Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 6, 2016, 4:42 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Do some number combinations have better odds?

Topic closed. 5280 replies. Last post 4 years ago by rdgrnr.

Page 294 of 353
4.820
PrintE-mailLink
rcbbuckeye's avatar - Lottery-043.jpg
Texas
United States
Member #55889
October 23, 2007
5595 Posts
Offline
Posted: February 10, 2013, 9:52 am - IP Logged

"Stack47, asks,

"What am I missing?" "

After saying: A 20% chance a winning ticket was sold times the chance of one out of over 32 million, but you're still saying "nobody beat the odds".

"A grasp of the fundamentals of mathematics, in particular, Probability theory."

Which part of 32 million in ticket sales is about 20% of the total combos did I miss?

Which part of there was only one winning ticket out of 32 million did I miss, Jimmy?

You're starting to become a troll; and oh BTW, why does Rdgrnr call you Nancy?

Because Nancy is the name of one of his ex wives that nagged him, like jimmy nags here???

Just a guess.

CAN'T WIN IF YOU'RE NOT IN

A DOLLAR AND A DREAM (OR $2)


    United States
    Member #116268
    September 7, 2011
    20244 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: February 10, 2013, 9:59 am - IP Logged

    This is a pic of Jimmy1446 in real life...............


      United States
      Member #116268
      September 7, 2011
      20244 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: February 10, 2013, 10:44 am - IP Logged

      Is his left hand all deformed, or is it just my imagination? lol. lol.


        United States
        Member #93947
        July 10, 2010
        2180 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: February 10, 2013, 10:51 am - IP Logged

        I've been on LP for seven years and Ronnie was the first person explaining a system that actually produced a jackpot match. And it doesn't matter what Boney, Jimmy, or any of the the other critics say.

        Stack47,

        Are you referring to the time Ronnie316 chose a set of 28 numbers through intuition that happened to contain the 5 winners?

        If so, what was the "System" he used?

        If not, what are you referring to?

        Please explain.

        --Jimmy4164


          United States
          Member #116268
          September 7, 2011
          20244 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: February 10, 2013, 11:01 am - IP Logged

          Stack47,

          Are you referring to the time Ronnie316 chose a set of 28 numbers through intuition that happened to contain the 5 winners?

          If so, what was the "System" he used?

          If not, what are you referring to?

          Please explain.

          --Jimmy4164

          WOw jImmY, i JusT eXpLaiNeD oNE pAgE aGo.

            dr65's avatar - black panther.jpg
            Pennsylvania
            United States
            Member #74096
            May 2, 2009
            22899 Posts
            Online
            Posted: February 10, 2013, 11:03 am - IP Logged

            Because Nancy is the name of one of his ex wives that nagged him, like jimmy nags here???

            Just a guess.

            I believe it may be the 'Pelosi' factor also.

            246 ~~ 485 ~~ 369 ~~ 890 ~~ 705 ~~ 357 ~~ 129 ~~ 165 ~  007 ~ 225 ~ 818 ~ 440 ~  7775 5557


              United States
              Member #116268
              September 7, 2011
              20244 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: February 10, 2013, 11:06 am - IP Logged

              I believe it may be the 'Pelosi' factor also.

              Hey, good one dr65. I was thinking Nancy Drew, but "crazy eyes" Pelosi is even BETTER.


                United States
                Member #93947
                July 10, 2010
                2180 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: February 10, 2013, 11:08 am - IP Logged

                Stack47,

                Are you referring to the time Ronnie316 chose a set of 28 numbers through intuition that happened to contain the 5 winners?

                If so, what was the "System" he used?

                If not, what are you referring to?

                Please explain.

                --Jimmy4164

                Ronnie316,

                Your comments a page ago were not explanations, merely observations, and clearly, no "System" was defined.

                Please explain.

                --Jimmy4164


                  United States
                  Member #116268
                  September 7, 2011
                  20244 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: February 10, 2013, 11:09 am - IP Logged

                  And this pic of Jimmy's ancestry did not even need photo shopping.


                    United States
                    Member #116268
                    September 7, 2011
                    20244 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: February 10, 2013, 11:10 am - IP Logged

                    Ronnie316,

                    Your comments a page ago were not explanations, merely observations, and clearly, no "System" was defined.

                    Please explain.

                    --Jimmy4164

                    And this pic of Jimmy's ancestry did not even need photo shopping.


                      United States
                      Member #116268
                      September 7, 2011
                      20244 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: February 10, 2013, 1:42 pm - IP Logged

                      Ronnie316,

                      Your comments a page ago were not explanations, merely observations, and clearly, no "System" was defined.

                      Please explain.

                      --Jimmy4164

                      Your reading comprehension needs work. 


                        United States
                        Member #116268
                        September 7, 2011
                        20244 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: February 10, 2013, 1:51 pm - IP Logged

                        Set of 28 for MM. Tue. Feb. 12, 2013. (explained)

                        Using the previous draw as elimination numbers..........

                        01 02 05 07 08 10 11 12 16 17 18 19 24 25 26 27 30 31 32 40 41 42 44 46 47 48 49 54

                        bonus ball 08 

                        Friday, February 08, 2013          06 · 15 · 20 · 39 · 50    054$12 Million
                        Tuesday, February 05, 201302 · 05 · 10 · 26 · 44    464$19 Million
                        Friday, February 01, 201301 · 30 · 32 · 40 · 41    173$13 Million
                        Tuesday, January 29, 201308 · 12 · 27 · 46 · 47    063$12 Million
                        Friday, January 25, 201311 · 12 · 17 · 31 · 48    014$89 Million
                        Tuesday, January 22, 201307 · 11 · 16 · 39 · 54    133$80 Million
                        Friday, January 18, 201308 · 18 · 25 · 42 · 49    143$70 Million
                        Tuesday, January 15, 201301 · 06 · 12 · 19 · 41    144$62 Million
                        Friday, January 11, 201324 · 29 · 30 · 34 · 56    01


                          United States
                          Member #116268
                          September 7, 2011
                          20244 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: February 10, 2013, 2:03 pm - IP Logged

                          If I were to post the exact same list in order of appearance. (as I did on Aug. 10, 2012) It would be THIS...

                          02 05 10 26 44 01 30 32 40 41 08 12 27 46 47 11 17 31 48 07 16 54 18 25 42 49 19 24

                          bonus ball 08

                          Friday, February 08, 2013           06 · 15 · 20 · 39 · 50    054$12 Million
                          Tuesday, February 05, 201302 · 05 · 10 · 26 · 44    464$19 Million
                          Friday, February 01, 201301 · 30 · 32 · 40 · 41    173$13 Million
                          Tuesday, January 29, 201308 · 12 · 27 · 46 · 47    063$12 Million
                          Friday, January 25, 201311 · 12 · 17 · 31 · 48    014$89 Million
                          Tuesday, January 22, 201307 · 11 · 16 · 39 · 54    133$80 Million
                          Friday, January 18, 201308 · 18 · 25 · 42 · 49    143$70 Million
                          Tuesday, January 15, 201301 · 06 · 12 · 19 · 41    144$62 Million
                          Friday, January 11, 201324 · 29 · 30 · 34 · 56    01 

                            United States
                            Member #124493
                            March 14, 2012
                            7023 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: February 10, 2013, 2:07 pm - IP Logged

                            This is a pic of Jimmy1446 in real life...............

                            Green laughI think that left hand is a little bent.  Or "askew".  I think that might be a result of playing with hard balls.

                            But I think most deformation is within nancys skull.


                              United States
                              Member #116268
                              September 7, 2011
                              20244 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: February 10, 2013, 2:19 pm - IP Logged

                              Green laughI think that left hand is a little bent.  Or "askew".  I think that might be a result of playing with hard balls.

                              But I think most deformation is within nancys skull.

                              I wonder if Little Nancy understands the risk of asking me to hit 5+1 again? Certainly she has used her probability theory skills to deduct that in all probability it SHOULD take me another 17.02785 years?

                                 
                                Page 294 of 353