-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Mark. I have the utmost respect for your opinion and sincerely welcome it! For my opening statement I will simply say this, "If you don't learn to think outside of the box, then you'll always be trapped in it...with everybody else". Now, I'll assume that you've already read my opening post of this thread where the definition of system resides. This is the very basis by which you must approach Pick3 if you want consistence of wins or losses for that matter.
The reason I include losses is because when you lose by the same approach that you win, the system has been established and produces those results based on the same method applied. All over this website, you'll find that everyone knows there are only 1,000 total combinations for Pick3. Is it unreasonable to fathom the idea of taking 600-700 of those and developing a mathematical approach to duplicate what the numbers are already doing and be consistent at it?
I think not. See, the closer you get to producing all the possible combinations the closer you get to matching whatever is drawn. Now, there is a catch to this. You must know which combinations to duplicate as well as how mant "flex" combinations to include in case of a shift of the scale which I've also covered. There several ways to develop a system which will work consistently as long as you understand how to approach the numbers. Most of the players here rely on what the numbers "aren't" doing as I play on what they "are" doing.
Luck prevails when you don't play near enough numbers or just random numbers on a whim and still get a hit from time to time, okay. Luck prevails when you don't know what's gonna happen with the numbers that you've played and you actually win. Luck prevails when you play for pairs or boxed and get a str8 win, okay. Nothing wrong with any of this except it's very inconsistent and between the time of this win and the next one you're back to square one. Why? No consistency.
Think about it this example: You see a nice color in which you'd like to paint your car or truck and you go to the paint shop for to have it mixed. To get that same color, there is a formula...a system of procedures and ingredients to duplicate that mixture. Correct? If the mixer deviated from the formula he'd get a different color wouldn't he? At the very least, a different shade. He tries it again with yet another deviation and get's a different result from the first one. A system produces an expected result based on specific input. No if's, and's, or but's about it.
If a person doesn't know what type of win they will land, there is no real system involved and this isn't meant to be arrogant, y, or sarchastic. I'm just a realist when it comes to working this game for money. Before I got things together financially so I could play the required set of numbers, I used to gamble on small sets of numbers, too. Thing is, when I lost, I knew where I was likely to lose. Noon else here can make this statement. If I were to play pairs, I'd know which pairs I'm going to match and where. If I were to play boxed, I'd know which numbers would be in which positions.
This is the reliability that a true system delivers along with consistent and dependable profits. I like knowing I'm going to win when I go in and how. Structure is very important when it comes to this game and with it comes ways on how to make your wins easier and better. Without it, you're constantly trying to figure out how to win the way you did three weeks ago. As always, this is just my .02 cents. How ironic is it that this same .02 cents generates me $250 in one day at will? Break out of the box, Mark. There's light outside of the box. Believe me...
"Match