Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 9, 2016, 8:24 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Goseahawks -111/+222..and observation high pair chart

Topic closed. 91 replies. Last post 8 months ago by Goseahawks.

Page 6 of 7
56
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
Madison, WI
United States
Member #172977
February 11, 2016
515 Posts
Offline
Posted: April 10, 2016, 10:38 pm - IP Logged

Not trying to start a flare up, but honestly, you don't "got it".  You seem to be looking for a fool proof, 100% accurate all the time working system. You may deny this, but think about it. Every time you point out a system that doesn't work, you should remind yourself that systems aren't 100% accurate, ore even close. And this revelation would stop you from going one step further in your investigation.

In other words, If someone is aware that no system works 100% of the time, or even 80% of the time, why would they waste their time pointing out the inferior parts of the system? The inferior parts obviously make up the 20%, so it should be expected? No?

It's like saying this over and over again ...."I'm confident this parachute will open up on my way down, but there have been cases where people pulled the tab and the chute didn't open". 

There's nothing wrong with being inquisitive, never stop asking questions, just try to ask more relevant questions, not the obvious..

Amber-My questioning is looking at whether a system is any better at predicting numbers than just randomly picking numbers, so I'm definitely not looking to hold a system to 100% accuracy.

Like this: If a system produces 1 suggested straight play per draw. I would look for whether the suggested play hits any better than one would expect from any random combo. The random combo we would expect to hit .1% of the time. So in that example I would be looking for it to work better than .1%, not 100%. If it did, then there'd be something to go with there. If not, might as well just pick a random combo to play. The numbers change based on the number of plays/combos/pairs being suggested by a system, but the idea is the same; does it give better suggestions than picking random numbers would? That would be the idea of gaining some advantage.

    Avatar
    Madison, WI
    United States
    Member #172977
    February 11, 2016
    515 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: April 10, 2016, 10:48 pm - IP Logged

    Not trying to start a flare up, but honestly, you don't "got it".  You seem to be looking for a fool proof, 100% accurate all the time working system. You may deny this, but think about it. Every time you point out a system that doesn't work, you should remind yourself that systems aren't 100% accurate, ore even close. And this revelation would stop you from going one step further in your investigation.

    In other words, If someone is aware that no system works 100% of the time, or even 80% of the time, why would they waste their time pointing out the inferior parts of the system? The inferior parts obviously make up the 20%, so it should be expected? No?

    It's like saying this over and over again ...."I'm confident this parachute will open up on my way down, but there have been cases where people pulled the tab and the chute didn't open". 

    There's nothing wrong with being inquisitive, never stop asking questions, just try to ask more relevant questions, not the obvious..

    Amber-One more thing. I am actually hoping to find that with the analysis, a system works. If we are going to find what works, we need creative people to come up with ideas and throw them out there. We also need people who are good at evaluating whether the ideas work or not. Some people might be good at both things idk.

    You seem pretty creative at coming up with ideas. Now, if something you come up with turns out not to have any merit, would you rather people keep quiet about that and you keep spending time and money going down a path that you shouldn't, or have someone explain to you how or why it isn't working so you can move on or modify the plan as necessary?

      amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

      United States
      Member #164727
      March 12, 2015
      2527 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: April 10, 2016, 10:52 pm - IP Logged

      Amber-My questioning is looking at whether a system is any better at predicting numbers than just randomly picking numbers, so I'm definitely not looking to hold a system to 100% accuracy.

      Like this: If a system produces 1 suggested straight play per draw. I would look for whether the suggested play hits any better than one would expect from any random combo. The random combo we would expect to hit .1% of the time. So in that example I would be looking for it to work better than .1%, not 100%. If it did, then there'd be something to go with there. If not, might as well just pick a random combo to play. The numbers change based on the number of plays/combos/pairs being suggested by a system, but the idea is the same; does it give better suggestions than picking random numbers would? That would be the idea of gaining some advantage.

      You really amaze me, and I'm not being facetious. 

      You eloquently explained the problems involved with random in your second paragraph. You filled a lot of the holes. And....... You answered your own question.

      In your first paragraph you tell me what you're looking for, and my response was "nothing is 100% predictable" (paraphrasing).... Doesn't That response trigger further confirmation that the 20% doesn't work? And that's how you account for the 80% success rate?

        Goseahawks's avatar - Lottery-057.jpg
        seattle
        United States
        Member #152111
        February 5, 2014
        1310 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: April 10, 2016, 10:53 pm - IP Logged

        again none of my system are  100%....play what u can afford....i personally stick with singles only...some people plays doubles and singles..and when i do play singles, these are my favorite pairs....my everyday pairs at that...my everyday keys are 0123....its all process of reducing at this point...playing 10-15 combos a day online...or spending 10-15.00 to make 150.00..ill take those box odds all day. but that's just me 

         

        01 03 05 07 09  12 14 16 18  23 25 27 29 34 36 38  45 47 49

          amber123's avatar - OpIFNim

          United States
          Member #164727
          March 12, 2015
          2527 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: April 10, 2016, 10:55 pm - IP Logged

          Amber-One more thing. I am actually hoping to find that with the analysis, a system works. If we are going to find what works, we need creative people to come up with ideas and throw them out there. We also need people who are good at evaluating whether the ideas work or not. Some people might be good at both things idk.

          You seem pretty creative at coming up with ideas. Now, if something you come up with turns out not to have any merit, would you rather people keep quiet about that and you keep spending time and money going down a path that you shouldn't, or have someone explain to you how or why it isn't working so you can move on or modify the plan as necessary?

          I agree, let's focus on the silent majority to speak out and get something started soon. Lots of talented individuals who are sealing their lips.

          I like this side of you. Thumbs Up

            SWMcCaig's avatar - 9b740053d1be538a3bed55bad1c5746d
            Broken Arrow, OK
            United States
            Member #155206
            May 11, 2014
            1875 Posts
            Online
            Posted: April 10, 2016, 10:58 pm - IP Logged

            I Agree!

            "What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us"

            Ralph Waldo Emerson

              Avatar

              United States
              Member #42083
              June 27, 2006
              490 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: April 10, 2016, 11:03 pm - IP Logged

              I agree with the statement about other pairs. That's why I believe so much in repeating pairs. But I won't go there for now.

              In the example you state about other pairs appearing with the budget pair, I observed that there was instances that the other pair did not show again in that 40 draw period. One of the pairs did, in fact it seemed to be in repeating mode. It showed more times than the budget pair. In the previous 40 draw period, it also appeared multiple times. However in the next 40 draw period it did not. The budget pair it was with....3 times in each of those 40 draw periods. So which is more consistent?

              This is what you look for......

               Rock Chalk Jayhawk

                Avatar

                United States
                Member #42083
                June 27, 2006
                490 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: April 10, 2016, 11:04 pm - IP Logged

                Agree on the favorite pairs.

                 Rock Chalk Jayhawk

                  lakerben's avatar - spherewall
                  New Mexico
                  United States
                  Member #86099
                  January 29, 2010
                  11119 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: April 10, 2016, 11:10 pm - IP Logged

                  So what has this endless babble about nothing accomplished?  Nothing.  Pages and pages of talk about something that could occur and assigning percentages to a game that is win or lose and the only percentage is 100% ,that is reality. 

                   

                   

                  Thinking of...

                  How about them cowboys!

                   

                   

                  US Flag

                    Avatar

                    United States
                    Member #42083
                    June 27, 2006
                    490 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: April 10, 2016, 11:52 pm - IP Logged

                    So what has this endless babble about nothing accomplished?  Nothing.  Pages and pages of talk about something that could occur and assigning percentages to a game that is win or lose and the only percentage is 100% ,that is reality. 

                     

                     

                    Thinking of...

                    Agreed. The only important page was the first one. Many good examples, explanations of reduction, and uses of indicators.

                     Rock Chalk Jayhawk

                      grwurston's avatar - Cute animals_Spider.jpg
                      Winning makes me smile.
                      bel air maryland
                      United States
                      Member #90251
                      April 24, 2010
                      4878 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: April 10, 2016, 11:57 pm - IP Logged

                      Amber-My questioning is looking at whether a system is any better at predicting numbers than just randomly picking numbers, so I'm definitely not looking to hold a system to 100% accuracy.

                      Like this: If a system produces 1 suggested straight play per draw. I would look for whether the suggested play hits any better than one would expect from any random combo. The random combo we would expect to hit .1% of the time. So in that example I would be looking for it to work better than .1%, not 100%. If it did, then there'd be something to go with there. If not, might as well just pick a random combo to play. The numbers change based on the number of plays/combos/pairs being suggested by a system, but the idea is the same; does it give better suggestions than picking random numbers would? That would be the idea of gaining some advantage.

                      Of course a system is better at better at predicting numbers than randomly picking them. Random is quick picks, if it hits it's all luck. A system is working with a plan to pick your numbers.

                      You follow football? You a Packers fan? Here's two game situations.

                      1) The Packers have the ball with 10 seconds left in the game. It's 4th down, on the 40 yard line. They need a touchdown to win. They're in the huddle. Aaron Rogers calls a play that they always use in that situation. They get the touchdown and win the game. That is a system.

                      2) Same situation. They're in the huddle. Aaron Rogers says to his receivers. "You guys go wherever the hell you want and I'll chuck the ball." The play starts. He doesn't know where to throw the ball, because the receivers are running around all over the place. He has no idea where the receivers are going. He gets sacked and they lose the game. That is randomly picking numbers.

                      Now what do you think the Packers will do?  Number 1 or number 2?



                       

                      "You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra, Hall of Fame baseball player.

                      The numbers will tell you what numbers to play. Pay attention to the numbers.

                      Don't just think outside the box, crush it.

                        ArizonaDream's avatar - Lottery-009.jpg

                        United States
                        Member #169277
                        October 10, 2015
                        630 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: April 11, 2016, 6:53 am - IP Logged

                        Of course a system is better at better at predicting numbers than randomly picking them. Random is quick picks, if it hits it's all luck. A system is working with a plan to pick your numbers.

                        You follow football? You a Packers fan? Here's two game situations.

                        1) The Packers have the ball with 10 seconds left in the game. It's 4th down, on the 40 yard line. They need a touchdown to win. They're in the huddle. Aaron Rogers calls a play that they always use in that situation. They get the touchdown and win the game. That is a system.

                        2) Same situation. They're in the huddle. Aaron Rogers says to his receivers. "You guys go wherever the hell you want and I'll chuck the ball." The play starts. He doesn't know where to throw the ball, because the receivers are running around all over the place. He has no idea where the receivers are going. He gets sacked and they lose the game. That is randomly picking numbers.

                        Now what do you think the Packers will do?  Number 1 or number 2?



                         

                        Not all plans are good plans. 

                         

                        With standard state payouts, if I bet totally randomly, I should expect to get 50% of my money back in winnings. (I'm playing on paper and on the prediction board only, btw)

                         

                        With my first attempt at creating a system, I found that I I was following a pattern that constantly paid back far less than random, maybe 20 % or so.  Now, that was very interesting, it suggests something non-random may actually be going on!  Just "flip" around the idea,  and do the opposite, right? 

                         

                        Much Better,  I started winning, I had stumbled on a pattern that was working (at least for a while) in my state. But I was relying on luck/intuition to bring the number of lines down to a reasonable number. 

                         

                        Then, in attempting to tighten the picks and maybe due to  a shift in the pattern, I started losing, every single time.  I thought I was close, because I got two of three right far more than the odds suggest I should have, but never all three.  Still encouraging, in the sense that results still looked to be non-random. 

                         

                        So, time to start phase 3, and that's where I am now.

                         

                        So, just a long-winded way to say that a bad plan or system can be worse than random, or no plan.

                          str8ca$hhomie's avatar - Cash

                          United States
                          Member #146028
                          August 22, 2013
                          842 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: April 11, 2016, 7:26 am - IP Logged

                          Of course a system is better at better at predicting numbers than randomly picking them. Random is quick picks, if it hits it's all luck. A system is working with a plan to pick your numbers.

                          You follow football? You a Packers fan? Here's two game situations.

                          1) The Packers have the ball with 10 seconds left in the game. It's 4th down, on the 40 yard line. They need a touchdown to win. They're in the huddle. Aaron Rogers calls a play that they always use in that situation. They get the touchdown and win the game. That is a system.

                          2) Same situation. They're in the huddle. Aaron Rogers says to his receivers. "You guys go wherever the hell you want and I'll chuck the ball." The play starts. He doesn't know where to throw the ball, because the receivers are running around all over the place. He has no idea where the receivers are going. He gets sacked and they lose the game. That is randomly picking numbers.

                          Now what do you think the Packers will do?  Number 1 or number 2?



                           

                          That's an excellent example of what a system should do. I don't think, however, that the Green Bay Packers would send their playbook to their rival the Chicago Bears so that they could give them feedback as to whether it worked or not (you know maybe tweak it a little bit) to see if it worked in their State.

                          Sometimes it's extremely difficult if not practically impossible to get people to disregard the smoke and mirrors.  Instead, they seem to enjoy the ride down the proverbial Garden Path....... helpless to extricate themselves from being totally deceived by known forces in their midst who would argue that they have come here for the sole purpose of helping people.......str8ca$hhomie

                            kreative1's avatar - flower2
                            NE PA
                            United States
                            Member #127838
                            May 10, 2012
                            1230 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: April 11, 2016, 9:49 am - IP Logged

                            Hey guys, sorry I've been away for a while.....dealing with future back surgery,,,been in the hospital for a few days, now im out on leave of absence,,,i see you guys are conversing over the post,,,all im going to say about it ,if it works, deal with it..I've spent some time on it trying to make it work for myself and u guys. As u guys know, I post  lots of systems Some good and others are betters..Im only here to help . If it doesn't appeal to any of your likings, Please move on. These systems are just  a tools. Nothing perfect about them..U don't have to play all the pairs that come with it..,because I wouldn't. But using other tools, such as, studying your own states p3/4 game, and  using keys/ QPS, AND being an experience smart player etc..helps u narrow it down, That's the key..each state is different, and the results will be slightly different, but the outcome will be the same with using this system . I try my best, before posting, to make sure it works for all states..Again it aint perfect, so stop whinning..So as for as this system goes again, i can assure u that the pairs or full combo will show in the timely matter I have said they would..good luck to all.

                            Best of luck with your future back surgery!

                            My husband had it 15 years ago with great results and the best advice I can give you is 
                            Listen to your doctor
                            Don't be in a hurry to return to work
                            Walk as much as possible
                            Throw honey do list to the side until you are fully recovered and don't let the boredom get to you!
                            Just because they send you home in a couple of days does not mean you are good to go lol

                            Apparently everyone else is so busy going back and forth that they didn't even read what you are dealing with
                            Thank you for taking the time to post a system for us to try and best of luck to youSmile

                            PA mid draw front pairs did not show in 2015,2016
                            17x,21x,49x,552,935 (3)

                            PA eve draw front pairs for str8 plays 2016 that haven't hit yet
                            17x,28x (2)
                            common front both draws 17x

                            singles that haven't hit in either draw yet 
                            017,123,234 
                            doubles
                            002,220,221,
                            557,662,775,991,992,994,996

                              Avatar
                              Madison, WI
                              United States
                              Member #172977
                              February 11, 2016
                              515 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: April 11, 2016, 1:12 pm - IP Logged

                              Of course a system is better at better at predicting numbers than randomly picking them. Random is quick picks, if it hits it's all luck. A system is working with a plan to pick your numbers.

                              You follow football? You a Packers fan? Here's two game situations.

                              1) The Packers have the ball with 10 seconds left in the game. It's 4th down, on the 40 yard line. They need a touchdown to win. They're in the huddle. Aaron Rogers calls a play that they always use in that situation. They get the touchdown and win the game. That is a system.

                              2) Same situation. They're in the huddle. Aaron Rogers says to his receivers. "You guys go wherever the hell you want and I'll chuck the ball." The play starts. He doesn't know where to throw the ball, because the receivers are running around all over the place. He has no idea where the receivers are going. He gets sacked and they lose the game. That is randomly picking numbers.

                              Now what do you think the Packers will do?  Number 1 or number 2?



                               

                              A system is only better at predicting numbers than randomly picking them if the results are better than what you would get with the random numbers. The system is not just automatically better because it is a system.

                              Love the Packers of course.

                              I don't know that the analogy is that great though. The relationship between the quarterback and the receivers is completely different than the relationship between the lottery and us players. The lottery is not making every effort to match up its numbers with our numbers, like a quarterback trying to make his pass match where the receivers run.

                              More like: Instead of a quarterback, the receivers have a ball throwing machine, which will throw the ball completely randomly. Different locations, speeds, trajectories, all over the field. Now, would it matter if the receiver runs a set route each time based on where the last ball ended up? Or just as good a chance running around all over the place like you state?

                              You would probably guess that I'd be the lazy receiver just standing sort of out in the middle waiting for the machine to send one my way, rather than moving all over the place for no apparent reason? Maybe that's what I would do idk. Maybe if I did I'd catch the same number of balls as any of the other receivers.