Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 18, 2017, 12:48 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

RL's T-Lex program download, free software

Topic closed. 1459 replies. Last post 9 months ago by frenchie.

Page 73 of 98
4.922
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
892 Posts
Offline
Posted: December 29, 2015, 10:53 am - IP Logged

Craig

I wanted to ask about something. Filter 2 in T-lex works really good, but it does not work at all if the first position is left running wild. Do you think the filter could work equally good with the first position not filled?

Thanks.

Adam

Craig

I think I've found an answer to it. It seems there's a way to do it. Putting 1 digit in positions 2-5 and 3 digits in the last positions should work ok. As a result we should get ar. 10 sets with a good hit among them, provided the digits are correct.

Adam

    RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

    United States
    Member #59354
    March 13, 2008
    4060 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: December 29, 2015, 12:05 pm - IP Logged

    Adam

    Filter 2 is a line optimizer and was intended as a automated last step when playing straight lexie

    values such as setting the first 4 values and letting the last 2 run wild.  In this type of setup the

    program will reduce to the fewest lines possible and guarantee at least one 4of5, 5of6 etc..  If

    the lines are generated with split digits then it takes many more lines to cover.

    Any correct lexie digit setup will produce a JP but the filter-2 option will be less effective in reducing 

    those lines.  It's impossible to optimize a pool of numbers for a JP hit so the best guaranteed prize

    will always be limited to a JP - 1 level prize.  It is however always possible that the optimizer will hit

    the JP, just not guaranteed. 

    The setup you mention will produce 6*1*10*10*1*3=1800 unfiltered lines for my 5-39.  The optimizer

    reduced to 793 with 1ea 4of5 and 15ea 3of5 and 85ea 2of5 for a total of 101 prize paying tickets so

    any line played from that pool has a 1 in 793 / 101 = 7.85 chance of winning a prize.   The overall odds

    of winning a prize is 1 in 8.77 so it does increase one's chances of winning something. 

    It's easy to become discouraged playing the lexie but hitting the first 4 digits gives us better odds than

    a standard P-4 depending on the matrix.  Hitting the first four lexie digits in a 5-39 gives us odds of 1 in

    5757 vs 1 in 10,000 for a standard P-4 and in almost all games the filter-2 will reduce to less than 10 with

    at least one 4of5 and several 3of5 prizes plus a shot at the JP.   If looking at the odds and the payout for

    a P-4 box vs the 5-39 lower level prize payouts then the 5-39 offers better odds of winning a prize.

     

    We do need better tools for predicting/selecting which digits to put into play but it's always going to be a

    guessing game.  I hate to loose even when playing on paper but I don't under estimate the odds for what

    we are trying to do.  I can't predict anything but I seem to be able to make some good guesses.

     

    In my P-4 test play I have gotten a couple str8 hits so far and I am up over $5K after ticket cost.  I will paper

    play for two weeks and if everything goes well then I will go live.

     

    RL

    Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

    I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

    they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

    USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

      US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

      lottoburg's avatar - wiggle
      NYC
      United States
      Member #54483
      August 20, 2007
      887 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: December 29, 2015, 1:00 pm - IP Logged

      Adam

      Filter 2 is a line optimizer and was intended as a automated last step when playing straight lexie

      values such as setting the first 4 values and letting the last 2 run wild.  In this type of setup the

      program will reduce to the fewest lines possible and guarantee at least one 4of5, 5of6 etc..  If

      the lines are generated with split digits then it takes many more lines to cover.

      Any correct lexie digit setup will produce a JP but the filter-2 option will be less effective in reducing 

      those lines.  It's impossible to optimize a pool of numbers for a JP hit so the best guaranteed prize

      will always be limited to a JP - 1 level prize.  It is however always possible that the optimizer will hit

      the JP, just not guaranteed. 

      The setup you mention will produce 6*1*10*10*1*3=1800 unfiltered lines for my 5-39.  The optimizer

      reduced to 793 with 1ea 4of5 and 15ea 3of5 and 85ea 2of5 for a total of 101 prize paying tickets so

      any line played from that pool has a 1 in 793 / 101 = 7.85 chance of winning a prize.   The overall odds

      of winning a prize is 1 in 8.77 so it does increase one's chances of winning something. 

      It's easy to become discouraged playing the lexie but hitting the first 4 digits gives us better odds than

      a standard P-4 depending on the matrix.  Hitting the first four lexie digits in a 5-39 gives us odds of 1 in

      5757 vs 1 in 10,000 for a standard P-4 and in almost all games the filter-2 will reduce to less than 10 with

      at least one 4of5 and several 3of5 prizes plus a shot at the JP.   If looking at the odds and the payout for

      a P-4 box vs the 5-39 lower level prize payouts then the 5-39 offers better odds of winning a prize.

       

      We do need better tools for predicting/selecting which digits to put into play but it's always going to be a

      guessing game.  I hate to loose even when playing on paper but I don't under estimate the odds for what

      we are trying to do.  I can't predict anything but I seem to be able to make some good guesses.

       

      In my P-4 test play I have gotten a couple str8 hits so far and I am up over $5K after ticket cost.  I will paper

      play for two weeks and if everything goes well then I will go live.

       

      RL

      RL,

      Thanks for your great explanations about Fit 2!

      I think the Fit 2 is really important filter for reducing the huge sets successfully.

      But I'm still confused about how and when to use Fit 2 correctly.

      Also, I can not find some tips from H key (Instruction key) and Videos from the Thread.

      Could you tell us about the use further by using a live example such MO539 in detail?

      Thanks for your sincere help and nice sharing again!!!

      Happy Holidays,

      lb

      • Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
      • Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
      • Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.
        Avatar
        Krakow
        Poland
        Member #86302
        February 2, 2010
        892 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: December 29, 2015, 3:13 pm - IP Logged

        Adam

        Filter 2 is a line optimizer and was intended as a automated last step when playing straight lexie

        values such as setting the first 4 values and letting the last 2 run wild.  In this type of setup the

        program will reduce to the fewest lines possible and guarantee at least one 4of5, 5of6 etc..  If

        the lines are generated with split digits then it takes many more lines to cover.

        Any correct lexie digit setup will produce a JP but the filter-2 option will be less effective in reducing 

        those lines.  It's impossible to optimize a pool of numbers for a JP hit so the best guaranteed prize

        will always be limited to a JP - 1 level prize.  It is however always possible that the optimizer will hit

        the JP, just not guaranteed. 

        The setup you mention will produce 6*1*10*10*1*3=1800 unfiltered lines for my 5-39.  The optimizer

        reduced to 793 with 1ea 4of5 and 15ea 3of5 and 85ea 2of5 for a total of 101 prize paying tickets so

        any line played from that pool has a 1 in 793 / 101 = 7.85 chance of winning a prize.   The overall odds

        of winning a prize is 1 in 8.77 so it does increase one's chances of winning something. 

        It's easy to become discouraged playing the lexie but hitting the first 4 digits gives us better odds than

        a standard P-4 depending on the matrix.  Hitting the first four lexie digits in a 5-39 gives us odds of 1 in

        5757 vs 1 in 10,000 for a standard P-4 and in almost all games the filter-2 will reduce to less than 10 with

        at least one 4of5 and several 3of5 prizes plus a shot at the JP.   If looking at the odds and the payout for

        a P-4 box vs the 5-39 lower level prize payouts then the 5-39 offers better odds of winning a prize.

         

        We do need better tools for predicting/selecting which digits to put into play but it's always going to be a

        guessing game.  I hate to loose even when playing on paper but I don't under estimate the odds for what

        we are trying to do.  I can't predict anything but I seem to be able to make some good guesses.

         

        In my P-4 test play I have gotten a couple str8 hits so far and I am up over $5K after ticket cost.  I will paper

        play for two weeks and if everything goes well then I will go live.

         

        RL

        Craig

        Actually that's the setup I meant. It should give around 30 sets depending on digit selections prior to filtering. From what I've seen Filter 2 is also effective for that kind of setup.

        Adam

        lexie

          RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

          United States
          Member #59354
          March 13, 2008
          4060 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: December 29, 2015, 5:23 pm - IP Logged

          Adam

          Hope you played those numbers.

          RL

          Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

          I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

          they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

          USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

            US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

            Avatar
            Krakow
            Poland
            Member #86302
            February 2, 2010
            892 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: December 30, 2015, 2:47 am - IP Logged

            Adam

            Hope you played those numbers.

            RL

            Craig

            Unfortunately I didn't. I didn't make it to the retailer. The winner was among 10 sets left after the reduction.

            Adam

              RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

              United States
              Member #59354
              March 13, 2008
              4060 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: December 30, 2015, 9:35 am - IP Logged

              Adam

              Maybe next time.

              RL

              Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

              I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

              they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

              USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                Avatar
                Lyon
                France
                Member #136722
                December 17, 2012
                44 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: December 30, 2015, 9:49 am - IP Logged

                Dear, RL

                As my english is a bit  rusted I will try for this end of year to be the most simple.

                I appreciate your work with Tyrasnnosorus and wish to add a small contribution, if this could help, or give some point of view.

                I use this tools for 5/49 game which gives me 7 digit to play.

                To choose my digits I use your s/c and NMD option

                All the time I have to hesitate between several combinations to wheel but of course with a large amount of possible choice

                So I wonder why not separate your wheels in by exemple 3 choices : Probable, Possible, Certain

                Certain = 1 choice, Probable = 2 choices, Possible = 3 choices of digit

                If I choose your wheel with let's say : 2certain, 2probable and 3 possible I come with more than 100 lines, but it is possible to play the same with less than 19 lines.

                See below how it fit

                 

                A02451Choice A
                B411XXChoice B
                C55590Choice C
                1BBCAA=41551
                2BBACC=41490
                3CCCAC=55550
                4CCBCA=55191
                5AACCA=02591
                6BABAC=42150
                7CAAAA=52451
                8ACACC=05490
                9ACBAA=05151
                10ABAAC=01450
                11CBBCA=51191
                12BABCC=42190
                13BCACA=45491   
                14ABACC=01490
                15CCCCC=55590
                16CCBAC=55150
                17BCAAC=45450
                18BAACC=42490
                19ABCAC=01550

                more orless the same with by an other example with 7 probable (7X2 digits)

                With only 16lines ( in your process  it come with 70 lines and 36 after filter )

                1078692Choice 1
                0951533Choice 2
                1111122=1078633
                2222121=0951632
                1212111=1971692
                1112221=1071532
                2212222=0971533
                1122122=1051633
                1221221=1958532
                2121112=0058693
                2122211=0051592
                2111121=0078632
                1121111=1058692
                2112112=0071693
                1111212=1078593
                2211211=0978592
                1222212=1951593
                2121222=0058533

                The question is do you think it could be implémented in your RL-Magic?

                  Avatar
                  Krakow
                  Poland
                  Member #86302
                  February 2, 2010
                  892 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: December 31, 2015, 9:49 am - IP Logged

                  Guys

                  Happy New Year to all of you and your families!

                  Adam

                    lottoburg's avatar - wiggle
                    NYC
                    United States
                    Member #54483
                    August 20, 2007
                    887 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: December 31, 2015, 9:55 am - IP Logged

                    Guys

                    Happy New Year to all of you and your families!

                    Adam

                    Hi,RL,Winsum,Nomyday,Adam and all:

                    Thanks for your great program and strategies!

                    Happy New Year to you and your families!!!

                    lb

                    • Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
                    • Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
                    • Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.
                      RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                      United States
                      Member #59354
                      March 13, 2008
                      4060 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: December 31, 2015, 10:33 am - IP Logged

                      jig69

                      I am working on a new wheel.  It's not the same as you describe above but may offer some interesting results.

                      I am testing it on P-4 but it should not be difficult to apply it to the lexie.  I am not sure if I understand exactly

                      what you are doing but the new wheel I am testing offers the user the choice of entering several digits and then

                      assigning options as to how each digit is used.  Some can be set to hit by position and others can be set as key

                      digits without regard to position and others can be set wild where they can be used as fillers.  The wheel offers

                      the user the option as to limit the number of fillers within a single line so it will be interesting to see the output.

                      The wheel should hit more positional digits but not sure how many lines will be generated.   Many times I have

                      most of the correct digits just a couple will be in the wrong position.  This wheel should fix that problem and still

                      stay within budget, but won't know for sure without more testing.  If it does well for P-4 then I will apply it to the

                      t-Lex program.

                      RL

                      Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                      I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                      they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                      USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                        US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                        RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                        United States
                        Member #59354
                        March 13, 2008
                        4060 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: December 31, 2015, 10:40 am - IP Logged

                        Adam

                        The wife missed the 5-39 last night by 3 step values and only played 1 line.  She missed step-1 on digit #2

                        and played a 2-1-1 and it was a 1-1-1.  Had she changed that one digit she would have hit the first 5 lexie

                        digits on one line for a 4of5 match. 

                        RL

                        Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                        I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                        they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                        USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                          US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                          RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                          United States
                          Member #59354
                          March 13, 2008
                          4060 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: December 31, 2015, 10:41 am - IP Logged

                          lottoburg

                          Happy new year to you and yours, same goes out to everyone.

                          RL

                          Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

                          I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

                          they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

                          USAF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Base_Engineer_Emergency_Force

                            US Flag Trump / 2016 & 2020  

                            Avatar
                            Krakow
                            Poland
                            Member #86302
                            February 2, 2010
                            892 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: December 31, 2015, 12:22 pm - IP Logged

                            Craig

                            Teresa is unbelievable. Playing one line and being so close is admirable. She will do and on her terms.

                            Adam

                              Avatar
                              Lyon
                              France
                              Member #136722
                              December 17, 2012
                              44 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: December 31, 2015, 1:49 pm - IP Logged
                              Thank you for your answer,

                              As we have no p3 / 4 here so I expect that will come in a version for the famous T-Lex that I often use with unfortunately too many games to play.

                              That's why I thought that a reduction like this one could be interesting, as it gives me often 3 or 4 number.
                              the one I use the most (on paper) is composed of 4 X 3 numbers within 9 lines:
                              A2421
                              B6016
                              C7343
                              1BCCB6346
                              2CBAC7023
                              3ACBA2311
                              4CACA7441
                              5AAAB2426
                              6BABC6413
                              7ABCC2043
                              8CBBB7016
                              9BBAA6021

                              Well that said, we are all in preparation for the new year eve and offers to seeing you next year, so I have to force myself ....
                              Best regards to all .
                                 
                                Page 73 of 98