Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 8, 2016, 5:30 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

D.C. Lottery hopes raffle will bring fiscal success

Washington, D.C. LotteryWashington, D.C. Lottery: D.C. Lottery hopes raffle will bring fiscal success

The D.C. Lottery's Quick Cash game had been around for more than 15 years when Todd Zimmerman walked into Rodman's Drugs in Northwest in February 2005 and bought two $1 tickets.

With three games on each ticket, the government contractor won the maximum $250,000 jackpot for each of the six games. But the improbable $1.5 million payout also helped put the D.C. Lottery's Quick Cash game more than $640,000 in the red for the year, records show.

Within months, the game was canceled, although lottery officials say the move had more to do with keeping their lineup of games fresh than Mr. Zimmerman's big wins.

The scenario nonetheless illustrates a point made in a recent audit of lottery operations. Prize payouts have a big effect on the D.C. Lottery's bottom line, yet largely are a matter of chance and beyond the control of management.

Now, city lottery officials are hoping their latest offering, a $1 million raffle, will pay off for players and the lottery.

The citywide game is similar to raffles held in several states, including Virginia. It also comes as the city's Office of the Chief Financial Officer is considering a move to privatize lottery operations, despite the lottery's record-setting sales last year.

The D.C. Millionaire Raffle, which started Monday and runs until Aug. 22, will sell 250,000 tickets at $10 a piece. The winner will get paid $1 million, three runners up will each receive $50,000 and 100 others will each receive $1,000. Odds of winning are one in 250,000.

"We're always looking for a new game each year," said Jeanette Michael, executive director of the D.C. Lottery. "We're trying to figure out ways to create excitement."

Ms. Michael took over the lottery in 2001. Since 2002, lottery sales have increased from $211 million in 2002 to a record $266 million last year.

"Her philosophy has been 'let's manage what we can control,'" said Robert Hainey, lottery spokesman.

Ms. Michael said she's not concerned with talk of privatization, a topic being debated in state houses across the country, including in California and Massachusetts, as lotteries face increasing competition from Internet gambling and casinos.

"That's not for me to comment on one way or another," she said. "I try to generate as much revenue as possible."

Nationally, proponents say lottery privatization will generate more revenue, including big, upfront lump sums of cash through selling the lottery. But critics question whether it's smart to have elected officials handling all that money in the short term, while leaving the long-term profits to private managers.

Ms. Michael hopes to increase lottery sales from $265 million to $300 million. Money transferred to the general fund supports education, parks, police, housing, senior and child services.

"Elected officials always want more and we're trying to give them more," she said. "We also have to run a lottery with the highest degree of integrity."

The Quick Cash losses were an anomaly, representing relatively minor losses, financial statements show.

The lottery also paid out $146.6 million in prizes last year, the highest since its inception in 1982, while transferring $73.8 million to the city's general fund.

Ms. Michael said the raffle game differs from other lottery games because only 250,000 tickets exist. If tickets sell out before Aug. 22, the game ends.

But the game also carries a risk for the lottery because of the guaranteed payouts; if the lottery sells just 100,000 tickets, generating $1 million in revenue, it still must pay out $1.25 million in prizes, whether it sells 250,000 tickets for $10 a piece.

Washington Times

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

7 comments. Last comment 9 years ago by JimmySand9.
Page 1 of 1
jarasan's avatar - new patrick.gif
Harbinger
D.C./MD.
United States
Member #44103
July 30, 2006
5583 Posts
Offline
Posted: July 4, 2007, 10:12 am - IP Logged

This raffle seems like a dog to me, one top prize. DC is computer drawn.  When this guy hit 6X on two tix. it kinda made me feel better about playing computer drawn games, but for all we know they've readjusted the RNG,  hard to say.  The Rodmans store is one that I go to sometimes for PBall and Dc6.  They have a great wine selection there, with advisors and all.

    justxploring's avatar - villiarna
    Wandering Aimlessly
    United States
    Member #25360
    November 5, 2005
    4461 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: July 4, 2007, 10:50 am - IP Logged

    This raffle seems like a dog to me, one top prize. DC is computer drawn.  When this guy hit 6X on two tix. it kinda made me feel better about playing computer drawn games, but for all we know they've readjusted the RNG,  hard to say.  The Rodmans store is one that I go to sometimes for PBall and Dc6.  They have a great wine selection there, with advisors and all.

    Hmm...sounds familiar.  A Washington D.C. game where people invest in a ticket and wait to see if they've won or lost?  Only one top prize?  Turns out to be a bad idea?

    "Her philosophy has been 'let's manage what we can control,'" 

    I'm voting for Ms Michaels!  Is she on the Democrat or Republican ticket?  LOL

      Avatar
      Grand Rapids, Michigan
      United States
      Member #53008
      June 19, 2007
      67 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: July 4, 2007, 10:57 am - IP Logged

      This game has been around for more than 15 years and all of a sudden this guy wins twice and the DC lottery decides to pull it?  Something doesn't quite sound right to me about that.

        mjwinsmith's avatar - moon

        United States
        Member #391
        June 8, 2002
        16067 Posts
        Online
        Posted: July 4, 2007, 11:20 am - IP Logged

        This game has been around for more than 15 years and all of a sudden this guy wins twice and the DC lottery decides to pull it?  Something doesn't quite sound right to me about that.

        You hit the nail right on the head!

        For 15 years they soaked the Lottery Playing Public, then once the tide turns they don't want to be in it any more.

        Shame on the D.C. Lottery.

          jarasan's avatar - new patrick.gif
          Harbinger
          D.C./MD.
          United States
          Member #44103
          July 30, 2006
          5583 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: July 4, 2007, 3:06 pm - IP Logged

          I would hope she is independent.  But you know what, they are moaning about a a guy who got a good hit (not quick pick!) and they still complain, $250,000,000. So I am leaning democrat, just like the rest of the DC govt. that gets 7-8 billion a year from the feds and they don't know where the money goes. Billions, more than a lot of states, with about a population of 600,000 and an area of about 90 square miles.  Par for the course.  Oh well.  Statehood! White Bounce

            BobP's avatar - bobp avatar.png
            Dump Water Florida
            United States
            Member #380
            June 5, 2002
            3104 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: July 4, 2007, 6:09 pm - IP Logged

            A city sized lottery, no cap on the prize and they got away with it for 15 years, sounds like D.C. was the winner overall. BobP

              Avatar

              United States
              Member #1826
              July 11, 2003
              2645 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: July 10, 2007, 10:43 pm - IP Logged

              This raffle seems like a dog to me, one top prize. DC is computer drawn.  When this guy hit 6X on two tix. it kinda made me feel better about playing computer drawn games, but for all we know they've readjusted the RNG,  hard to say.  The Rodmans store is one that I go to sometimes for PBall and Dc6.  They have a great wine selection there, with advisors and all.

              Very few raffles aren't dogs, and not the good kind of dog either. But even though there is only 1 top prize, the odds of winning are pretty much the same as a comparable raffle.

              (insert signature here)