The old dos software went out back durning my system post. About 30 people got the
software before I had to stop. The software was never intended for public release and
was somewhat dated. I never built a help menu or instructions and then found myself
coaching 30 people on 100's of different questions. It took over my entire life and so we
started a yahoo group so that members could learn from others thinking this would take
the load off, Nope. It was a little like throwing gas on a fire as I now had all the emails and
the group to deal with. I enjoyed this for the most part but had no time for anything, I gave
up all of my free time plus had to put other projects on hold just to answer peoples question.
I found myself getting up earlier and staying up later, pushing other projects aside. We decided
to finally close the group and tell people we could no longer keep doing it.
The jackpot I won was using the same dos system that I posted and gave away for free and the
amount was under 50K. The lady was the friend of a friend of a friend sort of thing so I was really
no big deal but was a little embarrassing.
I don't like attention and have a very tight small group of friends in my inner circle. To post a picture
here at LP you need a place to store the image online. I sent pics of tickets to carbob, winsum, and
others and if I was not truthful don't you think these people would have said something by now.
I don't feel the need to prove my claims to every single person in the world. Most of the people with the
software are amazed with how easy it is to reduce the sets down to 500 or so. The problem is getting
from that point down to less then 20 without losing the 5 of 5 and 4 of 5's. Some peole would say that
reducing sets to 500 and still having the winner in the 500 is easy, I say, "Try it." I can make 8 choices,
which if correct will produce the winning ticket in fewer then 15 lines most days. four of these are no
brainers and one only has two choices to pick from over 85% of the time. The remaining 3 are the hard
ones but but have odds of less then 1 in 100 for all three.
On what I consider a really bad day I miss 2 of the 7 and many days I miss only by one. The problem here
is that even at 1 in 100 odds I could go the rest of my life and never win. Some would say why don't you
play the 500, and my reply is how many 500's can you afford to lose in a row. I am not a gambler and can't
stand to even lose 5 bucks. Most days I play on paper and it cost me nothing. When I do play then
I expect to at least break even. The lottery is a hobby and nothing more.
I made my system post and from the beginning made clear that I would not release everything.
I posted some facts concerning digits and had hoped that people would add it to there system
of picking numbers. I at least hoped that people would take the time if nothing else to check
there sets against this data. My big mistake was to try and provide pen and paper users some
useful information that would allow them to use the digit system without software. I also had
to keep the 10 year old system seperated from the current methods being used. You will find jumps
in my post where I found myself getting ahead of what I intended to post. This left me in a less then
comfortable position. I should have just posted the digit data for people to use or not use and let it
go at that. Some here have decided to pick the system apart using statistics on a system that was
not designed to be statistical. Not one of these posters has provided me any information that I had
not tested before I wrote the first line many many years ago. I am a person who likes to solve things
and my whole life from a small child this has been my passion. The lottery was like a quest that I
knew might take my whole life with no guarantee of success and that I could not resist.
Since I found no statistical data that could support the idea that the lottery was winnable using statistics
I soon abandoned statistics but not the project. I started to study the concept random and found that
random is a catch phraes used to explain complex systems or events that are too complicated to easily
My next step was to study the matrix which lead me to the digit system. Back in those days I was limited
to using a computer with a 8088 cpu. It often took days or even a week to generate the data for even a
small matrix and even longer to run the analysis. I soon found that a random sample taken from the larger
matrix showed the random numbers generated fell very close to the expected average. The main problem
was that there was no way to predict when a number would show next. I found many at first that seemed
to show some promise but later found that these patterns could be explained by chance. I almost chose to
quit at this time but one day got the idea to count the digits within a group of randomly generated sets and
found the same data, they matched the expected. I knew that the only way to improve ones chance was
to be able to predict what would come next and without this any attempt would be almost useless. I want
to make the point that "I don't say that people who use patterns or other methods to choose numbers
are wasting time, if it works then use it." I was almost ready to give up again but then got the idea that
since the digits hit at a much greater rate then the numbers they produce then it only makes since that
the gaps between a digit hitting must be far less. BAM! The digit system was born. In the last 10 draws
for my 5-39 game 13 numbers are no-shows but the lowest hitting digit has hit 3 times. It is not uncommon
for any one numbers skips to be anything from 1 to 50 with some numbers staying out 100 or more games.
Digits do not suffer this, my 5-39's digits 1-2-3 have almost a 9 in 10 chance of hitting. Digits 4-5-6-7-8-9
have a 4.3 in 10 chance and Digit 0 has a 3.4 in 10 chance. Now some may be saying this can be calculated
and shows no advantage over any other method but consider this. If one Looks to the matrix of possible
sets one finds the matrix is very much the reason behind the digits and not the random selection of numbers.
The drawing of 5 numbers is irrelevant and no matter how random the 5 numbers seem to be they will
follow the matrix in population and distrubition. The advantage. Because the population and distrubition
of digits is uneffected by the randomness of the drawing then patterns of digits showing must also exist.
The error from the expected for digits is far less then the error rate for numbers especially in small samples.
Think of this a little like playing a number because it is due or overdue. With a number when using this
reasoning the chance of the number hitting in the next draw is far more likely to be incorrect then using the
same logic for digits. The digits hug a matrix like bark hugs a tree. It is a careful study of this that allows
one to make better choices. Finding the correct digits to play is only half the battle and the digits alone
will produce too many sets to play. However using the same logic as above when trying to predict which
digits to play one can also predict how many of each will show.
Example playing 6 digits 1-2-3-4-5-6 (no restrictions except all 6 must be in every set.
sets produced = 5421
if digits 1-2-3 are set so they must hit twice in each set and digits 4-5-6 only once per set
sets produced = 216
if digits 1-3 are set so they must hit twice in each set and digits 1-4-5-6 only once per set
sets produced = 144
All this is for nothing if the digits selected are incorrect, but as I have explained above the digits
with some careful study and knowing your matrix and using some of what I call random-logic then
the digits are not that hard to select. The drawing will be a random selection from the matrix and
the if the digits had no randomness at all then there would be no lottery. The random-logic is my
secret additive which adjust for this, It is different for every matrix and method used to select the
numbers such as RNG or ball drop but I think anyone could develope their own if they tried. I hope
this answers yours and many others questions about the digit system. Winning means being able
to predict and predicting digits is much easier then predicting numbers. Which ones to play and how
many is key. Some may hate the idea and others will love it, makes no difference to me which.