Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 11:14 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

New breakthrough prediction system

Topic closed. 415 replies. Last post 13 years ago by visiondude.

Page 12 of 28
PrintE-mailLink

Belgium
Member #2220
September 2, 2003
553 Posts
Offline
Posted: September 14, 2003, 2:10 pm - IP Logged

To all the critics:

Trashing new theories and systems without researching them is cheap and easy ! It is the work of fools who speak before they think.

At least I have the guts to stand up for a test. How many have done this before me? tell me?

So give me a break, will you.

    Thomas Covenant's avatar - money
    South Carolina
    United States
    Member #491
    July 16, 2002
    837 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: September 14, 2003, 2:34 pm - IP Logged

    >Thomas: different sources of entropy produce different results. That's true. Bottomline is that although the results may differ, they are in fact the same.<



    Bottomline is that little green elves actually pick the balls.



    The statement above isn't meant to be rude. It's just to prove a point. Making a general statement like you did is pointless without proof. Strokes of a keyboard, radioactive decay, or a lottery drum are different sources of entropy, they produce different results, so how can they be the same.


    Okay, now I believe you can predict lottery numbers


      Belgium
      Member #2220
      September 2, 2003
      553 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: September 14, 2003, 2:46 pm - IP Logged

      Thomas:

      1 + 1 = 2 and 23 + 1 = 24

      The results are different but the process is the same.


        United States
        Member #1759
        June 29, 2003
        1156 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: September 14, 2003, 2:57 pm - IP Logged

        That makes a lot of sense.

          Thomas Covenant's avatar - money
          South Carolina
          United States
          Member #491
          July 16, 2002
          837 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: September 14, 2003, 2:57 pm - IP Logged

          >Thomas:

          1 + 1 = 2 and 23 + 1 = 24

          The results are different but the process is the same.<



          And exactly what does this have to do with your program.? Or good sources of entropy? I understand what you are trying to say about your program. What I am saying is that you can't find a good source of entropy that matches the forces involved in a lottery drawing. And I think you know this.


          Okay, now I believe you can predict lottery numbers


            Belgium
            Member #2220
            September 2, 2003
            553 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:03 pm - IP Logged

            The forces involved with any kind of entropy are exactly the same forces.

            If you drop an apple, or you drop a brick. It's always gravity + air friction that is going to dictate the result. The results will differ, but the process is always the same.


              United States
              Member #1759
              June 29, 2003
              1156 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:05 pm - IP Logged

              That may be true Thomas but atleast he's giving it a try

              so wait and see what his program can do before you put it down.People didn't believe a lot of things could be done where science and technology are concerned but someone proved them wrong with innovative ideas and a different approach.They succeded so only time will tell whether GURU does or not and I'm willing to wait and see if he does quietly and if he doesn't than Oh Well I still have my own ideas to work with.


                Belgium
                Member #2220
                September 2, 2003
                553 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:06 pm - IP Logged

                Thanks Pick-4


                  United States
                  Member #1759
                  June 29, 2003
                  1156 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:13 pm - IP Logged

                  No problem, all this controversy over your program just reminds me of all the Scientists who had these off the wall ideas or new inventions that were put down and scorned but they kept working on them anyway.And when they accomplished there goal those same critics were praising them or they shut there mouths out of embarrasment because they were the ones making the BIGGEST noise about how this or that could not be done.


                    Belgium
                    Member #2220
                    September 2, 2003
                    553 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:16 pm - IP Logged

                    If any of you had seen what I already saw, I'm sure you would all be convinced. The problem is, if I tell too much of my theory, others may claim the trophy.


                      Belgium
                      Member #2220
                      September 2, 2003
                      553 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:25 pm - IP Logged

                      I can't blame you all for b

                        Thomas Covenant's avatar - money
                        South Carolina
                        United States
                        Member #491
                        July 16, 2002
                        837 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:33 pm - IP Logged

                        >If you drop an apple, or you drop a brick. It's always gravity + air friction that is going to dictate the result. The results will differ, but the process is the same.<



                        The results will differ. But don't you want the results to be the same? It wouldn't be much good if the results from your program is different from the actual draw.


                        Okay, now I believe you can predict lottery numbers

                          RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                          mid-Ohio
                          United States
                          Member #9
                          March 24, 2001
                          19819 Posts
                          Online
                          Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:36 pm - IP Logged
                          Quote: Originally posted by Guru on September 14, 2003


                          If any of you had seen what I already saw, I'm sure you would all be convinced. The problem is, if I tell too much of my theory, others may claim the trophy.



                          What make you think if anyone saw what you saw or knew more about your theory, they could claim a trophy or be a lottery winner?  You haven't won anything and it unlikely that anyone else can do any better with your theory.  I'm sure if there was anything to what you have been saying, you wouldn't be talking, you would be spending your winnings.  You sound more like a salesperson than a winner.

                          RJOh


                            Belgium
                            Member #2220
                            September 2, 2003
                            553 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:40 pm - IP Logged

                            Thomas:

                            the results of my program are dictated by it's process (wich is always the same)

                            So if you have a 6/40 lotto or a 6/60, the process will find the results that go with the kind of lottery it is predicting for.

                            Think and read carefully before you type Thomas.

                              Thomas Covenant's avatar - money
                              South Carolina
                              United States
                              Member #491
                              July 16, 2002
                              837 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: September 14, 2003, 3:48 pm - IP Logged

                              I guess you don't understand what I am saying, I will use one of your examples. 1 + 1 = 2, 23 + 1 = 24. Let's call the numbers 1 and 23 sources of entropy, as you can see, the process is the same, but the results are different because the sources of entropy are different. In a lottery system program you want the results to be the same. But this is not gonna happen. Unless your source of entropy is exactly like the forces in a lottery drum. And unless you have some crypto hardware attached to your computer, you have a very bad source of entropy for your RNG.


                              Okay, now I believe you can predict lottery numbers

                                 
                                Page 12 of 28