Quote: Originally posted by visiondude on Apr 7, 2011
"it would look like your saying the owner of this site published a wheel that doesn't guarantee what they say it does. And because I know for a fact, it does, it somehow becomes my responsibility".
when you state "i know for a fact it does", it became your responsibility once you claimed it did.
what solidified your responsibility to back up your claim, was when you went the arrogance trash talking route.
as you can tell, i don't "challenge" everyone that throws out insinuations such as you did, just the ones that think they can talk trash without the ability to back it up.
you made the arrogant based claim, so back it up.
your current excuse for avoiding a head to head -------> is having me click somewhere to investigate it.
go click on it, do whatever you need to do because it's not my concern "how" it works, only that it does, and that's your responsibility to demonstrate it does.
"Don't you find it odd with over 100,000 LP members and 13,856 views of this thread, you're the only one questioning how it's possible to use 46 bonus numbers on 46 lines or how it's possible to get a 2 if 5 guarantee using all 56 numbers on 46 lines?"
not at all. i am used to playing the lone ranger in here. doesn't sway me a stitch
btw, i might be the only one willing to demonstrate it (or any other methodology) cannot create an edge over randomness, because remember.....i narrowed my "concern" about the "2 if 5 guarantee" that it sells the notion you will "lose less" in the lottery.
don't you find it odd that with over 100,000 members and 13,856 views and 9 years that i can never find one person that will go head to head with me, whenever i challenge their "arrogant claim"?
you see stack, if someone really had something.....they would have shut me up a LOOOOOOOOOONG time ago.
shouldn't be hard to do, with the probable thousands of "successful systems" talk about in here.
everytime i do this with people like you, they stay only as long as their imaginations allow them the ability to manufacture excuses.
given the 100,000/13,856 rule, i would think you would be licking your chops staring at LP infamy.
you never will, because you are incapable of backing up something you state as being "true", and try as you like, you can never blame others when you don't.........but you will continue to try and do so.
do your own personal footwork.
i am not lifting a finger with any more effort than a "click" on the LP RNG.
that bare minimum effort is enough to bring any "system" in here to it's randomness knee's, in the real world of reality.
against you.....my english and math is more than sufficient