Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 11:14 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Do some number combinations have better odds?

Topic closed. 5280 replies. Last post 4 years ago by rdgrnr.

Page 240 of 353
4.820
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #124493
March 14, 2012
7023 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 15, 2013, 12:40 pm - IP Logged

The point is that if somebody cannot even do the simple math to explain the odds of winning a 4/8 game, then their claim that they have better odds than others is certainly without merit.

Well I cant really do the simple math to explain the force of gravity.

But that doesn't keep it from holding me down, or refuting the existence thereof.


    United States
    Member #93947
    July 10, 2010
    2180 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: January 15, 2013, 1:40 pm - IP Logged

    Every lottery website say ~70% of their winners used a similar system but so do their losers too. Disapprove 

    ~70% of their losers buy quick picks, now what does that suggest? Roll Eyes  Think about it.

    If 70% of all tickets purchased are Quickpicks and 70% of the winners bought Quickpicks, It would appear that 30% of the winners chose their own numbers.  Using the same information, and logic, it should be no surprise that 70% of the losing tickets are Quickpicks as well.  So, what is your point?


      United States
      Member #93947
      July 10, 2010
      2180 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: January 15, 2013, 2:21 pm - IP Logged

      I was going to reply to this. Had some stuff to say, but forgot it. Tired i guess.

      I like the links. There pretty cool. When you said the lottery had been figured out already though, it kinda threw me a little.

      You got the guys number that did it? If i get stuck I might need to give them a call and see how they did it.

      Greenfox,

      The reason I said the question of the possibility of increasing your odds of winning a Lotto game is NOT an unsolved problem is because it is a nonstarter.  It has held this status for hundreds of years.  You are assuming I meant that someone had solved the problem and is hiding the result.  This is not the case.

      If you really wish to persist in your pursuit of this goal, I seriously suggest you use my simple 5 Ball Lotto model to test your ideas.  If you come up with something that will allow you to increase your expected ROI in that game beyond 0.55, you can then extrapolate it to a playable game in your state.

      https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/255566 

      --Jimmy4164

        Boney526's avatar - NjlpLogo
        New Jersey
        United States
        Member #99032
        October 18, 2010
        1439 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: January 15, 2013, 4:25 pm - IP Logged

        First of all boney, I never claimed to know the fundamentals of mathematics..............

        Secondly, I didnt "call him dumb" I said "he says the dumbest things" which is a opinion about what he said.

        Despite the fact that you are correct, that you didn't outright call him dumb, you must recognize that you've been implying it for some time now.

         

        Context matters.  And you can pick and choose from your past words as much as you want, but saying things like "a buffoon could get better odds" and replying to his comment by saying "he says the dumbest things" when what he was saying was actually completely accurate makes you look dumb.

         

        Statements like "I have better odds" and "I never claimed to know the fundementals of mathemetics" directly contradict each other.  So I guess you could figure it out.

         

        If you can't work out the odds of a draw 4 out of 8 game, then why should anybody trust your claim that you have better odds?  It's illogical to do believe you, and it's illogical for you to make contradictary claims.

         

        Oh I forgot, your mind doesn't work that way.  Fair enough.  Your mind doesn't work with proof or logic.  If that's the case, then how can you claim it's undisputable fact that you have better odds?

          Avatar
          Kentucky
          United States
          Member #32652
          February 14, 2006
          7297 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: January 15, 2013, 6:41 pm - IP Logged

          The point is that if somebody cannot even do the simple math to explain the odds of winning a 4/8 game, then their claim that they have better odds than others is certainly without merit.

          You've been a member long enough to have noticed all the wish list topics when any jackpot reaches $100 million so you should know by now the majority of players are oblivious to the odds.

          then their claim that they have better odds than others is certainly without merit."

          All the claims of getting better odds are not only comparing those bets to QPs, but are based on meeting conditions. Considering 2.5% of all MM bets will win nothing and even if the conditions are not met that player can't expect to do worse than a like number of QPs. The discussion was always about meeting the conditions yet you keep on making remarks about things never said.

          Let's talk about the mathematical fact over 19,000 groups of 28 numbers will get a five number in the next five consecutive drawings. And then you can elaborate on why those groups will get five times better odds than any of the 28 number groups with 1. The probability is 87% of all 28 number groups won't have one five number match in the next five drawings.


            United States
            Member #116268
            September 7, 2011
            20244 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: January 15, 2013, 7:58 pm - IP Logged

            Despite the fact that you are correct, that you didn't outright call him dumb, you must recognize that you've been implying it for some time now.

             

            Context matters.  And you can pick and choose from your past words as much as you want, but saying things like "a buffoon could get better odds" and replying to his comment by saying "he says the dumbest things" when what he was saying was actually completely accurate makes you look dumb.

             

            Statements like "I have better odds" and "I never claimed to know the fundementals of mathemetics" directly contradict each other.  So I guess you could figure it out.

             

            If you can't work out the odds of a draw 4 out of 8 game, then why should anybody trust your claim that you have better odds?  It's illogical to do believe you, and it's illogical for you to make contradictary claims.

             

            Oh I forgot, your mind doesn't work that way.  Fair enough.  Your mind doesn't work with proof or logic.  If that's the case, then how can you claim it's undisputable fact that you have better odds?

            Boney I feel like your just bating me and bating me into making lengthy complicated responses and I can tell you that its NOT going to happen. In the post I'm quote above you write 5 paragraphs.


              United States
              Member #116268
              September 7, 2011
              20244 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: January 15, 2013, 7:59 pm - IP Logged

              So where do you want me to start Boney?? Paragraph 1?????


                United States
                Member #116268
                September 7, 2011
                20244 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: January 15, 2013, 7:59 pm - IP Logged

                Despite the fact that you are correct, that you didn't outright call him dumb, you must recognize that you've been implying it for some time now.

                  Boney526's avatar - NjlpLogo
                  New Jersey
                  United States
                  Member #99032
                  October 18, 2010
                  1439 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: January 15, 2013, 8:01 pm - IP Logged

                  I'd really only like you to respond to the bolded parts of my statements.  Everything else is me just responding to you.  If you feel it's necesarry to clarify why you're above the general rules of conversation and etiquette, you can.


                    United States
                    Member #116268
                    September 7, 2011
                    20244 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: January 15, 2013, 8:07 pm - IP Logged

                    You seem to misinterpret the whole overall theme of whats going on here boney. I am giving an opinion..... In other words I DONT think Jim is dumb in the sense of being a stupid person...................

                    I personally feel its "dumb" to be so closed minded about the subject at hand being "unsolvable" and just because there are "100s of years" of evidence means nothing to me.....


                      United States
                      Member #116268
                      September 7, 2011
                      20244 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: January 15, 2013, 8:09 pm - IP Logged

                      I'd really only like you to respond to the bolded parts of my statements.  Everything else is me just responding to you.  If you feel it's necesarry to clarify why you're above the general rules of conversation and etiquette, you can.

                       If that's the case, then how can you claim it's undisputable fact that you have better odds?


                        United States
                        Member #116268
                        September 7, 2011
                        20244 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: January 15, 2013, 8:10 pm - IP Logged

                         If that's the case, then how can you claim it's undisputable fact that you have better odds?

                        This is the only "bolded" part I see so this should be easy..................


                          United States
                          Member #116268
                          September 7, 2011
                          20244 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: January 15, 2013, 8:16 pm - IP Logged

                          This is the only "bolded" part I see so this should be easy..................

                          Even though this is not about "me" getting better odds........ I can claim it because it was achieved in a 39 draw trial.


                            United States
                            Member #116268
                            September 7, 2011
                            20244 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: January 15, 2013, 8:25 pm - IP Logged

                            What I'm trying to say boney is that this is a discussion forum and people are allowed to have opinions that you don't agree with and may possibly even be in error..............

                            Your not in charge of correcting every wrong and judging every opinion........


                              United States
                              Member #116268
                              September 7, 2011
                              20244 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: January 15, 2013, 8:30 pm - IP Logged

                              What I'm trying to say boney is that this is a discussion forum and people are allowed to have opinions that you don't agree with and may possibly even be in error..............

                              Your not in charge of correcting every wrong and judging every opinion........

                              So what if it is a "nonstarter" issue?? And so what if it is a "waste of time"?? Who made you and Jim and Mediabrat a judge over how I (or others) choose to use time and wither or NOT its a waste.......

                              You guys are judging other people based on your own personal (egg shell) perspectives.......

                                 
                                Page 240 of 353