Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 8:56 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

No delusion-100% winning method

Topic closed. 535 replies. Last post 10 years ago by Kola.

Page 20 of 36
PrintE-mailLink
LAVERNE MALONEY's avatar - smallgirl

United States
Member #1987
August 5, 2003
8968 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 22, 2006, 3:38 am - IP Logged

Kola, I am really looking at the possibility of a pointer #(s). I am finding that rows which contain the total of the draw or the mirror of the draw can be considered candidates for choosing strings in which to play. In some instances both the mirror & the total produced rows with winning #'s.

I must stress here that this finding is in it's early stage.

When I look at Michigan I see rows that produce winners that do not contain mirrors or totals. I am wondering if that is the nature of the draws that pertain to the particular state. 

That also leads me to believe that there may not be a general overall pointer # system, however one has to look at what row #'s are prone to their state & what they contain or do not contain.     

I was looking at Paurths row groupings. I'm trying to see what is unique about the rows that have winners & the rows that do not produce winners.

I have to add something. I have to tell it as I receive it. The winning rows may also contain the most recent hits in that particular state.

    Avatar
    Poway CA (San Diego County)
    United States
    Member #3489
    January 25, 2004
    14120 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: May 22, 2006, 3:40 am - IP Logged

    WTG to Ricky and CD they got it, but again CD is an old hand at this.

    Thank you, Fernando.  I just wanted to show that my method was a good method and only starts with 220 numbers.  I do think I proved my point!!

     

      Kola's avatar - image
      Blundering Time Traveler

      United States
      Member #28945
      December 25, 2005
      1527 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: May 22, 2006, 3:47 am - IP Logged

      Hi Kola, I'm confused about one thing. You say in the beginning of this thread that you made money with the system, but later, down many pages in this thread you say you can't post any numbers, because it's still in it's testing stage, or something to that effect.

      Thanx......

      Hi Pacattack. Yes, I made money with this system. What I was doing was taking out the duplicates, and then using other filters and techniques to try and reduce the improbable numbers. Even though I can incrementally profit with this system, I want a way to utilize it much better. I want to play less numbers, and I want a better pointer to the right number. I am not going to post a group of, in my opinion too many numbers, that if i am in error someone will lose money. No. if a person is going to lose money based on what I put out, I want to at least refine it to where I feel it needs to be.

      So, what I am testing is how to find a strong pointer to direct me to the proper string I should play. I'll start posting as soon as i finish testing. I hope I have been clear

        paurths's avatar - underground
        Switching between Fairfax, VA and Belgium
        Belgium
        Member #19287
        July 29, 2005
        2254 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: May 22, 2006, 3:52 am - IP Logged

        Here's how i choose the row for GA eve (i've written this before, but most people don't read what is written lol)

        I take the root of the draw on which the workout applies: assume the number is 148, the root is 1 + 4 + 8 = 13 --> 1 + 3 = Row 4
        This has worked in GA eve for the last 23 draws: 6 times straight and 8 times boxed. That's 14 out of 23.
        Which is not bad.

        But, it did not work at all for QC (not one hit if i remember correct), so there would only be any use if i would backtest GA eve for several months. And to be honest, i don't have the energy to do that, just b/c i think this might go nowhere. I might be wrong ofcourse...
        Anyway, 6 * $900 = $5400, with an investment of $1472 for straight play.
        For boxed play (i did not take note between doubles and6-ways) that would make: $1950 back for an investement of $1472 (and like i said, some were most likely doubles, like the last draw)

        Well, i'm off, back to pick4-statistics lol

        cheers
        Ricky

        lasas3

        An onion a day keeps everyone away!!!

          Avatar
          Poway CA (San Diego County)
          United States
          Member #3489
          January 25, 2004
          14120 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:01 am - IP Logged

          Workout for MI midday:
          Last draw: 493
          Prefered row for the hit: 7

          1 : 382, 383, 384, 388, 392, 393, 394, 398, 302, 303, 304, 308, 342, 343, 344, 348, 482, 483, 484, 488, 492, 493, 494, 498, 402, 403, 404, 408, 442, 443, 444, 448, 582, 583, 584, 588, 592, 593, 594, 598, 502, 503, 504, 508, 542, 543, 544, 548, 982, 983, 984, 988, 992, 993, 994, 998, 902, 903, 904, 908, 942, 943, 944, 948,

          2 : 493, 494, 495, 499, 403, 404, 405, 409, 413, 414, 415, 419, 453, 454, 455, 459, 593, 594, 595, 599, 503, 504, 505, 509, 513, 514, 515, 519, 553, 554, 555, 559, 693, 694, 695, 699, 603, 604, 605, 609, 613, 614, 615, 619, 653, 654, 655, 659, 093, 094, 095, 099, 003, 004, 005, 009, 013, 014, 015, 019, 053, 054, 055, 059,

          3 : 504, 505, 506, 500, 514, 515, 516, 510, 524, 525, 526, 520, 564, 565, 566, 560, 604, 605, 606, 600, 614, 615, 616, 610, 624, 625, 626, 620, 664, 665, 666, 660, 704, 705, 706, 700, 714, 715, 716, 710, 724, 725, 726, 720, 764, 765, 766, 760, 104, 105, 106, 100, 114, 115, 116, 110, 124, 125, 126, 120, 164, 165, 166, 160,

          4 : 615, 616, 617, 611, 625, 626, 627, 621, 635, 636, 637, 631, 675, 676, 677, 671, 715, 716, 717, 711, 725, 726, 727, 721, 735, 736, 737, 731, 775, 776, 777, 771, 815, 816, 817, 811, 825, 826, 827, 821, 835, 836, 837, 831, 875, 876, 877, 871, 215, 216, 217, 211, 225, 226, 227, 221, 235, 236, 237, 231, 275, 276, 277, 271,

          5 : 726, 727, 728, 722, 736, 737, 738, 732, 746, 747, 748, 742, 786, 787, 788, 782, 826, 827, 828, 822, 836, 837, 838, 832, 846, 847, 848, 842, 886, 887, 888, 882, 926, 927, 928, 922, 936, 937, 938, 932, 946, 947, 948, 942, 986, 987, 988, 982, 326, 327, 328, 322, 336, 337, 338, 332, 346, 347, 348, 342, 386, 387, 388, 382,

          6 : 837, 838, 839, 833, 847, 848, 849, 843, 857, 858, 859, 853, 897, 898, 899, 893, 937, 938, 939, 933, 947, 948, 949, 943, 957, 958, 959, 953, 997, 998, 999, 993, 037, 038, 039, 033, 047, 048, 049, 043, 057, 058, 059, 053, 097, 098, 099, 093, 437, 438, 439, 433, 447, 448, 449, 443, 457, 458, 459, 453, 497, 498, 499, 493,

          7 : 948, 949, 940, 944, 958, 959, 950, 954, 968, 969, 960, 964, 908, 909, 900, 904, 048, 049, 040, 044, 058, 059, 050, 054, 068, 069, 060, 064, 008, 009, 000, 004, 148, 149, 140, 144, 158, 159, 150, 154, 168, 169, 160, 164, 108, 109, 100, 104, 548, 549, 540, 544, 558, 559, 550, 554, 568, 569, 560, 564, 508, 509, 500, 504,

          8 : 059, 050, 051, 055, 069, 060, 061, 065, 079, 070, 071, 075, 019, 010, 011, 015, 159, 150, 151, 155, 169, 160, 161, 165, 179, 170, 171, 175, 119, 110, 111, 115, 259, 250, 251, 255, 269, 260, 261, 265, 279, 270, 271, 275, 219, 210, 211, 215, 659, 650, 651, 655, 669, 660, 661, 665, 679, 670, 671, 675, 619, 610, 611, 615,

          9 : 160, 161, 162, 166, 170, 171, 172, 176, 180, 181, 182, 186, 120, 121, 122, 126, 260, 261, 262, 266, 270, 271, 272, 276, 280, 281, 282, 286, 220, 221, 222, 226, 360, 361, 362, 366, 370, 371, 372, 376, 380, 381, 382, 386, 320, 321, 322, 326, 760, 761, 762, 766, 770, 771, 772, 776, 780, 781, 782, 786, 720, 721, 722, 726,

          10 : 271, 272, 273, 277, 281, 282, 283, 287, 291, 292, 293, 297, 231, 232, 233, 237, 371, 372, 373, 377, 381, 382, 383, 387, 391, 392, 393, 397, 331, 332, 333, 337, 471, 472, 473, 477, 481, 482, 483, 487, 491, 492, 493, 497, 431, 432, 433, 437, 871, 872, 873, 877, 881, 882, 883, 887, 891, 892, 893, 897, 831, 832, 833, 837

           

          Workout for MI eve:
          Last draw: 978
          Prefered row for the hit: row 6

          1 : 867, 868, 869, 863, 877, 878, 879, 873, 887, 888, 889, 883, 827, 828, 829, 823, 967, 968, 969, 963, 977, 978, 979, 973, 987, 988, 989, 983, 927, 928, 929, 923, 067, 068, 069, 063, 077, 078, 079, 073, 087, 088, 089, 083, 027, 028, 029, 023, 467, 468, 469, 463, 477, 478, 479, 473, 487, 488, 489, 483, 427, 428, 429, 423,

          2 : 978, 979, 970, 974, 988, 989, 980, 984, 998, 999, 990, 994, 938, 939, 930, 934, 078, 079, 070, 074, 088, 089, 080, 084, 098, 099, 090, 094, 038, 039, 030, 034, 178, 179, 170, 174, 188, 189, 180, 184, 198, 199, 190, 194, 138, 139, 130, 134, 578, 579, 570, 574, 588, 589, 580, 584, 598, 599, 590, 594, 538, 539, 530, 534,

          3 : 089, 080, 081, 085, 099, 090, 091, 095, 009, 000, 001, 005, 049, 040, 041, 045, 189, 180, 181, 185, 199, 190, 191, 195, 109, 100, 101, 105, 149, 140, 141, 145, 289, 280, 281, 285, 299, 290, 291, 295, 209, 200, 201, 205, 249, 240, 241, 245, 689, 680, 681, 685, 699, 690, 691, 695, 609, 600, 601, 605, 649, 640, 641, 645,

          4 : 190, 191, 192, 196, 100, 101, 102, 106, 110, 111, 112, 116, 150, 151, 152, 156, 290, 291, 292, 296, 200, 201, 202, 206, 210, 211, 212, 216, 250, 251, 252, 256, 390, 391, 392, 396, 300, 301, 302, 306, 310, 311, 312, 316, 350, 351, 352, 356, 790, 791, 792, 796, 700, 701, 702, 706, 710, 711, 712, 716, 750, 751, 752, 756,

          5 : 201, 202, 203, 207, 211, 212, 213, 217, 221, 222, 223, 227, 261, 262, 263, 267, 301, 302, 303, 307, 311, 312, 313, 317, 321, 322, 323, 327, 361, 362, 363, 367, 401, 402, 403, 407, 411, 412, 413, 417, 421, 422, 423, 427, 461, 462, 463, 467, 801, 802, 803, 807, 811, 812, 813, 817, 821, 822, 823, 827, 861, 862, 863, 867,

          6 : 312, 313, 314, 318, 322, 323, 324, 328, 332, 333, 334, 338, 372, 373, 374, 378, 412, 413, 414, 418, 422, 423, 424, 428, 432, 433, 434, 438, 472, 473, 474, 478, 512, 513, 514, 518, 522, 523, 524, 528, 532, 533, 534, 538, 572, 573, 574, 578, 912, 913, 914, 918, 922, 923, 924, 928, 932, 933, 934, 938, 972, 973, 974, 978,

          7 : 423, 424, 425, 429, 433, 434, 435, 439, 443, 444, 445, 449, 483, 484, 485, 489, 523, 524, 525, 529, 533, 534, 535, 539, 543, 544, 545, 549, 583, 584, 585, 589, 623, 624, 625, 629, 633, 634, 635, 639, 643, 644, 645, 649, 683, 684, 685, 689, 023, 024, 025, 029, 033, 034, 035, 039, 043, 044, 045, 049, 083, 084, 085, 089,

          8 : 534, 535, 536, 530, 544, 545, 546, 540, 554, 555, 556, 550, 594, 595, 596, 590, 634, 635, 636, 630, 644, 645, 646, 640, 654, 655, 656, 650, 694, 695, 696, 690, 734, 735, 736, 730, 744, 745, 746, 740, 754, 755, 756, 750, 794, 795, 796, 790, 134, 135, 136, 130, 144, 145, 146, 140, 154, 155, 156, 150, 194, 195, 196, 190,

          9 : 645, 646, 647, 641, 655, 656, 657, 651, 665, 666, 667, 661, 605, 606, 607, 601, 745, 746, 747, 741, 755, 756, 757, 751, 765, 766, 767, 761, 705, 706, 707, 701, 845, 846, 847, 841, 855, 856, 857, 851, 865, 866, 867, 861, 805, 806, 807, 801, 245, 246, 247, 241, 255, 256, 257, 251, 265, 266, 267, 261, 205, 206, 207, 201,

          10 : 756, 757, 758, 752, 766, 767, 768, 762, 776, 777, 778, 772, 716, 717, 718, 712, 856, 857, 858, 852, 866, 867, 868, 862, 876, 877, 878, 872, 816, 817, 818, 812, 956, 957, 958, 952, 966, 967, 968, 962, 976, 977, 978, 972, 916, 917, 918, 912, 356, 357, 358, 352, 366, 367, 368, 362, 376, 377, 378, 372, 316, 317, 318, 312

          Michigan Midday using my method using SLDs 3,6,8

          012 015 017 024 026 030 035 049 058 060 067 079 080 111 123 125 134 139 141 148 157 161 169 178 189 222 238 242 247 256 259 268 279 292 303 323 346 349 358 367 369 373 378 404 454 457 459 468 484 535 565 567 585 616 646 666 689 727 747 797 808 828 878 909 959 989

          .

          .

          Michigan Evening using my method using SLDs 0,4,7 (Doubles are indicated)

          000 013 016 019 025 028 034 037 040 046 055 059 068 070 089 121 124 127 136 145 149 151 158 167 179 181 202 232 235 239 248 257 262 269 278 313 343 347 356 359 368 383 389 424 458 464 467 479 494 545 569 575 578 626 656 686 707 737 767 789 818 848 888 929 969 999


          Michigan Evening = 910

          I had a box in 66 numbers:

          000 013 016 019 025 028 034 037 040 046 055 059 068 070 089 121 124 127 136 145 149 151 158 167 179 181 202 232 235 239 248 257 262 269 278 313 343 347 356 359 368 383 389 424 458 464 467 479 494 545 569 575 578 626 656 686 707 737 767 789 818 848 888 929 969 999

          The method that Kola is using had it one time only in the 640 as a box 190.  I don't know which row.

           

          CALIFDUUUUUDE, what's up? Hi ya' doin'.


          Well, you are in wrong my friend. If you look CLOSELY at Paurths program output on

          top for the Michigan evening...You will see that DSUM had a box in row # 2, and row # 4. There were 2 boxes in row 3. That's a total of 4 boxes.

          How did you miss that?

          Oops I'm becoming like you. LOL. Just for clarity, there was one more box, which was in row # 8.

          That's a total of 5 boxes. Three separate rows of #2, #4 and #8 rows of 64

          numbers each, each had a box of the 910 winning number. Another additional row,

          #3, had two boxes in it.

          I was using Inspector 3 and must have had it set up to eliminate duplicates.  So I will take your word for it that you had those boxes, but perhaps the rules have changed again.  I thought you said that you eliminate duplicates.  So following that rule, the row #3 would only have 1 box, not 2. 

          Ok, so you had 4 box hits in 640 numbers.  I had 1 box in 220 numbers.  I stand corrected.

           

            Avatar
            Kentucky
            United States
            Member #32652
            February 14, 2006
            7295 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:06 am - IP Logged

            Using the DSUM method:


            The digit 1 will always be followed by 0 (down 1), 1 (same), 2 (up 1), or 6 (mirror) and from this we can create a chart.


             

            D
            S
            U
            M
            1
            0
            1
            2
            6
            2
            1
            2
            3
            7
            3
            2
            3
            4
            8
            4
            3
            4
            5
            9
            5
            4
            5
            6
            0
            6
            5
            6
            7
            1
            7
            6
            7
            8
            2
            8
            7
            8
            9
            3
            9
            8
            9
            0
            4
            0
            9
            0
            1
            5

             

            Now if I understand the instructions correctly, when 709 hit the Ohio evening draw on April 1, 2006, using the chart, I should play (6-7-8-2) with (9-0-1-5) with (7-8-9-3).


            697 698 699 693 607 608 609 603
            617 618 619 613 657 658 659 653
            797 798 799 793 707 708 709 703
            717 718 719 713 757 758 759 753
            897 898 899 893 807 808 809 803
            817 818 819 813 857 858 859 853
            297 298 299 293 207 208 209 203
            217 218 219 213 257 258 259 253


            619 followed 932 with no results and the next 10 draws using the DSUM method:


            112 – 3 way box
            610 – 6 way box
            623 – missed
            337 – 3 way box
            219 – missed
            347 – missed
            646 – missed
            442 – missed
            112 – missed
            001 – straight and 3-way box


            Obviously only 12 draws is a poor way to evaluate any methodology, but using Betslips with its higher payoffs and playing $.50 straight and boxed at $64 a draw would have produced a profit of $282.


            Stack

              Kola's avatar - image
              Blundering Time Traveler

              United States
              Member #28945
              December 25, 2005
              1527 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:12 am - IP Logged

              Hi Kola, I'm confused about one thing. You say in the beginning of this thread that you made money with the system, but later, down many pages in this thread you say you can't post any numbers, because it's still in it's testing stage, or something to that effect.

              Thanx......

              it is just one of the many things, pac LOL

              Whether they be 1 one thing or ten thousand things, its okay. We do better as we move along. No contest here, right. I'm over here,and you are over there, and we are communcating through cyber-space. Do you realize that the most efficient methods of communication is by visaul(I see your face, and body), auditory(sound), and kinethestic(feeling) awareness. We don't have the benefit of being near each other to elucidate all this so we do the best we can. What I can promise you is that for the many things you are confused about just ask me and I will do my best to answer them. Some people have been confused from the beginning of this thread, and others like Laverne got it right away. Right away! With 6 billion people on the planet, hey, not everyone single person will undestand even if you feel you explain things simply.

              If there is often frequent confusion and misundertanding with the friends, and  other loved ones we see everyday and have the benefit of seeing,listening and feeling out, how can you expect anything more from the computer? So you won't sit in the dark, just ask me thequestion. Pacattack you say you are confused about one thing. I'm grateful that its just one thing. That means I am doing okay. With some other people who are having a challenging time, again, just ask. simple. if I don't explain well. Be patient, and ask again.  

                Kola's avatar - image
                Blundering Time Traveler

                United States
                Member #28945
                December 25, 2005
                1527 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:15 am - IP Logged

                Yes NodKola, the book is a ready reference guide and quite dated.  It is columns and columns of just "wraps" however there is a method at the beginning. 

                It has the "wraps" (rundowns) already done and the other side of the wrap that you did not use in your method, there is two sides (minus and plus), however if you flip through the pages of wraps from 000-999 you will see how all pick 3's wrap around each other. 

                 

                Thanks for being helpful Tenaj.

                  paurths's avatar - underground
                  Switching between Fairfax, VA and Belgium
                  Belgium
                  Member #19287
                  July 29, 2005
                  2254 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:21 am - IP Logged

                  Hi Kola, I'm confused about one thing. You say in the beginning of this thread that you made money with the system, but later, down many pages in this thread you say you can't post any numbers, because it's still in it's testing stage, or something to that effect.

                  Thanx......

                  it is just one of the many things, pac LOL

                  Whether they be 1 one thing or ten thousand things, its okay. We do better as we move along. No contest here, right. I'm over here,and you are over there, and we are communcating through cyber-space. Do you realize that the most efficient methods of communication is by visaul(I see your face, and body), auditory(sound), and kinethestic(feeling) awareness. We don't have the benefit of being near each other to elucidate all this so we do the best we can. What I can promise you is that for the many things you are confused about just ask me and I will do my best to answer them. Some people have been confused from the beginning of this thread, and others like Laverne got it right away. Right away! With 6 billion people on the planet, hey, not everyone single person will undestand even if you feel you explain things simply.

                  If there is often frequent confusion and misundertanding with the friends, and  other loved ones we see everyday and have the benefit of seeing,listening and feeling out, how can you expect anything more from the computer? So you won't sit in the dark, just ask me thequestion. Pacattack you say you are confused about one thing. I'm grateful that its just one thing. That means I am doing okay. With some other people who are having a challenging time, again, just ask. simple. if I don't explain well. Be patient, and ask again.  

                  change is ok, but i'm still refering to the titel of the thread, from which it seemed a method was available to play and win, a 100% of the times played.

                  Now, some might consider playing 640, or 460 or 220 numbers and get a box hit winning (and once in a few times a straight, depending on if and how the filtering is done (there's absolutely no rules for the filtering), i don't.

                  Then you talk of patterns.
                  Please explain those patterns, b/c you are extremely vague about them. All you say is that they exist.
                  Ok, i'll accept that, once you post information about them; how they are to be recognized and how they are to be used.

                  Another thing i'll ask is the filtering of duplicates, and i would like you to be very specific about it b/c filtering duplicates will result in either a boxed system or a straight system: so what are the rules for this filtering?

                  More questions will most likely follow later, after you have posted a clear answer concerning the questions i have just asked.

                  cheers
                  Ricky

                  lasas3

                  An onion a day keeps everyone away!!!

                    Avatar
                    Poway CA (San Diego County)
                    United States
                    Member #3489
                    January 25, 2004
                    14120 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:26 am - IP Logged

                    Using the DSUM method:


                    The digit 1 will always be followed by 0 (down 1), 1 (same), 2 (up 1), or 6 (mirror) and from this we can create a chart.


                     

                    D
                    S
                    U
                    M
                    1
                    0
                    1
                    2
                    6
                    2
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    7
                    3
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    8
                    4
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    9
                    5
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    0
                    6
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    1
                    7
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    2
                    8
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    3
                    9
                    8
                    9
                    0
                    4
                    0
                    9
                    0
                    1
                    5

                     

                    Now if I understand the instructions correctly, when 709 hit the Ohio evening draw on April 1, 2006, using the chart, I should play (6-7-8-2) with (9-0-1-5) with (7-8-9-3).


                    697 698 699 693 607 608 609 603
                    617 618 619 613 657 658 659 653
                    797 798 799 793 707 708 709 703
                    717 718 719 713 757 758 759 753
                    897 898 899 893 807 808 809 803
                    817 818 819 813 857 858 859 853
                    297 298 299 293 207 208 209 203
                    217 218 219 213 257 258 259 253


                    619 followed 932 with no results and the next 10 draws using the DSUM method:


                    112 – 3 way box
                    610 – 6 way box
                    623 – missed
                    337 – 3 way box
                    219 – missed
                    347 – missed
                    646 – missed
                    442 – missed
                    112 – missed
                    001 – straight and 3-way box


                    Obviously only 12 draws is a poor way to evaluate any methodology, but using Betslips with its higher payoffs and playing $.50 straight and boxed at $64 a draw would have produced a profit of $282.


                    Stack

                    You are showing only evening results.  Did you use the Midday number to plug into the method, or did you go evening to evening?

                    I do like your chart very much.

                     

                      Kola's avatar - image
                      Blundering Time Traveler

                      United States
                      Member #28945
                      December 25, 2005
                      1527 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:30 am - IP Logged

                      I would not feel up to doing such a workout by hand myself. but if I had a computer program to do the workout for me, then I would try to see if I could come out with a way or ways of filtering out some of the combos, of course filtering some of them is not enough, this calls for massive filtering, I wonder if some guide(s) and or pointers can be found as some people say that maybe can be done, or some other way, otherwise they would had to be filtered in the same way as one filters all of the 1000 straight combos, but that might also filter out any boxed winning numbers that might be there, in which case then it would just be better to go ahead and instead filter the 1000 straight combos.

                      No, the thing to do is to in some way, to find some-kind of filtering guide or guides made just for this particular system.

                      As the winning number will be there straight only about 40 to 50 percent of the time on the 460 straight combos it is very very important to find a filtering system or systems that won't often filter it out, I might be wrong, but I don't see a profit in trying to get the winning number boxed in such a system that has 460 combos and only from 2 to 4 (3 average) boxed winning numbers some-where in there among the 460 combos.

                      Otherwise, perhaps, if we want the winning number boxed, Why not just filter it out of the 220 boxed combos or maybe out of the 120 boxed singles?

                      Anyhow, the only way that I might find anything out if anything, would be by having Ricky's Kola program, but not the original, perhaps the version that he used here on his last posts where he posted the workouts, I think that it was version number 2, then I could do testing on my own, as I am not up to doing the workouts by hand, I am getting way too old for that.

                      Thanks to everybody for their input and thanks to Kola for his system and to Ricky for his programs and very very hard work.

                      Thanks alot Lantern.

                       

                      Remember that you don't have to play 460 numbers to get your box or straight hits.

                      With DSUM I gave two ways to play it. You can read it. I think it was back a few pages. In summary i shared how you could play it as a string of only 64 possible numbers or a only as a column of 10. I elucidated why this was earlier. The key, which you directly gave mention to on top, is to find that particular filter or pointer for this particular system

                        Kola's avatar - image
                        Blundering Time Traveler

                        United States
                        Member #28945
                        December 25, 2005
                        1527 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:48 am - IP Logged

                        Scared I think Kola is playing games in this thread. I think this thread should close.

                        No need to waste time here. 

                        It is obvious Kola read the book for $3.00 and is only doing one part of the calculations. Then She comes and creates this thread wasteing every one's time. Of course she won't admit this.Scared

                        Eek I have been doing some Remote Viewing !!, and I see Kola worrking in a Casino!!Eek

                        DeadShe reminds me of Ion saliu, the guy who writes lotto software that are so complex that only computer savvey people can  use them, and he writes trash like Kola, that no one can really understand.Dead

                         

                        ClownHere is a challange to sweet Kola, girl baby!! give us the pointers you are working on--Yes I know you still working out the bugs, but lets help you work the bugs out sweety pie!!.Clown 

                        Share Your Pointers With Us-regardless of how experimental they are. Of course you won't, because you are a Fake, and the system you claim as DSUM is not yours to begin with.Red Devil

                         

                        Folks let this thread die. Stop wasteing your time here.Bash 

                        Funny! Well, at least I hope that was your atempt, otherwise, oh boy...you are in trouble. LOL.

                        Now, let me humor you.  C'mon if you really could remote view me, you would see that I am a male. Also you would know that I am quite new to the Lottery, and have not read any books on the subject. Just that I am a person who is great conceptual thinker, and looks at things with a sort of system analyis. Although, I may have many shortcomings, thinking way the heck out of the box is not one of  them. It is a strength I treasure. 

                        Thanks for the challenge, but I don't buck to challenges, except that ones I make for myself. I'll take my time, and when I am done I will post. For now, I dont want anyone to help me.  If I feel I have reached a plateau, and I can't get past it, I will certainly offer what I have, for people to pick apart and improve upon. I like the self-imposed challenge of cracking the pick 3 and 4. Its hard, and I love that!!!

                        Go on your way friend, if this thread is too confusing.  May something else be worth your time, and help you to profit.

                          Kola's avatar - image
                          Blundering Time Traveler

                          United States
                          Member #28945
                          December 25, 2005
                          1527 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:57 am - IP Logged

                          This is incredible, but Row #3 had 3 boxes in it.

                          3 : 089, 080, 081, 085, 099, 090, 091, 095, 009, 000, 001, 005, 049, 040, 041, 045, 189, 180, 181, 185, 199, 190, 191, 195, 109, 100, 101, 105, 149, 140, 141, 145, 289, 280, 281, 285, 299, 290, 291, 295, 209, 200, 201, 205, 249, 240, 241, 245, 689, 680, 681, 685, 699, 690, 691, 695, 609, 600, 601, 605, 649, 640, 641, 645,

                          Incredible yes.

                          Laverne Maloney is one of the few along with some others who more than superficially understands what there is to be absorbed here. Hey I am still learning myself. 3 in a row yes. Happy hunting

                            Kola's avatar - image
                            Blundering Time Traveler

                            United States
                            Member #28945
                            December 25, 2005
                            1527 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: May 22, 2006, 4:59 am - IP Logged

                            Hello there Kola, I have to ask you. The draws are going from draw to draw such as midday to evening & evening to midday. Is that correct?

                            Yes Laverne that is correct.

                              Avatar
                              Poway CA (San Diego County)
                              United States
                              Member #3489
                              January 25, 2004
                              14120 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: May 22, 2006, 5:10 am - IP Logged

                              This is incredible, but Row #3 had 3 boxes in it.

                              3 : 089, 080, 081, 085, 099, 090, 091, 095, 009, 000, 001, 005, 049, 040, 041, 045, 189, 180, 181, 185, 199, 190, 191, 195, 109, 100, 101, 105, 149, 140, 141, 145, 289, 280, 281, 285, 299, 290, 291, 295, 209, 200, 201, 205, 249, 240, 241, 245, 689, 680, 681, 685, 699, 690, 691, 695, 609, 600, 601, 605, 649, 640, 641, 645,

                              Incredible yes.

                              Laverne Maloney is one of the few along with some others who more than superficially understands what there is to be absorbed here. Hey I am still learning myself. 3 in a row yes. Happy hunting

                              So, now you are saying you do not eliminate numbers, so does that mean that we are back to a total of 640 numbers?

                              Of course it does.  I don't even know why I asked the question.

                               

                                 
                                Page 20 of 36