Oh really?
So when I posted this...
"That's a pretty big assumption. Context matters. BTW a comma can indicate that a sentence is being split up into two seperate ideas. So just because two words are in the same sentence doens't mean that one modifies another. Like if I said that I like poker, but that some players are annoying - it's like concluding that I said that poker is annoying.
"poo-pooed" is relatively polite slang for ignored, or "shooed away." The word massive wasn't even used in reference to the term "poo-pooed."
I'm sure if you ever wrote two paragraphs I could find two words, which, when used together may form an insult. But I don't like to butcher someone else's words until I twist their meanings around. Because that would be rather lame and childish.
And there's only 2 childish people on this topic. (That would be you - and lottoboner.) Despite the fact that Stack disagrees with me, and I've called him ignorant, he's a pretty polite guy. Not childish, not derogtory.
You on the other hand, have been quite childish - twisting people's words so that you don't have to respond to valid points."
But you replied to "I'm not going to call you stupid - but your last statement was a dumb thing to say."
You didn't realize that you were ignoring a claim I made? I made the claim that You are acting childish, and said that I don't see how you conclude that Mediabrat is childish or derogatory. I suspect you realized how dumb the statements you're making are, and chose to ignore any posts which show that you're being childish.