Quick Links   You last visited May 17, 2022, 7:00 pm All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) | Neural Net Lottery Picker
Norway Member #9517 December 10, 2004 1836 Posts Offline | On some predictions the message "Index was outside the bounds of the array" appear....? | | |
Thread Starter
Netherlands Member #3476 January 24, 2004 212 Posts Offline | Hi MillionsWanted, Yes, especially when using a high number of hidden layer neurons this message can appear sometimes; I think the ANN is not able to produce good picks with a high level of hidden neurons (for pick 6/40,45, 49 etc). This might be different for keno games. Between 45 and 300 neurons gives the best results for my lottery game (6/45) so far (and the last 30 to 70 draw results) | | |
Thread Starter
Netherlands Member #3476 January 24, 2004 212 Posts Offline | Hi goodlukman, 'Cosmetic issue' is fixed. (The fixed tool has the same version number). | | |
United States
Member #168165
August 19, 2015
18 Posts
Offline
| Hi goodlukman, 'Cosmetic issue' is fixed. (The fixed tool has the same version number). Looks Good!! Thx | | |
Auckland New Zealand Member #2247 September 4, 2003 69 Posts Offline | Hi MillionsWanted, This fix doesn't work with Win 8.1 and 64 Bit Bitdefender. spot9 | | |
Norway Member #9517 December 10, 2004 1836 Posts Offline | Hi MillionsWanted, This fix doesn't work with Win 8.1 and 64 Bit Bitdefender. spot9 I'm using 64 bit Win 7 and 64 bit Bitdefender. | | |
Auckland New Zealand Member #2247 September 4, 2003 69 Posts Offline | The application has been obuscated (its content is scrambled and compressed) with the obfuscator tool 'ConfuserEx'. It's a known issue some virus scanners can give some false positives for applications obfuscated with this tool: https://github.com/yck1509/ConfuserEx/issues/17
https://github.com/yck1509/ConfuserEx/issues/180
I'll try to fix this. Hi stoopendaal, Is their any alternative to using ConfuserEX as I cannot use the program with BitDefender, which is rated as one of the best antivirus programs around. spot9 | | |
Norway Member #9517 December 10, 2004 1836 Posts Offline | Hi MillionsWanted, Yes, especially when using a high number of hidden layer neurons this message can appear sometimes; I think the ANN is not able to produce good picks with a high level of hidden neurons (for pick 6/40,45, 49 etc). This might be different for keno games. Between 45 and 300 neurons gives the best results for my lottery game (6/45) so far (and the last 30 to 70 draw results) I've only experienced this message when using 500 neurons on Keno. Never on ordinary lottery games. | | |
Krypton United States Member #140096 March 11, 2013 911 Posts Offline | All you guys have to do is turn off (disable) your anti virus or whatever you are using like malware bytes for a few minutes. If your not comfortable doing that go off line and then disable them. It should load fine then Stay In The Vortex, you'll be happy you did ..... Random? Seriously? You want me to believe that? | | |
United States Member #98535 October 9, 2010 104 Posts Offline | I have 2 more questions for Stoopendaal: 1) Just how many drawings of the game history should I load into the software for best results? I have a file with 3,748 drawings in it. Would the software work best with this whole file? Should I use a much shorter file of recent drawings? Please advise. Thanks. 2) You released version 1.2.2 of your software on Saturday, August 23. This was a few days after I downloaded version 1.2.1. Are you planning any more updates or new versions anytime soon? Thanks. Sincerely, Kosh | | |
Nova Scotia Canada Member #9934 December 27, 2004 1200 Posts Offline | I tried generating new numbers but the site you mentioned didn't work for me? How do I get fresh numbers, winsumloosesum?? Thank you | | |
Horwood NL Canada Member #70611 February 6, 2009 704 Posts Offline | I've been using as few as 30 numbers . Haven't hit more than 3 numbers in as few as 8 lines. On another note ... If you save your numbers only, then you loose the settings that produced them and you wouldn't be able to reproduce good results unless you wrote down your setting before you saved the numbers only. Just a thought. GW | | |
100
mid-Ohio United States Member #9 March 24, 2001 20272 Posts Offline | I've been using as few as 30 numbers . Haven't hit more than 3 numbers in as few as 8 lines. On another note ... If you save your numbers only, then you loose the settings that produced them and you wouldn't be able to reproduce good results unless you wrote down your setting before you saved the numbers only. Just a thought. GW Is that 3 numbers in one of eight lines or 3 numbers among the 30 numbers in eight lines? * you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones * 
| | |
Horwood NL Canada Member #70611 February 6, 2009 704 Posts Offline | Is that 3 numbers in one of eight lines or 3 numbers among the 30 numbers in eight lines? That's 3 on 1 of 8 lines (not profitable). I;m looking for settings which will give me at least 4 numbers on one line in 30 lines or less . Only playing on paper, not playing live. | | |
100
New Mexico United States Member #86096 January 29, 2010 20861 Posts Offline | im trying for p3. nm data with spaces: 9 1 8
2 3 0
7 5 4
4 0 6
2 9 2
7 9 9
6 0 7
2 5 9
4 4 7
1 4 3
1 6 1
8 0 5
0 3 6
2 5 5
0 4 5
6 0 5 results 01-03-00-;5.37690892432576;0.579704069133864;0.473329718665528;10:52:02.1406250;Alpha:9E-05| Noise:0.25|Threshold Error:0.01|Hidden Neurons:50|Test Data Range:50
05-02-03-;4.00376595182496;0.50023531661515;0.884440918571907;10:52:02.6562500;Alpha:9E-05| Noise:0.25|Threshold Error:0.01|Hidden Neurons:50|Test Data Range:50
02-01-04-;3.98175736113642;0.49885853212211;0.699059834828399;10:52:04.6875000;Alpha:9E-05| Noise:0.25|Threshold Error:0.01|Hidden Neurons:50|Test Data Range:50
03-01-04-;3.90601470357413;0.494091002724583;0.837280760786149;10:52:13.1718750;Alpha:9E-05| Noise:0.25|Threshold Error:0.01|Hidden Neurons:50|Test Data Range:50
06-02-00-;3.90151190661012;0.493806130139281;0.758613462889047;10:52:17.1718750;Alpha:9E-05| Noise:0.25|Threshold Error:0.01|Hidden Neurons:50|Test Data Range:50
04-00-03-;3.87122114091556;0.4918854758043;0.761455749016093;10:52:43.5625000;Alpha:9E-05| Noise:0.25|Threshold Error:0.01|Hidden Neurons:50|Test Data Range:50
03-04-01-;3.84848166023655;0.49043868502065;0.795372762511657;10:54:35.0625000;Alpha:9E-05| Noise:0.25|Threshold Error:0.01|Hidden Neurons:50|Test Data Range:50
04-02-01-;3.84515306826676;0.490226546370831;0.81004200121261;10:55:06.6875000;Alpha:9E-05| Noise:0.25|Threshold Error:0.01|Hidden Neurons:50|Test Data Range:50 Saturdys mid draw was 441 , close! | | |
|