Welcome Guest
You last visited January 18, 2017, 12:48 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Topic closed. 1459 replies. Last post 9 months ago by frenchie.

 Page 73 of 98
Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
892 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 29, 2015, 10:53 am - IP Logged

Craig

I wanted to ask about something. Filter 2 in T-lex works really good, but it does not work at all if the first position is left running wild. Do you think the filter could work equally good with the first position not filled?

Thanks.

Craig

I think I've found an answer to it. It seems there's a way to do it. Putting 1 digit in positions 2-5 and 3 digits in the last positions should work ok. As a result we should get ar. 10 sets with a good hit among them, provided the digits are correct.

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
4060 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 29, 2015, 12:05 pm - IP Logged

Filter 2 is a line optimizer and was intended as a automated last step when playing straight lexie

values such as setting the first 4 values and letting the last 2 run wild.  In this type of setup the

program will reduce to the fewest lines possible and guarantee at least one 4of5, 5of6 etc..  If

the lines are generated with split digits then it takes many more lines to cover.

Any correct lexie digit setup will produce a JP but the filter-2 option will be less effective in reducing

those lines.  It's impossible to optimize a pool of numbers for a JP hit so the best guaranteed prize

will always be limited to a JP - 1 level prize.  It is however always possible that the optimizer will hit

the JP, just not guaranteed.

The setup you mention will produce 6*1*10*10*1*3=1800 unfiltered lines for my 5-39.  The optimizer

reduced to 793 with 1ea 4of5 and 15ea 3of5 and 85ea 2of5 for a total of 101 prize paying tickets so

any line played from that pool has a 1 in 793 / 101 = 7.85 chance of winning a prize.   The overall odds

of winning a prize is 1 in 8.77 so it does increase one's chances of winning something.

It's easy to become discouraged playing the lexie but hitting the first 4 digits gives us better odds than

a standard P-4 depending on the matrix.  Hitting the first four lexie digits in a 5-39 gives us odds of 1 in

5757 vs 1 in 10,000 for a standard P-4 and in almost all games the filter-2 will reduce to less than 10 with

at least one 4of5 and several 3of5 prizes plus a shot at the JP.   If looking at the odds and the payout for

a P-4 box vs the 5-39 lower level prize payouts then the 5-39 offers better odds of winning a prize.

We do need better tools for predicting/selecting which digits to put into play but it's always going to be a

guessing game.  I hate to loose even when playing on paper but I don't under estimate the odds for what

we are trying to do.  I can't predict anything but I seem to be able to make some good guesses.

In my P-4 test play I have gotten a couple str8 hits so far and I am up over \$5K after ticket cost.  I will paper

play for two weeks and if everything goes well then I will go live.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

NYC
United States
Member #54483
August 20, 2007
887 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 29, 2015, 1:00 pm - IP Logged

Filter 2 is a line optimizer and was intended as a automated last step when playing straight lexie

values such as setting the first 4 values and letting the last 2 run wild.  In this type of setup the

program will reduce to the fewest lines possible and guarantee at least one 4of5, 5of6 etc..  If

the lines are generated with split digits then it takes many more lines to cover.

Any correct lexie digit setup will produce a JP but the filter-2 option will be less effective in reducing

those lines.  It's impossible to optimize a pool of numbers for a JP hit so the best guaranteed prize

will always be limited to a JP - 1 level prize.  It is however always possible that the optimizer will hit

the JP, just not guaranteed.

The setup you mention will produce 6*1*10*10*1*3=1800 unfiltered lines for my 5-39.  The optimizer

reduced to 793 with 1ea 4of5 and 15ea 3of5 and 85ea 2of5 for a total of 101 prize paying tickets so

any line played from that pool has a 1 in 793 / 101 = 7.85 chance of winning a prize.   The overall odds

of winning a prize is 1 in 8.77 so it does increase one's chances of winning something.

It's easy to become discouraged playing the lexie but hitting the first 4 digits gives us better odds than

a standard P-4 depending on the matrix.  Hitting the first four lexie digits in a 5-39 gives us odds of 1 in

5757 vs 1 in 10,000 for a standard P-4 and in almost all games the filter-2 will reduce to less than 10 with

at least one 4of5 and several 3of5 prizes plus a shot at the JP.   If looking at the odds and the payout for

a P-4 box vs the 5-39 lower level prize payouts then the 5-39 offers better odds of winning a prize.

We do need better tools for predicting/selecting which digits to put into play but it's always going to be a

guessing game.  I hate to loose even when playing on paper but I don't under estimate the odds for what

we are trying to do.  I can't predict anything but I seem to be able to make some good guesses.

In my P-4 test play I have gotten a couple str8 hits so far and I am up over \$5K after ticket cost.  I will paper

play for two weeks and if everything goes well then I will go live.

RL

RL,

I think the Fit 2 is really important filter for reducing the huge sets successfully.

But I'm still confused about how and when to use Fit 2 correctly.

Also, I can not find some tips from H key (Instruction key) and Videos from the Thread.

Could you tell us about the use further by using a live example such MO539 in detail?

Thanks for your sincere help and nice sharing again!!!

Happy Holidays,

lb

• Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
• Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
• Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.
Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
892 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 29, 2015, 3:13 pm - IP Logged

Filter 2 is a line optimizer and was intended as a automated last step when playing straight lexie

values such as setting the first 4 values and letting the last 2 run wild.  In this type of setup the

program will reduce to the fewest lines possible and guarantee at least one 4of5, 5of6 etc..  If

the lines are generated with split digits then it takes many more lines to cover.

Any correct lexie digit setup will produce a JP but the filter-2 option will be less effective in reducing

those lines.  It's impossible to optimize a pool of numbers for a JP hit so the best guaranteed prize

will always be limited to a JP - 1 level prize.  It is however always possible that the optimizer will hit

the JP, just not guaranteed.

The setup you mention will produce 6*1*10*10*1*3=1800 unfiltered lines for my 5-39.  The optimizer

reduced to 793 with 1ea 4of5 and 15ea 3of5 and 85ea 2of5 for a total of 101 prize paying tickets so

any line played from that pool has a 1 in 793 / 101 = 7.85 chance of winning a prize.   The overall odds

of winning a prize is 1 in 8.77 so it does increase one's chances of winning something.

It's easy to become discouraged playing the lexie but hitting the first 4 digits gives us better odds than

a standard P-4 depending on the matrix.  Hitting the first four lexie digits in a 5-39 gives us odds of 1 in

5757 vs 1 in 10,000 for a standard P-4 and in almost all games the filter-2 will reduce to less than 10 with

at least one 4of5 and several 3of5 prizes plus a shot at the JP.   If looking at the odds and the payout for

a P-4 box vs the 5-39 lower level prize payouts then the 5-39 offers better odds of winning a prize.

We do need better tools for predicting/selecting which digits to put into play but it's always going to be a

guessing game.  I hate to loose even when playing on paper but I don't under estimate the odds for what

we are trying to do.  I can't predict anything but I seem to be able to make some good guesses.

In my P-4 test play I have gotten a couple str8 hits so far and I am up over \$5K after ticket cost.  I will paper

play for two weeks and if everything goes well then I will go live.

RL

Craig

Actually that's the setup I meant. It should give around 30 sets depending on digit selections prior to filtering. From what I've seen Filter 2 is also effective for that kind of setup.

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
4060 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 29, 2015, 5:23 pm - IP Logged

Hope you played those numbers.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
892 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 30, 2015, 2:47 am - IP Logged

Hope you played those numbers.

RL

Craig

Unfortunately I didn't. I didn't make it to the retailer. The winner was among 10 sets left after the reduction.

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
4060 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 30, 2015, 9:35 am - IP Logged

Maybe next time.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

Lyon
France
Member #136722
December 17, 2012
44 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 30, 2015, 9:49 am - IP Logged

Dear, RL

As my english is a bit  rusted I will try for this end of year to be the most simple.

I appreciate your work with Tyrasnnosorus and wish to add a small contribution, if this could help, or give some point of view.

I use this tools for 5/49 game which gives me 7 digit to play.

To choose my digits I use your s/c and NMD option

All the time I have to hesitate between several combinations to wheel but of course with a large amount of possible choice

So I wonder why not separate your wheels in by exemple 3 choices : Probable, Possible, Certain

Certain = 1 choice, Probable = 2 choices, Possible = 3 choices of digit

If I choose your wheel with let's say : 2certain, 2probable and 3 possible I come with more than 100 lines, but it is possible to play the same with less than 19 lines.

See below how it fit

 A 0 2 4 5 1 Choice A B 4 1 1 X X Choice B C 5 5 5 9 0 Choice C 1 B B C A A = 4 1 5 5 1 2 B B A C C = 4 1 4 9 0 3 C C C A C = 5 5 5 5 0 4 C C B C A = 5 5 1 9 1 5 A A C C A = 0 2 5 9 1 6 B A B A C = 4 2 1 5 0 7 C A A A A = 5 2 4 5 1 8 A C A C C = 0 5 4 9 0 9 A C B A A = 0 5 1 5 1 10 A B A A C = 0 1 4 5 0 11 C B B C A = 5 1 1 9 1 12 B A B C C = 4 2 1 9 0 13 B C A C A = 4 5 4 9 1 14 A B A C C = 0 1 4 9 0 15 C C C C C = 5 5 5 9 0 16 C C B A C = 5 5 1 5 0 17 B C A A C = 4 5 4 5 0 18 B A A C C = 4 2 4 9 0 19 A B C A C = 0 1 5 5 0

more orless the same with by an other example with 7 probable (7X2 digits)

With only 16lines ( in your process  it come with 70 lines and 36 after filter )

 1 0 7 8 6 9 2 Choice 1 0 9 5 1 5 3 3 Choice 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 = 1 0 7 8 6 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 = 0 9 5 1 6 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 = 1 9 7 1 6 9 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 = 1 0 7 1 5 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 = 0 9 7 1 5 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 = 1 0 5 1 6 3 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 = 1 9 5 8 5 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 = 0 0 5 8 6 9 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 = 0 0 5 1 5 9 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 = 0 0 7 8 6 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 = 1 0 5 8 6 9 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 = 0 0 7 1 6 9 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 = 1 0 7 8 5 9 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 = 0 9 7 8 5 9 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 = 1 9 5 1 5 9 3 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 = 0 0 5 8 5 3 3

The question is do you think it could be implémented in your RL-Magic?

Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
892 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 31, 2015, 9:49 am - IP Logged

Guys

Happy New Year to all of you and your families!

NYC
United States
Member #54483
August 20, 2007
887 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 31, 2015, 9:55 am - IP Logged

Guys

Happy New Year to all of you and your families!

Thanks for your great program and strategies!

Happy New Year to you and your families!!!

lb

• Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
• Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
• Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
4060 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 31, 2015, 10:33 am - IP Logged

jig69

I am working on a new wheel.  It's not the same as you describe above but may offer some interesting results.

I am testing it on P-4 but it should not be difficult to apply it to the lexie.  I am not sure if I understand exactly

what you are doing but the new wheel I am testing offers the user the choice of entering several digits and then

assigning options as to how each digit is used.  Some can be set to hit by position and others can be set as key

digits without regard to position and others can be set wild where they can be used as fillers.  The wheel offers

the user the option as to limit the number of fillers within a single line so it will be interesting to see the output.

The wheel should hit more positional digits but not sure how many lines will be generated.   Many times I have

most of the correct digits just a couple will be in the wrong position.  This wheel should fix that problem and still

stay within budget, but won't know for sure without more testing.  If it does well for P-4 then I will apply it to the

t-Lex program.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
4060 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 31, 2015, 10:40 am - IP Logged

The wife missed the 5-39 last night by 3 step values and only played 1 line.  She missed step-1 on digit #2

and played a 2-1-1 and it was a 1-1-1.  Had she changed that one digit she would have hit the first 5 lexie

digits on one line for a 4of5 match.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
4060 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 31, 2015, 10:41 am - IP Logged

lottoburg

Happy new year to you and yours, same goes out to everyone.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
892 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 31, 2015, 12:22 pm - IP Logged

Craig

Teresa is unbelievable. Playing one line and being so close is admirable. She will do and on her terms.

Lyon
France
Member #136722
December 17, 2012
44 Posts
Offline
 Posted: December 31, 2015, 1:49 pm - IP Logged