Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited September 21, 2020, 11:26 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Class action over 'mesmerizing' video lottery terminals in Canada moves forward

Dec 17, 2018, 9:42 am

Share this news story on Facebook
Tweet this news story on Twitter
Atlantic Lottery CorporationAtlantic Lottery Corporation: Class action over 'mesmerizing' video lottery terminals in Canada moves forwardRating:

ST. JOHN'S, N.L. — An intriguing court case that alleges Crown-owned video lottery terminals are inherently deceptive and violate the Criminal Code has reached a critical milestone in Newfoundland and Labrador.

And the outcome of the case could have implications for VLT gaming across Canada.

The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal has cleared the way for a class-action lawsuit to go ahead, rejecting arguments for dismissal from the Atlantic Lottery Corp., which operates in all four Atlantic Provinces.

"VLTs are inherently deceptive, inherently addictive and inherently dangerous when used as intended," says a statement of claim filed in 2012. The lawsuit was certified as a class action in early 2017.

Among other things, it alleges VLTs should be considered illegal because they don't fit the Criminal Code definitions for slot machines, fair games of chance or lottery schemes.

More importantly, the plaintiffs allege VLTs more closely resemble a gambling card game known as three-card monte, which at first glance appears to be a straightforward test of tracking one of three cards as they are moved about.

The lawsuit argues the sleight-of-hand tricks used in this con game are not unlike the manipulative electronic programming VLTs use to create "cognitive distortions" about the perception of winning.

Toronto-based lawyer Kirk Baert, who represents plaintiffs Douglas Babstock and Fred Small, said the appeal court accepted that as a potential legal argument.

"The point of having this provision in the Criminal Code... was to prevent people from being deceived by charlatans and tricksters who use sleight-of-hand to make people lose their money," Baert said in an interview.

"Our point is that technology has evolved, and this is just the same thing — but it's being done through a machine instead of a human being at a table or at a carnival."

None of the allegations has been proven in court.

The Atlantic Lottery Corp. has insisted the highly regulated electronic games are decided only by chance.
In its ruling last week, the appeal court effectively rejected the plaintiffs' claims that the use of VLTs violate the federal Competition Act and a British law from 1710 known as the Statute of Anne, which was aimed at preventing deceitful gaming but fell into disuse.

The corporation has yet to say whether it will seek an appeal before the Supreme Court of Canada.

Aside from Babstock and Small, who are both retirees, those included in the class action are as many as 30,000 people in Newfoundland and Labrador who paid the lottery corporation to gamble on VLT games any time after April 2006.

The lawsuit is seeking damages equal to the alleged unlawful gain obtained by the corporation through VLT revenue.

As well, the plaintiffs are seeking an injunction that would bar the corporation from using VLTs, based on the assertion that the terminals do not constitute a permitted lottery under federal law.

If the lawsuit is successful, similar claims could be filed across Canada.

Citing a third-party study, the lawsuit says the odds of winning the $500 maximum prize from a VLT in Newfoundland and Labrador are roughly 270,000 to 1, which would mean a long-term player would likely lose about $30,000 before hitting the jackpot.

The statement of claim goes on to allege VLTs employ what is called "subliminal priming" to induce players to hyper-focus "and to create a dangerous dissociative mental state, wherein players cannot make rational decisions to continue to play or not."

The goal is to leave players "mesmerized," in the same way those duped by the three-card monte ruse can hardly believe their eyes, Baert said.

"It's predetermined that you will lose," he said. "The more you play, the more you lose."

The Star

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

7 comments. Last comment 2 years ago by sweetie7398.
Page 1 of 1
Avatar
Chasing $ Millions.
White Shores- California
United States
Member #136473
December 12, 2012
6312 Posts
Offline

.. if the game is inherent addictive, why are you playing it? if cigarettes & alcohol are addictive to you, & you want nothing to do with either, what is your reasonable course of action? Just because some dogs look cute, it does not mean they dont bite- if you get my drift.

 * Voice of Reason *   

 

People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it- George Bernard Shaw.

    Avatar
    Simpsonville
    United States
    Member #163184
    January 22, 2015
    2257 Posts
    Offline

    Not sure what they call the machines @ what appears to be a casino in Louisville, KY.  We went there Saturday night.  They might be VLT as slot machines are technically illegal in Kentucky.  They 'skirt' the law because the slot machines are based on previous horse races.  There is a button you can push to see what the race results were, all past races.  These games however have nothing to do with a horse race, looks and acts like a regular slot machine.  I didn't see anyone checking race results.

      music*'s avatar - DiscoBallGlowing
      USN United States Navy
      Fresno, California
      United States
      Member #157851
      August 2, 2014
      3959 Posts
      Offline

      Here in California, I thank both the legislature and the voters for not introducing VLTs. 

       Ask our neighbor to the North, Oregon what they think of this lawsuit. 

       I hope that the Courts protect players and ban VLTs. 

      Dance

       "We are all in this together!" 

        bighead55's avatar - Lottery-050.jpg
        New Member

        United States
        Member #194486
        December 17, 2018
        1 Posts
        Offline

        An intriguing court case that alleges Crown-owned video lottery terminals are inherently deceptive and violate the Criminal Code has reached a critical milestone in Newfoundland and Labrador.

        And the outcome of the case could have implications for VLT gaming across Canada.

        The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal has cleared the way for a class-action lawsuit to go ahead, rejecting arguments for dismissal from the Atlantic Lottery Corp., which operates in all four Atlantic Provinces.

        "VLTs are inherently deceptive, inherently addictive and inherently dangerous when used as intended," says a statement of claim filed in 2012. The lawsuit was certified as a class action in early 2017.

        Among other things, it alleges VLTs should be considered illegal because they don't fit the Criminal Code definitions for slot machines, fair games of chance or lottery schemes.

        More importantly, the plaintiffs allege VLTs more closely resemble a gambling card game known as three-card monte, which at first glance appears to be a straightforward test of tracking one of three cards as they are moved about.

        The lawsuit argues the sleight-of-hand tricks used in this con game are not unlike the manipulative electronic programming VLTs use to create "cognitive distortions" about the perception of winning.

        Toronto-based lawyer Kirk Baert, who represents plaintiffs Douglas Babstock and Fred Small, said the appeal court accepted that as a potential legal argument.

        "The point of having this provision in the Criminal Code... was to prevent people from being deceived by charlatans and tricksters who use sleight-of-hand to make people lose their money," Baert said in an interview.

        "Our point is that technology has evolved, and this is just the same thing — but it's being done through a machine instead of a human being at a table or at a carnival."

        None of the allegations has been proven in court.

        The Atlantic Lottery Corp. has insisted the highly regulated electronic games are decided only by chance.
        In its ruling last week, the appeal court effectively rejected the plaintiffs' claims that the use of VLTs violate the federal Competition Act and a British law from 1710 known as the Statute of Anne, which was aimed at preventing deceitful gaming but fell into disuse.

        The corporation has yet to say whether it will seek an appeal before the Supreme Court of Canada.

        Aside from Babstock and Small, who are both retirees, those included in the class action are as many as 30,000 people in Newfoundland and Labrador who paid the lottery corporation to gamble on VLT games any time after April 2006.

        The lawsuit is seeking damages equal to the alleged unlawful gain obtained by the corporation through VLT revenue.

        As well, the plaintiffs are seeking an injunction that would bar the corporation from using VLTs, based on the assertion that the terminals do not constitute a permitted lottery under federal law.

        If the lawsuit is successful, similar claims could be filed across Canada.

        Citing a third-party study, the lawsuit says the odds of winning the $500 maximum prize from a VLT in Newfoundland and Labrador are roughly 270,000 to 1, which would mean a long-term player would likely lose about $30,000 before hitting the jackpot.

        The statement of claim goes on to allege VLTs employ what is called "subliminal priming" to induce players to hyper-focus "and to create a dangerous dissociative mental state, wherein players cannot make rational decisions to continue to play or not."

        The goal is to leave players "mesmerized," in the same way those duped by the three-card monte ruse can hardly believe their eyes, Baert said.

        "It's predetermined that you will lose," he said. "The more you play, the more you lose."

        I hope I win

          Avatar
          Kentucky
          United States
          Member #32651
          February 14, 2006
          8965 Posts
          Offline

          .. if the game is inherent addictive, why are you playing it? if cigarettes & alcohol are addictive to you, & you want nothing to do with either, what is your reasonable course of action? Just because some dogs look cute, it does not mean they dont bite- if you get my drift.

          Sort of reminds of the people playing penny slot machines expecting to win millions.

          "Top prize $1000" but "the machine said I won $10 billion".

            weshar75's avatar - Lottery-042.jpg
            Mcminnville, Oregon
            United States
            Member #3013
            December 13, 2003
            4745 Posts
            Offline

            Mom and I love to play vlt's here in mcminnville at the lounges and restaurants.  But we go with a budget I like to drink usually two beers and give my $20 to mom and she plays $40 and drinks a soda.  Then we leave she won $5000 the top prize back in 2013.  You have to budget your gambling though were ever you go.  It is the same with lotto and vlt's and casinos and slots in casinos or table games.-weshar75

            US Flag

              sweetie7398's avatar - flower2
              100

              United States
              Member #22701
              September 30, 2005
              13335 Posts
              Offline

              Wow

              Life, love, family Love