|Posted: January 8, 2009, 3:21 am - IP Logged|
The only thing I can say is that the methods behind LottoSync are far removed from what you assume they are.
Problem is I can't repeat this forever and ever because it's eating away valuable time.
If your personal results are temporarily less than stellar... simple streakyness is the cause... stick with LS and It will turn in your favor...
I know from running many forecast tests (talking about thousands ran on a renderfarm) that missing out 4 times is absolutely normal and isn't yet telling you anything about how good or bad the program performs.
Anyone who knows statistics will agree that you need many many many tests before drawing a final conclusion.
Don't forget that lotteries have astronomical odds against the player.
for example :
If you were just guessing... probability tells us that the chance of hitting 3 or more numbers correct with 10 selected numbers in a standard 6/49 lotto is only 1 time in more than 11 times...
So... If you were only guessing... I'm sure that in this case loosing streaks of even more than 20 times shall occur.
Now... even if lottosync is capable of improving the chance of hitting 3 or more in a group of 10 numbers to a 1 in 3 times it may still very well loose the first 4 or more times you try it... That's absolutely normal.
Even if you would toss a simple coin and bet on heads... that's an easy 50/50 chance wich is far better than the odds in lotteries... you would see that loosing streaks of 4 times or more tossing tails in a row are not rare. So if a 50/50 chance already shows this amount of streakyness !!
I will make a personal prediction for you... Stick to LottoSync a little longer and a bigger win will be in the numbers soon... It's kinda typical (although it is no hard rule) that the software hits big after a couple of times missing out.
This is the best I can try to explain it...