Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 10, 2016, 7:11 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)


Topic closed. 45 replies. Last post 1 year ago by KY Floyd.

Page 4 of 4
United States
Member #23835
October 16, 2005
3475 Posts
Posted: October 13, 2015, 12:58 am - IP Logged

"Please tell us about this imaginary lottery where a winner isn't even possible."

If a lottery is run like a raffle where only the terminals pick which numbers are sold and have a drawing that picks a winning number that wasn't sold then you have a lottery that a winner isn't possible.

Lotteries with self picks also draw winning numbers that aren't sold but it was possible for someone to have picked that number.

I don't think many people would buy tickets for a lottery ran that way, I know I wouldn't.

You're confused about how it works.

The drawing can result in any of the possible combinations being selected, and that combination may or may not match a combination that was played. As long as at least one combination has been played it's possible that the combination that is drawn will match it, and there will be a winner. Unless every possible combination is played (which has never happened in a jackpot game with many millions of possible combinations) a winner is never guaranteed. In most drawings for jackpot games there is no winner, but a winner is always possible.

How the combinations people play are chosen is completely irrelevant to whether or not a winner is possible.All that matters is that combinations are played and a combination is drawn.

How the combinations are chosen will have a minor effect on how likely a winner is. When people choose their own numbers they tend to favor a subset of the numbers in the matrix, so for a given number of tickets sold fewer combinations are used. Randomly generated combinations don't favor a limited subset, so more combinations are used for a given number of tickets sold. That means that rather than making it impossible to win limiting tickets to QP's would make a winner somewhat more likely.