popeye>>>
Interesting concept is right. I have read this thread several times to make some sense of the method ...1313 tried to describe to us. I did exactly as stated with respect to the graphs. This graph and the PHI matrix ratio setup I studied in Architecture 101 many years ago. We called it the 'Golden Ratio', and it worked very well for 'proportioning' of building layouts and elevations. But that's about it. A rough indicator of ratio. A good designer does not need it. He already possesses the gift of 3D proportion, intuitively.
To overlay a transparency onto a graph of numbers did not work for me. If one uses the last set of CAN 6/49 numbers including the bonus, one places the 'dots' on a 45 degree angle, bottom left to top right on a graph [you know-the X and Y coordinates with zero at bottom left]. The overlay, when placed on top gives nothing I can discern, other than choosing numbers at the horizontal intersecting lines on the diagonal. You might as well multiply 1.618 and the last Lotto number...same thing achieved.
Another method is to place all 7 winning numbers on a vertical or horizontal line, place the overlay on top and read the numbers that intersect with all the horizontal or vertical matrix lines. Obviously you get numbers to play, and the more matrix lines you have [they get smaller and smaller due to the ratio effect] the more numbers. I tried this latter method for our 7/47 this past Friday Sept. 20th. I worked diligently for several hours discerning to play several numbers. But, alas, not 1 number popped! I was shocked.
Since I have my own GH, I tried again by placing all 47 numbers [total hits per number]on a horizontal dot matrix grid as above stated, placed the overlay on top to see what I would get...I saw nothing I could hang my hat on from the winning numbers. So whatever it was that ...1313 saw, these 3 simple methods I tried indicated nothing but frustration.
Has anyone else here found the same conditions as I have or even attempted this method? I am obviously missing a crucial step or just not reading the graph correctly, since in the last posts ...1313 produced 3/4 MegaBall numbers, and 12 other lotto numbers and he/she did not play!!!!! I'm shocked at that statement. I know I would have played the damned things-probably twice, too!
BTW folks, the transparency has to be the exact same size as the dot matrix diagram you are producing. Say 8 1/2x11. You want to keep all things equal. But who knows if ...1313 did that? We can't tell.
Since the NYSE or DJ can be read with this graph of PHI, it's public knowledge for anyone's predition or damned good guess as to 'what to expect next'. It would have been very helpful for ...1313 to display some more fancy footwork for us to agree upon or not.
I trust ...1313 did not make a 'method mistake' or divulging what little meat there was to chew on and is now backtracking to 'put it right', if not, all the best and good luck to ...1313 for leading the way, whatever it was. The 3 techniques I tried did not display any winning numbers. BTW>>>folks, I bet on them.
We now may never know and 13 just happens to be my lucky number, too!
more fun with numbers...eh!
yt
dx123.
