Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 10, 2016, 11:02 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

MO Pick-6 predictions

Topic closed. 282 replies. Last post 2 years ago by Hans.

Page 18 of 19
54
PrintE-mailLink
Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
Monte Carlo
France
Member #55589
October 9, 2007
1181 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 21, 2014, 8:55 pm - IP Logged

MO Pick6 Sat, Nov 22, 2014 Prediction

9 numbers

10 20 08 21 44 41 40 28 33

 

16 tickets=8 dollars

10 20 40 08 41 44
10 20 08 28 41 44
10 20 40 08 28 21
10 20 40 08 28 41
10 20 40 21 41 44
10 08 28 21 41 44
20 40 28 21 41 44
10 20 40 08 21 41
10 20 40 08 28 44
10 20 40 08 28 21
10 20 40 08 41 44
10 20 08 28 41 44
10 20 40 08 28 21
10 20 40 08 28 41
10 20 40 21 41 44
10 08 28 21 41 44

 

If the next drawing will not have a match3,I will play those lines until they hit.

 

cumulative prize ratio:(89+2.5)/(22.5+9+9)=225.93%

3 drawings have been played.I will not post prediction until the cumculative prize ratio drops below 100%.

Playing each drawing 16 tickets=8 dollars,I still have 5 drawings to go to try some match4,or match5 to improve the prize ratio.

Hans

Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

    Avatar
    Horwood NL
    Canada
    Member #70613
    February 6, 2009
    297 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 21, 2014, 9:45 pm - IP Logged

    I can see that, but how did you determine that you should use

    07 01 08  12 10 04 

    I don't see a relationship to the converted results. You say they are the 6 last digits prediction of the converted results.

    12 & 10 can't be a last digit.

    Thanks for the reply.

     GW

      RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

      United States
      Member #59354
      March 13, 2008
      3986 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 22, 2014, 2:56 am - IP Logged

      Hans

      The sets I posted here are not generated using a wheel.  The predictor never even looks at a single number

      past or present.  The predictor first calculates a seed value based on so many previous lines lexicographical 

      index values which are averaged together.  Next the program uses a algorithm which tries to calculate a series

      of steps needed so that one of these values converted will match a 5 of 6.  The program's only purpose is to

      hit a 5 of 6, all other prize matches are a not intended and are just a by-product of the algorithm.  The program

      hit 1ea 5of6 in 90 games and the overall odds of doing this is 1 in 30,961 so from that perspective it performed

      as designed.  My hopes were that it would also show a profit. 

      Did you even read the the post where I explained in detail what the test was all about.   If the seed value is correct

      then the program will match a 5of6 every time.  The seed value is not limited to just one value as there are 228 that

      will work for any game.  I plan to do more work on the method used to calculate the seed value that is used in the first

      step which is the only thing needed to make the program a success. 

      The program generates lexicographical index values which are converted into number sets in the last stage.  As I said

      many post back I have no control over the numbers that make up the actual lines and no number is excluded.  This has

      been proven to be the best betting strategy for any lottery game. 

      Totally different method being used here.  The only time I see actual numbers is when I feel out the bet slips.  The systems

      I actual play don't require analyzing numbers at all.  They build lines based on the mathematical probabilities gotten from

      analysis of the entire matrix.  Such as the number of digits needed to maximize the lines overall chances of showing in the

      next draw. 

      If the history of the game can be analyzed to give up the numbers that will show in the next draw then we would have no

      lotteries.  Short term analysis will sometimes provide good results but after a while they all fail because they are built around

      analysis taken from a few past games and the trends change.   This is why we see a few so called super systems that show

      a few good hits only to fail later.  From what you have said of you methods I suspect this will be your downfall unless you

      continually find short term trends within the data.  Nothing wrong with those methods but I don't use them.  Wheeling so many

      numbers only works if one can select the correct numbers to wheel and the fewer numbers used, the fewer matches one will

      trap.  My methods have made me enough that I will never drop into the red in my lifetime.  I average a 3 to one return over

      the course of a year.  I do have failures but overall I have shown a profit of at least 3 to 1 for over 10 years in a row.  My DMP

      software gives me many different options to generate my lines to play but they all work off the same principles and I have 

      stuck to these like glue for over 20 years now.  This test has nothing to do with my actual play but I will keep working on it 

      until I am convinced it will never work just like the all the other ideas I test.

      RL

      P.S.  The only value one needs to know when making a bet is the overall odds for winning a prize.  The overall odds

              for my 6-44 are 1 in 39.32751 if counting 3of6 and 1 in 655.1932 for a cash prize.

      Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

      I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

      they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

      USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

        US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

        RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

        United States
        Member #59354
        March 13, 2008
        3986 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 22, 2014, 3:16 am - IP Logged

        MO Pick6 Sat, Nov 22, 2014 Prediction

        9 numbers

        10 20 08 21 44 41 40 28 33

         

        16 tickets=8 dollars

        10 20 40 08 41 44
        10 20 08 28 41 44
        10 20 40 08 28 21
        10 20 40 08 28 41
        10 20 40 21 41 44
        10 08 28 21 41 44
        20 40 28 21 41 44
        10 20 40 08 21 41
        10 20 40 08 28 44
        10 20 40 08 28 21
        10 20 40 08 41 44
        10 20 08 28 41 44
        10 20 40 08 28 21
        10 20 40 08 28 41
        10 20 40 21 41 44
        10 08 28 21 41 44

         

        If the next drawing will not have a match3,I will play those lines until they hit.

         

        cumulative prize ratio:(89+2.5)/(22.5+9+9)=225.93%

        3 drawings have been played.I will not post prediction until the cumculative prize ratio drops below 100%.

        Playing each drawing 16 tickets=8 dollars,I still have 5 drawings to go to try some match4,or match5 to improve the prize ratio.

        Hans

        Hans

        You again played 3ea digit zeros in almost every line.  If digit zero does not show at all then none of

        your lines will have much chance at winning anything.  The three numbers can be broken down to cover

        any 2 in 3 lines.

        Example

        10-20

        10-40

        20-40

        Each of these could be played 6 times in 18 lines.   My analysis shows that digit zero will show fewer than 2

        in the next draw.  Just my humble analysis.  Your total digit count is 4 -> 0-1-4-8 and many of the sets only

        have 3ea base digits.  While this won't keep you from hitting a low level prize the probability for hitting a

        prize better than a 3of6 is almost null.

        Here are your numbers wheeled using the 3if3of6in9 built using CM

        Randomized = 28 08 10 33 41 20 40 21 44 

        08 10 20 28 33 41
        08 10 21 28 40 44
        20 21 33 40 41 44
        08 21 28 33 40 41
        10 20 28 33 40 44
        08 10 20 21 41 44
        08 10 28 33 41 44
        08 10 20 21 28 33
        08 10 20 28 40 41

        RL

        Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

        I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

        they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

        USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

          US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

          RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

          United States
          Member #59354
          March 13, 2008
          3986 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 22, 2014, 3:55 am - IP Logged

          Hans

          Here is another tip for what it's worth.  Digit placement for digit zero is best played as the 5th numbers

          second digit.  This placement is almost 50,000 lines better than the second best position as the 3rd

          number's second digit.   This is not a sure thing but it can make a difference overall.  There are 758,826

          lines in the matrix where the 5th number second digit = 0.  The overall is 1 in 7059052/758826=8.30

          and is out 13 games.

          RL 

          digit placement

          Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

          I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

          they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

          USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

            US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

            Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
            Monte Carlo
            France
            Member #55589
            October 9, 2007
            1181 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 22, 2014, 7:13 am - IP Logged

            I can see that, but how did you determine that you should use

            07 01 08  12 10 04 

            I don't see a relationship to the converted results. You say they are the 6 last digits prediction of the converted results.

            12 & 10 can't be a last digit.

            Thanks for the reply.

             GW

            I choose one digit or number from 01 and 11 for digit 1,and from 02 and 12 for digit 2.

            It's like a 6/12 lottery.

            Hans

            Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

              Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
              Monte Carlo
              France
              Member #55589
              October 9, 2007
              1181 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: November 22, 2014, 7:14 am - IP Logged

              Hans

              Here is another tip for what it's worth.  Digit placement for digit zero is best played as the 5th numbers

              second digit.  This placement is almost 50,000 lines better than the second best position as the 3rd

              number's second digit.   This is not a sure thing but it can make a difference overall.  There are 758,826

              lines in the matrix where the 5th number second digit = 0.  The overall is 1 in 7059052/758826=8.30

              and is out 13 games.

              RL 

              digit placement

              05 was predicted in my prediction steps,so if I were to replace digit 0 numbers,05 is the best choice.

              But I have no idea which number shall be replaced.There are three numbers in my prediction with digit 0.

              any clue?

              Hans

              Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                Monte Carlo
                France
                Member #55589
                October 9, 2007
                1181 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: November 22, 2014, 7:16 am - IP Logged

                Hans

                You again played 3ea digit zeros in almost every line.  If digit zero does not show at all then none of

                your lines will have much chance at winning anything.  The three numbers can be broken down to cover

                any 2 in 3 lines.

                Example

                10-20

                10-40

                20-40

                Each of these could be played 6 times in 18 lines.   My analysis shows that digit zero will show fewer than 2

                in the next draw.  Just my humble analysis.  Your total digit count is 4 -> 0-1-4-8 and many of the sets only

                have 3ea base digits.  While this won't keep you from hitting a low level prize the probability for hitting a

                prize better than a 3of6 is almost null.

                Here are your numbers wheeled using the 3if3of6in9 built using CM

                Randomized = 28 08 10 33 41 20 40 21 44 

                08 10 20 28 33 41
                08 10 21 28 40 44
                20 21 33 40 41 44
                08 21 28 33 40 41
                10 20 28 33 40 44
                08 10 20 21 41 44
                08 10 28 33 41 44
                08 10 20 21 28 33
                08 10 20 28 40 41

                RL

                Thanks for your 9 line wheel.Here is what I suggested for 9 numbers wheel

                 

                9 line wheel for 9 numbers

                01 02 03 05 06 07
                01 02 03 05 06 08
                01 02 03 04 06 07
                01 02 03 05 06 07
                01 03 04 05 08 09
                01 02 04 05 06 07
                01 03 04 05 06 08
                01 02 03 07 08 09
                01 02 03 06 07 09 

                 

                16 line wheel for 9 numbers

                 

                01 02 03 05 06 07
                01 02 03 05 06 08
                01 02 03 04 06 07
                01 02 03 05 06 07
                01 03 04 05 08 09
                01 02 04 05 06 07
                01 03 04 05 06 08
                01 02 03 07 08 09
                01 02 03 06 07 09
                01 03 04 05 07 09
                02 04 05 06 07 08
                01 02 03 04 06 07
                02 03 04 05 06 09
                01 02 03 05 07 08
                01 02 03 04 07 08
                01 02 06 07 08 09

                 

                If you could post results after randomizing process,and compare to your 9 line and 16 line wheel,we could check after the drawing to see which one has a higher prize ratio.

                or simply give a random set of 6 in 9 ,and test to see which one has a better chance of a match5 or jackpot as you mentioned your goal is for match5  instead of small match3 and match4 wins.

                 

                let's take an example.

                 

                I also noticed you changed my 9 number order

                Randomized = 28 08 10 33 41 20 40 21 44 

                That would make a great difference on the prize ratio.

                worst condition for 3 in 9 :If 40 21 44 were drawn among 9,there would be only 2 match3 in 9 tickets.prize ratio:22.22%

                best condition for 3 in 9,if 28 08 10 were drawn,5 match3 in 9 tickets,the prize ratio is 55.56%

                 

                prize ratio:1/4.5=22.22%

                08 10 20 28 33 41
                08 10 21 28 40 44
                20 21 33 40 41 44
                08 21 28 33 40 41
                10 20 28 33 40 44
                08 10 20 21 41 44
                08 10 28 33 41 44
                08 10 20 21 28 33
                08 10 20 28 40 41

                Here is my results

                9 numbers

                10 20 08 21 44 41 40 28 33

                 

                16 tickets=8 dollars

                10 20 40 08 41 44
                10 20 08 28 41 44
                10 20 40 08 28 21
                10 20 40 08 28 41
                10 20 40 21 41 44
                10 08 28 21 41 44
                20 40 28 21 41 44
                10 20 40 08 21 41
                10 20 40 08 28 44
                10 20 40 08 28 21
                10 20 40 08 41 44
                10 20 08 28 41 44
                10 20 40 08 28 21
                10 20 40 08 28 41
                10 20 40 21 41 44
                10 08 28 21 41 44

                 

                worst condition for 3 in 9 :If 40 28 33  were drawn among 9,no win,worse than yours.

                best condition for 3 in 9,if 10 20 08 were drawn,11 match3 in 9 tickets,the prize ratio is 5.5/8=68.75%,better than yours.

                we have different approach to the prize ratio for small wins,which you believed not much meaning as the goal is for match5 or jackpot.

                But let's check  which one has a better chance for match5 or jackpot.

                Hans

                Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                  Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                  Monte Carlo
                  France
                  Member #55589
                  October 9, 2007
                  1181 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 22, 2014, 7:37 am - IP Logged

                  I can see that, but how did you determine that you should use

                  07 01 08  12 10 04 

                  I don't see a relationship to the converted results. You say they are the 6 last digits prediction of the converted results.

                  12 & 10 can't be a last digit.

                  Thanks for the reply.

                   GW

                  I can see that, but how did you determine that you should use

                  I predict using past 10 drawing converted results the 6 digit from 01 to 12.

                  I usually choose one number from 01 and 11,or from 02 and 12

                  so that turned 6/12 lottery to 6/10 lottery.

                  This part is what I am still improving

                   

                  when 6 digits were correctly predicted,shall it have listed about 21 numbers with all 6 winning numbers from all numbers.

                  The next steps are choosing 9 numbers from 21 numbers abouts.This is the core part of my system and is what really matters.

                   

                  Usually 9 numbers would have 3-4 winning numbers,as I have done for the first and last time under this thread,

                  but who knows when 9 numbers have 5 or 6 winning numbers?

                  That's the time to win big in my 16 tickets.

                   

                  even if I don't have all 5 or 6 winning numbers,let's say  3-4 winning numbers,I can still win something than losing all by wheeling more than 9 numbers.

                  I do think prediction shall be reduced to a very limited pool,like 9-12 numbers,rather than more than 20 or 30 numbers.Because that is where filters are needed and involved,which is completely out of  control from human side.This time you are right and the next time you are wrong.

                  If we do need to use more numbers,I suggest using 16 numbers max.

                   

                  The final wheeling part is still under test and discussion with RL.

                  Hans

                  Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                    Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                    Monte Carlo
                    France
                    Member #55589
                    October 9, 2007
                    1181 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: November 22, 2014, 8:25 am - IP Logged

                    Hans

                    The sets I posted here are not generated using a wheel.  The predictor never even looks at a single number

                    past or present.  The predictor first calculates a seed value based on so many previous lines lexicographical 

                    index values which are averaged together.  Next the program uses a algorithm which tries to calculate a series

                    of steps needed so that one of these values converted will match a 5 of 6.  The program's only purpose is to

                    hit a 5 of 6, all other prize matches are a not intended and are just a by-product of the algorithm.  The program

                    hit 1ea 5of6 in 90 games and the overall odds of doing this is 1 in 30,961 so from that perspective it performed

                    as designed.  My hopes were that it would also show a profit. 

                    Did you even read the the post where I explained in detail what the test was all about.   If the seed value is correct

                    then the program will match a 5of6 every time.  The seed value is not limited to just one value as there are 228 that

                    will work for any game.  I plan to do more work on the method used to calculate the seed value that is used in the first

                    step which is the only thing needed to make the program a success. 

                    The program generates lexicographical index values which are converted into number sets in the last stage.  As I said

                    many post back I have no control over the numbers that make up the actual lines and no number is excluded.  This has

                    been proven to be the best betting strategy for any lottery game. 

                    Totally different method being used here.  The only time I see actual numbers is when I feel out the bet slips.  The systems

                    I actual play don't require analyzing numbers at all.  They build lines based on the mathematical probabilities gotten from

                    analysis of the entire matrix.  Such as the number of digits needed to maximize the lines overall chances of showing in the

                    next draw. 

                    If the history of the game can be analyzed to give up the numbers that will show in the next draw then we would have no

                    lotteries.  Short term analysis will sometimes provide good results but after a while they all fail because they are built around

                    analysis taken from a few past games and the trends change.   This is why we see a few so called super systems that show

                    a few good hits only to fail later.  From what you have said of you methods I suspect this will be your downfall unless you

                    continually find short term trends within the data.  Nothing wrong with those methods but I don't use them.  Wheeling so many

                    numbers only works if one can select the correct numbers to wheel and the fewer numbers used, the fewer matches one will

                    trap.  My methods have made me enough that I will never drop into the red in my lifetime.  I average a 3 to one return over

                    the course of a year.  I do have failures but overall I have shown a profit of at least 3 to 1 for over 10 years in a row.  My DMP

                    software gives me many different options to generate my lines to play but they all work off the same principles and I have 

                    stuck to these like glue for over 20 years now.  This test has nothing to do with my actual play but I will keep working on it 

                    until I am convinced it will never work just like the all the other ideas I test.

                    RL

                    P.S.  The only value one needs to know when making a bet is the overall odds for winning a prize.  The overall odds

                            for my 6-44 are 1 in 39.32751 if counting 3of6 and 1 in 655.1932 for a cash prize.

                    Hans

                    The sets I posted here are not generated using a wheel.  The predictor never even looks at a single number

                    past or present.  The predictor first calculates a seed value based on so many previous lines lexicographical 

                    index values which are averaged together.  Next the program uses a algorithm which tries to calculate a series

                    of steps needed so that one of these values converted will match a 5 of 6.  The program's only purpose is to

                    hit a 5 of 6, all other prize matches are a not intended and are just a by-product of the algorithm.

                     

                    This is about prize winning power.You can check a list of wheels using 9-53 numbers at lotto-logix website.The chance of different match is calculated already.

                    That pretty much saves your work.

                    Please check http://www.lotto-logix.com/wheelhouse/ecnr42n55c.html

                    BALANCED ECONOMY WHEEL

                     

                    For 42 Numbers In 55 Combinations

                     

                    Prize Winning Power

                    3 if 3 = 09.40% ... 4 if 4 = 00.74% ... 5 if 5 = 00.04%
                    3 if 4 = 33.54% ... 4 if 5 = 03.50% ... 5 if 6 = 00.23%
                    3 if 5 = 65.41% ... 4 if 6 = 09.92%
                    3 if 6 = 88.99%

                    5if5=00.04% and 5if6 is 00.23% by playing 42 numbers 55  combinations.

                    Even if you play 55 combinations for 1000 times,the chance of 5if5 is 40%,and by playing 100 times,the chance of 5if6 is 23%

                    Hans

                    Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                      Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                      Monte Carlo
                      France
                      Member #55589
                      October 9, 2007
                      1181 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: November 22, 2014, 9:01 am - IP Logged

                      BALANCED ECONOMY WHEEL

                       

                      For 42 Numbers In 55 Combinations

                       

                      Prize Winning Power

                      3 if 3 = 09.40% ... 4 if 4 = 00.74% ... 5 if 5 = 00.04%
                      3 if 4 = 33.54% ... 4 if 5 = 03.50% ... 5 if 6 = 00.23%
                      3 if 5 = 65.41% ... 4 if 6 = 09.92%
                      3 if 6 = 88.99%

                      5if5=00.04% and 5if6 is 00.23% by playing 42 numbers 55  combinations.

                      correction:Even if you play 55 combinations for 10000 times,the chance of 5if5 is 40%,and by playing 1000 times,the chance of 5if6 is 23%

                       

                      Also refer to 

                       v k t m 
                       44,6,5,5    204785 

                       204785 tickets for a guaranteed match5 paid out less than 1000 bucks. 


                      from http://rbelic.home.xs4all.nl/imp.htm

                      Hans

                      Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                        RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                        United States
                        Member #59354
                        March 13, 2008
                        3986 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: November 22, 2014, 10:21 am - IP Logged

                        Hans

                        You wrote.

                        204785 tickets for a guaranteed match5 paid out less than 1000 bucks. 

                        The total lines generated over the full test was less than 3,150.  The odds for a 5of6 hit in a
                        6-44 game are 1 in 30,961.  The predictor managed a 5of6 in  < 3150 so 30961/3150 = 9.8
                        times better than expected.  This is still not good enough to come out ahead.  3150/2=$1575
                        so even with all other prizes combined it still lost money.  To come out ahead for this game the
                        predictor needs to hit a 5of6 around once in every 45 games.  I believe the predictor can be
                        coded do this without much work.  The more lines one plays the better the chances for a  JP level
                        prize.  35 lines can be played for less than $20.00 per game or $40.00 per week.  If the predictor
                        can be made to function at the one 5of6 for every 45 games played then I could play it for ever
                        without it ever costing me a penny.  The only mathematically sound way to increase our chances
                        of a JP level prize is to play more lines.  Winning once every 45 games would meet the break-even
                        level needed to play without any risk as all tickets will require no out of pocket expense.

                        The
                        perfect system.


                        RL

                        Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                        I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                        they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                        USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                          US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                          Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                          Monte Carlo
                          France
                          Member #55589
                          October 9, 2007
                          1181 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: November 22, 2014, 10:33 am - IP Logged

                          Hans

                          You wrote.

                          204785 tickets for a guaranteed match5 paid out less than 1000 bucks. 

                          The total lines generated over the full test was less than 3,150.  The odds for a 5of6 hit in a
                          6-44 game are 1 in 30,961.  The predictor managed a 5of6 in  < 3150 so 30961/3150 = 9.8
                          times better than expected.  This is still not good enough to come out ahead.  3150/2=$1575
                          so even with all other prizes combined it still lost money.  To come out ahead for this game the
                          predictor needs to hit a 5of6 around once in every 45 games.  I believe the predictor can be
                          coded do this without much work.  The more lines one plays the better the chances for a  JP level
                          prize.  35 lines can be played for less than $20.00 per game or $40.00 per week.  If the predictor
                          can be made to function at the one 5of6 for every 45 games played then I could play it for ever
                          without it ever costing me a penny.  The only mathematically sound way to increase our chances
                          of a JP level prize is to play more lines.  Winning once every 45 games would meet the break-even
                          level needed to play without any risk as all tickets will require no out of pocket expense.

                          The
                          perfect system.


                          RL

                          sound nice.how many numbers have you wheeled in 35 lines? all 44 numbers or less than 44 numbers?

                          If your system could manage to have 5-6 winning numbers in 35 lines(winning numbers do not have to be on one line) using less than 44 numbers,there are some ways around I know to make profitable 16 lines.

                          Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                            RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                            United States
                            Member #59354
                            March 13, 2008
                            3986 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 22, 2014, 10:39 am - IP Logged

                            Hans

                            Reconfigure you lines using pairs of second digit zeros so that each combo will show 6 times in

                            18 lines.  Then use the 05 in place of the the third.  This is based on banking digit zero as most

                            likely to show > 1 in the next draw.   Personally I think digit zero will show less than 2 and maybe

                            not at all in the next game.  Just my best guess, I could be wrong as I am just stating the most

                            probable.

                             

                            RL

                            Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                            I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                            they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                            USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                              US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                              Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
                              Monte Carlo
                              France
                              Member #55589
                              October 9, 2007
                              1181 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: November 22, 2014, 10:45 am - IP Logged

                              Hans

                              Reconfigure you lines using pairs of second digit zeros so that each combo will show 6 times in

                              18 lines.  Then use the 05 in place of the the third.  This is based on banking digit zero as most

                              likely to show > 1 in the next draw.   Personally I think digit zero will show less than 2 and maybe

                              not at all in the next game.  Just my best guess, I could be wrong as I am just stating the most

                              probable.

                               

                              RL

                              we will see after the drawing if it works ;)

                              but I wanna bet on 10 41 21 44 40 20 one ticket~~

                              so if it has one match4,and by playing 16 times=16 tickets,that strategy will have 16*29=464 dollars!

                              Prize ratio:464/8=5800%.

                              That equals to half match5 prize.so I dont need to play 35 lines to have a match5 prize less than 1000,I need to play 32 times one match4 ticket and can just make it.

                              And if it's a match3 ticket,its free play so no loss.

                              match5 or jackpot would be the best as 16 times match5 prize can be around 15000,and almost all jackpot prize would be mine.

                              when will you post your 35 lines?

                              Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

                                 
                                Page 18 of 19