Get some help dude, less than a month ago you posted this.
I play the same 10 lines for all pick6.
1-13-14-18-24-27 ** 3-8-18-24-33-37 ** 8-11-14-24-37-38 ** 7-8-18-27-33-34 ** 1-13-14-31-33-34 ** 1-3-7-27-31-34 ** 1-3-7-11-14-33 ** 7-11-13-14-31-34
That system went by so fast it changed about as fast as a blink of the eye. I have nothing against
your system, it's that I have big problems with anyone who claims that there system is world changing
based on how it performed for one drawing. I try to run many test and let the results make the claims
not the other way around.
Can you read, the lines I posted here were a test of just one of my many ideas I am working on.
I have made no claims as to this one being the best in the world, it's closer to maybe the worst
prediction tool I have written so far. That's not to say that it can't be improved and when time
permits as I will make a few changes and run another series of test. Comparing you numbers to
the ones posted here is ridiculous to say the least. Like I said some of these programs may do well
at first only to fail later. That's why I test them, not to prove they are the best but to see if they
show any promise. Currently I have about 10 predictors I am either working on or testing.
I may be wrong but I think I saw where you posted lines for other games, if your whatever you call
it is as good as you say then add up all the predictions and post it's overall hits. My count shows one
win out of about half a dozen plays. Now your reduced to counting non winning two number hits to try
and prop it up. Just post the numbers and they will speak loudly enough for anyone to evaluate if it's
good or not. You may think I am trashing your system which I am not, I am trying to get you to see that
the one winning play could have been a product of random/chance and nothing more. If you can't even
consider that then you may be beyond help.
Anyway, I still think you should give your system a good test so you know for sure if it has any merit.
When someone makes these type of claims only to be forced to eat crow a little down the line, well
All my non-predictor programs/systems are dumb as a rock, it's the person using them that makes the
difference. They don't predict anything as they leave that part to the user. I think some of my tools are
about as good as can be coded but that has nothing to do with winning. My goal is to produce software
that is as accurate as I can make it and cram as much information as I can into the limited space so that
the user can access it all on one page. That's the best I can do and the rest is based on the user.
I have also made many post to try and show the advantages of playing digits etc... but all these are based
on conditions that the user must first meet. I have been attacked by a few here because they choose to
ignore the "IF" statements. These conditional methods are as mathematically correct as I can make them.
No one has ever attacked them in the context they were posted, but had to base the attacks on assumption
they made about what I was posting without reading what I actually posted.
Dime a dozen yo-yo's if you ask me.
Some people love my stuff and others hate it, it all boils down to personal choice. I don't care if someone
does not like it, that's there choice. Your system does not have to have my approval nor does comparing
your one game to the sets generated in a system test mean anything.
Some day you may look back on this and see I tried to help you. Start one topic and post lines for as many
games as you want. Let the readers make their own conclusions to how good it is. You will make more friends
and gain respect regardless of how it does overall. With test you can make adjustments and try to make it
better. I love to read new ideas because it might spark a new idea or another way of doing something.