Lottery Statistic Analyser 6 ReleasedPrev Topic Next Topic

New Topic New Poll

taiwanlottery

Taichung
Taiwan
Member #114,111
July 24, 2011
2,384 Posts
Offline

Aug 3, 2011, 7:30 pm

I did purchase it and as a newbie of analysers, im not really sure what to do with it. I can see some stats which are nice but in getting numbers for the next draw, it seems as though it shows the same numbers all the time for every draw.

Can you explain a little on how i can come up with numbers for the next draws better or is that it? Go to "Wheels and MNAs" and pick one of many sections where you may think the numbers may come from? If so, why are the numbers not changing for each draw?

Thanks for any help.
thegreendestiny

Emerald City
United States
Member #83,321
December 4, 2009
64 Posts
Offline

Aug 3, 2011, 9:11 pm

use the main window and choose from the drop down box and choose predictions using the lowes tab and there you can choose the indvidual balls for the next draw prediction that is if you also updated your draw database.

again i could be wrong, you may want to ask the developer. I just stumbled and read about it always playing around with the program.
taiwanlottery

Taichung
Taiwan
Member #114,111
July 24, 2011
2,384 Posts
Offline

Aug 4, 2011, 9:36 am

Thanks the green destiny!

If im not mistaken, thats just giving an average range of each ball placement but im wondering if this system will pick its own 6 balls for the next based on all its stats that it gathers.

I did update the recent draws. Maybe thats how it works from the wheels and mna's section and maybe because it takes stats from over a long period of time that the numbers will not change much in a short time period.

Thanks again!
Developer

Somerset
United Kingdom
Member #9,710
December 17, 2004
189 Posts
Offline

Aug 4, 2011, 4:38 pm

Please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_regression

This explains all about LOWESS

You are correct LOWESS works better with fewer draws, also use the smoothness to reduce the predicted ranges.

It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.
dr san

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92,560
June 9, 2010
3,779 Posts
Offline

Aug 4, 2011, 6:29 pm

Hello
developer, also if you can add the factorial calculus, genetics of numbers,
logic, Boolean algebra, map karnaugl, developer, when you still have time you
could see the maps of karnaugl, to optimize the game, yes because within an
array of rows and columns, and as an electrical circuit, i.e. see positions and
digits that do not repeat in the column and row UnionThank you
lakerben

50

New Mexico
United States
Member #86,096
January 29, 2010
24,778 Posts
Offline

Aug 4, 2011, 7:42 pm

Quote: Originally posted by dr san on Aug 4, 2011
Hello
developer, also if you can add the factorial calculus, genetics of numbers,
logic, Boolean algebra, map karnaugl, developer, when you still have time you
could see the maps of karnaugl, to optimize the game, yes because within an
array of rows and columns, and as an electrical circuit, i.e. see positions and
digits that do not repeat in the column and row UnionThank you

That's karnaugh maps used for boolean reduction in digital circuits. Maybe reduce pick 3 to Or Gates. Either input high produces a high output. However, Dr it may be that the game analysis are getting too complex.

Better to take the last 15 draws and break into groups ,hot,cold, overdue. Groups low hitting etc. Too many variables and it is reduced to mud.
paurths

Switching between Fairfax, VA and Belgium
Belgium
Member #19,286
July 29, 2005
2,254 Posts
Offline

Aug 4, 2011, 9:37 pm

Quote: Originally posted by taiwanlottery on Aug 3, 2011
I did purchase it and as a newbie of analysers, im not really sure what to do with it. I can see some stats which are nice but in getting numbers for the next draw, it seems as though it shows the same numbers all the time for every draw.

Can you explain a little on how i can come up with numbers for the next draws better or is that it? Go to "Wheels and MNAs" and pick one of many sections where you may think the numbers may come from? If so, why are the numbers not changing for each draw?

Thanks for any help.

If someone want software that spits out the next winning combination, it is rather easy to create a random number generator. Not that it will give anyone the winning combination on a plate, but heck...

The best software is the one that provides tools for everyone, or at least 90% of the potential lotteryplayers, that anyone can use to their best benefit.

Software that claims to deliver the next winning combination is software to keep away from. It is crap and theft, plain and simple.

Good lottery software provides statistics, data, information on what has happened and what is happening.

It is still the lottery player that needs to step in and be the interpreter, that should be the person between the information and the bet.

Most people however don't see it that way. Most people would like software that spits out the next winning combination, for each draw. Well, that ain't gonna happen.
Not one single person buys Microsoft Word with the expectation that upon opening it, it will produce a best seller novel without any input from the person openining it.

It comes down to that.
Information comes with a price. And sometimes it is well worth it. Yet, the user of such software still needs a brain.

cheers
Ricky

lasas3

An onion a day keeps everyone away!!!
BobP

Dump Water Florida
United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
3,574 Posts
Offline

Aug 5, 2011, 3:24 am

Maybe lottery software can't predict the winning combination, but it is fun to watch it try.

BobP
Developer

Somerset
United Kingdom
Member #9,710
December 17, 2004
189 Posts
Offline

Aug 5, 2011, 1:35 pm

I totally agree with you, no software will predict the lottery as it's a random event, if someone made a program to predict the lottery would they sell it, I think not.

Software can however provide pointers, show trends and give global statistics that help the user choose the best numbers to pick.

It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.
paurths

Switching between Fairfax, VA and Belgium
Belgium
Member #19,286
July 29, 2005
2,254 Posts
Offline

Aug 5, 2011, 10:28 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Developer on Aug 5, 2011
I totally agree with you, no software will predict the lottery as it's a random event, if someone made a program to predict the lottery would they sell it, I think not.

Software can however provide pointers, show trends and give global statistics that help the user choose the best numbers to pick.

Well, i totally agree with what you write here!
I can't find a "thumbs up" emoticon, otherwise that is what i would have put here ;-)

The true problem with glambers, me being one myself, is that they can spent a large amount of money playing "the game", but somehow they want software and such, which would help them in their search for gold, for free.

A gambler doesn't think about the money when she or he is spending it in the store buying tickets, but she or he will think 37 times before buying something that is a tool that will help them developing a better understanding of the game they are putting money on.

No sweat, i will release a new version of my software, lotsoftpro (current release name: Pick3Ghost I) in a few months, and just like with every release i will state clearly "this software does not predict the winning numbers for you".
I am pretty sure Stephen King never bought a WordPerfect or MS Word thinking, "hey, i got a very vivid imagination, but this thing is gonna write my novels for me".
He uses a tool, a tool that makes it easier for him to write down his thoughts. And that is what it comes down to.
Microsoft is not gonna put their MS Word on the market for free and say, "hey, good luck with it, we spend 100 000 hours developing it, but hey, that is no problem, we don't eat nor drink, it's all we do, just send us a 'thank's'. Let's get real , there is alot of hours put into the development of software, and most people don't seem to understand that.

Cheers & good luck,
Ricky

lasas3

An onion a day keeps everyone away!!!
JADELottery

Native American Eagle Sun

MN
United States
Member #21
December 7, 2001
4,811 Posts
Offline

Aug 5, 2011, 11:49 pm

The One Over None
I Know...
dr san

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92,560
June 9, 2010
3,779 Posts
Offline

Aug 7, 2011, 8:20 am

Hello, paulhts, I see as follows about payment,
of solft, each case is a case,

Example, lottery players in, some
people had more opportunities to learn to program, other, want to play but has
no knowledge of programming, I speak for me, everyone who help me when I
ganhartera a premio will have 20% also, the big problem

It is very player wants the solft for
free, if you earn the 20% not darama, many pay programs and still 20%, the
darama, here goes the saying dái and you will be given, and not look to
whom.

There are always two sides to agree on the costs and time lost,
but Lottery solft cannot be won, but rather a collective sport. The ideas of the majority of solft
are taken from the Forum, where many put ideas and do not charge
anything,
Developer

Somerset
United Kingdom
Member #9,710
December 17, 2004
189 Posts
Offline

Aug 7, 2011, 11:59 am

Quote: Originally posted by dr san on Aug 7, 2011

Hello, paulhts, I see as follows about payment,
of solft, each case is a case,

Example, lottery players in, some
people had more opportunities to learn to program, other, want to play but has
no knowledge of programming, I speak for me, everyone who help me when I
ganhartera a premio will have 20% also, the big problem

It is very player wants the solft for
free, if you earn the 20% not darama, many pay programs and still 20%, the
darama, here goes the saying dái and you will be given, and not look to
whom.

There are always two sides to agree on the costs and time lost,
but Lottery solft cannot be won, but rather a collective sport. The ideas of the majority of solft
are taken from the Forum, where many put ideas and do not charge
anything,

Hi DR San

I can honestly say all ideas in my software are unique and not taken from anywhere, they are based upon my knowledge and understanding of the draws and math involved in them.

In my software I have created a system called MNA's, a way of wheeling that performs better than world record breaking wheels. I KNOW THIS HAS NOT BEEN DONE BEFORE as I created this system.

Many global reports that look at every possibly combination of a draw and then comparing to past draw results giving much more accurate statistics. I KNOW THESE REPORTS HAVE NEVER BEEN SEEN BEFORE, I designed and created them and done all the math for them..

LOWESS predictions that plot curves across past draw results providing plus 1 draw predictions. As far as I know NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN LOTTERY SOFTWARE Again I designed and created and implemented this system to use LOWESS algorithm for lottery analyses..

Normal Distribution split between all ball placements giving real world statistics of each ball and each balls global position in the draw. As far as I know NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN LOTTERY SOFTWARE.

I don't see the point in spending hundreds possibly thousands of hours coding to just end up having software that just repeats what you can find on the internet or in other software, it would be a waste of time.

It has been said every software has a bug in it, it has also been said that every program can be reduced by one line of code.

There for any program can be reduced to 1 line that dont work.
dr san

bgonÃ§alves
Brasil
Member #92,560
June 9, 2010
3,779 Posts
Offline

Aug 7, 2011, 3:17 pm

Hello, developer, I agree with you, so much that
it placed on the forum for the members

The best forum in the world in
lottery, see the qualities of your solft, I think good,

I'll give you an idea of a lottery
filter 50/5 (euromilhao), you can use won't stop anything = cross "or multiply
the endings that think it will give, by groups.

I.e. entails the _ Endings that go out _, entails also _ the
groups that go out _ after extrais each group termination that you will take,
and can you _ just a group of numbers _. How do you see gives a greater economy of numbers compiled and
you only have, in practice the choice between 10 Endings as well as between 09
groups.

For example for the key yesterday: 13
14 18 32 34

Ends: 08 04 03 02 _ _

........Groups: _ 07 05 04 09 _

Let's imagine that I had predicted
right, so selecionavas groups _ 05 04 07 and 09 _ and who also had hit on
endings.

So selecionavas groups _ 04 05 07 09
_ and extarías them all the numbers c/Endings _ 02 03 04 and 08 _ thereby the
following group of numbers:

22 *_32_* *_13_* 23 43 04 *_14_* *_34_* *_18_*

As you see, only 09 numbers and
within them all removed.

Thus the emphasis and greater effort
should focus on the selection of Endings and groups going out.

What is rewarding as it is small
universes (10 for terminations 09 for groups

The groups are 9 =

The possible keys in accordance with
the amounts of 1 to 9 on EuroMillions are:

1, 10, 19, 28, 37, 46 = for the sum
1

2, 11, 20, 29, 38, 47 = for the sum
2

3, 12, 21, 30, 39, 48 = for the sum
3

4, 13, 22, 31, 40, 49 = for the sum
4

5, 14, 23, 32, 41, 50 = for the sum
5

6, 15, 24, 33, 42 = for the sum
6

7.16 34.43 = .25, for the sum
7

8, 17, 26, 35, 44 = for the sum
8

9, 18, 27, 36, 45 = to the soma
9

More figures

outputs were the
following:

1-1-1-1-1 with 16 outputs =
28.6%

2-1-1-1 with 31 exits = 55.4%

2-2-1 with 4 outputs = 7.1%

3-1-1 with 1 output = 1.8%

happened to the figures

5 with 0 outputs = 0%

41 with 0 outputs = 0%

with 32 outputs = 0% 0

311 with 15 outputs = 5.8%

221 with 27 outputs = 10.4%

2111 with 131 outputs = 50.6%

11111 with 86 exits = 33.2%

Filter-sum of the numbers/pairs and
trios:

In analysis in pairs and Trios more
removed in sums of 1 to 9, since its inception in 2/13/2004, the last draw in
2/6/2009, i.e. a total of 261 outputs:

SUM 1 (1, 10, 19, 28,
37.46)---PAIRS---

19 10 01 01 01 28 10 19 19 28 10 01 37 01

37 19 37 10 19 46 37 46 28 37 28 46 46 28

-------------------------------------------------------------

4 x 4 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 1 x
1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x

TRIOS:

01 10 01

37 19 10

46 37 19

-------------

1 x 1 x 1 x

(1-9)(1-6)(2-8) stars that accompanied the trios.

developer = the difference

among the largest termination with
the lowest termination, example 404 test terminaçao = largest and smallest 8 2 =
test 404 = 13, 14, 18, 32, 34 to difference gave 6, is that making statistics of
difference one might store a group of sums but the difference between the digits
(terminaçoes), because you can see if after I find the smallest digit is 3 and
the highest is 7

the other 4 terminaçoes will stay in
this range of 3 to 7 = 4.5 .6, or repetiçoes. or developer

create a graph = minima, maxina and
possible terminaçao average, hpa along with study of numero maximo and numero
minimo example 404 = 34 max = min = 13 = difference 21, interesting that the
number of never ending difference along sai numbers near him only 14.18 a above
21 another below
Delta Draw

United States
Member #81,841
October 31, 2009
856 Posts
Offline

Aug 9, 2011, 5:41 am

Quote: Originally posted by Developer on Aug 7, 2011
Hi DR San

I can honestly say all ideas in my software are unique and not taken from anywhere, they are based upon my knowledge and understanding of the draws and math involved in them.

In my software I have created a system called MNA's, a way of wheeling that performs better than world record breaking wheels. I KNOW THIS HAS NOT BEEN DONE BEFORE as I created this system.

Many global reports that look at every possibly combination of a draw and then comparing to past draw results giving much more accurate statistics. I KNOW THESE REPORTS HAVE NEVER BEEN SEEN BEFORE, I designed and created them and done all the math for them..

LOWESS predictions that plot curves across past draw results providing plus 1 draw predictions. As far as I know NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN LOTTERY SOFTWARE Again I designed and created and implemented this system to use LOWESS algorithm for lottery analyses..

Normal Distribution split between all ball placements giving real world statistics of each ball and each balls global position in the draw. As far as I know NEVER SEEN BEFORE IN LOTTERY SOFTWARE.

I don't see the point in spending hundreds possibly thousands of hours coding to just end up having software that just repeats what you can find on the internet or in other software, it would be a waste of time.

"I can honestly say all ideas in my software are unique and not taken from anywhere, they are based upon my knowledge and understanding of the draws and math involved in them.

In my software I have created a system called MNA's, a way of wheeling that performs better than world record breaking wheels. I KNOW THIS HAS NOT BEEN DONE BEFORE as I created this system."

Please cite what wheels you are talking about.

I don’t give a dog poop how deep you are in to your product.
I will not buy it on sympathy. You made a big fat claim on your MNA’s but what
do you do to document performance? How
much information do you divulge to the user what a MNA is, how it performs, why
and, - why beyond your endorsement, it is really good? Reverse engineers can
steal your product but the casual user is left in the dark on big fat claims
and advertising superstition.

You put some funky acronym on something like it is
important. I have been to meetings where your head would swim in all the
acronyms. They do not mean dog-poop if they have no meaning than just the full name. If you have superior wheels then DOCUMENT IT.
Why should the customer do so if they are paying you for your time and talent because
after all, YOU DEVELOPED the D.P. You need to package that information. Do not
expect the user to have a developers understanding. Telling a customer to go to a link to learn a
big term is telling them, “if you have to ask, then you are wasting your time
and mine”. You send a reply like that to
a customer and there is no repeat business or beneficial word-of-mouth from
that customer to potential customers.

Developers develop things for a reason. A toilet seat was
developed for a reason and there were certain things that were important to the
design. Think about it next time you sit down and leave the lid down. Your product is like a space toilet with no instructions or worse, a European butt washer. It was carefully thought about and designed but the designer failed in telling how to use it. Today’s software is relying on intuition but that is a developers pride and shortcoming. Have you ever bought a really advanced electronic product that was nearly impossible to program because the
instructions were half-baked? Consumer tolerance for that is zero.

There is no intuition packaged with software. Product intuition is a cultural thing. Going to a Wiki
link does not tell me why what you wish to impress me with is important to me
as a tool, as a resource in your package.

The days of getting worked up over sexy screenshots are over
mate. Do you see big name products selling on their sexiness or their PERFORMANCE? Both sell but this small niche market demands more than a simple no-brainer ap with cool screenshots. That junk is out there
and they are a dime a dozen.I know a guy right now who's whole product hinges on sexy screenshot art.

Developers will be some of your first customers. They do not
need the documentation, the users will. If you do not document and provide a
well-thought out manual and glossary of terms, then you wasted your time. The lines
of code may be different but a developer can get to the same results you do. Users just want to enjoy the program and not spend thousands of hours trying to learn how to use it.

You get your pig to market first and own the market with a
superior product that no one in their right mind would try to steal away. Look at
Gail Howard. How do your wheels compare to hers? She set the bar on wheels and
where are you on the bar? Explain how your wheels outperform hers. She has "world record breaking wheels" in terms of numbers of users and winners published. Gail Howard is our Queen of Wheels. Long live the Queen!

So how is the manual coming? Don’t forget multiple examples
where it applies in a sizeable, moveable window that can be viewed while the
program is used.

I am still at a hold recommendation. Don’t bother PM’g me
any more to get me to soften up or
loosen up my billfold. If you want to slay a niche market you have to do
better to get my dollar. If you cannot perform then the software is very questionable, no matter
how cheap it is.

IMHO you are mining the miners and we want rivets on our trousers.

Top dollar software is well documented and that is what sells.

DD

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

Lottery Statistic Analyser 6 ReleasedPrev TopicNext Topic

Lottery Statistic Analyser 6 ReleasedPrev Topic Next Topic