"What do you mean by "better results?""
I reduced the 98,280 full wheel combos Ronnie was using to under 5000 combos and every combo won a prize including the jackpot.
"It's absurd to think one day's results comparing a virtual handful of tickets in a game with 175Million potential outcomes would prove ANYTHING!"
LMAO!
Why would you want to compare less than 800 MM results to every possible combination when in every one of those drawings 171,318,747 of your potential combos failed to win a prize?
How was it possible for Ronnie to pick the numbers and for me to place his numbers into less than 5000 combos without any of those combos being among the over 171 million potential losing combos?
"Jimjwright showed you what to expect after quite a few more draws."
I could use Ronnie's numbers with the FREE 4 if 4 wheel on BobP's website for the next 25 years, match nothing, and still show a profit. Why do you always ignorantly assume any real lottery player would continue to use a totally failing betting strategy for quite a few more draws?
"Jimjwright showed you what to expect after quite a few more draws."
The following picture depicts the results after 42,305,214 games
Jimjwright's "quite a few more draws" is 406,781 years worth of MM drawings.
"If his work didn't convince you, check out this simulation again."
I did check it out, but you're forgetting the strategy here is to use less than all the numbers.
Jimj also said:
For each game 8 random tickets were generated for Test Group A and 8 random tickets were generated for Test Group B. For Test Group A the 8 tickets had all 48 numbers in play or no duplicate numbers.
You'll never find 8 randomly selected QP tickets with no duplicate numbers in a 6/48 game or any 8 consecutive QP where each line is not randomly generated independent of any of the other lines. Here is an example of what 8 randomly generated lines really look like in a 6/47 game.
- 05-07-12-38-40-42
- 03-13-17-19-21-36
- 05-09-19-25-37-45
- 01-15-18-23-33-34
- 10-12-13-26-27-29
- 06-08-19-34-35-44
- 14-17-29-32-35-41
- 08-12-18-30-45-46
By my count only 23 of the numbers were not duplicated and Jimj forgot to account for the fact a new set of QPs would be randomly generated for each of the 42,305,214 games.
To Jimj's credit, he did go on to explain in a later post his methodology, but I fail to see how his test results show anything more than the probably of any 8 tickets with no duplicate numbers in the next 42,305,214 games. I would like to see a comparison the my set of 8 randomly generated lines to 8 lines with no duplicates for a more reasonable 500 games.
His test doesn't apply to this discussion because we're talking about using half the numbers and the 28 numbers used can change every drawing. Post 28 numbers with any configuration of bonus numbers and will check your "ROI" using the FREE 4 if 4 wheel.