Picture if you will....Mild mannered, long time Lottery Post member calabs entering the Lottery Discussion forum with a two part question.
That question: Would you use vtrac search engine and would you be willing to become a Platinum member to use it? Innocent enough, most
of us would agree. Picture again...inquisitive turned insulting, short term member Delta Draw imagining there can't possibly be a vtrac search
engine that would do anyone any good without an accompanying full 10 page report on what it would do, how to use it, where the proof is,
where the hits are and step by step instruction for the beginner. Maybe a disclaimer could be added in BOLD print stating this search engine
is only a tool....if such a search engine were to be developed.
There indeed does seem to be a 5th dimension and we've just crossed over into it...welcome folks, to the Twilight Zone.
Personally, I don't see how a simple question has escalated or maybe disintegrated into a discussion where the OP has been more or less,
put on trial. Calabs simply posted a question to gauge interest in a vtrac search engine. Could it be the second part of his question that
struck a nerve? It seems there is some underlying reason connected to the need to post mathmatical findings, argue the importance of such
a resource and put pressure on calabs to explain, in-depth, the 5 W's of a hypothetical resource. I do believe that is between him and Todd.
Would you pay to become a Platinum member in order to use it? does not mean your Platinum membership fees will go up $100 if you say
yes or by George...USE it if it becomes an available resource.
There are already quite a few resources, tools, bonuses here that require paid membership...and for good reason. They are valuable. Do
you use all of them? Do you argue that your membership should cost less if you've never touched the deflate tool? Or do you just accept that
it is there and not question exactly what portion of your membership fee is allocated toward: resources, systems, inbox capacity, blog features,
search past results features, prediction limits and so on? If so, concerning the latter...then why argue so strongly against the possible
implemetation of a useful, new tracking source? Just as one may not understand the inspect or deflation tools, you may not understand a
new tool for vtracs data...the simple answer then is to study it...Not be handed the answer, given the step by step or be led by the hand
on how it works, how to do it, how to win with it by the one merely suggesting it would be useful. It would be a tracking tool. Plain and simple.
The road this discussion took is neither plain or simple.
calabs understands what he is suggesting...I've seen many people talk about vtracs and btw, they are pretty darn good with them. Do you
think they got a copy of: Become a Vtracs Master in One Day? I don't. I think they put a lot of effort into using what was provided for them
here and invested a lot of their own time understanding them and using them to their advantage. Maybe your playing style is such that
investment of time is not your cup of tea..then this resource by far would not be the one for you to use unless someone showed you where
it would hit, when it would hit and exactly how it would hit.
**How does one make that determination?** by studying your own states numbers, patterns, hot, cold, overdue, pairs, cycles etc...If it looks
like it's coming play it then. If you are presented with a line of 8 vtrac possibles...you don't go in blind and play them all unless you want to be
let down AND broke just because someone said: vtrac so and so is due. It is not a magic bullet...it's another tool......harmless and totally
undeserving of your attack. Like anything else...it's what you put into it....it's not life or death. By the way...you don't have to play anything
anyone tells you to play. It's all up to you.