It looks like you expect me to explain the English language to you. I said:
"When you put a five dollar chip on the red you don't "know" the results, but that's why it called gambling. If you win you can either remove your winnings or let the two five dollar chips ride and get a 3 to 1 payoff on your original bet if it's red and 7 to 1 on a streak of three. You're correct, you don't know when the streak will start or end, but you get an advantage when one occurs."
It's called a paragraph and if you don't understand what a paragraph is, look it up.
In the first sentence I said when you make any bet you don't know results and that's why it's called gambling. Gambling on a 50/50 outcome is really simple logic, you're going to win or you're going to lose. If you're playing for a streak and win, that's the first step. You let your money ride and second spin is still a gamble though a better bet because you'll get a 3 to 1 payoff on your original bet, but you don't know that result either and that's why it's called gambling too.
So the last sentence in the paragraph was a summation because in the first sentence I said, "you don't know the results" so "you don't know when a streak will start or end". And because I also explained how a three outcome parlay gives a player 7 to 1 payoff on the original bet, I added "but you get an advantage when one occurs".
"And explain how I'm his "disciple" please?"
It looks like you know how to take my last sentence of a paragraph out of context, but don't know why you're a disciple. Because you said "Of course..... he's promoting a person agenda lol." and "He's just using mathemtical proof, and provable concepts, to explain the nature of these games."
Jimmy made it clear he's been on an agenda ever since he got a PM from someone outside the U.S. who lost all their money playing the lottery (probably a Nigerian scam and Jimmy sent them some money).
*note to self: deeply apologize to LottoBoner for confusing him with Boney526.