Quote: Originally posted by LottoBoner on Jan 3, 2013
You know no educated mathematician takes the crap Gail Howard writes seriously.
Any educated mathematician would also say that 100 documented winners was a fluke.
A statistical anomaly. A Deviation from the Norm.
Gail Howard Theory is vital to winning a jackpot because she gives good examples of what types of patterns a player needs to look for in order to "get better odds"
Her promotion of the 0/1/2-5 pattern is interesting, but in my opinion it takes second place to the 0/1/2 - 4 pattern, which in turn takes second place to the 0/1/2 - 3 pattern and so on and so on until you get to the best pattern of them all. The 0-0-0-0 pattern.
Her book is very good. Could it be better regarding the flag formation as it pertains to a driving a force in the randomization of numbers? Then yes.
Would a good explanation of the standard deviation in various flag formation patterns be important and sublimely interesting? Well yes again.
GH is as droney says, a great marketer. But her wealth is derived mainly in my opinion, in the marketing of wheels, and wheeling systems and wheeling programs. And if you are going to fault her on that, then you might as well fault todd for offering abbreviated wheels with upgraded memberships.
GH is retired mostly from the circuit, that is why less people win, because she doesn't answer any HARD questions anymore, like she used to regarding the lottery, and the LFF, and frankly there is nobody that can. (Maybe Richard Lustig can, he has some good luck) but I already asked him and he didn't answer. (if that is even him)
GH played in New York, and I sincerely believe her dissemination of knowledge is what prompted NYL to turn a 6/40 +1 into a 6/59 +1
That is the only explanation, and yes GH did get a 5/6 in New York, and I think that's darn good because I have not been able to do that yet in my 6/59 +1 or my 6/40