Houston United States
Member #62,317
June 24, 2008
242 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Aug 12, 2010
Mega-ThinkTank,
Often, when people find themselves unable to defend their position, rather than either admit it, or keep quiet, they strike out with personal attacks or claims of prejudice. You shouldn't take this so personally. You are not alone. I have a friend with a college degree who got so confused over this issue that he actually agreed to exchange 10 Pick-3 tickets numbered [000-111-222-333-444-555-666-777-888-999] for seven of his specification that he thought were more random and more likely to hit. He gulped and laughed when I reminded him that he was paying $10 for seven tickets that he could buy at the store himself for $7, but he still insisted that a ticket like, say, 327, was more likely to win than 222. All you needed to say in response to my question was, "I haven't kept track, and anyway, I don't care. I'm here to Hit The Jackpot, and I'm willing to pay for the chance."
It's been quite a while since I read Taleb's FBR and I can't remember if he even mentioned lotteries. Actually, you might get more out of another book of his, The Black Swan.
Don't beat up on yourself, and...
Don't worry, be happy!
--Jimmy4164
Jim,
Trust me, I do not feel any lack of credibility with my method. I'd stack my method up against anything Nicolos Taleb (or you for that matter) have to say about lottery numbers. You're talking to a real thoroughbred player. A real student of the game.....there's only a few of us here, and with the gut to call you out on your rambling about lottery numbers, which you clearly at a amatuer stage.
I don't deal with Pick 3 and 4. I deal with major jackpots, the 6/56 games; Mega Million. The thing with you is your attitude or some ill-fate crusade to cast doubt on the credibility of the games. I gave you a clue how to approach the lottery; you have to lose the mindset of the common sensible approach, i.e. statistical analysis, probabilities and the like.
If it's common sense to stay away from a bad area. I'm telling to you go deep into the heart of that bad area and there, you'll hold the balance of power in that bad area. That's the kind of high I.Q. you need dealing with the lottery.
Just to get a clue what I'm talking about here, you'd need to take a whole year of past lottery numbers to see a clear pattern. Sometimes you have go back a little further than that. Then you locate the patterns in 3 sequencial steps, adjoined by numbers that are "lose" or no connection with the patterned numbers. It takes time and skills to have a trained eye to see that. Those lose numbers are probably the biggest stumbling block with most players and force them to quit or give up on it. That's the design of the game ---- the "hook" to lead the mind to captivity while draining you out of your money.
That just one aspect of the game though. You'll also have to deal with getting the right number group. RJOH have a system where A= 0-19, B=20-29 and so forth. I believe that's as good as the human mind can get among the members of Lottery Post. However, I have a method that's lightyears ahead of that stone age filtering, which gives me 5 sets and a gaurantee winner.
You see my approach, Jimmy? Its not just a one method fits all. You have to have a method to deal with one aspect and then another method to deal with another aspect and so on. I deal with 3 different methods and it took me more than 15 years to see and learn that.
You know, getting that "most beautiful girl in the world" is no simple thing, buddy.
United States
Member #93,943
July 10, 2010
2,180 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Mega-ThinkTank on Aug 12, 2010
Jim,
Trust me, I do not feel any lack of credibility with my method. I'd stack my method up against anything Nicolos Taleb (or you for that matter) have to say about lottery numbers. You're talking to a real thoroughbred player. A real student of the game.....there's only a few of us here, and with the gut to call you out on your rambling about lottery numbers, which you clearly at a amatuer stage.
I don't deal with Pick 3 and 4. I deal with major jackpots, the 6/56 games; Mega Million. The thing with you is your attitude or some ill-fate crusade to cast doubt on the credibility of the games. I gave you a clue how to approach the lottery; you have to lose the mindset of the common sensible approach, i.e. statistical analysis, probabilities and the like.
If it's common sense to stay away from a bad area. I'm telling to you go deep into the heart of that bad area and there, you'll hold the balance of power in that bad area. That's the kind of high I.Q. you need dealing with the lottery.
Just to get a clue what I'm talking about here, you'd need to take a whole year of past lottery numbers to see a clear pattern. Sometimes you have go back a little further than that. Then you locate the patterns in 3 sequencial steps, adjoined by numbers that are "lose" or no connection with the patterned numbers. It takes time and skills to have a trained eye to see that. Those lose numbers are probably the biggest stumbling block with most players and force them to quit or give up on it. That's the design of the game ---- the "hook" to lead the mind to captivity while draining you out of your money.
That just one aspect of the game though. You'll also have to deal with getting the right number group. RJOH have a system where A= 0-19, B=20-29 and so forth. I believe that's as good as the human mind can get among the members of Lottery Post. However, I have a method that's lightyears ahead of that stone age filtering, which gives me 5 sets and a gaurantee winner.
You see my approach, Jimmy? Its not just a one method fits all. You have to have a method to deal with one aspect and then another method to deal with another aspect and so on. I deal with 3 different methods and it took me more than 15 years to see and learn that.
You know, getting that "most beautiful girl in the world" is no simple thing, buddy.
Mega-ThinkTank,
I'm still waiting for someone to explain what causes the patterns you perceive in the results, assuming there are patterns other than RANDOM NOISE. I happen to know from a lot of experience that a Neural Network can be Trained to predict the next event in a sequence with Incredible Precision, as long as the predictions are made exclusively within the data that was used to optimize the parameters. I suspect you might be experiencing some analogy to this, causing you to believe you are CLOSE to uncovering the Mother Lode!
I will not be impressed here until someone presents Backtests of system performance on historical data that clearly demonstrate a profit over several years. You and others claim you are still working and collaborating on your systems. Wouldn't it be better to wait until you succeed, before making claims? If I were you, and I DID succeed(HAD succeeded?) I surely wouldn't be here talking about; I'd be out looking for investors!
The simple questions I would like to see answered are stated in this recent post:
Houston United States
Member #62,317
June 24, 2008
242 Posts
Offline
By the way Jim, I wonder if you're an American and residing in America? If not, great..... I want to ask you to give me the numbers to ANY lottery game ( 6/56 etc) in your country. However, don't give me the whole numbers, just the "end" numbers. Example...
12-20-24-32-56
Instead, just give me 2-0-4-2-6 (those are the end number to each of the whole numbers)
Give me that and I will use my method and produce 5 sets with a gaurantee winner. This will put to rest the nonsense by Nicolos Taleb and his intellectual follower, you sir.
mid-Ohio United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Mega-ThinkTank on Aug 12, 2010
By the way Jim, I wonder if you're an American and residing in America? If not, great..... I want to ask you to give me the numbers to ANY lottery game ( 6/56 etc) in your country. However, don't give me the whole numbers, just the "end" numbers. Example...
12-20-24-32-56
Instead, just give me 2-0-4-2-6 (those are the end number to each of the whole numbers)
Give me that and I will use my method and produce 5 sets with a gaurantee winner. This will put to rest the nonsense by Nicolos Taleb and his intellectual follower, you sir.
The last MM winning numbers were 02 14 26 50 56 +12.
Using 2 4 6 0 6, can you pick five combinations that will have a winner for Friday's drawing?
* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
Houston United States
Member #62,317
June 24, 2008
242 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by jimmy4164 on Aug 12, 2010
Mega-ThinkTank,
I'm still waiting for someone to explain what causes the patterns you perceive in the results, assuming there are patterns other than RANDOM NOISE. I happen to know from a lot of experience that a Neural Network can be Trained to predict the next event in a sequence with Incredible Precision, as long as the predictions are made exclusively within the data that was used to optimize the parameters. I suspect you might be experiencing some analogy to this, causing you to believe you are CLOSE to uncovering the Mother Lode!
I will not be impressed here until someone presents Backtests of system performance on historical data that clearly demonstrate a profit over several years. You and others claim you are still working and collaborating on your systems. Wouldn't it be better to wait until you succeed, before making claims? If I were you, and I DID succeed(HAD succeeded?) I surely wouldn't be here talking about; I'd be out looking for investors!
The simple questions I would like to see answered are stated in this recent post:
I will answer your question but slow down, Jimmy. I came out in my first post and stated that I haven't won a major jackpot. I didn't say I never won anything (and i have) but let's move on with your question.
What Causes The Patterns
Patterns are realized by connecting numbers through "consecutive" numbering, which begin after locating the starting point (two consecutive numbers that anchors the next 3 sequencial patterns). A pattern are consistenly connected until it breaks off with a lose number or a non-connecting number. After that, there's a semi starting point that exacts one of the Anchor numbers and leads in the 2nd phase of the sequencial pattern. And again for the 3rd and it breaks off and heads for the next starting point to start the next 3 sequencial patterns again and again and again..... that is the Matrix in its' essense.
I refuse to get any more specific than that. Half of the masses here will not understand it unless I actually reveal my method to them which I won't do because of their stubborness and ignorance towards me.
Last thing, If say, Michael Jordan or Larry Bird was to tell you that they will be an NBA Superstar while still teenagers, you'd probably tell them, "I don't believe it," just like you doubt me because I didn't win a major jackpot yet. That still doesn't mean they didn't have the knowledge and skills to get there. It was still a matter of time.
Houston United States
Member #62,317
June 24, 2008
242 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Aug 12, 2010
The last MM winning numbers were 02 14 26 50 56 +12.
Using 2 4 6 0 6, can you pick five combinations that will have a winner for Friday's drawing?
Hello Rjoh,
No. I would first have to work my method to get the winning numbers and then I do the last digit method to get an accurate number group. If my method throw off the numbers by one number, it would throw off the number group as well.
I just wanted to prove to Jim that my methods are legit and it works and that Nicolos Taleb has an amatuer way of looking at lottery numbers or randomness for that matter.
If you give me the last digits of a number already played, I can run it through my method and get the actual winning number with just the end numbers. Its the best I can show without revealing much, how legitimate and credible my method is.
mid-Ohio United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Mega-ThinkTank on Aug 12, 2010
Hello Rjoh,
No. I would first have to work my method to get the winning numbers and then I do the last digit method to get an accurate number group. If my method throw off the numbers by one number, it would throw off the number group as well.
I just wanted to prove to Jim that my methods are legit and it works and that Nicolos Taleb has an amatuer way of looking at lottery numbers or randomness for that matter.
If you give me the last digits of a number already played, I can run it through my method and get the actual winning number with just the end numbers. Its the best I can show without revealing much, how legitimate and credible my method is.
If you give me the last digits of a number already played, I can run it through my method and get the actual winning number with just the end numbers. Its the best I can show without revealing much, how legitimate and credible my method is.
Get the winning numbers of what? Are you saying the numbers will be winners but knowing where or what they won would reveal too much about your method?
* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
Houston United States
Member #62,317
June 24, 2008
242 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Aug 12, 2010
If you give me the last digits of a number already played, I can run it through my method and get the actual winning number with just the end numbers. Its the best I can show without revealing much, how legitimate and credible my method is.
Get the winning numbers of what? Are you saying the numbers will be winners but knowing where or what they won would reveal too much about your method?
What I meant is if you give me a past winning numbers for the Mega Million game or the Powerball with just the end numbers, I can use my method to produce the actual "whole numbers." That's what I meant. I can't keep being more specific, man or I'll reveal too much of my method.
Michigan United States
Member #22,394
September 24, 2005
1,583 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Mega-ThinkTank on Aug 12, 2010
What I meant is if you give me a past winning numbers for the Mega Million game or the Powerball with just the end numbers, I can use my method to produce the actual "whole numbers." That's what I meant. I can't keep being more specific, man or I'll reveal too much of my method.
United States
Member #93,943
July 10, 2010
2,180 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Stack47 on Aug 11, 2010
"I see says the blind man"
"It definitely does NOT support the assertion of any sort of cause and effect relationship among any of the things we're discussing here!"
Because the same probability applies had the poll asked how many times should 811 or any other three digit number be drawn in the last 33 years and based on some of the replies, I wrong assumed you were going in that direction. And I should have known better because of what I was talking about in the other thread.
How many three digit numbers repeated within the next three drawings?
Stack47,
Sorry, I'm running behind upgrading the program to scan the PA P-3 results file with additional queries. I decided to generalize it so I can quickly get the answer to: How many times did a P3 number match the previous winning number of N days ago. My original programs to find the 1 and 2 day ago events are getting too "dirty."
In the meantime, how about a conjecture and an exercise?
We know that over the 33+ years of the data, 14 matches were found for 1 day ago,
Theoretically, I said that these results are reasonable given that probability suggests they are members of a distribution with a mean of 11.6 and a Std. Dev. of 3.3
I think that when the program is finished, it will find 11.6 [sd 3.3] (8-16) matches for three(3) days ago as well. Do you agree?
Now for your question.
"How many three digit numbers repeated within the next three drawings?"
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you want to know how many times did 3 digit numbers repeat on AT LEAST ONE of the three days FOLLOWING their selection. In other words, if we choose Yesterday's Winner, how many times will it repeat AT LEAST ONCE Today, Tomorrow, OR the Next Day? Correct?
Assuming this is your question, which Ball Park do you think the answer will be in:
Houston United States
Member #62,317
June 24, 2008
242 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by truecritic on Aug 12, 2010
OK...here are one each.
MM
0 1 0 7 6 2
PB
9 0 0 7 7 9
Good try, Critc. This is why I wanted someone from a foreign country to give me their end numbers and Ill produced the winning "whole numbers." With the American games ( Mega and PwrBall) of course anyone can do a simply search (like RJOH said) and get the numbers.
What Im trying to prove is how credible my method is......I tell y'all what...... go back through the years, I dont care what year, and get me another 5 digits end number and I will stay on line and try to produce my 5 number set with a gaurantee winner before someone try to look it up. I swear to you I will not go through any searches to find the numbers but I will produce the winning whole numbers.