United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
Drawing Date
Pick 3
Pick 4
Midday
Evening
Midday
Evening
Fri, Dec 9, 2005
4-2-2
5-1-2-4
Thu, Dec 8, 2005
6-7-6
0-7-1-8
Wed, Dec 7, 2005
4-6-1
2-2-8-0
Tue, Dec 6, 2005
0-0-4
9-2-5-7
Mon, Dec 5, 2005
8-5-6
7-4-7-7
Sun, Dec 4, 2005
7-8-8
7-0-7-3
Sat, Dec 3, 2005
9-5-8
6-5-0-0
Fri, Dec 2, 2005
1-1-8
4-5-4-2
Thu, Dec 1, 2005
9-0-0
2-1-0-6
Wed, Nov 30, 2005
7-5-7
0-1-1-0
Tue, Nov 29, 2005
6-4-7
8-0-2-7
Mon, Nov 28, 2005
2-4-6
8-3-5-2
Sun, Nov 27, 2005
0-5-1
0-9-1-7
Sat, Nov 26, 2005
0-1-7
4-8-5-2
Fri, Nov 25, 2005
9-1-0
3-0-6-5
Thu, Nov 24, 2005
2-5-0
8-2-5-9
Wed, Nov 23, 2005
1-6-9
7-4-2-8
Tue, Nov 22, 2005
1-7-8
4-1-9-4
Mon, Nov 21, 2005
9-6-7
4-1-1-6
Sun, Nov 20, 2005
2-6-8
5-2-3-9
Sat, Nov 19, 2005
3-6-8
3-0-3-0
Fri, Nov 18, 2005
9-0-8
5-8-0-9
Thu, Nov 17, 2005
7-7-6
9-5-6-6
Wed, Nov 16, 2005
6-6-7
1-8-8-8
Tue, Nov 15, 2005
8-4-8
0-0-4-9
Mon, Nov 14, 2005
9-6-6
3-1-9-4
Sun, Nov 13, 2005
6-8-0
3-7-6-4
Sat, Nov 12, 2005
6-7-1
2-5-1-9
Fri, Nov 11, 2005
6-4-9
5-9-7-1
Thu, Nov 10, 2005
0-6-2
7-4-3-1
Look at the post in early nov. for LA.. one would have lost 4 nights in a row...
Sorry tntea, I see what you mean. Yes, but i'm sure that is really rare. But again, this is still in it's infancy, and I haven't tracked all states. Thanx for the heads up though. I'm still learning.
Chicago,IL. United States
Member #2,902
November 29, 2003
1,572 Posts
Offline
In the long run the positive cash flow system will fail just like every system because you cannot overcome the house's edge in the lottery. It's in the math, in the long run you will lose more than you will win. In the short run you can fool yourself into thinking a betting system works, by risking a lot to win a little. However in the long run no betting system can withstand the test of time and the ratio of money lost to money bet will get closer to the expecation for that game the longer you play.
United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
In the long run the positive cash flow system will fail just like every system because you cannot overcome the house's edge in the lottery. It's in the math, in the long run you will lose more than you will win.
What edge? Sure the states have the edge, but the off-shore pays 900 to 1, as opposed to 500 to 1 in the states. The off-shore pays out from the results of the states.
It's funny how someone wrote here that it dosen't work in Western Canada, well, I just found out a possible reason. They use computer drawings. Doesn't mean that's the reason, but it's surely interesting. Not true chaos, when using an RNG.
Chicago,IL. United States
Member #2,902
November 29, 2003
1,572 Posts
Offline
What edge? Sure the states have the edge, but the off-shore pays 900 to 1, as opposed to 500 to 1 in the states. The off-shore pays out from the results of the states.
Though the house edge is less, and off-shore is a better play they still have the edge and you will lose more than you win in the long run. What do you think there just giving money away and people just need to find a system to take it. There in the business of making money and you can't put the odds in a positive favor for the player.
United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
In the long run the positive cash flow system will fail just like every system because you cannot overcome the house's edge in the lottery. It's in the math, in the long run you will lose more than you will win. In the short run you can fool yourself into thinking a betting system works, by risking a lot to win a little. However in the long run no betting system can withstand the test of time and the ratio of money lost to money bet will get closer to the expecation for that game the longer you play.
When IBM was first sought for as a possible financier for the marketing of windows, the president laughed at Bill Gates and said something like, Nobody's gonna want this, it won't sell.
I'm not saying I've cured cancer, I just love numbers and my little brain is using it's candle powered motor to come up with a match to light the candle. If this doesn't pan out, well it won't be the first time. I'll just move on to my next hair brained scheme.
I kinda skimmed through the link you provided. I'll have to go look at it more, but it looks, so far like many things I've read in the past, and I can prove they are wrong. Chaos has a pattern. Just because someone hasn't seen them, doesn't mean they don't exist.
I bought a system some time ago that clearly explained the fallacy of what is taught in a few universities and other schools, which teaches that patterns and trends do not exist.
If you toss a coin only once in your lifetime, then it truley has a 50/50 chance for either heads or tails.
But, if you toss a coin more than once, something really strange happens.
For every toss that shows up at let's say heads, the more it favors towards change. The study has been typed here by me, verbatim. I'll have to do a search to give the link.
The system is similair to my post where it looks for patterns, sort of in like 3 in a row, then you do this, if that happens, then you do this, if this happens then you do that...etc.....Very interesting.
United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
What edge? Sure the states have the edge, but the off-shore pays 900 to 1, as opposed to 500 to 1 in the states. The off-shore pays out from the results of the states.
Though the house edge is less, and off-shore is a better play they still have the edge and you will lose more than you win in the long run. What do you think there just giving money away and people just need to find a system to take it. There in the business of making money and you can't put the odds in a positive favor for the player.
80 to 90 percent of their revenue is from people who don't win.
United States
Member #23,382
October 11, 2005
485 Posts
Offline
What edge? Sure the states have the edge, but the off-shore pays 900 to 1, as opposed to 500 to 1 in the states. The off-shore pays out from the results of the states.
Though the house edge is less, and off-shore is a better play they still have the edge and you will lose more than you win in the long run. What do you think there just giving money away and people just need to find a system to take it. There in the business of making money and you can't put the odds in a positive favor for the player.
Fast Eddie,
Systems do WORK...people are using them and winning with them every day..and yes some do work over the long term.....A friend of mine has been using a betting progression type system for many years...He goes on junkets approx 1 time a month as his state does not have a casino...anyway..he comes home with more then his starting bank EVERY time...his game of choice is blackjack..but this betting method works for all even money games...this is only a betting progression not a system to beat any game..that's a totally different bear...but if you were to play say blackjack and apply basic stratedgy and use a betting progression you would come out a winner.
PS: A few lotto players here on LP are winning constantly...are you saying that they do not win over the long term?? If so..Try and tell that to Tenaj, Laverne Maloney, Tntea, Blackapple and others that are winning often....