United States
Member #139,773
March 3, 2013
605 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Lildarryl on Jul 22, 2016
i can use it as a filter then. Wheel the 7 digits for straights and filter them out ...
TThats what i do with most systems posted on lp....
I do the workout and system them out.
Not trying to aggravate you, just trying to understand better how it is successful. So when I backtest again I may see better results or atleast try to see if it has hits and skips so I would understand when to play this methodology. What are using to wheel with? I have been using Lot Soft Pro, only eliminating duplicates, and Triplicates.
Madison, WI United States
Member #172,970
February 11, 2016
515 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lottologix on Jul 22, 2016
Not trying to aggravate you, just trying to understand better how it is successful. So when I backtest again I may see better results or atleast try to see if it has hits and skips so I would understand when to play this methodology. What are using to wheel with? I have been using Lot Soft Pro, only eliminating duplicates, and Triplicates.
I'm not sure why this is so difficult for some people to get. He laid the system out clearly right at the beginning. Use it to pick your numbers any state. Or don't. Modify it however you want. Or just pick whatever numbers you feel like.
Bottom line is, probably the only way to increase your chances of winning is to have more combos in play.
United States
Member #164,719
March 12, 2015
3,506 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by CARBOB on Jul 22, 2016
Amber, I believe most of the naysayers, don't try. They want someone else to do it for them.
Every time I post a system of my own, I usually get about 4 or 5 PMs asking me to show an example. As If I use a different number in an example, it will be easier to understand. They want me to rewrite everything all over again....lol
United States
Member #164,719
March 12, 2015
3,506 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on Jul 23, 2016
Has anyone tried changing the variables the program uses to generate the output string?
This can be done by pressing the C key while the program is running. I fooled around with
it a little and change the multiplier value from 6 to 3 and the box hits decreased. Might be
worth trying and might not, I just thought I would mention it again.
RL
Just attempted to do this, but no matter how much I changed the values, I still got the same exact results. And yes, I did close the program out and reopened it after saving it.
This may or may not help select the numbers to play. The setup will install the program and create shortcuts.
To open the control panel text file just press C on the keyboard and C-panel.txt will open. You can then edit
the values that will change the output of the program. When finished save the changes and exit. The program
will use the new settings the next time it is ran. Have fun, maybe someone will win using this. To run just input
the digits from your games last drawing and press the Run button. The program will generate the 7 digit string
which will be displayed in the "Results" box. Press the clear button to clear the last results. The program can
take up to 6 digits so it's good for about any single digit game.
RL
RL... thanks for this creation. One thing I seen is using only 1 digit they still give a 6 or 7 number chain except when you put the number 5 in there... it gives 0 and thats it. Is there something that can be altered so to get the number 5 to generate a chain? Thanks
We are all Lucky... just some of us don't realize it!
Maybe that would not be enough to make a regular profit.
But how to get digits that are a little more likely to come out on the very next draw that you want to play?
Well maybe one way would be to try to develop some kind of box key digits prediction technique such as I did maybe back on 2009 or whenever it was and or some kind of box pairs and or key pairs prediction.
I forgot the exact techniques that I used then, I remember the general idea of how the key digits prediction technique worked, but not the exact particular details.
What I did back then is not the only possible way in which a person can try to get key digits and or key pairs.
Many years ago I also worked ways of trying to get key pairs.
If only the state lotteries were a little more honest and if I had more free time and if some people would not cry so much about how and when I posted, maybe I would have kept posting my "Key-Digits Bar"
It is hard enough trying to make more or less accurate predictions without some people crying so much about how and when I posted and of course the predictions have to fail every so often and mostly more with the way that the states conduct their drawings.
People want to get rich and they get upset if the person who is making the predictions is not making them rich.
Yes, all digits, all pairs and all pick 3 numbers have exactly the same chance on each and every drawing, but that doesn't mean that all predictions have to fail, statistical chance is not as much of a problem for prediction as those who handle the lottery drawings are.
Why am I posting this here? Just for the hell of it, maybe to bother some people about it.
If we can get the right digits, pairs and or pick 3 numbers then we don't have to worry so much about filtration.
For many years I have wanted to make key digits bar predictions again, but I didn't, because as I said, I have little time for such things, it is very hard to impossible to make accurate predictions often enough and people cry too much that the predictor is not making them rich.
Durham, North Carolina United States
Member #1,616
June 5, 2003
4,752 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on Jul 23, 2016
I think blank values are treated as -1 or 0 but not sure how I addressed that issue in the code.
Also if imputing a pair of same digits only one digit will show up. I think I will do a update and
fix a couple things. One of the biggest I see that the output string should not have repeating
digits, kind of defeats the purpose.
Note! when making changes to the config file you only have to save the changes in notepad for
them to take affect. The main program does not need to be restarted. The program reads the
config file before each run.
RL
Me personally, I like the way it is with how it is giving double numbers as a result. Hint: for N.C. I see good things with just using the middle 3 numbers in the string and then doing adding 317 workout. But I only used the first two numbers of what came out last night as my input. Todays winner, 937, came out boxed.
But I would love to be able to use double numbers for the input, that way if a double does come out, say 443, I can input 44.
Taking it one day at a time, because there's no way to know what might have been.
United States
Member #164,719
March 12, 2015
3,506 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on Jul 23, 2016
I think blank values are treated as -1 or 0 but not sure how I addressed that issue in the code.
Also if imputing a pair of same digits only one digit will show up. I think I will do a update and
fix a couple things. One of the biggest I see that the output string should not have repeating
digits, kind of defeats the purpose.
Note! when making changes to the config file you only have to save the changes in notepad for
them to take affect. The main program does not need to be restarted. The program reads the
config file before each run.
RL
Note! when making changes to the config file you only have to save the changes in notepad for
them to take affect. The main program does not need to be restarted. The program reads the
config file before each run.
Tried this too but nothing.
What would be really cool Is If we could also change the values in the other section. For example, adding 222, I could change it to a different number. I know that's too much for ya, just throwing a thought out.
Thanks for everything you've done, it's appreciated.
Maybe that would not be enough to make a regular profit.
But how to get digits that are a little more likely to come out on the very next draw that you want to play?
Well maybe one way would be to try to develop some kind of box key digits prediction technique such as I did maybe back on 2009 or whenever it was and or some kind of box pairs and or key pairs prediction.
I forgot the exact techniques that I used then, I remember the general idea of how the key digits prediction technique worked, but not the exact particular details.
What I did back then is not the only possible way in which a person can try to get key digits and or key pairs.
Many years ago I also worked ways of trying to get key pairs.
If only the state lotteries were a little more honest and if I had more free time and if some people would not cry so much about how and when I posted, maybe I would have kept posting my "Key-Digits Bar"
It is hard enough trying to make more or less accurate predictions without some people crying so much about how and when I posted and of course the predictions have to fail every so often and mostly more with the way that the states conduct their drawings.
People want to get rich and they get upset if the person who is making the predictions is not making them rich.
Yes, all digits, all pairs and all pick 3 numbers have exactly the same chance on each and every drawing, but that doesn't mean that all predictions have to fail, statistical chance is not as much of a problem for prediction as those who handle the lottery drawings are.
Why am I posting this here? Just for the hell of it, maybe to bother some people about it.
If we can get the right digits, pairs and or pick 3 numbers then we don't have to worry so much about filtration.
For many years I have wanted to make key digits bar predictions again, but I didn't, because as I said, I have little time for such things, it is very hard to impossible to make accurate predictions often enough and people cry too much that the predictor is not making them rich.
MonEl, I'd like to comment a couple of your statements:
Maybe any 7 box digits would have a fair chance of winning every so often.
Strongly agree with you, but there is also a big difference between the same size wheels as follows.
This is from a random state P3 combined draws test.
3 of 7 singles = 35 combinations => The longest consecutive losses (max skip) in 2000 draws = 52
2 of 4 digits = 36 combos => The longest consecutive losses (max skip) in 2000 draws = 63
1 of 10 digits = 36 combos => The longest consecutive losses (max skip) in 2000 draws = 34 (very, very rarely comes to 40 in any state ever)
Conclusion: If you're looking at this amount of combinations (35 - 36) for singles only (no doubles and triples) then focus on finding a single digit (36 combinations). You can call it a "key" or whatever you want.
But how to get digits that are a little more likely to come out on the very next draw that you want to play?
On top of a "key" digit I'd look for 2 of 6 from other 9 digits = 60 single combos.
Then filter out the first 36 with another 60 to get 15 beautiful combos to play. With this amount of combos there is enough failure room and room for a progressive betting (wagering).
Well maybe one way would be to try to develop some kind of box key digits prediction technique ...
Long term successful prediction techniques exist, but hey cannot be available to public for a valid reason.
If only the state lotteries were a little more honest ...
In this and similar business' like stocks and Forex trading no one should blame a system for his/her inability to beat it. As long as all digits are in a drum, some people are winning and as long as they pay them out they are honest enough. They work hard to shuffle their "balls" the best way they know. They have to break strong trends in order to keep a lottery a game of chance.
Durham, North Carolina United States
Member #1,616
June 5, 2003
4,752 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by reddog on Jul 23, 2016
Me personally, I like the way it is with how it is giving double numbers as a result. Hint: for N.C. I see good things with just using the middle 3 numbers in the string and then doing adding 317 workout. But I only used the first two numbers of what came out last night as my input. Todays winner, 937, came out boxed.
But I would love to be able to use double numbers for the input, that way if a double does come out, say 443, I can input 44.
Another box hit last night in N.C. doing it that way. In the 317 rundown it was 374 and 473 came out. I'm just saying....
Lildarryl, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, and you have caused me to expand my mind and charge up my thinking cap.
RL, is it possible to to edit the program so it will accept a double number for the input ?
Taking it one day at a time, because there's no way to know what might have been.
Maybe that would not be enough to make a regular profit.
But how to get digits that are a little more likely to come out on the very next draw that you want to play?
Well maybe one way would be to try to develop some kind of box key digits prediction technique such as I did maybe back on 2009 or whenever it was and or some kind of box pairs and or key pairs prediction.
I forgot the exact techniques that I used then, I remember the general idea of how the key digits prediction technique worked, but not the exact particular details.
What I did back then is not the only possible way in which a person can try to get key digits and or key pairs.
Many years ago I also worked ways of trying to get key pairs.
If only the state lotteries were a little more honest and if I had more free time and if some people would not cry so much about how and when I posted, maybe I would have kept posting my "Key-Digits Bar"
It is hard enough trying to make more or less accurate predictions without some people crying so much about how and when I posted and of course the predictions have to fail every so often and mostly more with the way that the states conduct their drawings.
People want to get rich and they get upset if the person who is making the predictions is not making them rich.
Yes, all digits, all pairs and all pick 3 numbers have exactly the same chance on each and every drawing, but that doesn't mean that all predictions have to fail, statistical chance is not as much of a problem for prediction as those who handle the lottery drawings are.
Why am I posting this here? Just for the hell of it, maybe to bother some people about it.
If we can get the right digits, pairs and or pick 3 numbers then we don't have to worry so much about filtration.
For many years I have wanted to make key digits bar predictions again, but I didn't, because as I said, I have little time for such things, it is very hard to impossible to make accurate predictions often enough and people cry too much that the predictor is not making them rich.
I will add this: Knowing the STATE of 7 digits in moment is a huge filter. The current state may not be 0123456, it could be 6514032.
The 84 picks looks similar, but their current state is different. The first is for box wage without filter, the second is for straight bet with LEAD digits at top.
NC> workout
Pick 3
Pick 4
Midday
Evening
Midday
Evening
Sat, Jul 23, 2016
9-3-7
4-7-3
1-1-2-6
6-7-0-9
Fri, Jul 22, 2016
2-4-1
4-2-6
9-5-6-7
1-9-5-0
Thu, Jul 21, 2016
1-1-3
7-4-4
0-5-5-7
2-2-5-2
Wed, Jul 20, 2016
8-4-6
5-6-4
9-9-2-0
5-2-4-5
Tue, Jul 19, 2016
2-5-7
1-3-4
5-8-8-3
5-9-2-3
Mon, Jul 18, 2016
0-1-5
2-0-1
5-5-8-4
9-3-9-2
Sun, Jul 17, 2016
3-4-6
5-5-1
6-5-1-8
5-1-3-4
Sat, Jul 16, 2016
7-4-2
3-2-2
6-6-8-3
4-5-7-1
Fri, Jul 15, 2016
2-5-2
6-4-1
4-4-6-5
8-5-3-2
Thu, Jul 14, 2016
9-6-7
5-2-7
8-0-6-8
5-8-5-5
Take the draw 967, let's try to locate current state for next draws by simulating the digits 967
United States
Member #132,094
August 26, 2012
1,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by mmx1 on Jul 24, 2016
MonEl, I'd like to comment a couple of your statements:
Maybe any 7 box digits would have a fair chance of winning every so often.
Strongly agree with you, but there is also a big difference between the same size wheels as follows.
This is from a random state P3 combined draws test.
3 of 7 singles = 35 combinations => The longest consecutive losses (max skip) in 2000 draws = 52
2 of 4 digits = 36 combos => The longest consecutive losses (max skip) in 2000 draws = 63
1 of 10 digits = 36 combos => The longest consecutive losses (max skip) in 2000 draws = 34 (very, very rarely comes to 40 in any state ever)
Conclusion: If you're looking at this amount of combinations (35 - 36) for singles only (no doubles and triples) then focus on finding a single digit (36 combinations). You can call it a "key" or whatever you want.
But how to get digits that are a little more likely to come out on the very next draw that you want to play?
On top of a "key" digit I'd look for 2 of 6 from other 9 digits = 60 single combos.
Then filter out the first 36 with another 60 to get 15 beautiful combos to play. With this amount of combos there is enough failure room and room for a progressive betting (wagering).
Well maybe one way would be to try to develop some kind of box key digits prediction technique ...
Long term successful prediction techniques exist, but hey cannot be available to public for a valid reason.
If only the state lotteries were a little more honest ...
In this and similar business' like stocks and Forex trading no one should blame a system for his/her inability to beat it. As long as all digits are in a drum, some people are winning and as long as they pay them out they are honest enough. They work hard to shuffle their "balls" the best way they know. They have to break strong trends in order to keep a lottery a game of chance.
When I was making "Key-Digits Bar" predictions years ago, I would put my predictions on picture-image files using desktop screen captures and then I would upload the picture-images to an Internet Image Server and then using this editor here I would insert the images on my posts, but the images were kept on those image servers only for some time, so all or most of those images are long gone, they are no more, but anyhow take a look at a few of those very old "Key-Digits Bar" predictions:
As I said, the picture images that were put on those posts are long gone, but you can still see some of the predictions on some of the posts.
Why Did I put the predictions inside picture-images? Well, when it comes to my predictions and to the states lotteries maybe I am a little paranoid, besides I think that Google and others (their bots) can't read text characters that are inside picture-images.
I should not, cause I know better, but I will re-post a little of the above:
Pick 3 Day Winning Numbers
for 11/14/2009 were:
0 - 4 - 3
Sum It Up = 7
-----------
As seen there the key digits bar has these:
3 0 4 5 7 8 9 1 2 6
Well got all 3 winning digits on the first 3 digits of the "KeyDigitsBar"
Texas (TX) Pick 3 Night Past Winning Numbers
Draw Date Results
Fri, Nov 13, 2009 5-2-5
Thu, Nov 12, 2009 2-2-5
Wed, Nov 11, 2009 7-1-7
Tue, Nov 10, 2009 6-9-8
Mon, Nov 09, 2009 7-1-7
Sat, Nov 07, 2009 8-7-7
Fri, Nov 06, 2009 0-9-2
Thu, Nov 05, 2009 7-7-1
Wed, Nov 04, 2009 5-3-6
Tue, Nov 03, 2009 0-8-7
They are still up to their tricks.
----------
Pick 3 Night Winning Numbers
for 11/13/2009 were:
5 - 2 - 5
Sum It Up = 12
--------------
I didn't get any pairs, but got the key digits on the first 4 digits of the keybar again.
2 6 7 5 8 0 1 3 4 9
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Pick 3 Day Winning Numbers
for 11/13/2009 were:
4 - 6 - 1
Sum It Up = 11
----------
The 14th boxed pair on the list was 41 and at the end of it was 14.
On the key digits bar these were the digits: 5 1 4 6 0 3 8 2 7 9
I had seen strong random indications that there was a good chance of the# 3 digitshowing up tonight and it came out, it was all in accord to the random indications, it is all a high chance and of course never for sure.
------------
My "KeyDigitBar" had:
2 3 5 7 1 8 9 6 0 4All of them on the first 4 digits! (Don't tell TLC about this, if you want the stats to keep on coming)
The 73 Pair was the first one on the pairs bar and somewhere below there was the 27 pair.
The stats (Not me) did O.K. Today, again, it is not me, it is random.
By the way, were are the quick-pickers when you need them?
Maybe they will say that I posted after the draw, you know how it is with them.
Pick 3 Night Winning Numbers
for 11/16/2009 were:
2 - 3 - 7
Pick 3 Day Winning Numbers
for 11/17/2009 were:
4 - 6 - 3
Sum It Up = 13
----------------
Well, as you all know, I must have posted after the draw and besides also as you all know, quick picks are the way to go, if you don't believe that ask TLC and the quick-pickers, they will set you straight.
------------------
My "KeyDigitsBar" had:
3 4 67 0 1 2 9 5 8All 3 on the first 3digits, unexpected, but all in accord to the random stats, so all is as it should be, the random stats are good enough, they are one of the best oracles.
The random stats showed digts 4 and 7 to be very strong, mostly the 4 and it came out.
Pairs 64, 36 and 34, all 3 of them were there on the pairs key bar, but 30 or so pairs are too many.
As most of the time, the best deal was my "KeyDigitsBar", maybe I should patent it.
It was fun, I guess the quick pickers, have nothing to say anymore(?).
---------------------------
Back then at the end of 2009 I made my "Key-Digits Bar" predictions and also sometimes my pairs and patterns predictions for almost 3 months almost every-day for at least one of the Tx drawings and sometimes for both drawings.
It was a lot of fun doing that, for almost 3 months I had enough time almost every-day to do that, but my free time ended, also I got very upset with at least 2 people here at L.P. and also with the state lotteries, so I quit making those predictions.
For many reasons I think that I could not make predictions such as those again, my thoughts are that the drawings are not fair, Tx would not let me do that again.