Quote: Originally posted by LottoBoner on Feb 12, 2013
Being that we are chasing trends, I dont know if it would be wise to go with "No Shows"
as the trend for a "no show" is to not show.
I am posting a chart here. For those of you who dont know, SergeM is the programmer of all my MatrixWalks, and the following is portion of the chart that I rarely post. So the chart is courtesy of him.
Anyway. This is a count of Last 10, Last 25 Last 50 of Last digits. The obvious "Hot Trend, is to have two Last digit ones.
Every "2" on this chart (colored yellow) represents a LDS, last digit same. The 1's have been hot. The 0's could be waking, and the 9's are dead in the water. And the 3's are dead in the water. The dead numbers will wake up. But right away? Probably not. There will be delay, and calculating or becoming aware of this delay is key to catching them. So my personal opinion is to leave the dead fish dead in the water for the time being.
I would stick with 1. And if i was gonna use LottoLaughs system, i would go 1 -2. But the main thing first is for two numbers with Last digit one. Since #1 is a skip of 2, that would be one of my favorites for tonite.
2/12/2013
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
25
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
24
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
23
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
22
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
21
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
20
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
19
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
18
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
17
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
16
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
15
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
13
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
9
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
8
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
6
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
5
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2/12/2013
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
L10
|
7
|
8
|
7
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
L25
|
9
|
20
|
18
|
12
|
14
|
8
|
11
|
8
|
14
|
11
|
L50
|
9
|
21
|
20
|
15
|
18
|
13
|
17
|
15
|
22
|
20
|
Last Digits ones here has been and is in a LFF. It is Hot to Trot. The most recent draws are at the bottom, the farther draws at the top, from 1 to 25 last draws. So a wheel would have to have almost all the Last digit ones. I would use a matrix walk, and or skip to filter my Last Digit one selections.
Off the top,
1 skip 2
11 skip 4
21 skip 9
31 skip 4
41 skip 2
51 skip 17
Professionally I would play 1 11 31 41 51 in a wheel hoping to score two.
Then one could ask what Last digits come out the most with the Last digit one? Maybe the above chart can elucidate that .
Notice in the Last 25 draws, there has been 4 occasions where 4 of the 5 numbers were represented by only TWO LAST DIGITS. This phenomenon of TWO LAST Digits can express also in a LFF, and I would gamble to say we are in a LFF. This last occurred two draws ago.
The problem is matching the other Last Digit probables with the 1's.
I hope this helps some people.
Good Luck!
P.S. One of the ways I have found success is to find different variables with overlapping flag formations. Not a task for the feint of heart!