Welcome Guest
You last visited January 19, 2017, 10:37 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# The Phase X Method - It truly works!

Topic closed. 111 replies. Last post 10 years ago by Kola.

 Page 1 of 8
Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1532 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 8:45 pm - IP Logged

THE PHASE X METHOD

This new method is very, very simple, and is a variation of the Phase37 method discussed on this thread:

-

Using Phase37 was fine, but not as exacting as using a number's  own unique phase to derive a very small group of playable results.

Here's how:

1. Take any last draw and divide it by its SUM.

Example:

Using NY's September 7th Evening Draw of 916. NY's next winning midday draw on September 8th was 926

916's sum is 9 + 1 + 6 = 16

So 916/16 = 57.25

2. The resulting number of 57.25 is your Phase X number or just phase number. Progressively add the phase number to itself until you hit quadruple digits.

Example is:

57.25 + 57.25 + 57.25...Until you hit quadruple digits is :

057.25, 114.5, 171.75, 229, 286.25, 343.5, 400.75, 458, 515.25, 572.5, 629.75, 687, 744.25, 801.5, 858.75, 916, 973.25, 1030.5. You then stop ( you can go further until you hit 2???, but its up to you. In general, I don't).

So,

You see the winning number of 926, came out as the Boxed result of 629. And all you would have played is 18 numbers.

-

Often times the phase number is in the 20'3 and 30''s such as 24.25, or 35.67. I like when the phase number is in the 20's 30's, and 40's. This way, I won't play too many numbers or too little. Of course the lower the phase number, the more numbers you will play. The more numbers you play of course, the more accurate you will be.

If the phase number is too low for you:

Suppose the last draw was 055. The sum is 5+5 = 10

The phase number would be 055/10 = 5.5.

Now this phase number may be too low. Low meaning lots of numbers, and more money to spend. So what I do is get the phase X from the next number in 055's wrapdown, which is 166 0r 944.

055

166

277

388

499

500

611

722

833

944

-

Sometimes the Phase X numbers will be off by a digit. Because of this possiblity, I sometimes do the option below.

3. Optional :

I sometimes take all my phase x results, and go 1 up and 1 down on the last digit. I then also take a mirror of the last digit.

If I chosen to do this option with the Phase x number results of 57.25  from the top of this thread,

it would have been,

1 up, 1 down, and take mirror - all on last digit:

057, 058, 056, 052 , 114, 115, 113, 119,  171, 172, 170, 176,  229, 230, 228, 224,  286, 287, 285, 281,  343, 344, 342, 348,  400, 401, 399, 405,  458, 459, 457, 453,  515, 516, 514, 510,  572, 573, 571, 577,  629, 630, 628, 624, 687, 688, 686,  682, 744, 745, 743, 749,  801, 802, 800, 806,  858, 859, 857, 853,  916, 917, 915, 911,  973, 974, 972, 978,  1030, 031, 029, 035.

-

With this PHASE X, you will find that the number can hit as a box or even straight. Sometimes you are just 1 point off or a mirror off on the last digit.

As you Phase x, watch the numbers carefully and see how they trend. You will often see that some of the numbers in the Phase results, already came out in the past few days or rather will even come out in the next couple of days.

Only Once in a while, you may not get a strong number to phase. Then it would have been best to phase the next number in the last draw's wrapdown. As you backtest, you will notice when its probably best to do this.

-

Hope I was clear, and hope it helps you make a few pennies more!

Sunny California
United States
Member #40295
May 31, 2006
7713 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 9:08 pm - IP Logged

There you are! I've been waiting for this. Thanks Kola for all your hard work and dedication. I'm printing it out right now. This will probably put my system right out of business!!  I'll let you know what kind of results this gets in CA. Can't wait!!

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1532 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 9:24 pm - IP Logged

There you are! I've been waiting for this. Thanks Kola for all your hard work and dedication. I'm printing it out right now. This will probably put my system right out of business!!  I'll let you know what kind of results this gets in CA. Can't wait!!

Hi my friend!

Thank YOU for at least being interested.

NAAAAH!

After all I have my lottolaughs Folder  at the ever ready. Really like the 56 System as well. Thanks again.

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1532 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 9:30 pm - IP Logged

THE PHASE X METHOD

This new method is very, very simple, and is a variation of the Phase37 method discussed on this thread:

-

Using Phase37 was fine, but not as exacting as using a number's  own unique phase to derive a very small group of playable results.

Here's how:

1. Take any last draw and divide it by its SUM.

Example:

Using NY's September 7th Evening Draw of 916. NY's next winning midday draw on September 8th was 926

916's sum is 9 + 1 + 6 = 16

So 916/16 = 57.25

2. The resulting number of 57.25 is your Phase X number or just phase number. Progressively add the phase number to itself until you hit quadruple digits.

Example is:

57.25 + 57.25 + 57.25...Until you hit quadruple digits is :

057.25, 114.5, 171.75, 229, 286.25, 343.5, 400.75, 458, 515.25, 572.5, 629.75, 687, 744.25, 801.5, 858.75, 916, 973.25, 1030.5. You then stop ( you can go further until you hit 2???, but its up to you. In general, I don't).

So,

You see the winning number of 926, came out as the Boxed result of 629. And all you would have played is 18 numbers.

-

Often times the phase number is in the 20'3 and 30''s such as 24.25, or 35.67. I like when the phase number is in the 20's 30's, and 40's. This way, I won't play too many numbers or too little. Of course the lower the phase number, the more numbers you will play. The more numbers you play of course, the more accurate you will be.

If the phase number is too low for you:

Suppose the last draw was 055. The sum is 5+5 = 10

The phase number would be 055/10 = 5.5.

Now this phase number may be too low. Low meaning lots of numbers, and more money to spend. So what I do is get the phase X from the next number in 055's wrapdown, which is 166 0r 944.

055

166

277

388

499

500

611

722

833

944

-

Sometimes the Phase X numbers will be off by a digit. Because of this possiblity, I sometimes do the option below.

3. Optional :

I sometimes take all my phase x results, and go 1 up and 1 down on the last digit. I then also take a mirror of the last digit.

If I chosen to do this option with the Phase x number results of 57.25  from the top of this thread,

it would have been,

1 up, 1 down, and take mirror - all on last digit:

057, 058, 056, 052 , 114, 115, 113, 119,  171, 172, 170, 176,  229, 230, 228, 224,  286, 287, 285, 281,  343, 344, 342, 348,  400, 401, 399, 405,  458, 459, 457, 453,  515, 516, 514, 510,  572, 573, 571, 577,  629, 630, 628, 624, 687, 688, 686,  682, 744, 745, 743, 749,  801, 802, 800, 806,  858, 859, 857, 853,  916, 917, 915, 911,  973, 974, 972, 978,  1030, 031, 029, 035.

-

With this PHASE X, you will find that the number can hit as a box or even straight. Sometimes you are just 1 point off or a mirror off on the last digit.

As you Phase x, watch the numbers carefully and see how they trend. You will often see that some of the numbers in the Phase results, already came out in the past few days or rather will even come out in the next couple of days.

Only Once in a while, you may not get a strong number to phase. Then it would have been best to phase the next number in the last draw's wrapdown. As you backtest, you will notice when its probably best to do this.

-

Hope I was clear, and hope it helps you make a few pennies more!

One more thing,

this method is designed to played from draw to draw...midday to evening to midday...

Sunny California
United States
Member #40295
May 31, 2006
7713 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 9:38 pm - IP Logged

A couple of questions for you dear Kola. When a zero number shows up then, like 023, should we just stay away from the zeroes altogether? What are the better numbers to start with?

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1532 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 10:07 pm - IP Logged

A couple of questions for you dear Kola. When a zero number shows up then, like 023, should we just stay away from the zeroes altogether? What are the better numbers to start with?

You can do zero's if you want. You will certainly be more accurate. But again its cost prohibitive.

So if you have a number beginning with zero as your last draw and using your example of 023, you would do a wrapdown:

023

134

245

356

457

568

679

780

891

912

What you do now, is to take a number near 023, and get the Phase X number for it.

You would get the phase number for either 134,  or 245, or even 356.

The "9" position as in 912 is fine in general, but if you took the phase x number of 912 it would be 76. Personally, 76 it is a little too high for me.

Hope that helps.

United States
Member #14
November 9, 2001
31540 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 10:16 pm - IP Logged

kola - you always come up with interesting stuff - going to have fun testing in ga.  thanks.

love to nibble those micey feet.

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1532 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 10:20 pm - IP Logged

Thanks Emily G.

Hope it bears good juicy fruit.

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1532 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 10:30 pm - IP Logged

I did mention the "optional" portion of Phase X, where you may want to do some additional tweaking for the last digit in your results.

Yet,

As an alternate rule, you can forget about using it on the last digit, and only use it on the smallest digit in your results. Both can work well.

Sunny California
United States
Member #40295
May 31, 2006
7713 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 11:14 pm - IP Logged

It truly DOES work,CocaKola! Take a look at this!

I'm using a CA. drawing from a week ago--473.

4+7+3=14  473/14

My phase # 33.11

My numbers:

506

539

572

605

638

671

704

737

770

803

836

869

902

935

968

Now I took it a step further, if you don't mind. I sneaked a peek at my 56 system to see if it could maybe cut down on some of the numbers. My systems pairs gave me 93,03,13,23,29,39,49,59,99,09,and 19.

So I only used the numbers with those pairs--539 803 902 935.  \$4.00, not bad,huh? But the best is yet to come. Here were the next 8 results up until tonight:

416

874

396 (close,like you said,1 digit off from the 539 or 935 above)

563

178

468

803  STRAIGHT!!!!

449

Now how come you couldn't have come out with this just a week sooner???

I hope everyone will give your system a good try out. It looks like this might be your best yet!!

CONGRATS!!

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1532 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 11:42 pm - IP Logged

It truly DOES work,CocaKola! Take a look at this!

I'm using a CA. drawing from a week ago--473.

4+7+3=14  473/14

My phase # 33.11

My numbers:

506

539

572

605

638

671

704

737

770

803

836

869

902

935

968

Now I took it a step further, if you don't mind. I sneaked a peek at my 56 system to see if it could maybe cut down on some of the numbers. My systems pairs gave me 93,03,13,23,29,39,49,59,99,09,and 19.

So I only used the numbers with those pairs--539 803 902 935.  \$4.00, not bad,huh? But the best is yet to come. Here were the next 8 results up until tonight:

416

874

396 (close,like you said,1 digit off from the 539 or 935 above)

563

178

468

803  STRAIGHT!!!!

449

Now how come you couldn't have come out with this just a week sooner???

I hope everyone will give your system a good try out. It looks like this might be your best yet!!

CONGRATS!!

Hi lottolaughs,

Thanks Alot.

Yes, the method works very well. I have hit quite a bit with it. And if have to tweak it using the OPTIONAL  third instruction in my directions, its so straightforward and easy. I was just backtesting it with Virginia's results, which is said to be a challenging state, and it performed very well.

By the way, to piggy back on your example above, its great you were able to use your 56 System as a filter. I love that. Twist it, chop it, sculpt it according to mind's eye.

Rembember that its designed to be used from draw to draw for immediate results. Yes, like you did above, you can wait for some numbers to drop, but even using it for the next draw is better, and more accurate. But again you flex it how you want. I'm pleased you find it useful.

You say this may be my best yet huh? Well, I'm still working on my Magic Squares. There's only seven of them and the winning number is always in 1 of the seven. I know I'm being a little cryptic, but hopefully after some more testing,and it bears the fruit I desire, its will easily trump the little I've done.

Thanks again, my friend.

Sunny California
United States
Member #40295
May 31, 2006
7713 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 8, 2006, 11:55 pm - IP Logged

I didn't realize it was designed to be used from draw to draw,that's pretty quick! Whenever I backtest anything I usually give a number at least a week to drop so, to me, this is VERY impressive! As I'm doing more backtesting here, maybe I missed something, but what do you do when the number you start off with is say, 783 and you have to keep adding 43 to it? It seems like it runs out of numbers really quick or you get stuck in the 900's over and over again? What is this dummy doing wrong??

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1532 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 9, 2006, 12:09 am - IP Logged

It truly DOES work,CocaKola! Take a look at this!

I'm using a CA. drawing from a week ago--473.

4+7+3=14  473/14

My phase # 33.11

My numbers:

506

539

572

605

638

671

704

737

770

803

836

869

902

935

968

Now I took it a step further, if you don't mind. I sneaked a peek at my 56 system to see if it could maybe cut down on some of the numbers. My systems pairs gave me 93,03,13,23,29,39,49,59,99,09,and 19.

So I only used the numbers with those pairs--539 803 902 935.  \$4.00, not bad,huh? But the best is yet to come. Here were the next 8 results up until tonight:

416

874

396 (close,like you said,1 digit off from the 539 or 935 above)

563

178

468

803  STRAIGHT!!!!

449

Now how come you couldn't have come out with this just a week sooner???

I hope everyone will give your system a good try out. It looks like this might be your best yet!!

CONGRATS!!

Hi again Lottolaughs.

By the way, I was looking at your results, and the numbers were different than what I got .

If you take the phase number of 473:

473/14 = 33.78571429. You had 33.11 above.

The results will eventually yield:

...

...

506.785714

540.5714286 ---you got 539 above

574.3571429----you got 572 above

....

and so on...

The results you got were different from mine, because you didn't keep the decimal point. You have to keep it. Only when you have got all your numbers, can you then round off. if you round off the numbers beforehand you will get inaccurate results.

Hope you see even better results!

NYC
United States
Member #3706
February 13, 2004
96 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 9, 2006, 12:14 am - IP Logged

Cool I try it out

Sunny California
United States
Member #40295
May 31, 2006
7713 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 9, 2006, 12:19 am - IP Logged

Whoopsie! Well, that figures. I always WAS bad at math. You're right, I did drop the decimals and that was the phase number I came up with by hand, I should have done it on the calculator. But if I keep making those kinds of mistakes, by the looks of it, I could still wind up with a winner!   I will keep the decimals, though, because your results came VERY close also, wow! But about that question I had with the larger numbers? I'm kind of stuck on what to do with them. Thanks!

 Page 1 of 8