Search

Possible lotto formulaReply
I do the same thing with the powerball numbers. Same being general of course. Those types of things can work. I suggest if you see something working keep track of it and keep track of the next set that you have after the one that works, and don't let it go. Do it the exact same way. It most likely will eventually come. These are not standard mathematical formulas I am assuming, which is why in my opinion they work. And Lottotree12, any gambler can point the finger at any reason for losing, th
Dec 16, 2016, 7:32 pm - Soledad - Mathematics Forum

Lotto Winner PromisesReply
Lottery winners aren't like politicians or celebrities who are beholding to people who supported them and what ever is said in the excitement of a press conference is not a legal contract that anyone can hold them to.
Apr 25, 2012, 2:36 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

How long till the next big one?Reply
Now that the impossible has become possible, the jackpot will reach a one-time awesome jaw breaking $1, 900,000,000.00 dollars! Want to take the annuity on this one? Good idea, if you are young maybe or if you are old, leave to an trust fund---get some legal advice, but why do i? It will be a one winner and it will be me!
Apr 25, 2012, 1:51 am - mylollipop - Mathematics Forum

Mathematical Cost of Playing the GameReply
You might want to check with your state lottery to see if your club is legal.More and more states are now making it illegal to sell a lottery ticket for more then its face value and apply anti-scalping laws to violators.It doesn't matter how you breakdown the shares and expenses, if the total shares in the ticket add up to more then the cost of the ticket you may have a problem. Sometimes you don't have a problem until you win and try to collect. BobP
May 15, 2004, 1:10 pm - BobP - Mathematics Forum

Probability Sucks !Reply
Probability and consequences do suck...I mean if an already super-rich bee-atch like Martha Stewart can commit a financial crime, go to jail, then go back to her cushy home and become richer and even more adored by a stupid general public who is more concerned about poor Martha instead of their own lives, it makes one wonder why honest people who are nicer to the people around them and in need can't get ahead financially by legal means. I bet if Martha played any of the Lottery games, she'd pro
Mar 14, 2005, 5:50 pm - Texasman - Mathematics Forum

Determinism vs Randomness and ChanceReply
The 10,000 year old earth types are not content to go about their business with their beliefs, they feel compelled to attack the scientists who present an abundance of evidence to the contrary. The bible thumpers smile and feel satisfied and proud to proclaim they ain't related to no monkey, leaving the scientists frustrated and often in legal battles with their children's school districts, or if they're teachers, fighting for their jobs. Those 10,000 year old earth types are just like you,
Feb 26, 2011, 11:07 pm - ameriken - Mathematics Forum

Probability Sucks !Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Texasman on March 14, 2005Probability and consequences do suck...I mean if an already super-rich bee-atch like Martha Stewart can commit a financial crime, go to jail, then go back to her cushy home and become richer and even more adored by a stupid general public who is more concerned about poor Martha instead of their own lives, it makes one wonder why honest people who are nicer to the people around them and in need can't get ahead financially by legal means. I bet
Mar 15, 2005, 11:48 pm - emilyg - Mathematics Forum

Does Mathematical Innumeracy foster superstitions and support the belief in them?Reply
(http://www.math.temple.edu/~paulos/books.html) INNUMERACY - MATHEMATICAL ILLITERACY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES , Farrar, Straus, and Giroux (Hill and Wang division), 1989. -- INNUMERACY is an examination of some of the consequences in everyday life of mathematical illiteracy. These consequences - confused personal decisions, muddled governmental policies, even an increased susceptibility to pseudoscience - are not as visible as are those of illiteracy or general cultural ignorance. Unlike the l
May 21, 2011, 3:29 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Probability Sucks !Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Texasman on March 14, 2005Probability and consequences do suck...I mean if an already super-rich bee-atch like Martha Stewart can commit a financial crime, go to jail, then go back to her cushy home and become richer and even more adored by a stupid general public who is more concerned about poor Martha instead of their own lives, it makes one wonder why honest people who are nicer to the people around them and in need can't get ahead financially by legal means. I bet
Mar 16, 2005, 9:36 am - SirMetro - Mathematics Forum

Discussing Lottery MathReply
Aye, with respect to professional CT, my Vegas experiences teach me to double down on your action take. Remember the legendary Nick the Greek gambler? A paraphrase from him said the second biggest high he got after winning, was losing! On the other hand - another important player tell is that it seems, most serious male players really don't care about the odds, whether their methodology is right or wrong or even legal or illegal - only really care about how to win (even over sex) M
Jun 28, 2017, 5:02 pm - eddessaknight - Mathematics Forum