Welcome Guest
You last visited December 10, 2016, 4:45 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# New breakthrough prediction system

Topic closed. 415 replies. Last post 13 years ago by visiondude.

 Page 15 of 28

Belgium
Member #2220
September 2, 2003
553 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 15, 2003, 3:34 pm - IP Logged

Hi guys,

Haven't got much time. Just letting you now that I am not quitting.

United States
Member #1759
June 29, 2003
1156 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 15, 2003, 4:02 pm - IP Logged

That's GOOD to HEAR

Pennsylvania
United States
Member #1340
April 6, 2003
2450 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 15, 2003, 5:39 pm - IP Logged

for what it's worth, these are the values for RND that produce a whole number (looking at the powerball here) when multiplied by 53 (53*RND()) without need to force the output into the Integer data type...

 Number RND Value 1 0.018867925 2 0.037735849 3 0.056603774 4 0.075471698 5 0.094339623 6 0.113207547 7 0.132075472 8 0.150943396 9 0.169811321 10 0.188679245 11 0.20754717 12 0.226415094 13 0.245283019 14 0.264150943 15 0.283018868 16 0.301886792 17 0.320754717 18 0.339622642 19 0.358490566 20 0.377358491 21 0.396226415 22 0.41509434 23 0.433962264 24 0.452830189 25 0.471698113 26 0.490566038 27 0.509433962 28 0.528301887 29 0.547169811 30 0.566037736 31 0.58490566 32 0.603773585 33 0.622641509 34 0.641509434 35 0.660377358 36 0.679245283 37 0.698113208 38 0.716981132 39 0.735849057 40 0.754716981 41 0.773584906 42 0.79245283 43 0.811320755 44 0.830188679 45 0.849056604 46 0.867924528 47 0.886792453 48 0.905660377 49 0.924528302 50 0.943396226 51 0.962264151 52 0.981132075 53 1

Playing more than one ticket per game is betting against yourself.

Pennsylvania
United States
Member #1340
April 6, 2003
2450 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 15, 2003, 5:41 pm - IP Logged

and for the powerball itself...

(42*RND)

 Number RND Value 1 0.023809524 2 0.047619048 3 0.071428571 4 0.095238095 5 0.119047619 6 0.142857143 7 0.166666667 8 0.19047619 9 0.214285714 10 0.238095238 11 0.261904762 12 0.285714286 13 0.30952381 14 0.333333333 15 0.357142857 16 0.380952381 17 0.404761905 18 0.428571429 19 0.452380952 20 0.476190476 21 0.5 22 0.523809524 23 0.547619048 24 0.571428571 25 0.595238095 26 0.619047619 27 0.642857143 28 0.666666667 29 0.69047619 30 0.714285714 31 0.738095238 32 0.761904762 33 0.785714286 34 0.80952381 35 0.833333333 36 0.857142857 37 0.880952381 38 0.904761905 39 0.928571429 40 0.952380952 41 0.976190476 42 1

Playing more than one ticket per game is betting against yourself.

light on my feet
United States
Member #356
May 20, 2002
2744 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 15, 2003, 7:31 pm - IP Logged

pick4,

it sure is e

"i am .........."meant to"

P.S.,  that RJoH  is a stand up guy.  thanks,  vision

until further notice,  it's  france everyday

United States
Member #1759
June 29, 2003
1156 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 15, 2003, 8:30 pm - IP Logged

Are you TICKED OFF at me? VISIONDUDE? I think we've gone down this road before remember me telling you that I enjoy "BUSTING YOUR CHOPS" so it seems like your the one "TAKING THINGS TOO SERIOUSLY" not me.I could give a "HOOT" on whether you win the lottery before me after me,with a Quick-Pick or pulling numbers out of a Hat and furthermore I'm not selling anything so I have nothing to prove.My posts about strategiesare for those that use them not for you Quick-Pick Players,and you haven't WON ANYTHING AT ALL to my knowledge so what's your point about me spending more than I won? this is GAMBLING it's to be expected until you come up with something that can change this.I won \$500 from a ticket I bought on Aug.27 (not a quick-pick either)I cashed it the other day after forgetting about it when I went out of town.I play for me not you or anyone else and like I said before since I'm not selling software or systems I only have to answer to me.You can't pull the mess with me that you do with anyone selling a system or program I don't fit into that category.Also I GIVE INFORMATION for FREE many members (even friends of yours)have recieved strategies from me for the Pick-3/4 and 5 games

I don't make any claims like others do I just give logical info that can be used by intelligent players.If it bothers you don't read it,I really don't understand your FIXATION with PROOF on everything SHOW you WHAT? the numbers I play? you want me to POST numbers like some other members do? WHY? I'm GAMBLING not COMPETING against you or any other member.This isn't a contest to see who can PICK numbers it's to share information if you want something out of me just ask members who have gotten something out of me "THEY JUST ASKED NICELY" and I shared information FREELY.I think I've told you before that I'm not trying to CONVINCE YOU of anything or trying to PERSUADE you to stop buying QUICK-PICKS that's your THING so stick with it and I'll stick with what works for me.So CHILL OUT DUDE it's JUST A GAME we're ALL WINNERS in here because we're taking up the challenge to try and "BEAT THE ODDS" there's no need for all this negative attitude towards anyone that makes comments about INCREASING SOMEONE'S chances of WINNING at least there trying.It's not the CHRISTIAN thing to do you should be cautious I admit but at least give them a little support or praise for trying not everyone is trying to SCAM members in here.INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY right? not the other way around

you can trash the Software developers if they fall flat on there claims but at least give them a chance first my GOODNESS I'm not a CHRISTIAN but I atleast keep my negative comments to myself until I have GOOD REASON to voice them but I guess you play by a different set of RULES,be nice it's not that hard or are you SLIPPING?

that EXPLODING HEAD IMAGE you had maybe signs of temptations from the DARK SIDE!!! LUKE WHERE ARE YOU?

light on my feet
United States
Member #356
May 20, 2002
2744 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 16, 2003, 7:02 am - IP Logged

"i am .........."meant to"

P.S.,  that RJoH  is a stand up guy.  thanks,  vision

until further notice,  it's  france everyday

BOSTON
United States
Member #48
September 9, 2001
3594 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 16, 2003, 8:21 am - IP Logged

pick4master, I would really appreciate some insight from you that you freely share as to help on the pick 4 here in Mass. as to how you would play in this state. It is a difficult state to hit as everybody knows thanks.

United States
Member #1759
June 29, 2003
1156 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 16, 2003, 9:14 am - IP Logged

VISIONDUDE are you hard of hearing in your OLD AGE? I'm not trying to SHOW YOU anything,my POSTS are for players that use STRATEGIES not QUICK-PICKS I have nothing to PROVE TO YOU.Why can't you get that through your HEAD? read the post below yours from "RETXX" he's asking for information not a MIRACLE.You see VISIONDUDE

Pennsylvania
United States
Member #1340
April 6, 2003
2450 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 16, 2003, 12:18 pm - IP Logged

anyone still interested in the new theory discussion? (without the sales pitch)... anyone have any newer and more radical theories?

what about a RNG that can choose randomly but only from the values of RND that I posted above?... It would be more representative of the actual results of a lottery drawing (they never have to round-up the results... ).

Playing more than one ticket per game is betting against yourself.

South Carolina
United States
Member #491
July 16, 2002
837 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 16, 2003, 12:31 pm - IP Logged

Any RNG program would just give you results similiar to a quick pick at a lottery terminal. Trying to find the pattern of "randomness" is pointless. There is no pattern of "randomness". That's why it's called random. Do me a favor. Take a bunch of ping pong balls without numbers. Put them in a large clear jar. Take the jar and watch the balls while you shake it. Then tell me as you are watching the balls how it is possible to predict the order that these balls are bouncing with a computer program. People just focus on the numbers. You need to focus on the bouncing balls.

Okay, now I believe you can predict lottery numbers

Bakersfield
United States
Member #1568
May 24, 2003
421 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 16, 2003, 12:38 pm - IP Logged

Guru

Is this something you are working on by yourself? I noticed in the start of the thread there was mention of "we" and "us".  Just wondering.

South Carolina
United States
Member #491
July 16, 2002
837 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 16, 2003, 1:01 pm - IP Logged

There is not a lot of math involved in a lottery draw. The numbers on the balls are just symbols representing the ball. Replacing the numbers with pictures would work just as well. Let's say that in last saturday's Powerball drawing we had the following results. Apple, Pear, Grape, Bannana, Orange with a Powerball of Pear. That would pretty much render most Lottery systems useless. Why? Every thing is the same. The balls are the same, the lottery machines are the same. The lottery balls bounce the same.

Okay, now I believe you can predict lottery numbers

United States
Member #1759
June 29, 2003
1156 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 16, 2003, 1:15 pm - IP Logged

Your right and wrong THOMAS,Your right about you can't predict the exact 5 or 6 numbers that will be drawn and yes the Lottery is Random.BUT the numbers drawn over a period of time do form patterns and create variables that you can track with Lottery Software.Following the Pin-Pong balls is following the Numbers you can't seperate the 2 the numbers are painted on the Balls.The

best way to track the numbers is from a print out of the draw history or from a program.The Ping Pong balls and Numbers are ONE UNIT in the Draw Machine so how can you seperate the 2? Ask the Lottery Commission to put blank ping-pong balls in one machine and numbers cut out of paper in another? You Quick-Pick players keep using the word PREDICT that's incorrect no person or program can predict the numbers.But a person or program can eliminate the LEAST PROBABLE numbers to be drawn which will leave you with a GROUP of the MOST PROBABLE

numbers to be drawn.Of course that takes practice and skill the same kind the Casino Gamblers use when making there bets based on there skill and expertise from the game they plaY.Putting numbers in a JAR is not the same as using the DRAW machines so you can't compare it like that.If that were the case they would use GLASS JARS instead of those expensive machines.Your reasoning behind why software or systems can't work based on the SCIENTIFIC THEORY of RANDOMNESS I do agree with because trying to find or manipulate the force behind randomness or the reasoning behind randomness is pointless in it's NATURAL STATE but finding patterns in randomness when it's APPLIED to something is totally different.In this case NUMBERS becasue whether you want to believe it or not the numbers do form patterns and trends and other anomilies.Let's say for example RANDOMNESS is an invisible force that exists and this force when left alone cannot be manipulated but when it is applied to something PHYSICAL it can.Dice,numbered Ping-Pong Balls or a Deck of Cards for example so basically that's what's being done Randomness is an INVISIBLE force which we cannot manipulate in it's PURE FORM or STATE but when you apply it to something PHYSICAL you can manipulate it.And I don't mean controlling it per say but observing what occurs to the physical objects it's being applied to.Now as for the Ping-Pong Balls there physical but we can't physically manipulate them so we do that in an Artificial enviromnent like Draw Histories from a Lottery Program or Print out.Because we are observing the Balls activity in the MACHINE but outside of there environment since we can't physically be in there environment like the Studio or Draw Machine itself.You may not understand this but I've been reading all the post about this subject and it all made sense when I started to see what everyone is really getting at but kind of missing the point by making things to COMPLICATED or SCIENTIFIC you don't need any Mathematical formuals to select numbers unless your developing Software or Systems that produce numbers based on mathematical equations.I'm no Scientist and only have an AS Degree in Computers\Electronics but if you really look at what's going on you can see there's an easier or simpler way to help you hit the numbers without all this DEEP SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS just a BASIC ANALYSIS is necessary.

South Carolina
United States
Member #491
July 16, 2002
837 Posts
Offline
 Posted: September 16, 2003, 1:39 pm - IP Logged

You are totally missing the point Pick 4. Apply your systems to my example just using the fruit. If you truly had a workable system you should be able to. It shouldn't matter what is printed on the balls, the balls behave the same. The numbers are just symbols representing the balls.

Okay, now I believe you can predict lottery numbers

 Page 15 of 28