Welcome Guest
You last visited January 22, 2017, 1:10 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Easy pick 3 system

Topic closed. 158 replies. Last post 1 year ago by Tialuvslotto.

 Page 3 of 11
New Mexico
United States
Member #86099
January 29, 2010
11167 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 1:45 pm - IP Logged

What is the overall skip???

I'm not analyzing the skips today but the roots. Consequentally root zero hasn't hit.   The old man zero may trip since there was a 6,3 in the last mid draw.  But the New Mexico game is very fickle.  A 123 may hit and bypass the zero for another draw.

I'm playing 00x,01x this morning.  Its worth a gamble.

Kentucky
United States
Member #32652
February 14, 2006
7344 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 6:50 pm - IP Logged

26 numbers that are higher than 4, out of 600 draws is 4.3% ( do the math )

I showed the numbers and in the last 10 months it would've generated 123,000 bucks net profit. The numbers don't lie.

162 doubles based on your 27% estimate (which I agree with), and the 4.3% based on only 26 numbers above 4 in 600 draws equals 188 losses. Plus the cost which is 66,000 bucks.

At any rate, I'm starting with boxing the 110 combos until I have enough money to start at 25 cents straight bets with 660 combos. Then raise the bets to .50, then .75, all the way to the max limit of \$10.00 per number.

I'm excited about this because I know the numbers work, and the payout far exceeds the losses and the cost as I showed in the last page and above.

In a matter of a few months I will be on my way to making a living of this and quitting my job. Can't wait!

"26 numbers that are higher than 4, out of 600 draws is 4.3% ( do the math ) "

LMAO @ "do the math"!

There are ten 6-way boxes with 5 being the lowest digit; 567-568-569-578-579-589-678-679-689-789 and each of the ten 6-way boxes has six different 3 digit numbers for a total of 60. Statistically these ten 6-way boxes represent 8.3% of all 120 6-way boxes. Added to the 90 3-way boxes and the ten triples, there should be 396 6-way boxes with the lowest digit being 0,1,2,3, or 4 drawn in 600 drawings.

"162 doubles based on your 27% estimate (which I agree with), and the 4.3% based on only 26 numbers above 4 in 600 draws equals 188 losses. "

Nope, 600 minus 396 is 204 losses and not "188" and the 204 figure is plus or minus standard deviation. Can you show even one state 3 digit game that had a 600 drawing period where 27% were doubles, 72% singles, and 1% triples?

"enough money to start at 25 cents straight bets"

Can you show us all where we can legally wager 25 cents on a straight pick-3 number and get 900 to 1 odds without moving out of the U.S.?

New Mexico
United States
Member #86099
January 29, 2010
11167 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 6:51 pm - IP Logged

I don't always expect a 1 to repeat. It depends on the situation, sometimes an overdue number like the "2" that I  mentioned may show. 3 4 3 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 4 0 3 1 0 0 1 4 2-0verdue came through

It showed up tonight as 259 which was the Florida winning number.

The best way is to play online and do it the second way I showed, all of the 110 boxed numbers. Then when you have enough bankroll, you play the 110 all six ways straight. \$123,320 in 10 months is good for me.

And that's at 1 dollar bets, imagine working your way up to 10 dollar per number bets. That's 1.2 million in 10 months.

This is based on your data try these for the next 3 weeks or more for Florida.

000 002 012 016 017 022 032 042 044 052 059 062 072 076 078 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 092 099 100 109 116 117 119 129 139 144 149 159 169 176 178 179 181 182 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 211 216 217 221 231 241 244 251 259 261 271 276 278 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 291 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 316 317 320 330 340 344 350 359 360 370 376 378 380 381 382 390 399 400 404 414 416 417 424 434 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 454 459 464 474 476 478 481 482 484 494 499 500 506 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 526 536 544 546 556 559 566 576 578 581 582 586 596 599 600 606 616 617 626 636 644 646 656 659 666 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 681 682 686 696 699 700 708 716 717 718 728 738 744 748 758 759 768 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 781 782 788 798 799 800 807 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 827 837 844 847 857 859 867 876 877 878 881 882 887 897 899 900 909 916 917 919 929 939 944 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 969 976 978 979 981 982 989 999

United States
Member #1987
August 5, 2003
8968 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 8:15 pm - IP Logged

This is based on your data try these for the next 3 weeks or more for Florida.

000 002 012 016 017 022 032 042 044 052 059 062 072 076 078 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 092 099 100 109 116 117 119 129 139 144 149 159 169 176 178 179 181 182 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 211 216 217 221 231 241 244 251 259 261 271 276 278 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 291 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 316 317 320 330 340 344 350 359 360 370 376 378 380 381 382 390 399 400 404 414 416 417 424 434 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 454 459 464 474 476 478 481 482 484 494 499 500 506 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 526 536 544 546 556 559 566 576 578 581 582 586 596 599 600 606 616 617 626 636 644 646 656 659 666 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 681 682 686 696 699 700 708 716 717 718 728 738 744 748 758 759 768 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 781 782 788 798 799 800 807 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 827 837 844 847 857 859 867 876 877 878 881 882 887 897 899 900 909 916 917 919 929 939 944 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 969 976 978 979 981 982 989 999

In the beginning of the thread amber123 stated no doubles.

United States
Member #116344
September 8, 2011
3941 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 9:28 pm - IP Logged

26 numbers that are higher than 4, out of 600 draws is 4.3% ( do the math )

I showed the numbers and in the last 10 months it would've generated 123,000 bucks net profit. The numbers don't lie.

162 doubles based on your 27% estimate (which I agree with), and the 4.3% based on only 26 numbers above 4 in 600 draws equals 188 losses. Plus the cost which is 66,000 bucks.

At any rate, I'm starting with boxing the 110 combos until I have enough money to start at 25 cents straight bets with 660 combos. Then raise the bets to .50, then .75, all the way to the max limit of \$10.00 per number.

I'm excited about this because I know the numbers work, and the payout far exceeds the losses and the cost as I showed in the last page and above.

In a matter of a few months I will be on my way to making a living of this and quitting my job. Can't wait!

Many ways of inferring stats, do not get caught up with percentile, rather look at the large picture.

10P3= 1000picks

10C3=120 picks

10P3(digit repeat)=220 picks

10P3(positional)=720 picks

The above binomial format is your filter, the choice of assumption will reduce your picks for each format.

You can reduce to a tenth by a criteria(many options available). Why assume most frequent group is 0,1,2,3,4, when the format with 220picks can be reduced to 22 picks, while covering all bases.

United States
Member #164727
March 12, 2015
2688 Posts
Online
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 9:38 pm - IP Logged

"26 numbers that are higher than 4, out of 600 draws is 4.3% ( do the math ) "

LMAO @ "do the math"!

There are ten 6-way boxes with 5 being the lowest digit; 567-568-569-578-579-589-678-679-689-789 and each of the ten 6-way boxes has six different 3 digit numbers for a total of 60. Statistically these ten 6-way boxes represent 8.3% of all 120 6-way boxes. Added to the 90 3-way boxes and the ten triples, there should be 396 6-way boxes with the lowest digit being 0,1,2,3, or 4 drawn in 600 drawings.

"162 doubles based on your 27% estimate (which I agree with), and the 4.3% based on only 26 numbers above 4 in 600 draws equals 188 losses. "

Nope, 600 minus 396 is 204 losses and not "188" and the 204 figure is plus or minus standard deviation. Can you show even one state 3 digit game that had a 600 drawing period where 27% were doubles, 72% singles, and 1% triples?

"enough money to start at 25 cents straight bets"

Can you show us all where we can legally wager 25 cents on a straight pick-3 number and get 900 to 1 odds without moving out of the U.S.?

LMAO @ "do the math"!

There are ten 6-way boxes with 5 being the lowest digit; 567-568-569-578-579-589-678-679-689-789 and each of the ten 6-way boxes has six different 3 digit numbers for a total of 60. Statistically these ten 6-way boxes represent 8.3% of all 120 6-way boxes. Added to the 90 3-way boxes and the ten triples, there should be 396 6-way boxes with the lowest digit being 0,1,2,3, or 4 drawn in 600 drawings.

I have no idea what you're writing about. There were 26 combinations during the 600 draws that the lowest digit above 4. I even tallied them up for you month by month. 26 is 4.3% of 600 draws. Why are some of you having so much difficulty understanding this?

Nope, 600 minus 396 is 204 losses and not "188" and the 204 figure is plus or minus standard deviation. Can you show even one state 3 digit game that had a 600 drawing period where 27% were doubles, 72% singles, and 1% triples?

Where are you getting 396 from?

Can you show us all where we can legally wager 25 cents on a straight pick-3 number and get 900 to 1 odds without moving out of the U.S.?

No I can't because a place like that doesn't exist here. But there is a place offshore that pays 900. I'll just leave it at that.

Maybe the 27% is a little off by a 3 or 4% margin of error in either direction, and that's perfectly ok because I'll still make money, and lots of it. As for the other stats, they are FACT. If you and others don't agree with me, that's fine, But I won't continue debating. I know the numbers I've seen and re-checked many times.

Maybe I'll start a tracking of the money spent and won, with the losses right in the this thread and update the results on a daily basis so everyone can see for themselves. It's really very simple, but some of you want to throw things in that has nothing to do with the facts.

I'll start the make believe betting starting tomorrow for Florida.

United States
Member #164727
March 12, 2015
2688 Posts
Online
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 10:30 pm - IP Logged

For some of you who are having a problem understanding this, I'll do just this month of October.

From the 4th of October till today the 27th, equals 48 draws.

48 draws X 900 =43,200, this is how much I would win in 48 draws in an ideal world, if there were no doubles triples and lowest digit number above 4. So below you will see the deductions. The first deduction is COST. Then the next deduction is the doubles that ruin my day, and lastly, it's the combinations with the lowest number above 4.

To play both mid and eve it's 660 bucks twice a day in other words 48 draws, that costs 31,680

There were 9 doubles so far. That cost me 5940 (9 X 660=5940)

Only 1 combination with the lowest digit above 4 (October 13-eve-967) This cost me 660 bucks...so...

Won-43,200

Cost-31,680

Doubles lost money on-5940 bucks

Lowest numbers above 4 loss-660 bucks

So,

43,200 minus the 31,680 cost, and another 6,600 for doubles, and lastly, another 660 loss due to the ONLY combination with the lowest number above 4 leaves me a net worth of.

43,200-won

-31,680-cost

-  5,940-doubles

-     660-lowest number above 4

=  4,920-net profit.

There, you have it. There were 9 doubles and I still would have made almost 5 grand in the last 24 days. Sorry, these are real numbers.

Lincoln, California
United States
Member #167130
June 27, 2015
256 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 10:55 pm - IP Logged

For some of you who are having a problem understanding this, I'll do just this month of October.

From the 4th of October till today the 27th, equals 48 draws.

48 draws X 900 =43,200, this is how much I would win in 48 draws in an ideal world, if there were no doubles triples and lowest digit number above 4. So below you will see the deductions. The first deduction is COST. Then the next deduction is the doubles that ruin my day, and lastly, it's the combinations with the lowest number above 4.

To play both mid and eve it's 660 bucks twice a day in other words 48 draws, that costs 31,680

There were 9 doubles so far. That cost me 5940 (9 X 660=5940)

Only 1 combination with the lowest digit above 4 (October 13-eve-967) This cost me 660 bucks...so...

Won-43,200

Cost-31,680

Doubles lost money on-5940 bucks

Lowest numbers above 4 loss-660 bucks

So,

43,200 minus the 31,680 cost, and another 6,600 for doubles, and lastly, another 660 loss due to the ONLY combination with the lowest number above 4 leaves me a net worth of.

43,200-won

-31,680-cost

-  5,940-doubles

-     660-lowest number above 4

=  4,920-net profit.

There, you have it. There were 9 doubles and I still would have made almost 5 grand in the last 24 days. Sorry, these are real numbers.

I just ran the Ca. Daily 3 through a workout to test your system

I looked at the last 1373 drawings for Day, Evening, and Combined.  If my calculations are correct this is hard to believe.

Ca Combined       % for all draws

Games 1373

No Match Draws  990 (72%)

Doubles 364 (27%)

Triples 19 (1%)

Lowest number (0-4) 899 (65%)

Lowest number (5-9) 91 (7%)

Using the Payout tonight for a straight \$615 and Box \$196 as the average payout.  Playing all 6 combinations of the 110 would = \$1595 for every game hit.  The total for playing all 1373 games is \$906,180.  The total winnings are 899 X \$1595 = \$1,433,905.  Profit \$527,725.

Am I missing something, I don't believe this but the numbers if correct don't lie.

United States
Member #164727
March 12, 2015
2688 Posts
Online
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 11:07 pm - IP Logged

I just ran the Ca. Daily 3 through a workout to test your system

I looked at the last 1373 drawings for Day, Evening, and Combined.  If my calculations are correct this is hard to believe.

Ca Combined       % for all draws

Games 1373

No Match Draws  990 (72%)

Doubles 364 (27%)

Triples 19 (1%)

Lowest number (0-4) 899 (65%)

Lowest number (5-9) 91 (7%)

Using the Payout tonight for a straight \$615 and Box \$196 as the average payout.  Playing all 6 combinations of the 110 would = \$1595 for every game hit.  The total for playing all 1373 games is \$906,180.  The total winnings are 899 X \$1595 = \$1,433,905.  Profit \$527,725.

Am I missing something, I don't believe this but the numbers if correct don't lie.

Playing all 6 combinations of the 110 would = \$1595 for every game hit.

Ha ha, glad you brought this up. I did the same mistake the first time. This is why I spent half a day making sure I crunched the numbers correctly. People make mistakes when in haste as I and you did..lol

The mistake is that we both got the 110 amount wrong. If you're playing 110 combinations ALL SIX WAYS, it costs \$660.00, not 110 anymore, that's for boxed only. 110 X 6 =660

Please let me know if this made sense, and if it didn't, please tell me what part I have wrong. I want to truly understand your experience in Cali. They are computerized I think. And they're also Parimutuel ..

Lincoln, California
United States
Member #167130
June 27, 2015
256 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 11:13 pm - IP Logged

I used \$660 per game x 1373 games = \$906,180.

For wins I used \$615 for the straight and 5 x 196 for the five box hits = \$\$1595 per win.

I don't see the error yet.

United States
Member #164727
March 12, 2015
2688 Posts
Online
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 11:15 pm - IP Logged

I just ran the Ca. Daily 3 through a workout to test your system

I looked at the last 1373 drawings for Day, Evening, and Combined.  If my calculations are correct this is hard to believe.

Ca Combined       % for all draws

Games 1373

No Match Draws  990 (72%)

Doubles 364 (27%)

Triples 19 (1%)

Lowest number (0-4) 899 (65%)

Lowest number (5-9) 91 (7%)

Using the Payout tonight for a straight \$615 and Box \$196 as the average payout.  Playing all 6 combinations of the 110 would = \$1595 for every game hit.  The total for playing all 1373 games is \$906,180.  The total winnings are 899 X \$1595 = \$1,433,905.  Profit \$527,725.

Am I missing something, I don't believe this but the numbers if correct don't lie.

Just do the current month of October in Cali as I did in Florida, and then publish it here on this thread. I would love to see the positive results.

Back test the last 27 days of October.

Lincoln, California
United States
Member #167130
June 27, 2015
256 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 11:17 pm - IP Logged

It looks like the system will work as long as the percentage of games for the 110 is over 50% and the payouts are enough to be positive.

United States
Member #164727
March 12, 2015
2688 Posts
Online
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 11:17 pm - IP Logged

I used \$660 per game x 1373 games = \$906,180.

For wins I used \$615 for the straight and 5 x 196 for the five box hits = \$\$1595 per win.

I don't see the error yet.

A Straight win for a dollar bet pays \$900.00 offshore.

United States
Member #164727
March 12, 2015
2688 Posts
Online
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 11:19 pm - IP Logged

It looks like the system will work as long as the percentage of games for the 110 is over 50% and the payouts are enough to be positive.

It's well over 50%. More like 69%

27% doubles

4.3% lowest number above 4.

This means I win 69% of the time.

Lincoln, California
United States
Member #167130
June 27, 2015
256 Posts
Offline
 Posted: October 27, 2015, 11:22 pm - IP Logged

Not sure about that going abroad, the trip cost something, you can't go for free.   I used the payout for tonight as the base.  I am looking at the cash flow right now.  I will keep checking this and see when you start using the house money.

 Page 3 of 11