Quick Links You last visited December 3, 2016, 12:35 pm All times shown are Eastern Time (GMT5:00)  The Phase X Method  It truly works!Blundering Time Traveler United States Member #28945 December 25, 2005 1527 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 12:25 am  IP Logged  
I didn't realize it was designed to be used from draw to draw,that's pretty quick! Whenever I backtest anything I usually give a number at least a week to drop so, to me, this is VERY impressive! As I'm doing more backtesting here, maybe I missed something, but what do you do when the number you start off with is say, 783 and you have to keep adding 43 to it? It seems like it runs out of numbers really quick or you get stuck in the 900's over and over again? What is this dummy doing wrong?? Although it was designed to be used from draw to draw the numbers that come out can certainly and often do drop if given the whole week. If you start off with 783, yes you keep adding 43.5 to it. That large number is fine. its not even really large. Sometimes I phase numbers like 64.34. Sometimes I don't. If I don't like the phase numbers, I don't play them. I'll use another number in a wrapdown to get the phase numbers. The bottome line is if you really don't like the phase X number, and feel its too large or small, you can choose another near number in the wrapdown, and get its phase X number What do you mean exactly about getting "stuck in the 900's over and over again"? If you need, give me 2 last draws, and I'll do an example for you.   
Sunny California United States Member #40295 May 31, 2006 7712 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 12:31 am  IP Logged  
Oh,thanks! An example would be great. Can you use the 783? The one before it was 809. I guess I really need to see how you add those decimals. Forgive me for being such a numbskull.   
Blundering Time Traveler United States Member #28945 December 25, 2005 1527 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 1:12 am  IP Logged  
Oh,thanks! An example would be great. Can you use the 783? The one before it was 809. I guess I really need to see how you add those decimals. Forgive me for being such a numbskull. Your Not. I love your brain! Okay... Lets take your example of 809, and 783. The goal is to derive 783 last draw from 809second to last draw.  So ... The phase number of 809 is 8 + 0 + 9 = 17 809/17 = 47.58823529 Now you progressively add 47.5882359 until you get to quadruple digits, and then stop. 1. 47.58, = 047 2. 95.17, = 095 3. 142.76= 142 and 143 4. 190.35 = 190 5. 237.94 = 237 and 238 6. 285.52 = 285 and 286 7. 333.11 8. 380.7 = 380 and 381 9. 428.29 = 428 10. 475.88 = 475 and 476 11. 523.47 = 523 12. 571 = 571 13. 618.64 = 618 and 619 14. 666.23 = 666 15. 713.82 = 713 and 714 16. 761.14 = 761 17. 809 = 809 18. 856.58 = 856 and 857 19. 904.176 = 904 20. 951.76 = 951 and 952 21. 999.35 and 999 Now you stop. Good results. The winning number of 783 can be found in bold above. Its #5 above in bold in the form of 238. Remember that I remarked earlier in the thread, that if you choose to tweak a digit, you can tweak the last digit or which would have been the 8 or tweak the smallest digit which have been the 2. By tweaking you just go 1 up, 1 down, and take the mirror of only 1 digit. If you had tweaked 238, it would have been 738. 7 of course is the mirror of 2. You would have had the winning number in box form. If I had played these numbers I wouldn't have won, because I stick to the rule of tweaking the last digit only, and I stick to it.    
Blundering Time Traveler United States Member #28945 December 25, 2005 1527 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 1:21 am  IP Logged  
Great. I see you live in NY. The example I gave in the beginnig of the post was NY's midday and evening draw from the September 6th and 7th. You will get hits in NY.   
Sunny California United States Member #40295 May 31, 2006 7712 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 1:26 am  IP Logged  
That is exactly what I needed,Kola! Thanks for your patience with me. I'm understanding it a lot better now. This will make for some very interesting backtesting, I'll get started in the morning and search for my calculator! You've been so helpful, I thank you very much! Talk to you soon.   
Blundering Time Traveler United States Member #28945 December 25, 2005 1527 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 1:29 am  IP Logged  
That is exactly what I needed,Kola! Thanks for your patience with me. I'm understanding it a lot better now. This will make for some very interesting backtesting, I'll get started in the morning and search for my calculator! You've been so helpful, I thank you very much! Talk to you soon. Your welcome. Talk to you soon.   
Blundering Time Traveler United States Member #28945 December 25, 2005 1527 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 1:38 am  IP Logged  
Hi Giotonia, Good attempt. thanks for jumping in the fray, and trying it on for size. I like the way you divided the numers into groups. I'm currently doing something along the same lines, because I noticed something interesting with the phase numbers and the winning numbers  You made a little error though. The second to last draw was 926, and the last draw was 819. You have to take the phase number of 926..  Using the 926, and 819 example above. 926/17 = 54.47058824. The results are 054 108.94 163.41 217.88 272.35 326.82, 381.29 435.76 490.23 544.70 599.17 653.64 708.11 762.58 817.05 871.52 926 980.47 1034.94 Now you stop. You can now round off the numbers. 054, 108, 109, 163, 217, 218, 272, 326, 327, 381, 435, 436, 490, 544, 545, 599, 653, 654, 708, 762, 763, 817, 871, 872, 926, 980 You will notice that when given a number such as 108.94, I play both 108, and 109. Now as option that I described earlier, you can either take the last digit of each number or smallest digit of each number, and go move 1 point up, 1 down, and take the mirror of the digit. By doing so you would have gone 1 up on the last number of 980, and you would have gotten 981, which was the winning number in NY in Box form.. Hope this helped.  I think you have misunderstood some of my posts according to your example above especiallly where you underlined the numbers. That's not how I identify the winning number. Slowly, reread the posts again, and ask me any quetsions you may have.   
NYC United States Member #3706 February 13, 2004 96 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 1:47 am  IP Logged  
I'm know I trying to do it correctly now.   
NYC United States Member #3706 February 13, 2004 96 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 2:12 am  IP Logged  
The evening of 9/7 numbers were 801. I have to get 926 Middays numbers 801/9 =89 So the numbers are 089 178 267 356 445 534 623 712 801 890 979 1068 Should I continue to go or just stop here bc there are only 12 numbers to play with   
Blundering Time Traveler United States Member #28945 December 25, 2005 1527 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 2:46 am  IP Logged  
The evening of 9/7 numbers were 801. I have to get 926 Middays numbers 801/9 =89 So the numbers are 089 178 267 356 445 534 623 712 801 890 979 1068 Should I continue to go or just stop here bc there are only 12 numbers to play with Giotonia, I apologize. You were right. I used the wrong values for my NY draws, even though the method is correct in principle.  Concerning NY's 801, and 926. You got 801/9 = 89. The Phase number 89 is too big. Generally, I like Phase numbers in the 20's, 30's and 40's. Sometimes, I use the 50's . You need a new number to get Phase X. I wrote earlier that you can do a wrapdown of the last draw  in this case 801, and take a number near it, and then do Phase X on that number. For example: WRAPDOWN of 801 801 912 023 134 245 356 467 578 689 790  The number I will choose to Phase X on is 790. So 790/16 = 49.375 So progressively add 49.375 = PHASE NUMBERS 049. 098 and 099 148 197 and 198 246 and 247 296 345 and 346 395 444 493 and 494 543 592 and 593 641 and 642 691 740 and 741 790 839 888 and 889 938 987 and 988 1036 and 037 You see the winning number of 926 showed up above in the box form of 296.  If you had wanted to play just 12 numbers derived from the Phase X Number of 89, that would have been fine. You may have hit, but again the lower the Phase X Number, the more accurate you can be. And suppose you wanted to play the phase numbers of from 89, it would have been fine to go past 1068 until 2047, or even 3026, and just play the last three numbers. I don't like to do this though. It becomes more hit and miss when you go into quadruple digits.   
Blundering Time Traveler United States Member #28945 December 25, 2005 1527 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 2:53 am  IP Logged  
THE PHASE X METHOD This new method is very, very simple, and is a variation of the Phase37 method discussed on this thread:  Using Phase37 was fine, but not as exacting as using a number's own unique phase to derive a very small group of playable results. Here's how: 1. Take any last draw and divide it by its SUM. Example: Using NY's September 7th Evening Draw of 916. NY's next winning midday draw on September 8th was 926 916's sum is 9 + 1 + 6 = 16 So 916/16 = 57.25 2. The resulting number of 57.25 is your Phase X number or just phase number. Progressively add the phase number to itself until you hit quadruple digits. Example is: 57.25 + 57.25 + 57.25...Until you hit quadruple digits is : 057.25, 114.5, 171.75, 229, 286.25, 343.5, 400.75, 458, 515.25, 572.5, 629.75, 687, 744.25, 801.5, 858.75, 916, 973.25, 1030.5. You then stop ( you can go further until you hit 2???, but its up to you. In general, I don't). So, You see the winning number of 926, came out as the Boxed result of 629. And all you would have played is 18 numbers.  Often times the phase number is in the 20'3 and 30''s such as 24.25, or 35.67. I like when the phase number is in the 20's 30's, and 40's. This way, I won't play too many numbers or too little. Of course the lower the phase number, the more numbers you will play. The more numbers you play of course, the more accurate you will be.  If the phase number is too low for you: Suppose the last draw was 055. The sum is 5+5 = 10 The phase number would be 055/10 = 5.5. Now this phase number may be too low. Low meaning lots of numbers, and more money to spend. So what I do is get the phase X from the next number in 055's wrapdown, which is 166 0r 944. 055 166 277 388 499 500 611 722 833 944  Sometimes the Phase X numbers will be off by a digit. Because of this possiblity, I sometimes do the option below. 3. Optional : I sometimes take all my phase x results, and go 1 up and 1 down on the last digit. I then also take a mirror of the last digit. If I chosen to do this option with the Phase x number results of 57.25 from the top of this thread, it would have been, 1 up, 1 down, and take mirror  all on last digit: 057, 058, 056, 052 , 114, 115, 113, 119, 171, 172, 170, 176, 229, 230, 228, 224, 286, 287, 285, 281, 343, 344, 342, 348, 400, 401, 399, 405, 458, 459, 457, 453, 515, 516, 514, 510, 572, 573, 571, 577, 629, 630, 628, 624, 687, 688, 686, 682, 744, 745, 743, 749, 801, 802, 800, 806, 858, 859, 857, 853, 916, 917, 915, 911, 973, 974, 972, 978, 1030, 031, 029, 035.  With this PHASE X, you will find that the number can hit as a box or even straight. Sometimes you are just 1 point off or a mirror off on the last digit. As you Phase x, watch the numbers carefully and see how they trend. You will often see that some of the numbers in the Phase results, already came out in the past few days or rather will even come out in the next couple of days. Only Once in a while, you may not get a strong number to phase. Then it would have been best to phase the next number in the last draw's wrapdown. As you backtest, you will notice when its probably best to do this.  Hope I was clear, and hope it helps you make a few pennies more! The values used for these NY draws were wrong. Someone made me aware of that. Thanks Giotonia. The method is correct though. The post directly above this one, deals with the actual draw numbers.   
Michigan United States Member #41047 June 10, 2006 1083 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 9:10 am  IP Logged  
Thank again Kola your awsome (Mind) your system is the best I'll be on the look out for your cubes system in the furture thanks Kola for everything .   
Blundering Time Traveler United States Member #28945 December 25, 2005 1527 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 9:14 am  IP Logged  
Thank again Kola your awsome (Mind) your system is the best I'll be on the look out for your cubes system in the furture thanks Kola for everything . Thank you Mind.   
Detroit United States Member #12329 March 11, 2005 360 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 10:47 am  IP Logged  
does anyone have a speed sheet that can automatically give you the results?   
Blundering Time Traveler United States Member #28945 December 25, 2005 1527 Posts Offline  Posted: September 9, 2006, 11:12 am  IP Logged  
does anyone have a speed sheet that can automatically give you the results? Yes,Duckhunter,it may be a little tedious to add numbers, The following is thing closest you can get to automation with a calculator.This is trivial,and most of you already know this, but for those that overlooked it... If using a calculator: Once you get the phase X number on your calculator, just press the "+" addition button once, and then press the "=" 'equals' button every time you want the next phase numbers. You don't have to reinput the original Phase X NUMBER. Example: Phase X Number is 52.45 Now press the " +" addition button once. Then press the eqaul button Press "=" You get 104.9 Press "=" again  you get 157.35 Press "=" again  you get 209.8 and so on...  Hope this helps a few of you a litte.   
