"But I never claimed the wheel would win the jackpot or even match 3, 4, or 5 numbers".
who can remember what you have bloviated in here. you change your "game" as much as lady gaga changes outfits. your on-the-fly costume changes are well documented in comparison to when i call you out on your chameleon act.
the premise i always called you on was that your arrogance could never match what you were bloviating, and any variation of your on-the-fly chameleon act was met with the get down to business of a straight up mano a mano.
nothing worse than a bloviator who can't.
thus, i was always consistent with you, and went straight to the ultimate tell all, your whatever against the LP RNG, whenever you threup your "variations" to avoid it at all costs.
no one cares if it's 2if anything. so what if you get lucky, or i get lucky, that means squat diddly in the ultimate realm.
you can spend your days making excuse after excuse, truth is you totally ran the other direction whenever i suggested the ultimate tell all. the tell all that would also tell that you can "lessen" your losses, etc.
remember stack, this is not the only thread in which you totally took the train out of truthville, this just ANOTHER thread in which you have. -------> multiple ones by now.
"You demanded proof that the wheel will function exactly as I claimed, but after I suggested a bet that you're now refusing to make, the only logical conclusion is you know you'll lose."
you got that right, but not how you tried to weezel out of it when it's demonstrated with integrity........over time.
vision will meet you on main street anytime, but there is no way you are pulling your underhanded one lucky shot scam.
you trying to pull that once again demonstrates the slime factor attached to your counter.
the logical conclusion is i know i have an EQUAL CHANCE in a straight heads up challenge over time, so the last thing you will ever see me emoting is "worrying" what a guy like you has.
multiple threads and multiple posts wearing your swiftest track shoes, and i am schicken.
there is only one kind of man that makes me even take note of what they claim they are.....the ones that always do what they say they can.
you aren't remotely "that man".
just to be clear on our "history" together.....all i ever have done is throw my common sense blanket over the threads i have been in. somewhere along the line you took exception to that, and high on mtn dew decided your were gonna throw rocks in my direction.
good by me, just you still won't back it up with the "ultimate" i always sent your way
your assertion from day1 was that SP's "outperformed" QP's.....and my aim has always been to show that isn't true, not in an integrity based over time test