Search

BETA - Neural Network in Java. Numbers PredictorReply
Rickiou True random does not exist, unfortunately, sufficiently random does. Lotteries don't need to cheat the game odds are designed to earn profits. The house always wins, even when there is a big payout. Don't forget, they pocket around 50% of sales just for running the game. The only cheating I have seen has been by insiders hoping to score big. There are ways to play smarter but these fall short of handing us a JP. Tonight I hope to win the MO 6-44 game. I plan to say a littl
Aug 30, 2017, 8:46 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum

Visual Basic Programing and MathReply
Therefore, is crucial to understand well your method. NY Lottery has 20 numbers from 80. The winning ticket numbers are 10 of 20. Your method studies the 184.756 combinations of 10 to 20. But, in another post in the forum lottery system, rightly you write how to choose 20 numbers out of 80. I can not understand .... In Italy there is a similar lottery, 20 of 90 numbers that are drawn every five minutes. You can play tickets from 1 up to number 10 on the 20 winning numbers drawn. A winning num
Mar 12, 2017, 5:40 am - mirapep - Mathematics Forum

How to simulate a distribution and use the lottery's own randomness against itself.Reply
The problem with this is that you are taking a set of data from the past and simulating the MB numbers for the same time period (i.e., the past). That is why your simulated MB frequencies are very close to the actual MB frequencies. It does not indicate what the next MB will be. The probability of hitting the MB for the next drawing on one ticket is exactly 1/15 regardless of which number you choose. The 15 MB ping-pong balls that bounce around have no knowledge of the previous two draws and
Feb 26, 2016, 12:14 am - Tucker Black - Mathematics Forum

Neural Net Lottery PickerReply
1- Can this software be saved on the desktop? If so where is the save as button? Create a folder on your laptop/pc (like c:/MyLotteryTools/NeuralNet/) and copy the tool (exe file) from your download folder to this folder. Next right click on the tool ( a menu will pop up) and finally create a shortcut of the tool to your desktop. 2- How can we use this software to win the BIG MM and PB jackpots? And more importantly, how long do I have to wait before I win the huge jackpots. It's an
Aug 12, 2015, 1:03 pm - stoopendaal - Mathematics Forum

Lottery numbers' combination secrets!Reply
SkyLine69, not yet lol, sometimes got a few numbers on one line, without the mega --- was a failure. There are still a few other methods can get more help, must be after my success then canbe opened. In the lotteries outside Hong Kong or Asia are thought quite complicate because the the numbers are movingreal difficult! I think Super Lotto and Power Balls are more likely near Hong Kong Mark 6 (6/49) mark six, mega number is of no use, not required. In contrary, US lotteries req
Apr 17, 2014, 7:21 pm - sflottolover - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot? I was actually surprised at the original topic question here in the Math Forum of all places. This question usually shows up regularly over in the pick 3 forums. Pretty obvious isn't it ? Sure, it's very obvious to most of the serious hobby players out there. Of course......math and logic improves the Odds. Years ago....didn't we already cover this? Yes we did. We did a short demo version ....and proved the val
Jul 24, 2013, 9:44 am - WIN D - Mathematics Forum

what is wheeling system logic?Reply
I suggested that you choose your battles wisely. All of this completely ignores the fact that no matter what you do, your $Winnings are directly proportional to the number of tickets you purchase, NOT to the way you choose your numbers. Where you napping when I clearly said my choice of game for using a 3 if 4 wheel was Ohio's RC5 or when I clearly showed using that wheel, 12 $1 tickets can show a net profit of $28 WITHOUT matching the wheel's mathematical guarantee? Don't pretend you
Apr 17, 2011, 8:46 pm - Stack47 - Mathematics Forum

MATH 5/39: Stack47, Garyo1954, RL-RANDOMLOGIC VS Jimmy4164Reply
It's amazing how you concluded my calculations were based on a one time bet of $360. It's also telling how you obfuscate my statements in general. You should consider politics. Since you've made it clear that you know it all, it would be futile to try to teach you anything new. Unfortunately, the real problem here is that the degree of your NEED to be in control results in such an extreme NEED to believe that RL can outmaneuver the randomness of 39 lottery objects with such precision and deft
Mar 2, 2011, 12:58 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Determinism vs Randomness and ChanceReply
your continual blatherings of the lie that I don't understand the odds there as well are a bore. I don't care if you understand the odds or not but I said Just another example of your illogical and unrealistic assumptions of how people play lottery games . Thanks for again posting that worthless information from your imaginary Challenge statistics. If you spend more than that, you'll hit more often so just multply. If you play box tickets, you'll hit more often, but the prizes will be p
Feb 24, 2011, 11:49 pm - Stack47 - Mathematics Forum

I Always thought an 85% or 90% number reduction would be enough.Reply
Thanks for the replies everyone ..... and John..... thanks for the printout. Noticed that CA had a Straight hit off the list ....a little early. I really wish I could take advantage of some of the more obvious filters at the right times ...... after the fact they always seem so completely obvious .....of course. Perhaps.....if I were smarter it would be obvious before hand. I always think to myself...... If a smart person had the same information I had worked on at the time .
Sep 3, 2009, 10:06 am - WIN D - Mathematics Forum