Quick Links   You last visited July 7, 2022, 8:45 am All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Inquiry in Iowa Lottery mystery touches Canada Hot Lotto: Inquiry in Iowa Lottery mystery touches CanadaRating:IOWA CITY, Iowa — Investigators seeking to unravel an attempted multimillion-dollar Iowa Lottery jackpot scheme have been in contact with Canadian authorities and are looking into people who may have been involved, an agent said Thursday. Special Agent in Charge Patrick Townsend of the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation confirmed his agency sought assistance from Canadian law enforcement early in the 18-month investigation into a withdrawn claim for a $14.3 million Hot Lotto jackpot. (See $14.3 million Hot Lotto prize claim withdrawn, Lottery Post, Jan. 27, 2012.) He said the case has taken a positive turn in recent months, and investigators are working leads that could provide answers in a mystery that has captured worldwide attention. "We have people of interest that we are working on and looking into," Townsend said, declining to elaborate on how many or to release their identities. "There are opportunities for us to follow up with and hopefully they take us down some roads that actually go somewhere." In December 2011, a 77-year-old New York lawyer Crawford Shaw waited until minutes before a one-year deadline to turn in a winning Hot Lotto ticket. Shaw signed the ticket on behalf of a newly created trust, claiming he was its sole trustee. The ticket was confirmed as valid. Shaw later said that he was representing an attorney for a person who purchased the ticket and wished to remain anonymous, and that he did not know the winner's name. He said the trust's proceeds would go to a corporation in Belize, a known tax haven. Lottery officials refused to pay the jackpot until Shaw gave them the names of everyone who had possessed the ticket in the year after it was purchased at a Des Moines gas station. They wanted to know that the ticket had been legally purchased and possessed. Shaw refused and offered to give the jackpot to charity before eventually withdrawing the claim in January 2012, walking away from millions. DCI then launched an investigation. DCI has declined to release surveillance footage from the gas station that shows the person purchasing the winning ticket, which Townsend said remains a crucial piece of evidence. Townsend said the contact with Canadian authorities was for "purposes of the investigation" and declined to elaborate. He said investigators working under his supervision have not done any foreign travel "at this point." Foreign citizens are eligible to win the Lottery. Shaw, a Yale graduate who has been accused of fraud in business dealings, has recently changed his cellphone number. Townsend said agents have "had attempted contact with Crawford Shaw" but declined to elaborate. Lawyers who have sued Shaw have said they have found it difficult to find him. Lottery spokeswoman Mary Neubauer said Thursday the agency was encouraged that new leads are being followed in the case, which she called "quite complicated." The agency declined a public records request seeking information about the possible Canadian link and other documents, citing the ongoing criminal investigation. "No one wants to know what truly occurred in this matter more than us here at the Iowa Lottery. It was our product involved and the actions of others thrust us into the middle of a very unusual and very strange situation," she said. "We want the criminal investigation to continue unimpeded in the hope that we all will one day know the whole story." AP
100
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 20272 Posts Offline | I've followed this case for a while and I still don't know what scheme they are talking about. If buying and claiming winning tickets in certain ways are considered illegal schemes then they should spell them out in the rules so players don't waste time and money buying tickets they can't collect on. * you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
| | |
Los Angeles, California United States Member #103809 January 5, 2011 1530 Posts Offline | I've followed this case for a while and I still don't know what scheme they are talking about. If buying and claiming winning tickets in certain ways are considered illegal schemes then they should spell them out in the rules so players don't waste time and money buying tickets they can't collect on. I for one am curious to know what really happened. This isn't just a run of the mil claim, it was highly suspicious. Here's a few possibilities: 1. Ticket was taken from original purchaser, who now sleeps with the fishes. 2. Ticket is a duplicate, printed by a lottery employee with the same codes as the winning ticket, thus the need to wait until the final hours to make sure the *real* ticket did not appear. 3. Winner has a large multi-million civil judgement against them and wants to hide the loot from the courts. OJ Simpson is the winner?  | | |
Oklahoma United States Member #82389 November 12, 2009 6371 Posts Offline | Wow this is crazy drama if they have the videitchy dont they release it  | | |
25 Ringleader
Michigan United States Member #81738 October 28, 2009 100148 Posts Offline | I've followed this case for a while and I still don't know what scheme they are talking about. If buying and claiming winning tickets in certain ways are considered illegal schemes then they should spell them out in the rules so players don't waste time and money buying tickets they can't collect on. Yep, this is a strange one. Happy National Macaroni Day  | | |
100 Grand High Exalted Mystic Ruler
The Hall Of The Mountain Kings Tennessee United States Member #73902 April 28, 2009 15326 Posts Offline | | | |
frontenac, kansas United States Member #67722 December 3, 2008 224 Posts Offline | I am like you ridge....inside job...... Even if it was someone wanted by the law I am sure they could find a friend , relative or a patsie somewhere to turn it in. | | |
Keokuk,Iowa United States Member #116499 September 12, 2011 305 Posts Offline | I am like you ridge....inside job...... Even if it was someone wanted by the law I am sure they could find a friend , relative or a patsie somewhere to turn it in.  
| | |
United States Member #141028 April 2, 2013 1481 Posts Offline | If it quacks like a duck.................? Really strange.
| | |
British Columbia Canada Member #116096 September 4, 2011 4034 Posts Offline | Interesting  "You have to be in it to win it!" | | |
United States Member #121739 January 16, 2012 7913 Posts Offline | I am like you ridge....inside job...... Even if it was someone wanted by the law I am sure they could find a friend , relative or a patsie somewhere to turn it in. Inside job? Meaning a lottery retailer was involved or a lottery employee? | | |
United States Member #94612 July 24, 2010 4735 Posts Offline | I for one am curious to know what really happened. This isn't just a run of the mil claim, it was highly suspicious. Here's a few possibilities: 1. Ticket was taken from original purchaser, who now sleeps with the fishes. 2. Ticket is a duplicate, printed by a lottery employee with the same codes as the winning ticket, thus the need to wait until the final hours to make sure the *real* ticket did not appear. 3. Winner has a large multi-million civil judgement against them and wants to hide the loot from the courts. OJ Simpson is the winner?  GREAT points! I hope it is something like what you listed, if its not and they just want to know WHO the owner is and that person just didn't want anyone to know - well that is an expensive cost to pay for privacy. Give up on the money just so no one knows - hummm. | | |
Baltimore, MD United States Member #143326 May 30, 2013 438 Posts Offline | For $!4 million dollars, I'll tell them everything they want to know and I'll even make up some stuff if they like!! Let's compare privacy vs receiving $14 million dollars, hmmmm, it sounds like a no brainer!! Following the trends and patterns means following the money! | | |
United States Member #94612 July 24, 2010 4735 Posts Offline | For $!4 million dollars, I'll tell them everything they want to know and I'll even make up some stuff if they like!! Let's compare privacy vs receiving $14 million dollars, hmmmm, it sounds like a no brainer!! I am with you on that...  | | |
100
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 20272 Posts Offline | For $!4 million dollars, I'll tell them everything they want to know and I'll even make up some stuff if they like!! Let's compare privacy vs receiving $14 million dollars, hmmmm, it sounds like a no brainer!! Apparently the lawyer and his clients felt telling them everything they wanted to know would not result in them getting their money and only expose information they wanted kept private. * you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
| | |
|