who ever has bought his work, why dont' you do a copyright search wiht his name and see what pops up, this is what comes up for books and literary items under Gail Howard ( you have to do your search with last name first comma first name)
Registered Works Database (Author Search) Search For: HOWARD, GAIL Items 1 - 4 of 4 For a list of commonly used abbreviations that appear in the catalog record, click here.
1. Registration Number:
TX-3-636-612
Title:
State lotteries: how to get in it and how to win it]; lottery disclosure report. By Gail Howard. 5th ed.
Ohio United States
Member #5,810
July 22, 2004
126 Posts
Offline
Ok I see two different programs listed by this fellow, a pick 5 and a pick 6...are they both incorporated in the pick 6??? or is the pick5 just the same as the pick 6 with the different name?
Just curious
Since I won the $300 with his system, I decided to take the bullet for the team and buy both.
They are almost identical. Only the numbers that would obviously change from a pick 5 to pick 6 change in the documention. The most important information... how to pick the numbers... is identical.
If you buy it, do NOT buy both. Just one of them will do it.
I personally would have been a bit more honest and incorporated both into one document, but hey... this is America! He can do whatever he likes...
United States
Member #9,059
November 26, 2004
221 Posts
Offline
Ok I see two different programs listed by this fellow, a pick 5 and a pick 6...are they both incorporated in the pick 6??? or is the pick5 just the same as the pick 6 with the different name?
Just curious
Since I won the $300 with his system, I decided to take the bullet for the team and buy both.
They are almost identical. Only the numbers that would obviously change from a pick 5 to pick 6 change in the documention. The most important information... how to pick the numbers... is identical.
If you buy it, do NOT buy both. Just one of them will do it.
I personally would have been a bit more honest and incorporated both into one document, but hey... this is America! He can do whatever he likes...
Hi,
I don't recommend you buy it, this Pick 5, 6 system is a copy of another known system, and Pinback already explains in detail how it works, so don't waste your money.
Ohio United States
Member #5,810
July 22, 2004
126 Posts
Offline
Ok I see two different programs listed by this fellow, a pick 5 and a pick 6...are they both incorporated in the pick 6??? or is the pick5 just the same as the pick 6 with the different name?
Just curious
Since I won the $300 with his system, I decided to take the bullet for the team and buy both.
They are almost identical. Only the numbers that would obviously change from a pick 5 to pick 6 change in the documention. The most important information... how to pick the numbers... is identical.
If you buy it, do NOT buy both. Just one of them will do it.
I personally would have been a bit more honest and incorporated both into one document, but hey... this is America! He can do whatever he likes...
Hi,
I don't recommend you buy it, this Pick 5, 6 system is a copy of another known system, and Pinback already explains in detail how it works, so don't waste your money.
United States
Member #9,059
November 26, 2004
221 Posts
Offline
I just think that in order to have an accurate examination of how well a system performs,
you would have to drop numbers, because the crux of the selection proccess,on a daily
basis is required, in order for the system to constantly morph itself. I'm not putting down
your efforts in any way. Iam only interested in the exact steps mentioned by him, to be
entered in a program. If thats even possible without spending a fortune on computer
programmers, to tailor-fit any request. But I appreciate your attempt.
It isn't possible to tailor-fit his method to provide a particular number of numbers (?) to play, because then it would no longer be based on the statistical information he provides! To play his method, there is no option but to play the numbers it provides, no matter how many numbers that is. Do anything else, and you're creating a new method of your own! (And then you should sell it on ebay... )
Are we even talking about the same system? He clearly states that numbers have
to be updated on a daily basis. Unless I'm not understanding you, pardon me, but
without giving away the system, I can tell you that you get about half, new numbers
to play when you update them. You don't play the same number sets every day.
The selection proccess doesn't even allow you to play the same numbers. So either
i'm a complete idiot that probably doesn't understand programs and the lingo, or we
are speaking of a different sysytem.
I think whatever the program would require to update such as this system would
be very complex, but again I don't have the foggiest when it comes to writing
programs.
When I was eighteen (now 41) I used to write commodore computer game
programs just for fun, copying them from magazines.
I'm 43 and spent part of my 20's working in computer stores selling Commodore 64's and marveling over people like you who had the patience to type in computer games from magazines! That sort of patience I never had.
I'm not sure the numbers his method comes up with change quite that much from drawing to drawing. Since you use the last 10 drawings each time, only one set of numbers drops out (the oldest) and one set of numbers (the latest drawing) is added. Then you count them up again. Here is a sample of two weeks (six drawings) of numbers suggested by his method from the life of Rolling Cash 5:
You can see how only a few numbers change each time.
I think the biggest problem in discussing it is that we can't discuss it! While probably nothing would come of it, I'm just not willing to risk lawyers knocking on my door.
Ohio United States
Member #5,810
July 22, 2004
126 Posts
Offline
I just think that in order to have an accurate examination of how well a system performs,
you would have to drop numbers, because the crux of the selection proccess,on a daily
basis is required, in order for the system to constantly morph itself. I'm not putting down
your efforts in any way. Iam only interested in the exact steps mentioned by him, to be
entered in a program. If thats even possible without spending a fortune on computer
programmers, to tailor-fit any request. But I appreciate your attempt.
It isn't possible to tailor-fit his method to provide a particular number of numbers (?) to play, because then it would no longer be based on the statistical information he provides! To play his method, there is no option but to play the numbers it provides, no matter how many numbers that is. Do anything else, and you're creating a new method of your own! (And then you should sell it on ebay... )
Are we even talking about the same system? He clearly states that numbers have
to be updated on a daily basis. Unless I'm not understanding you, pardon me, but
without giving away the system, I can tell you that you get about half, new numbers
to play when you update them. You don't play the same number sets every day.
The selection proccess doesn't even allow you to play the same numbers. So either
i'm a complete idiot that probably doesn't understand programs and the lingo, or we
are speaking of a different sysytem.
I think whatever the program would require to update such as this system would
be very complex, but again I don't have the foggiest when it comes to writing
programs.
When I was eighteen (now 41) I used to write commodore computer game
programs just for fun, copying them from magazines.
I'm 43 and spent part of my 20's working in computer stores selling Commodore 64's and marveling over people like you who had the patience to type in computer games from magazines! That sort of patience I never had.
I'm not sure the numbers his method comes up with change quite that much from drawing to drawing. Since you use the last 10 drawings each time, only one set of numbers drops out (the oldest) and one set of numbers (the latest drawing) is added. Then you count them up again. Here is a sample of two weeks (six drawings) of numbers suggested by his method from the life of Rolling Cash 5:
You can see how only a few numbers change each time.
I think the biggest problem in discussing it is that we can't discuss it! While probably nothing would come of it, I'm just not willing to risk lawyers knocking on my door.
Hmm
That's what I thought.
If you can figure out how his system works from that information, then you are much smarter than I.
United States
Member #9,059
November 26, 2004
221 Posts
Offline
I just think that in order to have an accurate examination of how well a system performs,
you would have to drop numbers, because the crux of the selection proccess,on a daily
basis is required, in order for the system to constantly morph itself. I'm not putting down
your efforts in any way. Iam only interested in the exact steps mentioned by him, to be
entered in a program. If thats even possible without spending a fortune on computer
programmers, to tailor-fit any request. But I appreciate your attempt.
It isn't possible to tailor-fit his method to provide a particular number of numbers (?) to play, because then it would no longer be based on the statistical information he provides! To play his method, there is no option but to play the numbers it provides, no matter how many numbers that is. Do anything else, and you're creating a new method of your own! (And then you should sell it on ebay... )
Are we even talking about the same system? He clearly states that numbers have
to be updated on a daily basis. Unless I'm not understanding you, pardon me, but
without giving away the system, I can tell you that you get about half, new numbers
to play when you update them. You don't play the same number sets every day.
The selection proccess doesn't even allow you to play the same numbers. So either
i'm a complete idiot that probably doesn't understand programs and the lingo, or we
are speaking of a different sysytem.
I think whatever the program would require to update such as this system would
be very complex, but again I don't have the foggiest when it comes to writing
programs.
When I was eighteen (now 41) I used to write commodore computer game
programs just for fun, copying them from magazines.
I'm 43 and spent part of my 20's working in computer stores selling Commodore 64's and marveling over people like you who had the patience to type in computer games from magazines! That sort of patience I never had.
I'm not sure the numbers his method comes up with change quite that much from drawing to drawing. Since you use the last 10 drawings each time, only one set of numbers drops out (the oldest) and one set of numbers (the latest drawing) is added. Then you count them up again. Here is a sample of two weeks (six drawings) of numbers suggested by his method from the life of Rolling Cash 5:
You can see how only a few numbers change each time.
I think the biggest problem in discussing it is that we can't discuss it! While probably nothing would come of it, I'm just not willing to risk lawyers knocking on my door.
Hmm
That's what I thought.
If you can figure out how his system works from that information, then you are much smarter than I.
A normal lotto player could figure out how this system works with that information. There is no need to buy it.