Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 8, 2016, 10:57 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Easy pick 3 system

Topic closed. 158 replies. Last post 1 year ago by Tialuvslotto.

Page 8 of 11
4.611
PrintE-mailLink
amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

United States
Member #164727
March 12, 2015
2526 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 30, 2015, 11:57 pm - IP Logged

"When will this madness STOP?  "

When you acknowledge the fact you're making obvious errors in your math.

"Good Grief !, I'd be happy with an additional 1500 bucks a month. "

That would be nice, but without a huge swing defying all probability, players will lose their shirts with "easy pick-3 system".

Green laugh

 

 540,000-won (900 X 600=540,000)

-396,000-cost (660 X 600=396,000)

-112,200-lost in doubles and triples (170 X 660=112,200)

-  17,160-lost due to 26 numbers with the lowest digit above 4 (26 X 660=17,160)

= 14,640- net profit for the last 10 months

      1,460 net profit a month.

 

What part/s of this math is wrong?

    Avatar
    Kentucky
    United States
    Member #32652
    February 14, 2006
    7314 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:02 am - IP Logged

    "540,000-won (900 X 600=540,000) "

    With a top prize of $900, a $540,000 in 600 drawings is an average of $900 a drawing, and you're claiming you won $900 in every drawing. How many times does one have to ask how you won "$540,000" from 600 drawings and then say you lost $660 in each of 196 drawings?

      amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

      United States
      Member #164727
      March 12, 2015
      2526 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:08 am - IP Logged

      "540,000-won (900 X 600=540,000) "

      With a top prize of $900, a $540,000 in 600 drawings is an average of $900 a drawing, and you're claiming you won $900 in every drawing. How many times does one have to ask how you won "$540,000" from 600 drawings and then say you lost $660 in each of 196 drawings?

      You win in every drawing until an obstacle gets in your way, right? $540,000 bucks if nothing got in your way. Unfortunately the conditions in the real world involves THREE obstacles in this particular case.

      The first obstacle is the cost-396,000 bucks.

      The second obstacle is the doubles and trips. -112,200

      The third obstacle is the lowest numbers above 4. That was 26 of them. =17,160

       

      By the time we deducted all those obstacles as "COSTS", the net profit I made was a measly 1,460 bucks a month.

      Hurray!

        Avatar
        Kentucky
        United States
        Member #32652
        February 14, 2006
        7314 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:23 am - IP Logged

        Green laugh

         

         540,000-won (900 X 600=540,000)

        -396,000-cost (660 X 600=396,000)

        -112,200-lost in doubles and triples (170 X 660=112,200)

        -  17,160-lost due to 26 numbers with the lowest digit above 4 (26 X 660=17,160)

        = 14,640- net profit for the last 10 months

              1,460 net profit a month.

         

        What part/s of this math is wrong?

        "What part/s of this math is wrong? "

        How many times must you be told your system "simulated or not" DID NOW WIN $540,000?

        The winnings or losses are determined by the difference between the cost and the wins. In your example because you won nothing in 196 drawings *(170 X 660=112,200)" and "(26 X 660=17,160)" you must subtract the 196 drawings you won nothing from the total 600 drawings (600 - 196 = 404). Get out your calculator and multiply 404 by $900 ($363,600). The difference between the winnings $363,600 and the cost $396,000 or a net loss of $32,400.

        I thought you found your mistake when you gave the example of "Billy" when you subtracted the cost from the actual winnings.

          Avatar
          Kentucky
          United States
          Member #32652
          February 14, 2006
          7314 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:25 am - IP Logged

          You win in every drawing until an obstacle gets in your way, right? $540,000 bucks if nothing got in your way. Unfortunately the conditions in the real world involves THREE obstacles in this particular case.

          The first obstacle is the cost-396,000 bucks.

          The second obstacle is the doubles and trips. -112,200

          The third obstacle is the lowest numbers above 4. That was 26 of them. =17,160

           

          By the time we deducted all those obstacles as "COSTS", the net profit I made was a measly 1,460 bucks a month.

          Hurray!

          "$540,000 bucks if nothing got in your way. "

          You can't win $900 in each of the`196 losing drawings. Why are you ignoring those 196 drawings that did "get in your way"?

            amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

            United States
            Member #164727
            March 12, 2015
            2526 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:26 am - IP Logged

            "What part/s of this math is wrong? "

            How many times must you be told your system "simulated or not" DID NOW WIN $540,000?

            The winnings or losses are determined by the difference between the cost and the wins. In your example because you won nothing in 196 drawings *(170 X 660=112,200)" and "(26 X 660=17,160)" you must subtract the 196 drawings you won nothing from the total 600 drawings (600 - 196 = 404). Get out your calculator and multiply 404 by $900 ($363,600). The difference between the winnings $363,600 and the cost $396,000 or a net loss of $32,400.

            I thought you found your mistake when you gave the example of "Billy" when you subtracted the cost from the actual winnings.

            It's easily becoming clear to me that my explanations aren't working for you. I've done everything I could to help you, and I failed.

            Unhappy

              amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

              United States
              Member #164727
              March 12, 2015
              2526 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:28 am - IP Logged

              "$540,000 bucks if nothing got in your way. "

              You can't win $900 in each of the`196 losing drawings. Why are you ignoring those 196 drawings that did "get in your way"?

              I didn't ignore them.

                170 doubles and trips.

                  26 lowest numbers above 4.

              =196

               

              Eek

                Avatar
                Kentucky
                United States
                Member #32652
                February 14, 2006
                7314 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:29 am - IP Logged

                It's easily becoming clear to me that my explanations aren't working for you. I've done everything I could to help you, and I failed.

                Unhappy

                Every time you post on this subject, you lower LP's average IQ by several points.

                  Avatar
                  Kentucky
                  United States
                  Member #32652
                  February 14, 2006
                  7314 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:31 am - IP Logged

                  I didn't ignore them.

                    170 doubles and trips.

                      26 lowest numbers above 4.

                  =196

                   

                  Eek

                  Which part of 600 minus 196 equals 404 didn't they teach in the second grade?

                    amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

                    United States
                    Member #164727
                    March 12, 2015
                    2526 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:31 am - IP Logged

                    Every time you post on this subject, you lower LP's average IQ by several points.

                    How? You haven't disproved my simple deductions from REAL NUMBERS.

                      amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

                      United States
                      Member #164727
                      March 12, 2015
                      2526 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:32 am - IP Logged

                      Why can't you tell me what part of this math is wrong? I asked you once already and you eluded the question.

                      540,000-won (900 X 600=540,000)

                      -396,000-cost (660 X 600=396,000)

                      -112,200-lost in doubles and triples (170 X 660=112,200)

                      -  17,160-lost due to 26 numbers with the lowest digit above 4 (26 X 660=17,160)

                      = 14,640- net profit for the last 10 months

                            1,460 net profit a month.

                       

                      What part/s of this math is wrong?

                        amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

                        United States
                        Member #164727
                        March 12, 2015
                        2526 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:41 am - IP Logged

                        Which part of 600 minus 196 equals 404 didn't they teach in the second grade?

                        Your math is so skewed, I'm amazed that a somewhat bright person on LP such as you has taken it this far.

                        The 600 is the NOT the number. 600 X 900= 540,000 is the real number. You're confusing 600 draws with the amount it generated, which is 540,000

                          amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

                          United States
                          Member #164727
                          March 12, 2015
                          2526 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: October 31, 2015, 12:47 am - IP Logged

                          I won a 500 dollar sweepstakes. But, I had to buy an envelope so i could mail the Entry form, that cost me 5 cents. Then i had to by a stamp. That cost me 32 cents. That equals 37 cents.

                          So in actuality, I netted $499.68

                          Type

                            Tialuvslotto's avatar - Jailin
                            Texas
                            United States
                            Member #150797
                            December 31, 2013
                            815 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: October 31, 2015, 5:53 am - IP Logged

                            I won a 500 dollar sweepstakes. But, I had to buy an envelope so i could mail the Entry form, that cost me 5 cents. Then i had to by a stamp. That cost me 32 cents. That equals 37 cents.

                            So in actuality, I netted $499.68

                            Type

                            Lets simplify this:

                            You play one draw.  A double is drawn -- you lose.

                             

                            With "Amber math"

                            You play 1 draw = win $900

                            Deduct loss from double = -$660

                            You still win! 900-660=$240.

                             

                            With "Reality Math"

                            You play 1 draw, cost = -$660

                            Your winnings = $0

                            Net result -660+0=-660

                            Sorry to rain on your parade.

                            "There is no such thing as luck; only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe."

                            ~Robert A. Heinlein

                              TasBob's avatar - 4NJ9EUA
                              Bowling Green ,Florida
                              United States
                              Member #108735
                              March 30, 2011
                              4091 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: October 31, 2015, 6:24 am - IP Logged

                              This is a systems forum ..It seems to me that this is a loss, no one is working on making the system better. 

                              What a waste of talent here.. My math 2+2 =4  Who cares. Amber12 May u WIN BIG..Good Luck

                              Procrastination Stops Progress ⇒Σ

                                 
                                Page 8 of 11