Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 18, 2017, 11:21 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

The positive cash flow system

Topic closed. 201 replies. Last post 11 years ago by cps10.

Page 3 of 14
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #17555
June 22, 2005
5582 Posts
Offline
Posted: December 10, 2005, 3:07 pm - IP Logged

Nice Pac,

It worked today in NJ.

Sat, Dec 10, 20057-4-1
Fri, Dec 9, 20051-5-3
Thu, Dec 8, 20051-1-8
Wed, Dec 7, 20050-7-8
Tue, Dec 6, 20054-7-5
Mon, Dec 5, 20058-2-7
Sun, Dec 4, 20059-0-7
Sat, Dec 3, 20051-3-7
Fri, Dec 2, 20053-7-6
Thu, Dec 1, 20059-1-4
Wed, Nov 30, 20051-0-9
Tue, Nov 29, 20057-5-5
Mon, Nov 28, 20054-1-5
Sun, Nov 27, 20051-7-3
Sat, Nov 26, 20052-7-8
Fri, Nov 25, 20055-5-3
Thu, Nov 24, 20055-9-4
Wed, Nov 23, 20052-6-1
Tue, Nov 22, 20057-2-9
Mon, Nov 21, 20054-3-8
Sun, Nov 20, 20054-6-1
Sat, Nov 19, 20050-5-9
Fri, Nov 18, 20056-0-9
Thu, Nov 17, 20057-8-5
Wed, Nov 16, 20055-6-9
Tue, Nov 15, 20053-5-2
Mon, Nov 14, 20054-2-5
Sun, Nov 13, 20051-8-1
Sat, Nov 12, 20054-6-0
Fri, Nov 11, 20059-0-2


 

If I followed this right...4 days of low first #'s Today 741 Hight WIN$$$$

 

Powerplayer

You also have another qualifier on nov. 12,13,14,15th. On the 16th you would have won. That's two hits in a month, not one.


    United States
    Member #17555
    June 22, 2005
    5582 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: December 10, 2005, 3:12 pm - IP Logged
    Drawing DatePick 3Pick 4
    MiddayEveningMiddayEvening
    Fri, Dec 9, 2005 4-2-2 5-1-2-4
    Thu, Dec 8, 2005 6-7-6 0-7-1-8
    Wed, Dec 7, 2005 4-6-1 2-2-8-0
    Tue, Dec 6, 2005 0-0-4 9-2-5-7
    Mon, Dec 5, 2005 8-5-6 7-4-7-7
    Sun, Dec 4, 2005 7-8-8 7-0-7-3
    Sat, Dec 3, 2005 9-5-8 6-5-0-0
    Fri, Dec 2, 2005 1-1-8 4-5-4-2
    Thu, Dec 1, 2005 9-0-0 2-1-0-6
    Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7-5-7 0-1-1-0
    Tue, Nov 29, 2005 6-4-7 8-0-2-7
    Mon, Nov 28, 2005 2-4-6 8-3-5-2
    Sun, Nov 27, 2005 0-5-1 0-9-1-7
    Sat, Nov 26, 2005 0-1-7 4-8-5-2
    Fri, Nov 25, 2005 9-1-0 3-0-6-5
    Thu, Nov 24, 2005 2-5-0 8-2-5-9
    Wed, Nov 23, 2005 1-6-9 7-4-2-8
    Tue, Nov 22, 2005 1-7-8 4-1-9-4
    Mon, Nov 21, 2005 9-6-7 4-1-1-6
    Sun, Nov 20, 2005 2-6-8 5-2-3-9
    Sat, Nov 19, 2005 3-6-8 3-0-3-0
    Fri, Nov 18, 2005 9-0-8 5-8-0-9
    Thu, Nov 17, 2005 7-7-6 9-5-6-6
    Wed, Nov 16, 2005 6-6-7 1-8-8-8
    Tue, Nov 15, 2005 8-4-8 0-0-4-9
    Mon, Nov 14, 2005 9-6-6 3-1-9-4
    Sun, Nov 13, 2005 6-8-0 3-7-6-4
    Sat, Nov 12, 2005 6-7-1 2-5-1-9
    Fri, Nov 11, 2005 6-4-9 5-9-7-1
    Thu, Nov 10, 2005 0-6-2 7-4-3-1

     

     

    Look at the post in early nov.  for LA..  one would have lost  4 nights in a row...

    Sorry tntea, I see what you mean. Yes, but i'm sure that is really rare. But again, this is still in it's infancy, and I haven't tracked all states. Thanx for the heads up though. I'm still learning.


      United States
      Member #17555
      June 22, 2005
      5582 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: December 10, 2005, 3:15 pm - IP Logged
      Drawing DatePick 3Pick 4
      MiddayEveningMiddayEvening
      Fri, Dec 9, 2005 4-2-2 5-1-2-4
      Thu, Dec 8, 2005 6-7-6 0-7-1-8
      Wed, Dec 7, 2005 4-6-1 2-2-8-0
      Tue, Dec 6, 2005 0-0-4 9-2-5-7
      Mon, Dec 5, 2005 8-5-6 7-4-7-7
      Sun, Dec 4, 2005 7-8-8 7-0-7-3
      Sat, Dec 3, 2005 9-5-8 6-5-0-0
      Fri, Dec 2, 2005 1-1-8 4-5-4-2
      Thu, Dec 1, 2005 9-0-0 2-1-0-6
      Wed, Nov 30, 2005 7-5-7 0-1-1-0
      Tue, Nov 29, 2005 6-4-7 8-0-2-7
      Mon, Nov 28, 2005 2-4-6 8-3-5-2
      Sun, Nov 27, 2005 0-5-1 0-9-1-7
      Sat, Nov 26, 2005 0-1-7 4-8-5-2
      Fri, Nov 25, 2005 9-1-0 3-0-6-5
      Thu, Nov 24, 2005 2-5-0 8-2-5-9
      Wed, Nov 23, 2005 1-6-9 7-4-2-8
      Tue, Nov 22, 2005 1-7-8 4-1-9-4
      Mon, Nov 21, 2005 9-6-7 4-1-1-6
      Sun, Nov 20, 2005 2-6-8 5-2-3-9
      Sat, Nov 19, 2005 3-6-8 3-0-3-0
      Fri, Nov 18, 2005 9-0-8 5-8-0-9
      Thu, Nov 17, 2005 7-7-6 9-5-6-6
      Wed, Nov 16, 2005 6-6-7 1-8-8-8
      Tue, Nov 15, 2005 8-4-8 0-0-4-9
      Mon, Nov 14, 2005 9-6-6 3-1-9-4
      Sun, Nov 13, 2005 6-8-0 3-7-6-4
      Sat, Nov 12, 2005 6-7-1 2-5-1-9
      Fri, Nov 11, 2005 6-4-9 5-9-7-1
      Thu, Nov 10, 2005 0-6-2 7-4-3-1

       

       

      Look at the post in early nov.  for LA..  one would have lost  4 nights in a row...

      How do you figure? You would have won on the 19th. I must not be explaining it right.

      You're not playing those four days. You wait until the fourth day and play on the fifth.

      Pac,

      Look at 11/10 up...it is a losser in this state...

      11/10 low

      11/11 high

      11/12 high

      11/13 high

      11/14 high

      11/15 HIGH..we were to bet low...from 11/15 thru 11/18 all where high...

       

      2 qualifiers  1 win/1 loss...

      I know, I just saw my mistake. Exceptions in every part of life.

        Avatar
        Manitoba
        Canada
        Member #5566
        July 11, 2004
        133 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: December 10, 2005, 4:09 pm - IP Logged

        Doesn't work in Western Canada.


          United States
          Member #17555
          June 22, 2005
          5582 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: December 10, 2005, 4:19 pm - IP Logged

          Doesn't work in Western Canada.

          I know..I didn't expect it to work everywhere all the time.

          By the way, do they use machines or balls?

            Avatar

            United States
            Member #6950
            September 15, 2004
            203 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: December 10, 2005, 5:00 pm - IP Logged

            Are you saying that SC evening should be low for tonight?


              United States
              Member #17555
              June 22, 2005
              5582 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: December 10, 2005, 5:13 pm - IP Logged

              Are you saying that SC evening should be low for tonight?

              Sorry, I was looking at midday.

              Yes you're right. If it works out, it should be low.

                fast eddie's avatar - lasvegas2
                Chicago,IL.
                United States
                Member #2902
                November 29, 2003
                1435 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: December 10, 2005, 5:47 pm - IP Logged

                In the long run the positive cash flow system will fail just like every system because you cannot overcome the house's edge in the lottery. It's in the math, in the long run you will lose more than you will win. In the short run you can fool yourself into thinking a betting system works, by risking a lot to win a little. However in the long run no betting system can withstand the test of time and the ratio of money lost to money bet will get closer to the expecation for that game the longer you play.

                http://wizardofodds.com/gambling/betting-systems.html

                "Money won is twice as sweet as money earned"


                  United States
                  Member #17555
                  June 22, 2005
                  5582 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: December 10, 2005, 5:51 pm - IP Logged

                  In the long run the positive cash flow system will fail just like every system because you cannot overcome the house's edge in the lottery. It's in the math, in the long run you will lose more than you will win.

                  What edge? Sure the states have the edge, but the off-shore pays 900 to 1, as opposed to 500 to 1 in the states. The off-shore pays out from the results of the states.

                  It's funny how someone wrote here that it dosen't work in Western Canada, well, I just found out a possible reason. They use computer drawings. Doesn't mean that's the reason, but it's surely interesting. Not true chaos, when using an RNG.

                   

                    fast eddie's avatar - lasvegas2
                    Chicago,IL.
                    United States
                    Member #2902
                    November 29, 2003
                    1435 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: December 10, 2005, 5:58 pm - IP Logged

                    What edge? Sure the states have the edge, but the off-shore pays 900 to 1, as opposed to 500 to 1 in the states. The off-shore pays out from the results of the states.

                    Though the house edge is less, and off-shore is a better play they still have the edge and you will lose more than you win in the long run. What do you think there just giving money away and people just need to find a system to take it. There in the business of making money and you can't put the odds in a positive favor for the player.

                    "Money won is twice as sweet as money earned"

                      paurths's avatar - underground
                      Switching between Fairfax, VA and Belgium
                      Belgium
                      Member #19287
                      July 29, 2005
                      2254 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: December 10, 2005, 6:11 pm - IP Logged

                      Are you saying that SC evening should be low for tonight?

                      Sorry, I was looking at midday.

                      Yes you're right. If it works out, it should be low.

                      010,012,030,034,070,074,210,214,232,272,274,412,430,434,470,472

                      at $25/number, cool! Jester


                        United States
                        Member #17555
                        June 22, 2005
                        5582 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: December 10, 2005, 6:13 pm - IP Logged

                        In the long run the positive cash flow system will fail just like every system because you cannot overcome the house's edge in the lottery. It's in the math, in the long run you will lose more than you will win. In the short run you can fool yourself into thinking a betting system works, by risking a lot to win a little. However in the long run no betting system can withstand the test of time and the ratio of money lost to money bet will get closer to the expecation for that game the longer you play.

                        http://wizardofodds.com/gambling/betting-systems.html

                        When IBM was first sought for as a possible financier for the marketing of windows, the president laughed at Bill Gates and said something like, Nobody's gonna want this, it won't sell.

                        I'm not saying I've cured cancer, I just love numbers and my little brain is using it's candle powered motor to come up with a match to light the candle. If this doesn't pan out, well it won't be the first time. I'll just move on to my next hair brained scheme.

                        I kinda skimmed through the link you provided. I'll have to go look at it more, but it looks, so far like many things I've read in the past, and I can prove they are wrong. Chaos has a pattern. Just because someone hasn't seen them, doesn't mean they don't exist.

                        I bought a system some time ago that clearly explained the fallacy of what is taught in a few universities and other schools, which teaches that patterns and trends do not exist.

                        If you toss a coin only once in your lifetime, then it truley has a 50/50 chance for either heads or tails.

                        But, if you toss a coin more than once, something really strange happens.

                        For every toss that shows up at let's say heads, the more it favors towards change. The study has been typed here by me, verbatim. I'll have to do a search to give the link.

                        The system is similair to my post where it looks for patterns, sort of in like 3 in a row, then you do this, if that happens, then you do this, if this happens then you do that...etc.....Very interesting.

                        It's called " The Koycerin wagering method "


                          United States
                          Member #17555
                          June 22, 2005
                          5582 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: December 10, 2005, 6:15 pm - IP Logged

                          What edge? Sure the states have the edge, but the off-shore pays 900 to 1, as opposed to 500 to 1 in the states. The off-shore pays out from the results of the states.

                          Though the house edge is less, and off-shore is a better play they still have the edge and you will lose more than you win in the long run. What do you think there just giving money away and people just need to find a system to take it. There in the business of making money and you can't put the odds in a positive favor for the player.

                          80 to 90 percent of their revenue is from people who don't win.


                            United States
                            Member #23383
                            October 11, 2005
                            485 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: December 10, 2005, 6:29 pm - IP Logged

                            What edge? Sure the states have the edge, but the off-shore pays 900 to 1, as opposed to 500 to 1 in the states. The off-shore pays out from the results of the states.

                            Though the house edge is less, and off-shore is a better play they still have the edge and you will lose more than you win in the long run. What do you think there just giving money away and people just need to find a system to take it. There in the business of making money and you can't put the odds in a positive favor for the player.

                            Fast Eddie,
                            Systems do WORK...people are using them and winning with them every day..and yes some do work over the long term.....A friend of mine has been using a betting progression type system for many years...He goes on junkets approx 1 time a month as his state does not have a casino...anyway..he comes home with more then his starting bank EVERY time...his game of choice is blackjack..but this betting method works for all even money games...this is only a betting progression not a system to beat any game..that's a totally different bear...but if you were to play say blackjack and apply basic stratedgy and use a betting progression you would come out a winner.

                             

                            PS: A  few lotto players here on LP are winning constantly...are you saying that they do not win over the long term??  If so..Try and tell that to Tenaj, Laverne Maloney, Tntea, Blackapple and others that are winning often....


                              United States
                              Member #17555
                              June 22, 2005
                              5582 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: December 10, 2005, 6:32 pm - IP Logged

                              Strangely, I couldn't find any viable info on Koycerin. This is the only thing I found worth anything at all.

                              http://talkaboutgambling.com/group/rec.gambling.misc/messages/35270.html

                               

                                 
                                Page 3 of 14