Search

Lottery Statistics Analyzer v 6.0.6 SettingsReply
Ok. Great, you disagree, I respect this. Of course we all different and if some software good for some it may be not good for others. It is normal. I disagree with you though that is complex garbage as you said. There is some futures that is very unique, but yes, complex, but the filters if you learn how to use them can help you narrow down combinations very well. And btw before purchase software you can try it and see if it is for you, so if you saw that is so complex for you, why did you ev
Jun 18, 2016, 12:48 pm - tvpventures - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
Congrats MillionsWanted! It is some what progress I think. You must be doing something right that will bring you to big win one day. I was just working on the NNLP all morning trying to test Poweball Lottery. Tested all kind of different settings, cant get anything close for some reason. But I only have 50 draws history , since Poweball matrix changed. May be that's why. Would you be able to share what settings are you using? I would like to try it. I will be greatly appreciated.
May 21, 2016, 2:27 pm - tvpventures - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Since we are talking about jackpot style games, the kinds with a top prize of ten million dollars or more, I wouldn't expect to see a top prize won very often but just some evidence that the odds of winning the top prize were greatly improved. Eventually I would expect to see a big win if the right choices were made often enough and with jackpot games winning once might be enough. Lottery players have all kinds of theories about winning and make all kinds of claims and if they are satisfied w
Jul 23, 2013, 8:57 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Question for programmers!Reply
For the most part my experiences have been with MM, PB and Ohio's 6/49 games. I've had a couple of short winning streaks that included several 3of6 with a 4of6 within 3-4 drawings. A couple of weeks ago I increased my plays to 45 lines instead of my usual 10-20 lines and matched 4of6 twice in one drawing but the closest I came to winning a jackpot was in 2002 when I matched 5of6 in Ohio's Super Lotto plus. While I've almost always spent more than I've ever won, lately most of the winning com
Oct 8, 2011, 2:47 am - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

can you help me or share what formulaand strategy would be use in the philippine lotto..Reply
Yumi, I am in the US but I am not a Filipino. Mayroon akong isang Filipino asawa. When you are poor it is OK to buy a Lotto ticket once in a while because IT IS POSSIBLE that you could win a nice pile of money. But, please, do not spend more money on the lotto in one WEEK than you can earn in 1/2 HOUR! The most likely thing that is going to happen is that you are going to lose HALF of what you spend, so only spend a little. This way, you will have a little chance for a big win, but you wi
Jul 19, 2010, 1:03 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Quantum PhysicsReply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on December 31, 2004If you won a big jackpot and really believed that you knew something that gave you an edge, would you share it with the whole world before you had a chance to try and win big again?RJOhAs for me, no, I couldn't share a winning strategy with others only because I personally don't believe that one exists. I always play quick picks.If there were people who won big or consecutively then of course other people would be asking if they had a system t
Jan 1, 2005, 7:39 am - Phokas - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Right, everyone gets another try if they want it. Go out and get that big win........... ext Drawing: Mon, Sep 2, 2013, 7:29 pm Eastern Time (GMT-5:00) 1Day : 06Hour : 36Min : 30Sec Next Jackpot: $45 Million Jackpot History Change from last: $200,000
Sep 1, 2013, 12:55 pm - Ronnie316 - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Eventually I would expect to see a big win if the right choices were made often enough and with jackpot games winning once might be enough. It depends on how much it will cost to consistently make the right choices. Had Ronnie started a year ago and could match five numbers from 28 numbers five times in the next 40 MM drawings, there would be a small profit by betting $10,000 on each drawing without winning the jackpot. In one of those five drawings, he matched the bonus number so on paper
Jul 24, 2013, 2:00 pm - Stack47 - Mathematics Forum

I can predict one number for sure in a random gameReply
Hi Scientistman I really like what you said in your post: sometimes it is easier to look at the numbers physically and start choosing the numbers. So true. Most of the times I choose more correct numbers by pencil and paper then by wheeling them on software..I dont even want to deal with wheeling anymore.. when really picking the numbers one should keep it very simple, yet we complcate things or think to much we screw ourselves right out of a big win.. So true too! I always feel
Feb 11, 2013, 11:36 am - tvpventures - Mathematics Forum

Algorithms for number selection?Reply
You don't have to use a computer to come up with variables or use them, it just that using a computer might make the process faster. Besides if you come up with something that shows promise, the potential rewards could be an incentive to learn what ever more you think you need to know to use a computer to do the work. I'm experimenting with ways to come up with variables that are reliable 75% of the time using the local game (6/49) but the targeted number groups are too large to get a winner
May 13, 2012, 3:52 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum