Why any good Pick 3 system, method, or tool will ,almost, certainly failPrev Topic Next Topic

New Topic New Poll

onlymoney

United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline

Nov 15, 2014, 11:36 pm

Quote: Originally posted by doodoohead on Nov 15, 2014
Please, Where is anything "talked" about and so Refreshingly shown anywhere up there? So, do we see ANY tiny proof of these marvelous claims? That's my point. Everyone already knows about "Rogue Waves". Big deal, its called "win some lose some". Show some of those claims. That's where the rubber meets the road for making money. Big talk ! Always with the big claims. Then a lot of off subject diversions get tossed around. Then personal slights attempts about someone's humorous Avatar name and off it goes again right onlymoney? First blood. No thanks, not interested. That's not the point either is it? Or, is it?

" Fortunately, though, an important discovery was made while conducting my analysis. That is, I've kept noticing certain trends that accompany the appearances of doubles. Sure enough, this breakthrough has turned out to be a major missing piece since it provides for newer ,and muchbetter, restrictions. So far, it has proved to be very effective in protecting against these freak losing streaks."

llllllllllll

My son, such little faith and no patience.
garyo1954

Texas
United States
Member #4,549
May 2, 2004
4,228 Posts
Offline

Nov 15, 2014, 11:47 pm

Quote: Originally posted by onlymoney on Nov 15, 2014
His analogy was spot on. I've seen those shows about rogue waves. Just like anything else, numbers work in waves and calm, meaning randomness/chaos behaves sporadically, yet generally predictable.

Waves at the beach usually come in three, then there's a sort of calm for a while until the waves show again.

Numbers work the same way. There is "Normal" activity, and sudden spikes. recent Florida p-3 winners are a good example. The 9 in the first position couldn't stay away. That's not the normal distribution. There's a deviance in the flow, like a piece of wood in a fast running river causing a vortex in the water around it, then the flow may get stronger and the piece of wood becomes loose, returning the flow of water back to it's smooth pattern.

Look at vTraks if you want to talk about waves. Nothing new.

Analogies can be made of shooting stars, round vs oblong cheerios, purple fruit loops, wild hairs growing out your ear. If they were in a novel you'd say they were imagery.

Imagery doesn't explain/prove/show or demonstrate jack.

WHOEVER this character is, he went into Frankie's thread and told her to post numbers that he can check.

If he is going to demand others post numbers, HE needs to MAN UP OR BE CALLED ON IT.

Don't care if you like his analogy.

Don't care if he is your friend.

Don't care if he can stand on his head, whistle Dixie while juggling monkeys with his feet.

When he demands proof, in the form of numbers he can check, he should be willing to post the same.

And if he doesn't man up and post the numbers that prove his whatever, then he's nothing but a purple oblong cheerio.

I'm probably here unless I'm not.
Dreaming would be a perfectly useless function if it's only purpose was to entertain.
onlymoney

United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline

Nov 15, 2014, 11:54 pm

Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Nov 15, 2014
Look at vTraks if you want to talk about waves. Nothing new.

Analogies can be made of shooting stars, round vs oblong cheerios, purple fruit loops, wild hairs growing out your ear. If they were in a novel you'd say they were imagery.

Imagery doesn't explain/prove/show or demonstrate jack.

WHOEVER this character is, he went into Frankie's thread and told her to post numbers that he can check.

If he is going to demand others post numbers, HE needs to MAN UP OR BE CALLED ON IT.

Don't care if you like his analogy.

Don't care if he is your friend.

Don't care if he can stand on his head, whistle Dixie while juggling monkeys with his feet.

When he demands proof, in the form of numbers he can check, he should be willing to post the same.

And if he doesn't man up and post the numbers that prove his whatever, then he's nothing but a purple oblong cheerio.

If he is going to demand others post numbers, HE needs to MAN UP OR BE CALLED ON IT.

How do you know ahead of TIME that the OP of this thread will not reveal his system?

He posted this thread about 7:22 PM tonight. It's 11:52 as I write this. Now you've forced me to find two magic wands, hat and bunny.

Eff this, this is too much to handle.

WTF?

I'll leave it up to someone else to tolerate..lol
doodoohead

United States
Member #2,392
September 27, 2003
1,039 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 12:01 am

Because he already went through all this last week and was never was able to show anything then either. This is his pattern. If he shows any part of any of these claims I will eat my dog collar

He continuously says things like, "My very extensive research proves...blah blah blah" and shows no part of anything he says. Are you kidding? Big claims and he really does not even understand the basic premises. If he did, he would already be there by now.

* If you can name it, you can find it, and if you can find it, you can track it, and if you can track it, you can beat it.
garyo1954

Texas
United States
Member #4,549
May 2, 2004
4,228 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 12:05 am

LMAO....

You should get matching clown suits if you think this clown is going to post numbers that can be checked.

Read the original thread where he harped about the flaw in Win D's system, but NEVER posted anything to show what, or where the flaw was, even when asked point blank by several members.

I'm probably here unless I'm not.
Dreaming would be a perfectly useless function if it's only purpose was to entertain.
onlymoney

United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 12:15 am

Quote: Originally posted by doodoohead on Nov 16, 2014
Because he already went through all this last week and was never was able to show anything then either. This is his pattern. If he shows any part of any of these claims I will eat my dog collar

He continuously says things like, "My very extensive research proves...blah blah blah" and shows no part of anything he says. Are you kidding? Big claims and he really does not even understand the basic premises. If he did, he would already be there by now.

What have you done lately to improve the chances of winning? I'd really like to know.
onlymoney

United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 12:18 am

Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Nov 16, 2014
LMAO....

You should get matching clown suits if you think this clown is going to post numbers that can be checked.

Read the original thread where he harped about the flaw in Win D's system, but NEVER posted anything to show what, or where the flaw was, even when asked point blank by several members.

Yeah, I agree with his assessment. He wasn't picking on WIN D per se, but If you read in between the lines you'd notice he's writing about systems in general. WIN D's system helped him get closer to his goal, that's all.
doodoohead

United States
Member #2,392
September 27, 2003
1,039 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 12:42 am

Quote: Originally posted by onlymoney on Nov 16, 2014
What have you done lately to improve the chances of winning? I'd really like to know.

Well, since you don't require any follow up or proof of anything. Actually, I have done hundreds of breakthrough things. Wonderful, "refreshing" things you could say.

So, shut down on those other points up there are you? Can you spell diversion? So can I, unfortunately for you.

We will just sit back and wait for some of these missing but "refreshing" claims you talked about finally show up. Patience is golden and so is my post- digested dog collar which I will be glad to include at the same time. Both will be pretty ripe by the time they finally arrive.

* If you can name it, you can find it, and if you can find it, you can track it, and if you can track it, you can beat it.
onlymoney

United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 12:50 am

Quote: Originally posted by doodoohead on Nov 16, 2014
Well, since you don't require any follow up or proof of anything. Actually, I have done hundreds of breakthrough things. Wonderful, "refreshing" things you could say.

So, shut down on those other points up there are you? Can you spell diversion? So can I, unfortunately for you.

We will just sit back and wait for some of these missing but "refreshing" claims you talked about finally show up. Patience is golden and so is my post- digested dog collar which I will be glad to include at the same time. Both will be pretty ripe by the time they finally arrive.

The neighborhood critic.

It's hard to believe you've done anything breathtaking other than a poor attempt as an armchair warrior wannabe with no points to back up.

People who have no credentials can't make serious decisions.

And It wasn't a diversion. It was exposing the source, the root.
onlymoney

United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 12:53 am

Kicking Ass and taking names !
garyo1954

Texas
United States
Member #4,549
May 2, 2004
4,228 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 1:03 am

Quote: Originally posted by onlymoney on Nov 16, 2014
Yeah, I agree with his assessment. He wasn't picking on WIN D per se, but If you read in between the lines you'd notice he's writing about systems in general. WIN D's system helped him get closer to his goal, that's all.

Has nothing to do with WIN D. Or Frankie.

I'd feel the same if he did to his dog.

He needs to live by the rules he imposes on others.

If he is going to demand proof, he should provide proof.

It's a sad little person who runs around the board telling people their system won't work and refusing to offer any proof of such claims.

What's the point in that?

With this I'm out. I'm busy with some programming and that takes some attention to detail.

Night!

I'm probably here unless I'm not.
Dreaming would be a perfectly useless function if it's only purpose was to entertain.
onlymoney

United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 1:23 am

Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Nov 16, 2014
Has nothing to do with WIN D. Or Frankie.

I'd feel the same if he did to his dog.

He needs to live by the rules he imposes on others.

If he is going to demand proof, he should provide proof.

It's a sad little person who runs around the board telling people their system won't work and refusing to offer any proof of such claims.

What's the point in that?

With this I'm out. I'm busy with some programming and that takes some attention to detail.

Night!

Garyo wrote the following in this post, https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/282866/3861746

"Read the original thread where he harped about the flaw in Win D's system, but NEVER posted anything to show what, or where the flaw was, even when asked point blank by several members. "

You brought up WIN D, not me. Then you say it has nothing to do with WIN D.

Go figure...
garyo1954

Texas
United States
Member #4,549
May 2, 2004
4,228 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 1:42 am

Quote: Originally posted by onlymoney on Nov 16, 2014
Garyo wrote the following in this post, https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/282866/3861746

"Read the original thread where he harped about the flaw in Win D's system, but NEVER posted anything to show what, or where the flaw was, even when asked point blank by several members. "

You brought up WIN D, not me. Then you say it has nothing to do with WIN D.

Go figure...

Don't obfuscate so much. It was "Win D's system" thread.

Pick 3 is a exactly like a lava lamp. Sleep on that analogy.

Good night!

Not coming back this time.

Brain needs rest.

G

I'm probably here unless I'm not.
Dreaming would be a perfectly useless function if it's only purpose was to entertain.
onlymoney

United States
Member #128,784
June 2, 2012
5,427 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 1:57 am

Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Nov 16, 2014
Don't obfuscate so much. It was "Win D's system" thread.

Pick 3 is a exactly like a lava lamp. Sleep on that analogy.

Good night!

Not coming back this time.

Brain needs rest.

G

Don't misconstrue to elude. Address the issue I brought up.

You're right, get some rest before replying again.

ZZZZZZZZZZ
Pick3Guy

United States
Member #155,987
June 5, 2014
497 Posts
Offline

Nov 16, 2014, 2:23 am

Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on Nov 15, 2014
Short version: I solved this because I said so.

Otherwise, nothing to detail the perceived flaw; no numbers to prove it.

A bunch of stuff about rogue waves. Something about the lottery commission rerouting ships to defeat doubles traps.

A claim of some recent discovery that defeats the perceived flaw that you haven't proved exists.

Again no numbers to prove any solution has been found.

Like you told Frankie, "post some numbers we can check."

G

Well, you can twist what I've said all you want, but it doesn't change anything. Anyway, the "perceived" flaw has to do with Win D's double trap and that's it. Btw, no numbers are needed to prove the flaw. It's a matter of logic and common sense. Win D, himself, exposed the flaw in his logic.

So, what is this logically flaw? Anyone can check out Win D's posts to find out. According to Win D, most doubles fall "way before" the 8th, 9th, or 10th draws. But, yet, the Win D double trap requires one to wait until there are 7 consecutive singles. My response to him was simple. Since most doubles fall early on then why not target those doubles? After all, this is supposed to be a doubles trap.

The truth is that Win D's doubles trap is ,in fact, not a doubles trap at all. Now, it might seem like it is, but it's not. What is it really? Believe it or not, it's really a trap for singles. But, of course, we don't have much need for a singles trap.

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

Why any good Pick 3 system, method, or tool will ,almost, certainly failPrev TopicNext Topic

Why any good Pick 3 system, method, or tool will ,almost, certainly failPrev Topic Next Topic