poker or blackjack, there's nothing you can do to gain an advantage at this. You can't make decisions to influence the outcome," Zac Bissonnette, author of "Debt-Free U," told Business Insider..

So there's no great significance to the fact that the Powerball jackpot was won by residents of Harding, Pa., Lithonia, Ga., Lakeville, Minn., Fall River, Mass., Catskill, N.Y., and Abingdon, Md., in 2011.

"If you look at the number of ticket buyers in a city compared to a small town, there are a couple of confounding patterns," said Chu-Caroll. "Every small town has a couple of stores selling lottery tickets. If you actually look at the number of vendors in the big cities, compared with the number of vendors outside of the big cities, there are actually more lottery vendors outside of the cities. And if you look at ticket-buying patterns, the group of ticket buyers is a much smaller proportion of the population outside of the cities."

But, there is no rhyme or reason for why winners come from a particularly area, experts said.

"It is not known until after the drawing where the ticket was sold. There is just as much of a chance of it being sold in a small town as a large town, the city as the suburbs, the North as the South, the East as the West," Andrea Brancato, a Michigan lottery PR director, told ABC News in an email.

"If you look at the list of Mega Millions winners, for example, you will see that there are large cities (Los Angeles, Richmond, Va., Dallas) all the way to small towns (Lapeer, Mich., and many of the other places that I've not heard of!)."

Here's a look at the locations of Mega Million Winners for 2010:

$25 million won in Broadview Heights, Ohio

$141 million won in Gladstone, Mich.

$54 million won in Brooklyn, N.Y.

$135 million won Morro Bay, Calif.

$64 million won in Agoura Hills, Calif., and El Monte, Calif.

$26 million won in Syracuse, N.Y. and Canastota, N.Y.

$36 million won in Kalamazoo, Mich.

$12 million jackpot won in Greensboro, N.C.

$64 million jackpot won in Brooklyn, N.Y.

$266 million jackpot won in Pico Rivera, Calif.

$20 million jackpot won in Hennepin, Ill.

$134 million won in Long Beach, Calif.

$144 million won in Katy, Texas

Here's a look at some of the locations of Powerball Winners for 2010:

$48.8 million won in Saratoga, N.Y.

$18.7 million won in Louisville, Ky.

$79 million won in Martinsburg, W. Va.

$258.5 won in Marshall, Mo.

$141.4 million won in Asheville, N.C.

$61.5 million won in Bradenton, Fla.

$116 million won in Mabelton, Ga.

$85.7 million won in Baton Rouge, La.

$73.8 million won in Royal Palm Beach, Fla.

$96.9 million won in Helena, Mont. and Kalamazoo, Mich.

http://news.yahoo.com/lottery-strategy-odds-winning-same-large-cities-small-141016090--abc-news-money.html#

Entry #306

Obama suggests silencing free speech of...

the wealthy and corporations

He who has ears let him hear:

Obama Suggests Constitutional Amendment to Silence Free Speech of Wealthier People & Corporations

President Barack Obama used the online springboard provided by Reddit to dive into the media crush at the GOP convention, with a skillfully executed call for a constitutional amendment to curb the free-speech of wealthier people and corporations.

“I think we need to seriously consider mobilizing a constitutional amendment process to overturn Citizens United. … Even if the amendment process falls short, it can shine a spotlight of the super PAC phenomenon and help apply pressure for change,” Obama said during 4:30 p.m. EST online event.

The publicity-grabbing gambit complements his campaign-theme portrayal of himself as the defender of middle-class Americans, and Gov. Mitt Romney as the champion of wealthy, job-exporting plutocrats.

The proposal also helps shift the media’s focus away from the stalled economy, record unemployment, debts and deficits.

http://visiontoamerica.com/11855/obama-suggests-constitutional-amendment-to-silence-free-speech-of-wealthier-people-corporations/

Entry #305

The difference between Republicans & Dems

A Republican and a Democrat were walking down the street when they came to a homeless person. The Republican gave the homeless person his business card and told him to come to his business for a job. He then took twenty dollars out of his pocket and gave it to the homeless person to make sure he had the means to get there.

The Democrat was very impressed, and when they came to another homeless person, he decided to help. He walked over to the homeless person and gave him directions to the welfare office. He then reached into the Republican's pocket and got out twenty dollars. He kept $15 for administrative fees and gave the homeless person $5.

Now you understand the difference between Republicans and Democrats.
Entry #304

Obama is victim of Bush's failed promises

(No, I haven't flipped, read on):
_________________________________
 
Obama is victim of Bush's failed promises..By a Democrat reporter.
I Think it is time that we asked George Bush to step aside so that Obama can get his presidency going.
 
Here's an opinion piece by Chuck Green who writes "Greener Pastures" for the Denver Post Aurora Sentinel...one of the more liberal papers in the country. Additionally, Mr. Green is a lifelong Democrat...so this is rather a stunning piece... 

Obama is victim of Bush's failed promises!
Barack Obama is setting a record-setting number of records during his first term in office:
Largest budget ever. Largest deficit ever. Largest number of broken promises ever.
Most self-serving speeches ever. Largest number of agenda-setting failures ever. Fastest dive in popularity ever!

Wow! Talk about change.

Just   fresh from his inauguration celebrations, President Obama was flying high. After one of the nation's most inspiring political campaigns, the election of America 's first black president had captured the hopes and dreams of millions. To his devout followers, it was inconceivable that a year later his administration would be gripped in self-imposed crisis.

Of course, they don't see it as self-imposed. It's all George Bush's fault !

George Bush, who doesn't have a vote in congress and who no longer occupies
The White House, is to blame for it all.

He broke Obama's promise, to put all bills on the White House web site for five days before signing them.

He broke Obama's promise, to have the congressional health care negotiations broadcast live on C-SPAN.

He broke Obama's promise, to end earmarks.

He broke Obama's promise, to keep unemployment from rising above 8 percent.

He broke Obama's promise, to close the detention center at Guantanamo in the first year.

He broke Obama's promise, to make peace with direct, no precondition talks with America's most hate-filled enemies during his first year in office, ushering in a new era of global cooperation.

He broke Obama's promise, to end the hiring of former lobbyists into high White House jobs.

He broke Obama's promise, to end no-compete contracts with the government.

He broke Obama's promise, to disclose the names of all attendees at closed
White House meetings.

He broke Obama's promise, for a new era of bipartisan cooperation in all matters.

He broke Obama's promise, to have chosen a home church to attend Sunday services with his family by Easter.

Yes, it's all George Bush's fault! President Obama is nothing more than a puppet in the never-ending failed Bush administration.
If only George Bush wasn't still in charge, all of President Obama's problems would be solved. His promises would have been kept, the economy would be back on track, Iran would have stopped its work on developing a nuclear bomb and would be negotiating a peace treaty with Israel . North Korea would have ended its tyrannical regime, and integrity would have been restored to the federal government.

Oh, and did I mention what it would be like, if the Democrats, under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, didn't have the heavy yoke of George Bush around their necks? There would be no ear marks, no closed-door drafting of bills, no increase in deficit spending, no special-interest influence (unions), no vote buying ( Nebraska, Louisiana ).

If only George Bush wasn't still in charge, we'd have real change by now.

All the broken promises, all the failed legislation and delay (health care reform, immigration reform) is not President Obama's fault or the fault of the Democrat-controlled Congress. It's all George Bush's fault !

Take for example the attempt of Eric Holder, the president's attorney general, to hold terrorists' trials in New York City . Or his decision to try the Christmas Day underpants bomber as a civilian. What about Holder not wanting to release documents to congress just recently?

Two disastrous decisions.

Certainly those were bad judgments based on poor advice from George Bush!

Need more proof?

You might recall when Scott Brown won the election to the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts, capturing "The Ted Kennedy Seat", President Obama said, Brown's victory was the result of the same voter anger that propelled Obama into office in 2008. People were still angry about George Bush and the policies of the past 10 years. And they wanted change.

Yes, according to the president, the voter rebellion in Massachusetts, was George Bush's fault.

Therefore, in retaliation, they elected a Republican to the Ted Kennedy seat, ending a half-century of domination by Democrats. It is all George Bush's fault !
Will the failed administration of George Bush ever end, and the time for hope and and change ever arrive ???

Will President Obama ever accept responsibility for something / anything?

(Chuck Green is a veteran Colorado journalist and former editor-in-chief of The Denver Post.)
 
It's Bush's Fault!
 
Entry #303

Chicago's gun laws so effective

Strictest gun laws in the country:

Nineteen people were shot in seven attacks overnight in Chicago, as the US city's gun violence epidemic continued.

Thirteen of the victims were shot within a half-hour period, including eight in a drive-by shooting on a single street.

Chicago officials have been battling a sharp increase in shootings and homicides, with some elected officials arguing gangs do not fear the police.

The city's murder rate has spiked 29% year-over-year as of this month.

By that time in 2011, 270 people had been killed in the city, according to data complied by the local newspaper RedEye Chicago. In 2012, that number is 348.

Most of the violence has been in Chicago's troubled south and west sides, but there also have been a handful of incidents in the downtown area.

Victims 'not co-operating'

Thursday's violence began shortly after 17:00 local time (22:00 GMT), when four men were wounded on the west side.

A drive-by shooting in the south side injured seven males and one female, ranging in age from 14 to 20 years. Then five people were wounded in three other shootings around the same time.

Early on Friday morning, a 17-year-old was shot in the back.

Andrew Holmes, a community activist, told NBC Chicago some of the injured were not co-operating with police.

"They need to step up and speak up for us," he said. "Nine times out of 10, they knew who was firing the shot at them."

It is not the first time this year Chicago has seen a single night of double-digit victims.

Over the Memorial Day weekend in May, 12 people were killed, and another 48 were wounded.

Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy has been criticised for eliminating police teams sent to crime hot spots.

Chicago's homicide increase is counter to lowered rates in other major US cities, including New York and Washington.

Entry #302