Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 19, 2017, 4:14 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# Do some number combinations have better odds?

Topic closed. 5280 replies. Last post 4 years ago by rdgrnr.

 Page 348 of 353
PrintE-mailLink
u\$a
United States
Member #106665
February 22, 2011
19964 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 22, 2013, 2:40 pm - IP Logged

I'm using Thrifty's Positive energy Flow System to win a lottery jackpot today.

u\$a
United States
Member #106665
February 22, 2011
19964 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 22, 2013, 2:41 pm - IP Logged

I LIKE YOUR 9

u\$a
United States
Member #106665
February 22, 2011
19964 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 22, 2013, 4:04 pm - IP Logged

I'm using Thrifty's Positive energy Flow System to win a lottery jackpot today.

Good Luck

United States
Member #116268
September 7, 2011
20244 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 22, 2013, 5:26 pm - IP Logged

There have been 808 drawings since the last MM matrix change. I compared each group of 45 combinations to those 808 drawings.

Ronnie's 45 lines

matched
0+1=477
1+1=244
2+1=40
3+0=114
3+1=4
4+0=3

Total lines 808 x 45 = 36360
882 prizes won = \$3934

Jimmy's 45 lines

matched
0+1=481
1+1=255
2+1=39
3+0=122
3+1=3
4+0=3

Total lines 808 x 45 = 36360
903 prizes won = \$3871

As you can see both groups did about the same.

Thanks for taking a look at these groups RJOh, clearly these groups did not have BETTER ODDS.

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
19900 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 22, 2013, 5:58 pm - IP Logged

Stack47,

Talk about "sleezy."  You just won't give up, will you?  You will even resort to underhanded tactics like taking Ronnie316's original set of 45 lines and strategically modifying them to make a set with dramatic positive results.  And you did it in such a sneaky way.  For example, look at your line number 19 above,

19. 06-14-24-28-49--3   //  Stack47's line #19

Pretty clever.

19. 06-14-24-30-49--03  //  Ronnie16's original line #19

Hindsight really is 20/20, isn't it, Stack47?

And this is just ONE example.  Can anyone see the other evidence of this fraud's work?

I guess you thought nobody would notice.

I hope RJOh doesn't indulge you in your effort to get people to deny the truth.

--Jimmy4164

Hopefully Stack was trying to be "funny" rather than "sleezy" when he altered every line in Ronnie's original set of 45 lines except lines #1, #15, #32, #33 and #41.  It will be interesting to see if his altered lines do any better than the other sets in future drawings.

* you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket *

United States
Member #116268
September 7, 2011
20244 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 22, 2013, 6:27 pm - IP Logged

Hopefully Stack was trying to be "funny" rather than "sleezy" when he altered every line in Ronnie's original set of 45 lines except lines #1, #15, #32, #33 and #41.  It will be interesting to see if his altered lines do any better than the other sets in future drawings.

I dont think Stack would do anything funny or sleezy. Im thinking he used a wheel to reproduced the list instead of a simple copy and paste. I use LP wheels and I'm pretty sure he uses CoverMaster.

United States
Member #116268
September 7, 2011
20244 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 22, 2013, 6:33 pm - IP Logged

u\$a
United States
Member #106665
February 22, 2011
19964 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 22, 2013, 6:39 pm - IP Logged

Kentucky
United States
Member #32652
February 14, 2006
7343 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 22, 2013, 11:55 pm - IP Logged

Hopefully Stack was trying to be "funny" rather than "sleezy" when he altered every line in Ronnie's original set of 45 lines except lines #1, #15, #32, #33 and #41.  It will be interesting to see if his altered lines do any better than the other sets in future drawings.

I used the same 2 if 5 of 56 number wheel Ronnie used, but I didn't place the numbers into the wheel in numerical order. In that post I said "He could have used a random order and your results using the bonus number "3" could have shown three 5 + 1 matches." There was nothing "sleezy" when I pointed out to Ronnie the wheel is unbalanced and that if he is still using the last numbers out as a strategy, he could arrange those numbers into the wheel where they will occur more in the wheel.

I'm assuming it was Jimmy that said I was being sleezy because I am blocking his posts. Seriously, do you know anyone that would play the same 45 lines using just one bonus number in 808 drawings?

"when he altered every line in Ronnie's original set of 45 lines except lines #1, #15, #32, #33 and #41."

If you have access to LP's wheel, you'll see there is a QP function too. Back in the pencil and paper days, most wheels were unbalanced and the numbers were entered into the wheel from most favored to least favored. The 45 line wheel uses all the numbers and I thought everyone knew it's the order in which the numbers are placed into the wheel that determines if a line matches more than the guaranteed 2 number match.

Kentucky
United States
Member #32652
February 14, 2006
7343 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 23, 2013, 12:00 am - IP Logged

I dont think Stack would do anything funny or sleezy. Im thinking he used a wheel to reproduced the list instead of a simple copy and paste. I use LP wheels and I'm pretty sure he uses CoverMaster.

I used the exact same wheel you used, I used all 56 numbers, but entered the numbers in a different order than you. I used a little math and logic and improved the chances of that wheel winning a jackpot.

United States
Member #116268
September 7, 2011
20244 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 23, 2013, 11:37 am - IP Logged

I used the exact same wheel you used, I used all 56 numbers, but entered the numbers in a different order than you. I used a little math and logic and improved the chances of that wheel winning a jackpot.

We have been discussing AND altering order input on wheels LONG before Jammys destructive and negative presents on this thread. I'm glad you used an altered input because its exactly what I was considering.

This thread is still about TRYING TO WIN A JACKPOT, no matter how hard Jammy tries to destroy it.

United States
Member #116268
September 7, 2011
20244 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 23, 2013, 11:40 am - IP Logged

Set of 28 for MM. Fri. Mar. 22, 2013.

01 03 04 06 07 08 11 12 14 15 17 19 20 22 24 25 30 32 34 35 39 41 42 43 44 46 49 51

bonus ball 03

3 of 5 on this draw.

 Friday, March 22, 2013 14 · 27 · 34 · 37 · 41    + 38 4 \$20 Million

United States
Member #116268
September 7, 2011
20244 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 23, 2013, 11:40 am - IP Logged

Boney also had 3 of 5 on this draw.

United States
Member #116268
September 7, 2011
20244 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 23, 2013, 11:42 am - IP Logged

We have been discussing AND altering order input on wheels LONG before Jammys destructive and negative presents on this thread. I'm glad you used an altered input because its exactly what I was considering.

This thread is still about TRYING TO WIN A JACKPOT, no matter how hard Jammy tries to destroy it.

PS. Jammy is my favorite ass clown. I admire his persistence.

Kentucky
United States
Member #32652
February 14, 2006
7343 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 24, 2013, 7:17 pm - IP Logged

We have been discussing AND altering order input on wheels LONG before Jammys destructive and negative presents on this thread. I'm glad you used an altered input because its exactly what I was considering.

This thread is still about TRYING TO WIN A JACKPOT, no matter how hard Jammy tries to destroy it.

"This thread is still about TRYING TO WIN A JACKPOT, no matter how hard Jammy tries to destroy it."

What he apparently called sleazy (and I'm only assuming because I won't read his posts) was me using a different order, which I did, but it was to prove that even the worst frequent bonus number produced three 5 + 1 winners using the same wheel.   I doubt he even knows it is possible to enter the number into a wheel using other orders or knows some wheels are designed to place numbers in a specific order that may change every drawing like most favored to least favored.

 Page 348 of 353