Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 8:56 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Do some number combinations have better odds?

Topic closed. 5280 replies. Last post 4 years ago by rdgrnr.

Page 220 of 353
4.820
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #116268
September 7, 2011
20244 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 5, 2013, 12:16 pm - IP Logged

That joke was in such bad taste...

 

You basically called your mom a slut....  You should probably take two seconds to think before you post, with all the nonsense you've been posting.

How did you know my Mama was a slut..............What?


    United States
    Member #124493
    March 14, 2012
    7023 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: January 5, 2013, 12:31 pm - IP Logged

    It's impossible and random.  There's no way to see a streak until after it already occured.

     

    It's like playing any other gambling game, and getting lucky in the short term.  Clearly, the house is going to win if you play roulette.  But say your bet is "Red."  It will be impossible to predict when, but eventually, the croupier will spin 10 reds in a row.  You 

     

    Then again I don't know why I'm responding to a statement which literally doesn't make sense.  It's like asking someone "can I fly your Toyota to work tomorrow?  I've got a book report due."

     

    I mean, yeah, I'm fine with anything you do.  I'm just telling you you're wrong.  But it doesn't matter if I show you 1+1 is 2, if you want to believe that for you it's 2.5, you will.

    No NoSpamNo NoSpamNo NoSpamNo NoTroll

    No NoSpamNo NoSpamNo NoSpamNo NoTroll

    No NoSpamNo NoSpamNo NoSpamNo NoTroll


      United States
      Member #116268
      September 7, 2011
      20244 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: January 5, 2013, 4:23 pm - IP Logged

      Ok Boney, so now your adding 1 +1 = 2.5  to the list of things I'm saying??


        United States
        Member #116268
        September 7, 2011
        20244 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: January 5, 2013, 4:25 pm - IP Logged

        Where does this sick self-imposed logic end? I hope your taking your meds..............


          United States
          Member #116268
          September 7, 2011
          20244 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: January 5, 2013, 4:38 pm - IP Logged

           01/04/13 - 01 02 23 25 55    +39

          How did you pick your 12 elimination numbers?

          I pull randomly selected balls out of my................. sack.Yes Nod

            Avatar
            Kentucky
            United States
            Member #32652
            February 14, 2006
            7295 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: January 5, 2013, 5:33 pm - IP Logged

            Standard Deviation is a measure of dispersion.  Probability is a measure of the likelihood of an event occuring.  Each of these measures is derived from data and are independant calculations.

            Consequently, to make a reference to "the effect of standard deviation on probability" is ABSURD!

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability 

            http://www.mathisfun.com/data/standard-deviation.html 

            --Jimmy4164

            You're proving to be your usual waste of time, Jimmy. Nobody cares.


              United States
              Member #116268
              September 7, 2011
              20244 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: January 5, 2013, 5:39 pm - IP Logged

              You're proving to be your usual waste of time, Jimmy. Nobody cares.

              I Agree! No one follows his bizarre logic, let alone his links..........

                RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                mid-Ohio
                United States
                Member #9
                March 24, 2001
                19816 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: January 5, 2013, 5:39 pm - IP Logged

                I pull randomly selected balls out of my................. sack.Yes Nod

                I take it you're not trying to beat the odds of only being right only 487/792 (2/3) times.

                 * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                   
                             Evil Looking       


                  United States
                  Member #116268
                  September 7, 2011
                  20244 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: January 5, 2013, 5:45 pm - IP Logged

                  I take it you're not trying to beat the odds of only being right only 487/792 (2/3) times.

                  "Beating" the odds was never the objective. If I can successfully eliminate 12 numbers on a SINGLE draw, I have fulfilled the objective of getting BETTER ODDS on that one single draw. This is not Boney rocket science.


                    United States
                    Member #116268
                    September 7, 2011
                    20244 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: January 5, 2013, 5:51 pm - IP Logged

                    If good sense and reason were a dictate, Boney would have an interest in this approach as he only plays for extreme jackpots and on the night PB was $588 million my selections would have given him BETTER ODDS.


                      United States
                      Member #116268
                      September 7, 2011
                      20244 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: January 5, 2013, 5:54 pm - IP Logged

                      Near 10 times BETTER ODDS to be exact...................


                        United States
                        Member #116268
                        September 7, 2011
                        20244 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: January 5, 2013, 6:04 pm - IP Logged

                        Amazing to me that Boney likely has the skill to put those 39 numbers into a computer program RNG and get a group of QP lines to play for a piece of the $588 million, but he would rather selfishly play numbers he thinks no one else is playing so he wont have to share it with anyone. Perhaps Boney had a difficult childhood??


                          United States
                          Member #116268
                          September 7, 2011
                          20244 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: January 5, 2013, 6:07 pm - IP Logged

                          Next time we get a jackpot like that I will put the 39 numbers in my sack and start pulling them out 5 at a time til I get about 50 or 60 lines to play................

                            Avatar
                            Kentucky
                            United States
                            Member #32652
                            February 14, 2006
                            7295 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: January 5, 2013, 6:12 pm - IP Logged

                            It's impossible and random.  There's no way to see a streak until after it already occured.

                             

                            It's like playing any other gambling game, and getting lucky in the short term.  Clearly, the house is going to win if you play roulette.  But say your bet is "Red."  It will be impossible to predict when, but eventually, the croupier will spin 10 reds in a row.  You 

                             

                            Then again I don't know why I'm responding to a statement which literally doesn't make sense.  It's like asking someone "can I fly your Toyota to work tomorrow?  I've got a book report due."

                             

                            I mean, yeah, I'm fine with anything you do.  I'm just telling you you're wrong.  But it doesn't matter if I show you 1+1 is 2, if you want to believe that for you it's 2.5, you will.

                            "There's no way to see a streak until after it already occured."

                            Are you saying with all your mathematical background you can't determine the probability of having many streaks in a short term with 50/50 outcomes?

                            "It's like playing any other gambling game, and getting lucky in the short term."

                            Or very unlucky if you bet a streak will end and it continues. You're talking about streaks of 10 when streaks of 3 will get you 7 to 1 on an even money bet. Betting on streaks is a basic strategy playing Baccarat and the entire betting concept of craps is based on either streaks of passes or not passing.

                            When you put a five dollar chip on the red you don't "know" the results, but that's why it called gambling. If you win you can either remove your winnings or let the two five dollar chips ride and get a 3 to 1 payoff on your original bet if it's red and 7 to 1 on a streak of three. You're correct, you don't know when the streak will start or end, but you get an advantage when one occures.


                              United States
                              Member #116268
                              September 7, 2011
                              20244 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: January 5, 2013, 7:10 pm - IP Logged

                              Set of 39 for PB. Wed. Nov. 28, 2012.

                              01 02 03 04 05 09 10 12 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 42 43 46 47 51 52 54 55 56 57 58

                              bonus ball 03

                              On this specific, individual, particular, lone and singular night I was playing with BETTER ODDS. Can anyone deny the reality of this simple truth without convoluting it into a book chapter from a mad scientist?

                              01 02 03 04 05 09 10 12 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 42 43 46 47 51 52 54 55 56 57 58

                               

                              Wednesday, November 28, 2012              05 · 16 · 22 · 23 · 29     06                  $587.5 Million

                                 
                                Page 220 of 353