Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 17, 2017, 9:54 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

MO Pick-6 predictions

Topic closed. 282 replies. Last post 2 years ago by Hans.

Page 14 of 19
54
PrintE-mailLink
Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
Monte Carlo
France
Member #55589
October 9, 2007
1181 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 12, 2014, 7:50 am - IP Logged

I don't say what Hans is doing has no merit, It's just I would never claim a systems success based on one drawing.

Back-test can be helpful but cannot be trusted for future play. The only real test of a system is playing forward

where the results speak the truth.

 

This is what I meant.

keep checking history win does not help you any better.

 

You said you won a jackpot?What is your proof?

I have predicted a pick5 jackpot here at LP back years ago.My pick 5 prediction statistics is profitable.

So far my cumulative prize ratio is far 10 times higher than yours,if you can not bear the challenge,just quit.

You allowed to post and contribute then you start to ask me out because you can simply not do what I did.

Hans

Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

    RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

    United States
    Member #59354
    March 13, 2008
    4054 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 12, 2014, 9:26 am - IP Logged

    Hans

    Now I am starting to feel sorry for you.

     

    There are people here at LP that can back up my win and I don't feel the need to include you as one of

    them.  As for your so called challenge there is no challenge nor was there ever one.  Get some help, you

    need it.   You asked if you could post a few predictions and I said yes not knowing you were such an ass. 

    I guess the little video of a program I made in a couple hours which showed better results then what your

    amazing method has done meant nothing. 

     

    Take a moment and look over all your predictions and think about what your claiming.  You don't even

    count all the lines you post.  If your not going to count them then why post them as part of your act.

    I only see one game where you done better than the expected if selecting at random.  What happened

    in the last game where you busted, your method fell on it's ass, or maybe it just works once in a while

    kind of like a toy cap gun or even a quick pick. 

     

    The only challenge I took on here at LP was one in which I posted actual scans of real ticket and was up

    around $500 bucks in or around 6 to 8 games.  The challenge lasted until the topic was locked by Todd.

    I started to post my next set and found it had been locked.  To this day don't know why. 

     

    Let me give you a challenge, pick a game to use your method on and actually buy the tickets and post the

    scans.  Nothing like putting a little money on the line to add to the excitement.  One game played every

    draw for 10 consecutive drawings. 

     

    You must have some sort of lottery where you live or does your system only work on the MO 6-44 game.

    If so then it's not to impressive, no not too impressive at all.  Kind of lame if you really think about it.  A

    system that only works on a lottery far far away. 

     

    Anyway if your interested in putting some real money up for the lines you play then feel free to start a

    special topic and name is something stupendous so to grab all the attention.  Who knows I might even

    take a peek but not making any promises.

     

    Show me your method is up to the challenge, winning a few bucks in one game and then watching your

    winnings go down each game as they are doing now is no proof of anything.  Do you really think that one

    game where you hit a few prizes makes it special?  Millions have had similar wins even without a system.

    I know a person who plays birthdays one line per game and has won way more than they will ever spend

    even if they play until they die. 

     

    You can however if your not interested in actual play, continue posting lines for my 6-44 but don't ask me 

    to post tickets that I intend to play.  If I hit a JP I don't want to share it with many other people but that

    should not be a problem for you as you have nothing to loose, except maybe some of your ego.

     

    Challenge, LMAO, your little factory upstairs must be working overtime to create such delusions of grandeur.

    Post your predictions for 90 games and then we will see if you have anything.  I could be wrong and your 

    methods might be amazing.  Who knows you might hit a 6of6 tonight as all lines have the same odds and

    many a JP has been won even with a QP.

     

    RL

    Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

    I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

    they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

    USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

      US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

      Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
      Monte Carlo
      France
      Member #55589
      October 9, 2007
      1181 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 12, 2014, 9:09 pm - IP Logged

      over 25 years of lottery work,all you could do is a waste,since you confirmed yourself the meaning of prediction is no better than random picks.

      If so,you,as some ass or idiot from your mouth back to you,I would have taken you for something wrong.

      I thought you were someone special,who could work and learn from other people.But as I found you are a lottery math fool ass and have no understanding of what predictions means.

      Lottery is a luck game and all we could do is to win once in life.

      If my 9 numbers could have 4 winning numbers,it could also have 6 winning numbers.

      The actual play would affordable for me.But your hundreds of lines indicate your system is a wheel generator,not a predictor.

      Unless you can make it,claim it.Otherwise,say goodbye to your sorry-ass system predictor.

      That's my sorry for you too.

      Hans

      Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

        Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
        Monte Carlo
        France
        Member #55589
        October 9, 2007
        1181 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 12, 2014, 10:26 pm - IP Logged

        MO PICK6 Wed, Nov 12, 2014 Prediction

        correction:I forgot to delete unlogical tickets.

        a total of 20 tickets for the next drawing,which costs 10 dollars.

         

        Numbers
        10 29 14 04 44 03 17 27 39

        13 tickets

        04 10 14 29 39 44
        03 10 14 29 39 44
        03 10 14 29 39 44
        03 04 10 14 17 29
        03 10 14 17 29 44
        03 04 10 17 39 44
        03 04 14 17 39 44
        03 04 10 14 29 44
        03 04 10 14 29 39
        03 04 10 14 29 39
        10 14 17 29 39 44
        04 10 14 17 29 39
        03 04 17 29 39 44

        Numbers
        10 29 14 04 44 03 17 27 39 02 05 09 22 32 40

        7 tickets


        03 09 14 17 27 40
        02 04 27 29 32 40
        02 03 14 32 40 44
        09 17 22 39 40 44
        02 04 14 22 39 40
        09 10 17 29 39 40
        02 10 27 32 39 40

         

        Hans

        my 7 tickets have 3 match2,while your 25 tickets have only 2 match2.

        That pretty much indicates your system is a failure generator.

        I better keep out and leave you in garbage,never come back to your flaming thread.

        byebye

         

        24 28 31 34 37 43   7015067
        17 22 32 35 39 42   6736117
        15 16 17 27 37 42   6467499
        13 17 18 19 31 40   6224709
        12 13 23 33 34 44   5976754
        10 32 37 39 40 41   5713302
        10 11 12 23 41 43   5439518
        09 11 13 23 37 38   5165734 CS
        08 12 19 35 36 38   4897116
        07 16 19 40 42 43   4623332
        07 08 27 33 38 42   4354714
        06 13 16 24 31 36   4106759
        06 07 13 17 21 22   3827809
        05 13 15 20 23 28   3600517
        05 07 22 28* 30* 39   3352561
        04 14 21 26 34 40   3068446
        04 08 12 18 28 38   2804994
        03 17 27 41 42 44   2479552
        03 10 30* 34 36* 39   2283254
        03 06 14 17 21 38   2030133
        02 21 27 32 41 42   1777012
        02 10 31 36 38 43   1534223
        02 06 14 18 23 37   1281102
        02 03 13 14 17 33   1027981
        01 12 16 20 37 42   0738700

        Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

          RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

          United States
          Member #59354
          March 13, 2008
          4054 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 12, 2014, 11:30 pm - IP Logged

          Hans

          Get some help dude, less than a month ago you posted this.

          I play the same 10 lines for all pick6.

          1-13-14-18-24-27 ** 3-8-18-24-33-37 ** 8-11-14-24-37-38 ** 7-8-18-27-33-34 ** 1-13-14-31-33-34 ** 1-3-7-27-31-34 ** 1-3-7-11-14-33 ** 7-11-13-14-31-34

          That system went by so fast it changed about as fast as a blink of the eye.  I have nothing against

          your system, it's that I have big problems with anyone who claims that there system is world changing

          based on how it performed for one drawing.  I try to run many test and let the results make the claims

          not the other way around. 

           

          Can you read, the lines I posted here were a test of just one of my many ideas I am working on.

          I have made no claims as to this one being the best in the world, it's closer to maybe the worst

          prediction tool I have written so far.  That's not to say that it can't be improved and when time

          permits as I will make a few changes and run another series of test.  Comparing you numbers to

          the ones posted here is ridiculous to say the least.  Like I said some of these programs may do well

          at first only to fail later.  That's why I test them, not to prove they are the best but to see if they

          show any promise.  Currently I have about 10 predictors I am either working on or testing. 

           

          I may be wrong but I think I saw where you posted lines for other games, if your whatever you call

          it is as good as you say then add up all the predictions and post it's overall hits.  My count shows one

          win out of about half a dozen plays.  Now your reduced to counting non winning two number hits to try

          and prop it up.  Just post the numbers and they will speak loudly enough for anyone to evaluate if it's

          good or not.  You may think I am trashing your system which I am not, I am trying to get you to see that

          the one winning play could have been a product of random/chance and nothing more.   If you can't even

          consider that then you may be beyond help.

           

          Anyway, I still think you should give your system a good test so you know for sure if it has any merit.

          When someone makes these type of claims only to be forced to eat crow a little down the line, well

          it's sad.

           

          All my non-predictor programs/systems are dumb as a rock, it's the person using them that makes the

          difference.  They don't predict anything as they leave that part to the user.  I think some of my tools are

          about as good as can be coded but that has nothing to do with winning.   My goal is to produce software

          that is as accurate as I can make it and cram as much information as I can into the limited space so that

          the user can access it all on one page.  That's the best I can do and the rest is based on the user.

           

          I have also made many post to try and show the advantages of playing digits etc... but all these are based

          on conditions that the user must first meet.  I have been attacked by a few here because they choose to 

          ignore the "IF" statements.  These conditional methods are as mathematically correct as I can make them.

          No one has ever attacked them in the context they were posted, but had to base the attacks on assumption

          they made about what I was posting without reading what I actually posted. 

           

          Dime a dozen yo-yo's if you ask me.

           

           

          Some people love my stuff and others hate it, it all boils down to personal choice.  I don't care if someone

          does not like it, that's there choice.  Your system does not have to have my approval nor does comparing

          your one game to the sets generated in a system test mean anything. 

           

          Some day you may look back on this and see I tried to help you.  Start one topic and post lines for as many

          games as you want.  Let the readers make their own conclusions to how good it is.  You will make more friends

          and gain respect regardless of how it does overall.  With test you can make adjustments and try to make it

          better.   I love to read new ideas because it might spark a new idea or another way of doing something.

           

          RL

          Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

          I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

          they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

          USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

            US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

            Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
            Monte Carlo
            France
            Member #55589
            October 9, 2007
            1181 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 13, 2014, 1:47 am - IP Logged

            I play the same 10 lines for all pick6.

            1-13-14-18-24-27 ** 3-8-18-24-33-37 ** 8-11-14-24-37-38 ** 7-8-18-27-33-34 ** 1-13-14-31-33-34 ** 1-3-7-27-31-34 ** 1-3-7-11-14-33 ** 7-11-13-14-31-34

             

            Those 10 lines performed way better than most lines.As you could easily check my pick6 prediction statistics at LP,23.09% is the average prize ratio to all pick6 in USA.

            I did see your trying help on lottery being random and could not been 100% predicted.

            I also see the point of last digits prediction filtered to 5-6.

            I think you don't see my idea behind my lines either.

            First,I first time predicted 4 winning numbers in a pool of 9.That's where we start,a good beginning,the hope that keeps all going on for further prediction.If my system does not have a possibility to get prize ratio over 100%,I will not even interrupt your posts and tried to help.

            As I worked over many years in lottery,jackpot prediction is only possible by playing a pool of limited numbers.

            So I have 9 to 12 numbers each time,and from those numbers I generate and filter affordable 8-12 tickets.

            Then I made my prediction after yours,and I won 4 match4 and some match3,with the prize ratio over 2000%,and that's when you started to get pissed off and asked me out.

            I am not intended to compare my system or methods to yours,as whose is better.I only wanted to share and communicate with you,but we have different understanding of lottery,I believe the jackpot prediction is possible when we catch 6 winning numbers in a limited pool of 9-12 numbers,while you use almost half or more numbers and pick up pattern from wheels by guess or whatever statistics methods.That is against the odds as no pattern could be correct every time.

            We only need it to be right for one time,to make it.

            Hans

            Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

              RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

              United States
              Member #59354
              March 13, 2008
              4054 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: November 13, 2014, 9:33 am - IP Logged

              Hans

              If we can trap all the numbers in a pool of 9 then we don't need to predict.  The reason I asked you

              to stop posting was all the rhetoric.  You should first test an idea before making such claims.  You have

              to overcome two obstacles, the first is the actual trapping of the numbers then you must build the lines

              to play from those numbers.  Each method can be expressed in mathematical terms of the success.  I

              say that your methods require a number of guesses and as such two different people using you system

              will get different results.  It's not the system but the players ability to choose correctly in both the trapping

              and then the building of the sets.   Anytime one is successful in trapping several numbers in a small pool

              then the wheeling part is a no brainer.   The odds for trapping the numbers in a pool of nine is the only 

              thing of interest here.  Your instructions on how you do this show nothing.  Me saying you will not be able

              to do this on any regular basis is based on math.  At first I thought you may have found in a round-about

              way, some off the wall method to reverse the RNG process.  Once I dug a little deeper then it was quickly

              discerned that your method of selection would do no better than random.  The hit you had was just a

              chance event.  The lines you selected to play were not some work of a super system but the result of

              having 4 of 6 in 9.  It would very hard to play 8 lines from this list and not do well.

               

              I hope you can see this and refrain from posting rhetoric.  Test your methods and know what your saying

              is true.   I have a tool where I can copy and paste a persons lines/sets which will reverse engineer them

              It checks to see if a known wheel was used and if not then it creates a wheel based on the lines/numbers

              played. 

              The wheel is then checked for mathematical qualities to see if there was any pre-draw mathematical reasoning

              behind the selection.  Next it analyzes the actual numbers in play using the same type of analysis.  In your win

              the 4 matching numbers sets had the same 4 numbers.  You say that your wheeling method was far superior to

              any other wheel, that is simply not true.  You took risk and it paid off but it could have went the other way.

               

              I must reiterate how wrong you are about why I suggested you stop posting.  You were wrong to compared your

              one play to the test being performed.  You claimed your system was far superior to my predictor and suggested I

              make the switch, LOL.  The predictor being tested is just one of hundreds of programs that I have written over the

              years to test an idea and has nothing to do with what I use in my regular play.  Read a little about what is being 

              posted before you post.   All the analysis I have ran shows nothing, and I do mean nothing about the lines you 

              have played as being anything more than a chance hit.  Again I could be wrong but the only real way for you to

              prove your system superior is to run many forward test.  You also made the comment that the little quick predictor

              was inferior because it used 20 numbers, I suggest that you look at the total lines produced.

               

              Anyway, if you really think your method is superior then prove it.  Do a bunch or predictions and add them all up and

              see how it does over many games.  I could say that my predictor was far better because it managed a 50f6 once and

              all I had to do was press one button.  How ridiculous would that be, I hope you get my point.  Let me ask you this.

              Lets say that I posted 6 numbers and could guarantee that 5 of them will show in the next draw.  I do not know which

              5 for certain.  How many lines would you need to play for the 6-44 to ensure a JP hit? 

               

              RL

              Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

              I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

              they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

              USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                Monte Carlo
                France
                Member #55589
                October 9, 2007
                1181 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: November 13, 2014, 9:44 am - IP Logged

                RL,

                I am doing the test of my system by counting the prize ratio.

                http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/282717

                The prize ratio has not yet dropped below 101% until I would not be posting any prediction for this lottery.

                I don't care how you select your numbers,how many systems you have made,how many tests you have run.

                So if you could forget about your ego and try to learn to have some respect by giving your best predictions,that's what I appreciate.

                All I care is a successful prediction before the draw,either you manage to keep prize ratio over 100%,or you manage to predict a jackpot.

                That is what I am doing and will do.

                I said my wheeling method with filter applied reduces tickets into affordable amount of tickets to play,very practical.

                So I do not need any back test of the system,I only test predictions.

                I also said if you give me 20 numbers,I could produce better prize ratio tickets than most could do.That was my challenge and you denied.

                You keep asking me out and then compromised yourself by saying trying to help me.But what I see is another thing.

                You did not take the challenge of the 20 numbers wheeling into tickets to compete against mine,to at least beat random tickets.

                Your prediction over all the thread has not made a single match4 in so many rounds,while I made it for the first time with 4 match4 in 8 tickets.

                let's speak with the truth,ok.

                Hans

                Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                  Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                  Monte Carlo
                  France
                  Member #55589
                  October 9, 2007
                  1181 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 13, 2014, 9:55 am - IP Logged

                  Let me ask you this.

                  Lets say that I posted 6 numbers and could guarantee that 5 of them will show in the next draw.  I do not know which

                  5 for certain.  How many lines would you need to play for the 6-44 to ensure a JP hit?

                  In this case,I will play full combinations for a direct JP.

                  But in a case of 9 or 12 numbers,I would choose to play my wheeling with filtered applied.I could get the best prize ratio as I could.

                  My method is based on two times predicting correct 8 last digits for 6/44 lottery.first time is based on actaul past 10 drawings,and the other time is based on converted past 10 drawing results.

                  I compare two time results and select 9-12 numbers with my system.This is the core part of it.But since you said I guess,I would give you some info about it.

                  I usually have more than 20 numbers after first time selection,my system will run as I CLICK THE BUTTON and it generate in a few steps 9 and 12 numbers to play.

                  I will then wheel 9 or 12 numbers with my wheel with filter applied.The filter is again a system.I need to click buttons to get the final tickets.

                  Last time your tickets failed more badly compared to mine.

                  You can see 

                  4 of 6 numbers$29 (average amount)1 in 335
                  3 of 6 numbersFree Ticket (QP)1 in 21

                  so to get 4 match4,can you calculate the odds in 8 tickets?

                  That's the value of the prediction.

                  I hope you get what I mean.

                  Hans

                  Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                    RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                    United States
                    Member #59354
                    March 13, 2008
                    4054 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: November 13, 2014, 12:11 pm - IP Logged

                    Hans

                    The question I posed was to see if you could make the calculations.  The answer is 228.  That's the

                    number of lines one would have to play to ensure a JP hit even if having 5 correct numbers in a pool

                    of 6, the other number must come from outside the pool.

                     

                    The odds you post are based on a $1.00 play.  The real odds for matching a 4of6 on a single line is 1 in 669.42

                    not 1 in 335.  There are 84 possible 6 number lines that can be generated from a pool of 9.  However we cannot

                    make simple calculations to come up with the minimum lines needed to cover every possible combination of 4. 

                    Even if we knew in advance 4 correct numbers it would take 780 total lines to ensure a JP level prize.  Your odds

                    of matching a 4 if 4 playing a 9 number pool is is not 1 in 350 or 1 in 669.43,  it's 45/15 or 1 in 3. 

                     

                    There are 45 4of6 possible combinations in 9 numbers converted to six number lines.  Each line played has 15

                    possible chances of matching one of the possible 4of6 prizes within the possible 9 number lines .   It does not matter

                    which 9 numbers we play.

                     

                    Here is the list

                    1-2-3-4

                    1-2-3-5

                    1-2-3-6

                    1-2-4-5

                    1-2-4-6

                    1-2-5-6

                    1-3-4-5

                    1-3-4-6

                    1-3-5-6

                    1-4-5-6

                    2-3-4-5

                    2-3-4-6

                    2-3-5-6

                    2-4-5-6

                    3-4-5-6 

                    If every line has 15 chances at a 4 of 6 and there are a total of 45 four number combinations possible within a list of

                    9 numbers sorted into 6 number lines then we have a 1 in 3 chance for any line played.  It only takes 3 lines to ensure

                    a 4of5 hit so playing 8 lines should produce around 3ea 4 of 6 matches. 

                     

                    Like I said, if we calculate the odds of correctly selecting 4 of 9 out of a larger 44 number pool then we can see that

                    is where the nice hit comes in, not the 3ea 4of6 lines, they are a given if wheeled correctly.   Your method however

                    could have caused you to not of hit anything.  If the 3 lines I wheeled would have each been played 3 times than no

                    risk would have been taken for 3ea 4of4 hits.  If any combination of 4 of 9 would have showed then my lines would

                    win a prize however yours don't share this fact.  There are reasons for using mathematical proven wheels, it's so you

                    get full coverage in the fewest lines possible.  Think about it.

                     

                    Back to the odds for hitting 4 numbers from 9 numbers taken from a pool of 44.   There are 7,059,052 combinations of 6

                    in 44 numbers.  There are 84 combos of 6 in any 9 lines selected so 7,059,052/84 gives us the odds of 1 in 84036.3. 

                    Notice that I said trapping 6 correct numbers is 1 in 84,036 but what are the odds of trapping 4 numbers in a pool of 9

                    taken from a pool or 44.  There are 135,751 possible 4of4 combos in 44 numbers so and 126 possible 4 number combos

                    in 9 so the overall odds for a 4of6 playing 9 total numbers is 135,751/126=1 in 1077.  So from this we can conclude that

                    hitting a 4of6 pooling 9 numbers is about the same as winning a daily pick-3. 

                     

                    Now broken down do you still feel the same way and does anything here give you cause to change the way you think

                    about your prior comments.  Hitting 4 numbers is not bad but the lines you played could have ruined it.  I suggest you

                    use a mathematically proven wheel from now on and play the lines more than once if you want to increase your overall

                    provided you can trap the numbers in the smaller pool.   These figures show that you should be able to get a 4 number

                    match around 1 out of every 1077 games.  If you can hit maybe 6 to 10 out of every 1077 then you IMHO will have shown

                    that your system might have some merit.  I say 6 to 10 because we have to consider SD and chance it's self.  Build a RNG

                    that generated 9 numbers and then test it against a random set of 6 numbers and check the results.  Run this type of

                    test many times and average the results.  This will give you a baseline.  If your methods do better than the baseline then

                    you can say that your method works, if it falls below then it does not. 

                     

                    RL

                    Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                    I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                    they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                    USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                      US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                      RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                      United States
                      Member #59354
                      March 13, 2008
                      4054 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: November 13, 2014, 12:39 pm - IP Logged

                      P.S.

                      I don't know if you caught the main reason for the long post so I will make it clear.

                      To cover every possible 4of6 which takes 3 lines for a investment of $1.50 at .50

                      per line.  The odds are 1 in 1077 using your system.  The odds for winning a 4of6

                      if playing any line even if chosen at random is 1 in 669.  Your system evaluated using

                      math has worse odds than a QP.  This is not to say that wheeling is bad per say, but

                      for a wheel to do well you must be able to hit the numbers.  All lottery systems suffer

                      from this and like I have said many times, They depend on the users abilities to make

                      good choices.  I Think that a good system must improve the overall odds of a QP provided

                      the conditions are meet.  Even if you are very good at picking numbers your system does

                      not look very good.  Sorry

                      RL

                      Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                      I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                      they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                      USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                        US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                        Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                        Monte Carlo
                        France
                        Member #55589
                        October 9, 2007
                        1181 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: November 13, 2014, 9:14 pm - IP Logged

                        I am tired of your concepts and wheel explanation.You think I don't know about what the wheel is?

                        Like I said if you can't make correct prediction,wheels are useless.so face it.

                        I am sick and tired of checking this thread and its a waste of my time.

                        Goodbye.

                        Hans

                        Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                          Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                          Monte Carlo
                          France
                          Member #55589
                          October 9, 2007
                          1181 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: November 13, 2014, 9:43 pm - IP Logged

                          My lottery prediction evaluation is based on prize ratio,  not on the winning probability.

                          If you are against my theory,we have nothing to talk about.

                          If at least 3 bankers are for sure,my system is 100% to be able to generate profitable tickets.

                          not to mention 4 bankers to be predicted.

                          All I need is more than 3 winning numbers in a pool of 9 or 12.

                          Hans

                          Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                            RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                            mid-Ohio
                            United States
                            Member #9
                            March 24, 2001
                            19894 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 14, 2014, 12:11 am - IP Logged

                            My lottery prediction evaluation is based on prize ratio,  not on the winning probability.

                            If you are against my theory,we have nothing to talk about.

                            If at least 3 bankers are for sure,my system is 100% to be able to generate profitable tickets.

                            not to mention 4 bankers to be predicted.

                            All I need is more than 3 winning numbers in a pool of 9 or 12.

                            Hans

                            Post your predictions on the prediction board and the results will speak for themselves.  Debating the merits of your prediction methods are just words which prove nothing.

                             * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                               
                                         Evil Looking       

                              RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                              United States
                              Member #59354
                              March 13, 2008
                              4054 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: November 14, 2014, 1:51 am - IP Logged

                              Hans

                              The information I gave you is true and like I have tried to explain several times now, unless you can

                              accurately predict the 9 or 12 numbers to pool, you won't do well.  The odds for doing this depends

                              on the matrix played and is easy enough to calculate. 

                              MO 6-44

                              9=1 in 840363.33

                              10=1 in 33614.53

                              11=1 in 15297.33

                              12=1 in 7639.67. 

                              Anytime you manage one of these levels then the odds for each prize match is determined by the number

                              of lines it takes to cover all possible combos for the prize level you are attempting.  As shown in the previous

                              post, a nine number pool playing for a four number match = 1 in 3.  This is because that's the number of lines

                              it takes to cover every 4 number combination.   Saying you are playing for something else does not change the

                              odds of success and so I have to consider your claims as rhetoric.

                              rhet·o·ric

                              language designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect on its audience,

                              but often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content.

                              I really hoped you had found some method for predicting the numbers for my 6-44 or any other game for that matter.

                              It's possible that your methods could have some value but I really hope you can see the value of testing before you 

                              make such claims.  Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.  You don't need to wheel and post the lines

                              for the numbers you predict, it's not necessary as it's the pool of numbers that will set your predictions apart.  Look 

                              at Maddog's challenge and how he runs it.  The numbers is all you need to post because the number of lines needed

                              to match any prize level is as simple as looking up the wheel one wants to use.   

                               

                              I had hoped that you would see what I was referring to so that I would not have to show an analysis of what you are

                              attempting in public forum.  I see many system post that are not mathematically correct but don't bother to try and correct

                              the person posting.  However when someone starts posting in my yard don't expect me to turn the other way and ignore

                              what is being said..

                              Please continue to post numbers so that we can see if your method works out, I don't see enough of anything to make

                              my mind up one way or the other but the odds are against you.  It all depends on your abilities to trap numbers and the

                              rest is trivial.

                              I take no joy in these type of post as I don't want to stifle anyone's creativity, however, I can't allow these types of rhetorical

                              claims to be made even if unintentional. 

                              RL 

                              Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                              I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                              they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                              USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                                US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                                 
                                Page 14 of 19