Welcome Guest
You last visited December 2, 2016, 2:44 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Topic closed. 1459 replies. Last post 7 months ago by frenchie.

 Page 21 of 98
Pennsylvania
United States
Member #2218
September 1, 2003
5387 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 8, 2015, 9:16 am - IP Logged

Master Zip file update:

https://app.box.com/s/egtjm3g8xpvsfbi3xyiah354ofkzwb69

Drawings updated through Sunday June 7 2015

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
3960 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 11, 2015, 6:51 pm - IP Logged

I finished the sum predictor for the lexie and below are the top 4 digit values for each lexie position for

the MM drawing on 6-12-15.  The digits are arranged most probable on the left to right.  I have not had

any time to backtest and they might flop.  I also included my picks for bonus numbers.

RL

A=01
B=2635
C=2135
D=2436
E=4521
F=1247
G=5649
H=9875

BB = 3 and 5

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

New Mexico
United States
Member #86099
January 29, 2010
11114 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 11, 2015, 6:57 pm - IP Logged

I finished the sum predictor for the lexie and below are the top 4 digit values for each lexie position for

the MM drawing on 6-12-15.  The digits are arranged most probable on the left to right.  I have not had

any time to backtest and they might flop.  I also included my picks for bonus numbers.

RL

A=01
B=2635
C=2135
D=2436
E=4521
F=1247
G=5649
H=9875

BB = 3 and 5

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
3960 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 12, 2015, 8:53 am - IP Logged

LB

I live played my 5-39 using the same tool and it only hit 2 of 6 lexie digits in last nights game.

I hope to find the time to run some test before Saturdays lotto drawing as it's up over 4-mill.

Anyone who uses the above results for the next MM game should keep this in mind.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

New Member
missiouri
United States
Member #83258
December 3, 2009
14 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 12, 2015, 10:57 am - IP Logged

I played the Mo-5-39 last night    542x13     winner 14-18-27-32-37

my picks                                                 winning numbers

1-212    16-31-33-36-37                          1-212

2-221     17-18-19-20-25                          2-111

3-122     17-18-19-26-32                         3-222

4-122      17-18-20-21-36                        4-211

5-111     17-18-20-28-38                          5-312

6-211      17-18-21-24-35                         6-312

17-18-21-35-36

17-18-22-29-39

17-18-23-28-29

17-18-24-27-35

New Member
missiouri
United States
Member #83258
December 3, 2009
14 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 12, 2015, 11:28 am - IP Logged

Mo-6-44      3x31432        6/13/15

1-211      4-13-17-21-40-42

2-321      4-17-22-24-33-44

3-211      5-6-8-14-31-32

4-111      5-7-14-22-26-42

5-221      5-9-12-14-18-24

6-211      5-11-14-32-35-44

7-122      5-14-16-21-22-30

5-19-20-24-30-34

6-7-14-16-17-34

6-9-11-23-33-42

Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
858 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 13, 2015, 3:18 am - IP Logged

I played the Mo-5-39 last night    542x13     winner 14-18-27-32-37

my picks                                                 winning numbers

1-212    16-31-33-36-37                          1-212

2-221     17-18-19-20-25                          2-111

3-122     17-18-19-26-32                         3-222

4-122      17-18-20-21-36                        4-211

5-111     17-18-20-28-38                          5-312

6-211      17-18-21-24-35                         6-312

17-18-21-35-36

17-18-22-29-39

17-18-23-28-29

17-18-24-27-35

whiskers

You did pretty well. You had 4 out of 5 winning numbers in your selections. It's true that not on one line, but you were not that far from a 4 of 5.

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
3960 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 13, 2015, 3:07 pm - IP Logged

Hi all

I had some time to backtest the sums predictor and while it's easy to get the most probable lexie value

it seems that the most probable or even the 2nd, 3rd, 4th most probable does not want to play along.

This is nice for analysis but as a predictor it simply does not seem to work.  Oh well back to the drawing

board.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
3960 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 13, 2015, 3:18 pm - IP Logged

Whiskers

Hope you win big tonight as long as it's not the JP, lol. I got dibs on the 4.1 mill.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

United States
Member #133657
October 5, 2012
82 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 13, 2015, 4:30 pm - IP Logged

Hi all

I had some time to backtest the sums predictor and while it's easy to get the most probable lexie value

it seems that the most probable or even the 2nd, 3rd, 4th most probable does not want to play along.

This is nice for analysis but as a predictor it simply does not seem to work.  Oh well back to the drawing

board.

RL

Hmm, what would happen to the backtest results if you inverted the order? The least probable becomes the most probable, the 2nd least probable becomes the 2nd most probable, etc. Does the predictor become more successful then?

United States
Member #59354
March 13, 2008
3960 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 13, 2015, 10:44 pm - IP Logged

LN

A couple come from the low end, a couple from the middle and a couple from the high end.

RL

Working on my Ph.D.  "University of hard Knocks"

I will consider the opinion that my winnings are a product of chance if you are willing to consider

they are not.  Many great discoveries come while searching for something else

Trump / 2016 & 2020

Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
858 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 14, 2015, 3:34 am - IP Logged

Hi guys,

Last night I set the lexie digits as follows :

1- 3

2- 4

3- 7

4- 8

5- 6

6-7

The actual lexies were :

1-8

2-4

3-7

4-8

5-6

6-7

My set was : 04 29 32 35 39

The winning combination was : 28,29,33,41,42

Again I acted against my own advice not to play the first lexie position as the first one is almost impossible to hit.

From Denver, Rocky Mountain Empire,
United States
Member #49750
February 13, 2007
439 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 14, 2015, 4:32 am - IP Logged

Hi guys,

Last night I set the lexie digits as follows :

1- 3

2- 4

3- 7

4- 8

5- 6

6-7

The actual lexies were :

1-8

2-4

3-7

4-8

5-6

6-7

My set was : 04 29 32 35 39

The winning combination was : 28,29,33,41,42

Again I acted against my own advice not to play the first lexie position as the first one is almost impossible to hit.

Five out of six is impressive! How did you do it though? Is it just lucky guessing or there is method to the madness? In any case, good job!

Go Broncos!

From Denver, Rocky Mountain Empire,
United States
Member #49750
February 13, 2007
439 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 14, 2015, 4:35 am - IP Logged

LN

A couple come from the low end, a couple from the middle and a couple from the high end.

RL

RL, the key to this excellent software is an automatic predictor, no matter what the flaw is. Don't give up, keep working on it. Thanks!

Go Broncos!

Krakow
Poland
Member #86302
February 2, 2010
858 Posts
Offline
 Posted: June 14, 2015, 4:39 am - IP Logged

Five out of six is impressive! How did you do it though? Is it just lucky guessing or there is method to the madness? In any case, good job!