The Carolinas - Charlotte United States
Member #21,626
September 12, 2005
4,142 Posts
Offline
CD - you are very welcome. Random numbers might work just as well, you could be right. I will investigate further. I am next going to test the dependency on the next drawing, meaning I will take a drawing and its number, divide up as Cashman does, and if it wins the next day, great. If it doesn't, I will take that drawing and divide IT up and play the next day. That will allow me to see if random numbers might be better.
Poway CA (San Diego County) United States
Member #3,489
January 25, 2004
14,120 Posts
Offline
CD - you are very welcome. Random numbers might work just as well, you could be right. I will investigate further. I am next going to test the dependency on the next drawing, meaning I will take a drawing and its number, divide up as Cashman does, and if it wins the next day, great. If it doesn't, I will take that drawing and divide IT up and play the next day. That will allow me to see if random numbers might be better.
Best,
cps10
I'm slowly becoming a believer of picking a set of numbers using whatever method one chooses and then stick with that same set for a period of time ... like a few days or a week at most. The reason for this is obvious. It is the same principle that people use when they post "all states" on the prediction page ... it has to hit somewhere sometime!! If you change your numbers every draw, in theory, you could ALWAYS miss! The only thing I don't like about keeping the same set of numbers is that I like to look at each draw and then the history of that draw to determine if I think doubles or triples are due. But, I'm inclined to stop trying to guess the doubles and triples and just play a set of numbers for a period of time.
The Carolinas - Charlotte United States
Member #21,626
September 12, 2005
4,142 Posts
Offline
CD - agreed. I am also a believer that if you keep playing the same numbers, one will eventually turn up.
Can anyone tell me how many combinations there are if you are using only 5 numbers? For instance, if you are using all 10 numbers, then you have 1000 combos:
10 x 10 x 10
But if you use 5 numbers, is that 5 x 5 x 5 = 125?
The Carolinas - Charlotte United States
Member #21,626
September 12, 2005
4,142 Posts
Offline
Thanks RJOh - I was just trying to figure out how many there were of each, not necessarily what they were. If this one experiment works, then I will have to try and do that.
Whereabouts in Ohio are you? I am in Springfield an awful lot.
By the way, the way I did this with the 40 combos finally crapped out, so I am going back to the drawing board with this very concept, and look at it the way that Pac looked at it by taking the pairs that were generated and wheeling the output of the 12 pluses and minuses.
United States
Member #28,972
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
Lottery Math
Numbers wrap instead of going above 9 or below 0, and no carries to next position.
4-5=9
9+4=3
Raven. I was wondering if he used the "Egyptian method" (Lottery Math- don't carry) 3 digit numbers do wrap instead of going above 9 or below 0 (000-999) mirrors on the 5th and return back to itself of the 11th.
Cashman's workout is a shortcut to the rundown 123 plus minus system and what a clever tool it is.
For those folks who either don't understand how it works or it's just too tedious for them to rundown a number. The reason the number 12 is used is because a number returns to itself on the 11th rundown. It's ready made and all the numbers are randown in Prof. Hitt's rundown book. Cashman's shortcut beams on the most likely hits. It's nothing new - been used for generations.lol
plusminus
785785
674 808
563 921
452 044
341 167
230 280 - Mirrors
129 303
018 426
907 549
896 662
785 785
Hey guys!!
I'll be able to post maybe once in a while! Didn't think I could, but, here I am!! Maybe once a week, once every 2-3 weeks....
I'll try to post some numbers when I can. I have about 15 minutes of free time right now.
Just thought I'd post here. Although my method of using #12 as a "power" number may seem like something that was used before, it has nothing to do with what Tenaj described above which has been used for generations. #12 is only one of the many "power" numbers, and, using the "power" #12, in the manner I prescribed for this system is only a small stepping stone on 12's complete usage. And, playing pairs is only a small aspect of using my secret formula.
I don't have much time, but, I'll try to post some numbers, but, I doubt I won't be able to untill mid february, as that's the next time I'll have time like this.
Also, let me point out a few things about the system I posted here....
Just adding and subtracting 12 alone will not do. You have learn the art of "mixing".
Say, you do the +12 and -12 formula, and you get the number 754 from your "mixing", but, the number 753 comes up. Well, if you knew about the power of "mixing", you'd know that 754, also equals 753, or 755. More than not, it also equals 704, or, 743. Etc.
I will let you guys know that, the biggest secret in the lottery is using more than one "formula" at once (using them as ways to "check" each other as well), using other states' numbers as "signals" to predict specific states, and realizing that "nature" and "game mechanics" will no matter what influence your selections in a certain why (which is why I reccommend "mixing").
Anyway, I have to run guys, I'll be back as soon as I can!