Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 10, 2016, 5:39 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Statistics around the balance of even/odd and small/big numbers

Topic closed. 142 replies. Last post 6 years ago by RL-RANDOMLOGIC.

Page 10 of 10
PrintE-mailLink
time*treat's avatar - radar

United States
Member #13130
March 30, 2005
2171 Posts
Offline
Posted: February 16, 2011, 3:53 pm - IP Logged

truecritic

The old dos software went out back durning my system post.  About 30 people got the

software before I had to stop.  The software was never intended for public release and

was somewhat dated.  I never built a help menu or instructions and then found myself

coaching 30 people on 100's of different questions.  It took over my entire life and so we

started a yahoo group so that members could learn from others thinking this would take

the load off, Nope.  It was a little like throwing gas on a fire as I now had all the emails and

the group to deal with.  I enjoyed this for the most part but had no time for anything, I gave

up all of my free time plus had to put other projects on hold just to answer peoples question.

I found myself getting up earlier and staying up later, pushing other projects aside.  We  decided

to finally close the group and tell people we could no longer keep doing it.   

The jackpot I won was using the same dos system that I posted and gave away for free and the

amount was under 50K.  The lady was the friend of a friend of a friend sort of thing so I was really

no big deal but was a little embarrassing. 

I don't like attention and have a very tight small group of friends in my inner circle.  To post a picture

here at LP you need a place to store the image online.  I sent pics of tickets to carbob, winsum, and

others and if I was not truthful don't you think these people would have said something by now.

I don't feel the need to prove my claims to every single person in the world.  Most of the people with the

software are amazed with how easy it is to reduce the sets down to 500 or so.  The problem is getting

from that point down to less then 20 without losing the 5 of 5 and 4 of 5's.  Some peole would say that

reducing sets to 500 and still having the winner in the 500 is easy,  I say, "Try it."  I can make 8 choices,

which if correct will produce the winning  ticket in fewer then 15 lines most days.  four of these are no

brainers and one only has two choices to pick from over 85% of the time.  The remaining 3 are the hard

ones but but have odds of less then 1 in 100 for all three. 

On what I consider a really bad day I miss 2 of the 7 and many days I miss only by one.   The problem here

is that even at 1 in 100 odds I could go the rest of my life and never win.  Some would say why don't you

play the 500, and my reply is how many 500's can you afford to lose in a row.  I am not a gambler and can't

stand to even lose 5 bucks.   Most days I play on paper and it cost me nothing.  When I do play then

I expect to at least break even.  The lottery is a hobby and nothing more.

 

I made my system post and from the beginning made clear that I would not release everything.

I posted some facts concerning digits and had hoped that people would add it to there system

of picking numbers.  I at least hoped that people would take the time if nothing else to check

there sets against this data.  My big mistake was to try and provide pen and paper users some

useful information that would allow them to use the digit system without software.  I also had

to keep the 10 year old system seperated from the current methods being used.  You will find jumps

in my post where I found myself getting ahead of what I intended to post.  This left me in a less then

comfortable position.  I should have just posted the digit data for people to use or not use and let it

go at that.  Some here have decided to pick the system apart using statistics on a system that was 

not designed to be statistical.  Not one of these posters has provided me any information that I had

not tested before I wrote the first line many many years ago.  I am a person who likes to solve things

and my whole life from a small child this has been my passion.  The lottery was like a quest that I

knew might take my whole life with no guarantee of success and that I could not resist. 

 

Since I found no statistical data that could support the idea that the lottery was winnable using statistics

I soon abandoned statistics but not the project.  I started to study the concept random and found that

random is a catch phraes used to explain complex systems or events that are too complicated to easily

figure out. 

My next step was to study the matrix which lead me to the digit system.  Back in those days I was limited

to using a computer with a 8088 cpu.  It often took days or even a week to generate the data for even a

small matrix and even longer to run the analysis.  I soon found that a random sample taken from the larger

matrix showed the random numbers generated fell very close to the expected average.  The main problem

was that there was no way to predict when a number would show next.  I found many at first that seemed

to show some promise but later found that these patterns could be explained by chance. I almost chose to

quit at this time but one day got the idea to count the digits within a group of randomly generated sets and

found the same data, they matched the expected.   I knew that the only way to improve ones chance was

to be able to predict what would come next and without this any attempt would be almost useless.  I want

to make the point that "I don't say that people who use patterns or other methods to choose numbers

are wasting time, if it works then use it."   I was almost ready to give up again but then got the idea that

since the digits hit at a much greater rate then the numbers they produce then it only makes since that 

the gaps between a digit hitting must be far less.  BAM! The digit system was born.  In the last 10 draws

for my 5-39 game 13 numbers are no-shows but the lowest hitting digit has hit 3 times.  It is not uncommon

for any one numbers skips to be anything from 1 to 50 with some numbers staying out 100 or more games.

Digits do not suffer this,  my 5-39's digits 1-2-3 have almost a 9 in 10 chance of hitting.  Digits 4-5-6-7-8-9

have a 4.3 in 10 chance and Digit 0 has a 3.4 in 10 chance.  Now some may be saying this can be calculated

and shows no advantage over any other method but consider this.  If one Looks to the matrix of possible

sets one finds the matrix is very much the reason behind the digits and not the random selection of numbers.

The drawing of 5 numbers is irrelevant and no matter how random the 5 numbers seem to be they will

follow the matrix in population and distrubition.   The advantage.  Because the population and distrubition

of digits is uneffected by the randomness of the drawing then patterns of digits showing must also exist.

The error from the expected for digits is far less then the error rate for numbers especially in small samples.

Think of this a little like playing a number because it is due or overdue.  With a number when using this

reasoning the chance of the number hitting in the next draw is far more likely to be incorrect then using the

same logic for digits.  The digits hug a matrix like bark hugs a tree.  It is a careful study of this that allows

one to make better choices.  Finding the correct digits to play is only half the battle and the digits alone

will produce too many sets to play. However using the same logic as above when trying to predict which

digits to play one can also predict how many of each will show. 

5-39

Example playing 6 digits 1-2-3-4-5-6 (no restrictions except all 6 must be in every set.

sets produced = 5421

if digits 1-2-3 are set so they must hit twice in each set and digits 4-5-6 only once per set

sets produced = 216

if digits 1-3 are set so they must hit twice in each set and digits 1-4-5-6 only once per set

sets produced = 144

 

All this is for nothing if the digits selected are incorrect,  but as I have explained above the digits

with some careful study and knowing your matrix and using some of what I call random-logic then

the digits are not that hard to select.  The drawing will be a random selection from the matrix and

the if the digits had no randomness at all then there would be no lottery.  The random-logic is my

secret additive which adjust for this,  It is different for every matrix and method used to select the

numbers such as RNG or ball drop but I think anyone could develope their own if they tried.  I hope

this answers yours and many others questions about the digit system.   Winning means being able

to predict and predicting digits is much easier then predicting numbers.  Which ones to play and how

many is key.  Some may hate the idea and others will love it, makes no difference to me which. 

 

RL

This is interesting. If I were starting from scratch, or all out of my own ideasIdea, I'd kick this around some. 

It should have had its own thread. Wink

In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.

    RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

    United States
    Member #59354
    March 13, 2008
    3985 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: February 16, 2011, 4:00 pm - IP Logged

    "...what you should to..."  ??

    Sorry, I'm not planning on leaving just yet RL-RANDOMLOGIC.

    You just can't deal with the hard questions, can you?  You see, you THINK that I don't understand what you're doing, or what you're saying.  You THINK.  You THINK that you know all about statistics and that your methods don't fall within their purview.  You claim that you do very well, but because your method is so complex, requiring so much of the "human element," that it's just not realistic for anyone to expect you to try to prove your success.  The reason you give for this complexity is that your secret proprietary ingredient, if you will, is based on an anomoly that you THINK you've found in the computerized lottery that you play in Missouri.  First of all, even if there is treachery in the IT shop in the Missouri Lottery, I doubt if it is something you can keep track of with your BASE-10 Digit gyrations unless the programmers there are in league with you, because their RNGs are working in a BINARY system in their computers, and you're juggling 0-9.  I notice you don't want to tackle the BASE-20 system in my other Thread.  Doesn't show much promise, does it?

    But let's give you the benefit of the doubt - let's assume you cracked the code, and can beat the odds in the MO Show Me 5 by at least FIVE times better than what Chance would predict.  (Without hitting the Jackpot, this is what you must do to do better than break even.)  Given these facts, there are questions that trouble me, and they are questions that anyone else here pondering your voracity should ask.

    1)  If you have TRULY discovered a BUG or a conspiracy in the programming of the Missouri Show Me 5 Lotto, is it not your Civic Duty to notify the appropriate authorities of your discovery, rather than try to expoit it for your own financial gain, even trying to teach others how to profit as well?  I'm not a lawyer, but there might very well be penalties awaiting you, as you might be committing fraud with your efforts in this enterprise.

    2)  Assuming you're not Civic Minded, and with question 1) above in mind, what causes you to be in a near state of obsession trying to convince me and anyone else reading here that you are able to exploit a weakness in the MO Lottery, rather than quietly going about your [possibly illegal] business, perhaps increasing your stakes?

    3)  Your reticence regarding publishing your picks in advance is understandable when considering question 1), but doesn't seem to fit with question 2).  Could it be that Q1 and Q2 don't apply at all and that the reason you don't want to risk publishing picks is because you KNOW, from past experience, that you can have long periods of losses, or, at best, no wins?  Could it also be that you KNOW that if it were not for your $25K win you would be in the hole, as probability predicts?

    In May of 2010, you posted:

    http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/214099/1661732

    "Back in 99 won 25,000 taxes paid  and  have won over 100ea  4 of 5 prizes and 3ea 5 of 6 prizes. but it

    seems something changed and my system took a dive. Not doing too well now. haven't hit even a 3 of 5

    in over two months. My system plays digits with no reguard to the actual numbers.  Maybe someday I

    will post it"

    I really believe you should think back to the case reported here in the Lottery News Forum about the man who discovered exploitable conditions in some of the scratch off games.  He chose the right path; he did his Civic Duty and notified authorities.  Don't you think you should too?

    --Jimmy4164

    P.S.  Why not splurge and spring for a Gold membership?  I'll send you some cool Avatars.


    Jimmy

    You know the only ones who reply to your post are me and stack. If we decide to quit then it will be

    as though you are talking to yourself.  The nose dive my system took was in the bayesian predictor

    which is no longer being used.  You are still clueless in stating that I am beathing the odds, I say that

    the odds are based on the randomness of the drawing and it is the randomness that is in question. 

    My civic duty compaired to the scratchers problem is not comparable,  I am like a card counter using

    every trick in the book to increase my wins.  Don't get mad because my post above has made all your

    post useless.  I am not saying the problem is a problem of programming but a function of what is called

    random.  Generating a set of numbers from a closed group is the problem and not the RNG, ball droppers

    have the same problem but not as definable.  You should also get it through your head that the digits are

    used as a method to reduce sets but also show other information that can be  useful.  Picking 5 or 6 from

    10 will always be easier then picking 5 from 39.  Thats the digit system, filtering is filtering and the fewer

    filters used the better. 

    Consider last nights drawing. 8-27-33-34-39 = digits 2-3-4-7-8-9

    digit 2 showed 1 time

    digit 3 showed 4 times I set it to hit 2 or more shows in each set

    digit 4 showed 1 time

    digit 7 showed 1 time

    digit 8 showed 1 time

    digit 9 showed 1 time

    setting one priority filter reduced from 575757 to 24 sets. 

    8 x 2 of 5

    4 x 3 of 5

    2 x 4 of 5

    1 x 5 of 5

    03 04 07 28 39
    03 04 07 29 38
    03 04 08 27 39
    03 04 08 29 37
    03 04 09 27 38
    03 04 09 28 37
    03 07 28 34 39
    03 07 29 34 38
    03 08 27 34 39
    03 08 29 34 37
    03 09 27 34 38
    03 09 28 34 37
    04 07 28 33 39
    04 07 29 33 38
    04 08 27 33 39
    04 08 29 33 37
    04 09 27 33 38
    04 09 28 33 37
    07 28 33 34 39
    07 29 33 34 38
    08 27 33 34 39  5 of 5 hit
    08 29 33 34 37
    09 27 33 34 38
    09 28 33 34 37

    My concerns about the lottery officals making adjustments to the RNG if correct would be wrong no matter

    the reasons.  Making any adjustments that would overcome any bias that could be used by the player is like

    stacking the deck and would be wrong.  Only 2.7 percent of ticket sales in my state are for our pick-5 game

    and I think that pick-6 is 2.8.  Most people buy scratchers and that shows that they are smarter then you

    give them credit.  Everytime someone buys a non-winning scratchers  the odds for winning improve for every

    other player.  Around 60% of sales are scratchers and I think that the number games are on there way out. 

    How hard would it be to recover from a 2.7% drop in sales and since the payout is at least 50% then we are

    only talking about 1.35% reduction for pick-5.  The lottery feeds off the people it depends upon to exist. 

     

    You also used my post about not hitting for a couple of months against me and think that I must have spent

    everything I had.  The fact is that I play on paper most of the time and if I play more then a couple times

    without winning I switch to playing on paper until I start hitting again.  The reason I don't buy a membership

    is that I don't need any of the fee based tools that are provided to paying members.  Why would I pay a fee

    for something I don't need and would not use.   I know that from your many post that you think that any

    thing a player uses to try and improve their odds is a waste of time so why would you purchase tools you

    would never use.   Maybe you want to be sure LP survives so our arguments can continue.  I invested

    several hundreds hours of my time and effort and gave away many software programs and other apps

    all for free, even when many offered to pay.  I wrote custom programs for some members, still with no 

    charge.  Your meagar $50.00 investment must make you very proud and I praise you for your contribution. 

    Maybe Todd will change the post and require all members to pay a fee but until that time I will just use the

    free membership.  I think that your post would offend the many here that use the free membership. Maybe

    my post attracted a few new members that decided to purchase a membership, you never know.

     

    RL


      United States
      Member #93947
      July 10, 2010
      2180 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: February 16, 2011, 4:44 pm - IP Logged

      You said,  "You know the only ones who reply to your post are me and stack."

      This isn't true, but regardless, unless you and Stack47 are the only ones accounting for the thousands of views, I have to assume there are a few out there who have learned something.  Many people are shy in these situations, and not as willing to risk looking foolish, as you are.

      "If we decide to quit then it will beas though you are talking to yourself."

      Why then don't you do me, yourselves, and everyone else a favor by refraining from commenting on my posts?

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      After considering again these questions from my Post above,

      anyone still believing your unsupported claims has my sympathy.

      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/225251/1956491

      But let's give you(RL-RANDOMLOGIC) the benefit of the doubt - let's assume you cracked the code, and can beat the odds in the MO Show Me 5 by at least FIVE times better than what Chance would predict.  (Without hitting the Jackpot, this is what you must do to do better than break even.)  Given these facts, there are questions that trouble me, and they are questions that anyone else here pondering your veracity should ask.

      1)  If you have TRULY discovered a BUG or a conspiracy in the programming of the Missouri Show Me 5 Lotto, is it not your Civic Duty to notify the appropriate authorities of your discovery, rather than try to expoit it for your own financial gain, even trying to teach others how to profit as well?  I'm not a lawyer, but there might very well be penalties awaiting you, as you might be committing fraud with your efforts in this enterprise.

      2)  Assuming you're not Civic Minded, and with question 1) above in mind, what causes you to be in a near state of obsession trying to convince me and anyone else reading here that you are able to exploit a weakness in the MO Lottery, rather than quietly going about your [possibly illegal] business, perhaps increasing your stakes?

      3)  Your reticence regarding publishing your picks in advance is understandable when considering question 1), but doesn't seem to fit with question 2).  Could it be that Q1 and Q2 don't apply at all and that the reason you don't want to risk publishing picks is because you KNOW, from past experience, that you can have long periods of losses, or, at best, no wins?  Could it also be that you KNOW that if it were not for your $25K win you would be in the hole, as probability predicts?

       

      --Jimmy4164

        RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

        United States
        Member #59354
        March 13, 2008
        3985 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: February 16, 2011, 7:27 pm - IP Logged

        You said,  "You know the only ones who reply to your post are me and stack."

        This isn't true, but regardless, unless you and Stack47 are the only ones accounting for the thousands of views, I have to assume there are a few out there who have learned something.  Many people are shy in these situations, and not as willing to risk looking foolish, as you are.

        "If we decide to quit then it will beas though you are talking to yourself."

        Why then don't you do me, yourselves, and everyone else a favor by refraining from commenting on my posts?

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        After considering again these questions from my Post above,

        anyone still believing your unsupported claims has my sympathy.

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/225251/1956491

        But let's give you(RL-RANDOMLOGIC) the benefit of the doubt - let's assume you cracked the code, and can beat the odds in the MO Show Me 5 by at least FIVE times better than what Chance would predict.  (Without hitting the Jackpot, this is what you must do to do better than break even.)  Given these facts, there are questions that trouble me, and they are questions that anyone else here pondering your veracity should ask.

        1)  If you have TRULY discovered a BUG or a conspiracy in the programming of the Missouri Show Me 5 Lotto, is it not your Civic Duty to notify the appropriate authorities of your discovery, rather than try to expoit it for your own financial gain, even trying to teach others how to profit as well?  I'm not a lawyer, but there might very well be penalties awaiting you, as you might be committing fraud with your efforts in this enterprise.

        2)  Assuming you're not Civic Minded, and with question 1) above in mind, what causes you to be in a near state of obsession trying to convince me and anyone else reading here that you are able to exploit a weakness in the MO Lottery, rather than quietly going about your [possibly illegal] business, perhaps increasing your stakes?

        3)  Your reticence regarding publishing your picks in advance is understandable when considering question 1), but doesn't seem to fit with question 2).  Could it be that Q1 and Q2 don't apply at all and that the reason you don't want to risk publishing picks is because you KNOW, from past experience, that you can have long periods of losses, or, at best, no wins?  Could it also be that you KNOW that if it were not for your $25K win you would be in the hole, as probability predicts?

         

        --Jimmy4164

        Jimmy

        I can tell that you did not even read the post.  My claims of winning don't include the JP win

        at all.  The win was around 38K before taxes and believe it or not I gave the ticket away.  Now

        I don't know where you came up with the idea that I cracked the system as this seems to be

        yet another fantasy of yours, let me say that I have not cracked anything. What I have done is

        to find certain data that exist in every simulation that I have ever ran.  I wait until I see all the 

        markers that lead up to an event and then I play.  Sometimes I miss but If I wait until until every

        thing shows before I play then I win most of the time.  [possibly illegal], I don't think so because

        what I am doing according to you does not exist.  My "near state of obsession" is a hobby and nothing

        more.  You should consider how far you went to prove everyone wrong as it seems like a full blown

        obsession.

        I hope that this might cause someone else to dig a little deeper and think outside the box.  You 

        blew everything off because you never considered an alternative solution to the problem.  If as 

        I say that the drawings are not as random as you think and given that the probability and odds are

        based entirely on a random selection, then the stats will not always be correct.  You jump in and by

        using static calculations along with large amounts of data are able to prove what many of us already

        know and have known for a long, long time.   Many here fell into your trap and were made to look bad. 

        You took this as some sort of badge of honnor, WOW. 

        I don't say that there is no element of randomness just that it is not as random as you think. Many here

        have found a few things that they think help but won't standup to a backtest that uses all the drawings. 

        It only takes a couple calculations to prove them wrong when using this approach.   I say they are not

        always wrong and many times they use the same approach just in a different way.

        Catching these events and playing them at the right time is essential.  If I have improved my timing then

        the draw becomes less and less random.  Sorry if your world is falling apart but it is not really nessary, all

        you need to do is just consider other explainations before you dismiss someones claims. I won't post what

        took me many many years to develope but I hope I have conveinced others to reexamine some of the

        processes that they may have droped because of your backtesting.  Playing every draw will always leave

        you with a loss, I avoid doing so like I would a plague.

        RL

          Avatar
          Kentucky
          United States
          Member #32652
          February 14, 2006
          7322 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: February 16, 2011, 7:37 pm - IP Logged

          Jimmy

          #1. Wrong again. 

          #2. I don't play everyday and sometimes go over a month without playing. 

          #3.  Why would I waste my time playing a game in another state with no hope of winning anything. 

          #4. I don't spend $2000 per year, EVER. 

          #5. My average plays per year are around 25 to 35 with average tickets purchased around $500.00

          #6. you are still clueless. 

           

          All the statistics you keep belching up have nothing to do with my play.  Every thing you post is based

          on picking or making a random selection.  Take the randomness out of the equation and they become

          meaningless just like you.  I have had many offers for over $100.00 for a copy of  the old dos version

          and still I have never sold a single copy.  I did however give many copies away for free.  Not for sale

          now or ever.

          You keep trying to move the post away from it's original meaning by connecting the 15 year old dos

          version to what I am using now.  I still use the digits because it requires little or no filtering in it's 

          current state.  What was posted in my system post will produce if used correctly and the correct digits

          are played.  This was the claim that I made.   

          My claims of winnings are not tied to only what is posted but you have to attack me to feel better about

          yourself.  I was almost fooled into thinking you might have a brain but have since cast that notion aside.

          If you want to debate the randomness of a rng closed system then maybe you might have something to

          add but I doubt it.  Your continued insistance on using probability to explain away a system that you don't

          understand is a bore.  All the JR-High math you use means nothing to me so let me tell you one more time

          why.

          I use statistics every day and count on the results but I don't use them to win the lottery.  Because I don't

          view random the same way as you do then you think all my efforts are in vain.  If what is called random is

          truly random then I would expect to win no more then the odds would account for +/- some small deviation. 

          Your problem with my claim stems from the fact that you think that the drawing is random.   You have never

          once considered even for a moment that maybe it is not as random as you think.  If as I say that it is not

          compleatly random then the odds that you belch out so often would then mean nothing.  I told you at the

          very first that I knew what I was doing but you did not have the nessary brain power to figure this out.  Let

          me point out just how stupid I think you really are.

          First I made many attemps to prove that staticics will predict the outcome of a random event very well.

          Next I pointed out many times that I don't think that the draws are completely random in nature.  Any

          person with half a brain could have put 2 and 2 togeather and come to the conculsion that if the results

          are different then the expected that something must be off or wrong.  Your brilliant deduction was to call

          me a phoney and trash my system because I made claims that you could not account for.  You never even

          for a moment considered that what I said about  the randomness of the game might be the fault.  Take the

          random element out of the mix and the probability fails. I have said many times that I am not a millionaire

          yet, this would also mean that I have not compleated the work but continue working on it almost weekly. 

          I may never solve the problem but I have made much progress which accounts for my results which

          probability cannot explain.  This is the reason behind my many statements that probability will never help

          me pick my winning numbers.  The lottery will always produce static results given it is completely random. 

          I left many clues along the way. I once posted that I had two concerns when posting this system.  The first

          was that not many would understand and the second was that someone would.  You can trash this all you

          want but remember this, One day I may report my findings, how will you feel then.  Your post are 

          meaningless and have provided nothing new or anything that will help anyone win for that matter. 

          Random Logic

          "All the statistics you keep belching up have nothing to do with my play."

          Off the top of my head I can give three examples when Jimmy's statistics not only had nothing to do with actual play and one (Maddog's Challenge the details) was so far off the charts, it defied credibility. It's obvious when someone assumes "one size fits all" when it comes to actual lottery play, they never played lottery games, never talked to anybody that did, or they are on a crusade against wagering on lottery games. 

          "Your post are  meaningless and have provided nothing new or anything that will help anyone win for that matter."

          I've noticed that very few people comment on Jimmy's so called earth shattering discussions and links. Had he been interested in helping others, he could have used his statistical knowledge to help those people find the best three or four squares in their tic tac toe workout. But he wanted to show them why betting all the possible combinations would result in a loss.

            RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

            United States
            Member #59354
            March 13, 2008
            3985 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: February 16, 2011, 7:42 pm - IP Logged

            Stack47

            Not in his nature.

             

            Chair

             

            RL


              United States
              Member #93947
              July 10, 2010
              2180 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: February 17, 2011, 1:12 am - IP Logged

              Jimmy

              I can tell that you did not even read the post.  My claims of winning don't include the JP win

              at all.  The win was around 38K before taxes and believe it or not I gave the ticket away.  Now

              I don't know where you came up with the idea that I cracked the system as this seems to be

              yet another fantasy of yours, let me say that I have not cracked anything. What I have done is

              to find certain data that exist in every simulation that I have ever ran.  I wait until I see all the 

              markers that lead up to an event and then I play.  Sometimes I miss but If I wait until until every

              thing shows before I play then I win most of the time.  [possibly illegal], I don't think so because

              what I am doing according to you does not exist.  My "near state of obsession" is a hobby and nothing

              more.  You should consider how far you went to prove everyone wrong as it seems like a full blown

              obsession.

              I hope that this might cause someone else to dig a little deeper and think outside the box.  You 

              blew everything off because you never considered an alternative solution to the problem.  If as 

              I say that the drawings are not as random as you think and given that the probability and odds are

              based entirely on a random selection, then the stats will not always be correct.  You jump in and by

              using static calculations along with large amounts of data are able to prove what many of us already

              know and have known for a long, long time.   Many here fell into your trap and were made to look bad. 

              You took this as some sort of badge of honnor, WOW. 

              I don't say that there is no element of randomness just that it is not as random as you think. Many here

              have found a few things that they think help but won't standup to a backtest that uses all the drawings. 

              It only takes a couple calculations to prove them wrong when using this approach.   I say they are not

              always wrong and many times they use the same approach just in a different way.

              Catching these events and playing them at the right time is essential.  If I have improved my timing then

              the draw becomes less and less random.  Sorry if your world is falling apart but it is not really nessary, all

              you need to do is just consider other explainations before you dismiss someones claims. I won't post what

              took me many many years to develope but I hope I have conveinced others to reexamine some of the

              processes that they may have droped because of your backtesting.  Playing every draw will always leave

              you with a loss, I avoid doing so like I would a plague.

              RL

              Team RL-RANDOMLOGIC / STACK47,

              The context for these 5 quotes is in your post above.

              "I wait until I see all the markers that lead up to an event and then I play."

              "If as I say that the drawings are not as random as you think and given that the probability and odds are based entirely on a random selection, then the stats will not always be correct."

              "I don't say that there is no element of randomness just that it is not as random as you think."

              "Catching these events and playing them at the right time is essential."

              "Sorry if your world is falling apart but it is not really nessary, allyou need to do is just consider other explainations before you dismiss someones claims."

              First of all, my world is not "falling apart."  However, you are beginning to sound a little desperate, as you clearly dodge the real issues here.

              Your vague references to "markers," "events," "not as random as you think," "Catching these events," and "other explanations," continue to refer back to your suggestions that there is fraud in computerized lotteries, and they beg a very simple question:

              What are these markers, events, and explanations, and where is the PROOF ?

              I have revealed my agenda here many times, but I will repeat it.  I am trying to ensure that poor people do not spend more than a reasonable entertainment allotment on the Lottery, and that includes paying predatory "System" sellers [that abound] for software.

              You have yet to give a reasonable explanation for WHY you are so obsessed with debunking me  and convincing people that you can beat the odds against matching the random selections of State Lotteries.  Until you publish your selections in advance of the Draws, you can't convince any thinking person that you can!  As long as you refuse to demonstrate the efficacy of and fully disclose your "System," the only rational explanation for your obsession is that you are setting people up for a future marketing effort.  If this was NOT the case, you would have moved on months ago, ignoring me.  I am holding you back!

              All the tools necessary to have fun picking numbers in a way that increases the number of hits on the lesser prizes are available right here on LP.  It is not necessary to harbor the false belief that RL-RANDOMLOGIC can show you how to match 2, 3, or 4 out of 5 numbers at a RATE FIVE times what QuickPick players can expect to match.

              --Jimmy4164

                RL-RANDOMLOGIC's avatar - usafce

                United States
                Member #59354
                March 13, 2008
                3985 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: February 17, 2011, 3:19 am - IP Logged

                Jimmy

                Your not holding me back and you still think that I intended to sell my system and your thinking

                is STILL WRONG... I have never made any attemps or plans to sell it and not only that but have

                refused offers to purchase it.  I have shown others my winning tickets and your madd I did not

                include you in the loop.  You have been wrong all along except for the fact that I will not post the

                exact method I use to pick digits.  You would not understand it if I did so why waste the time.

                If you think that I care what you believe you are wrong about that also, I am just returning the

                favor.  Want to hear something funny, most of the time I don't even read your replies, I just wait

                for you to respond so I can write some more knowing your ego won't allow you to pass up the 

                opportunity to reply.  You always need to get in the last word so all I need to do is just post a reply

                and then take bets on how long it takes for you to respond.   We gave up betting on what you would

                say long ago.   

                 

                PS

                I stand by my claims because they are true. 

                RL

                   
                  Page 10 of 10