Welcome Guest
You last visited January 16, 2017, 7:51 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

No delusion-100% winning method

Topic closed. 535 replies. Last post 11 years ago by Kola.

 Page 11 of 36
Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1531 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:02 pm - IP Logged

You seem confused, tntea... lol

Oh I am..

What part is confusing?

I am having problems picking out which part isn't..

You play 220 combos and win each time..

There is a profit to be made?

Where?

LOL!

The Lottery Profits: Of Course!

Friends you don't play 220 combos. Why would there be a bother talking about a system where you play all possible combos? If you hover around this it may be a little challenging to really delve into my posts, and contribute to finding the pattern and using the power of permutation to reduce your plays to 64 or less numbers. And in the 64, the winning number is thereall the time. You have to work it out manually to really see a possible pattern.  The generous program that was given by Paurths removes the elegance in the way the numbers line up. Lets work together.

Poway CA (San Diego County)
United States
Member #3489
January 25, 2004
14120 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:07 pm - IP Logged

You seem confused, tntea... lol

Oh I am..

What part is confusing?

I am having problems picking out which part isn't..

You play 220 combos and win each time..

There is a profit to be made?

Where?

LOL!

The Lottery Profits: Of Course!

Friends you don't play 220 combos. Why would there be a bother talking about a system where you play all possible combos? If you hover around this it may be a little challenging to really delve into my posts, and contribute to finding the pattern and using the power of permutation to reduce your plays to 64 or less numbers. And in the 64, the winning number is thereall the time. You have to work it out manually to really see a possible pattern.  The generous program that was given by Paurths removes the elegance in the way the numbers line up. Lets work together.

Kola, why don't you lead by example and pick a state and start posting the 64 numbers in the Pick 3 forum for us to evaluate how well it does?

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1531 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:12 pm - IP Logged

First you say the pattern is still to be found, then you say you have been playing the pattern in your home state....

Never mind, i'm sure we'll all hear it when it has been found.

In the mean time i deleted the zip-file, since it appears to create all the good numbers, but somehow when filtering out the duplicates it filters out in a wrong fashion b/c it never returns more than 220 numbers  , perhaps its the sorting lol .

Grtz and good luck,
Ricky

Hi Paurths. be patient

Your moving too fast-jumping too conclusions.

For clarity's sake,

There is a pattern in the actual and original manual DSUM method itself. I'm trying to really hone and cull what that is.

In the meantime,i have to use other methods to help me filter out the implausible numbers, and help me to retain the possibles. One method I use is to look at the pattern of what fell in my home state. This helps me a little to filter out the implausible numbers. TWO DIFFERENT THINGS ENTIRELY. I hope that helps.

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1531 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:15 pm - IP Logged

I often use DSUM and match it against the pattern the has been falling in my particular state. I then play that string.

Maybe this is where the confusion is.. Show how you narrow the 220 combos to only 10 numbers according to pattern that is falling.  With this being 100% accurate.. it is worth checking out..

Great if you do use it.

I didn't say i could narrow my 220 to 10.

Not yet anyway. Somethin's brewin' though.

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1531 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:21 pm - IP Logged

You seem confused, tntea... lol

Oh I am..

What part is confusing?

I am having problems picking out which part isn't..

You play 220 combos and win each time..

There is a profit to be made?

Where?

LOL!

The Lottery Profits: Of Course!

Friends you don't play 220 combos. Why would there be a bother talking about a system where you play all possible combos? If you hover around this it may be a little challenging to really delve into my posts, and contribute to finding the pattern and using the power of permutation to reduce your plays to 64 or less numbers. And in the 64, the winning number is thereall the time. You have to work it out manually to really see a possible pattern.  The generous program that was given by Paurths removes the elegance in the way the numbers line up. Lets work together.

Kola, why don't you lead by example and pick a state and start posting the 64 numbers in the Pick 3 forum for us to evaluate how well it does?

CalifDude, I so promise you I will. I can't wait. It would be fun. I haven't  don't so because I could not on a super consistent basis  reproduce the hits everytime. Again I'm testing some new and very, very promising revelations. After I'm done i will happily start posting. I'm hopeful it will be very soon.

United States
Member #1987
August 5, 2003
8968 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:22 pm - IP Logged

You seem confused, tntea... lol

Oh I am..

What part is confusing?

I am having problems picking out which part isn't..

You play 220 combos and win each time..

There is a profit to be made?

Where?

LOL!

The Lottery Profits: Of Course!

Friends you don't play 220 combos. Why would there be a bother talking about a system where you play all possible combos? If you hover around this it may be a little challenging to really delve into my posts, and contribute to finding the pattern and using the power of permutation to reduce your plays to 64 or less numbers. And in the 64, the winning number is thereall the time. You have to work it out manually to really see a possible pattern.  The generous program that was given by Paurths removes the elegance in the way the numbers line up. Lets work together.

Well said Kola, you have to see it in the long hand form first, at least perform the operations once for your state. I guarantee once you have actually gone through the exercises in the mind & physically with a writing instrument & paper you will see more clearly how this all fits together. Automation is great, but one has to first go through the workings of a system in order to see how the parts link up to each other.

Please do not divide Kola so that he has to respond to criticisms & the like, if one is generally interested in how this all pans out go with him on this wholeheartedly. Do not go against the grain on this one, go with the grain. The harvest will be even greater than you could have ever imagined.

Ohio
United States
Member #39208
May 12, 2006
390 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:26 pm - IP Logged

Hi All,

Sorry to disappoint  the naysayers...lol BUT, KOLA'S METHOD STRIKES AGAIN IN OHIO.

Of the 64 permutations of yesterday evening's 705, 890 was at the TOP of the "UDM" column. Once again this column was "unwrapped" and the Ohio mid-day was...yep you guessed it, 089.

kudos to kola!

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1531 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:31 pm - IP Logged

You seem confused, tntea... lol

Oh I am..

What part is confusing?

I am having problems picking out which part isn't..

You play 220 combos and win each time..

There is a profit to be made?

Where?

LOL!

The Lottery Profits: Of Course!

Friends you don't play 220 combos. Why would there be a bother talking about a system where you play all possible combos? If you hover around this it may be a little challenging to really delve into my posts, and contribute to finding the pattern and using the power of permutation to reduce your plays to 64 or less numbers. And in the 64, the winning number is thereall the time. You have to work it out manually to really see a possible pattern.  The generous program that was given by Paurths removes the elegance in the way the numbers line up. Lets work together.

Well said Kola, you have to see it in the long hand form first, at least perform the operations once for your state. I guarantee once you have actually gone through the exercises in the mind & physically with a writing instrument & paper you will see more clearly how this all fits together. Automation is great, but one has to first go through the workings of a system in order to see how the parts link up to each other.

Please to not divide Kola so that he has to respond to criticisms & the like, if one is generally interested in how this all pans out go with him on this wholeheartedly. Do not go against the grain on this one, go with the grain. The harvest will be even greater than you could have ever imagined.

Laverne, Laverne, Laverne,

Well said. You are really a breath of fresh air. Thanks

I'm the one you who is pitying the ones who may be writing off the system. Just

because they could possibly make it infintely better. Oh well...I'll be KRUnching

on my end. Thanks again.

Switching between Fairfax, VA and Belgium
Belgium
Member #19287
July 29, 2005
2254 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:35 pm - IP Logged

Hi All,

Sorry to disappoint  the naysayers...lol BUT, KOLA'S METHOD STRIKES AGAIN IN OHIO.

Of the 64 permutations of yesterday evening's 705, 890 was at the TOP of the "UDM" column. Once again this column was "unwrapped" and the Ohio mid-day was...yep you guessed it, 089.

kudos to kola!

What does this mean, that now one has to play all states and hopes that one of them turns out correct?

Never mind, i will just wait for the rules of this system to be posted, and if kola then wants, i'll turn it into a program for everyone to use.
Every system has rules on which things obey, otherwise it is not a system but a random event, and even that must have some rules according to Stephen Hawking...

lasas3

An onion a day keeps everyone away!!!

New Jersey
United States
Member #17843
June 28, 2005
50955 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:44 pm - IP Logged

You seem confused, tntea... lol

Oh I am..

What part is confusing?

I am having problems picking out which part isn't..

You play 220 combos and win each time..

There is a profit to be made?

Where?

LOL!

The Lottery Profits: Of Course!

Friends you don't play 220 combos. Why would there be a bother talking about a system where you play all possible combos? If you hover around this it may be a little challenging to really delve into my posts, and contribute to finding the pattern and using the power of permutation to reduce your plays to 64 or less numbers. And in the 64, the winning number is thereall the time. You have to work it out manually to really see a possible pattern.  The generous program that was given by Paurths removes the elegance in the way the numbers line up. Lets work together.

Well said Kola, you have to see it in the long hand form first, at least perform the operations once for your state. I guarantee once you have actually gone through the exercises in the mind & physically with a writing instrument & paper you will see more clearly how this all fits together. Automation is great, but one has to first go through the workings of a system in order to see how the parts link up to each other.

Please do not divide Kola so that he has to respond to criticisms & the like, if one is generally interested in how this all pans out go with him on this wholeheartedly. Do not go against the grain on this one, go with the grain. The harvest will be even greater than you could have ever imagined.

As usual: You don't know what you are talking about!

Here's a Manual Workout for 894:

905
894 349
783

PERM
783 789 784 785 743 749 744 745 793 799 794 795 703 709 704 705
383 389 384 385 343 349 344 345 393 399 394 395 303 309 304 305
883 889 884 885 843 849 844 845 893 899 894 895 803 809 804 805
983 989 984 985 943 949 944 945 993 999 994 995 903 909 904 905

783-894-905-016-127-238-349-450-561-672-783
789-890-901-012-123-234-345-456-567-678-789
784-895-906-017-128-239-340-451-562-673-784
785-896-907-018-129-230-341-452-563-674-785
743-854-965-076-187-298-309-410-521-632-743
749-850-961-072-183-294-305-416-527-638-749
744-855-966-077-188-299-300-411-522-633-744
745-856-967-078-189-290-301-412-523-634-745
793-804-915-026-137-248-359-460-571-682-793
799-800-911-022-133-244-355-466-577-688-799
794-805-916-027-138-249-350-461-572-683-794
795-806-917-028-139-240-351-462-573-684-795
703-814-925-036-147-258-369-470-581-692-703
709-810-921-032-143-254-365-476-587-698-709
704-815-926-037-148-259-360-471-582-693-704
705-816-927-038-149-250-361-472-583-694-705

383-494-505-616-727-838-949-050-161-272-383
389-490-501-612-723-834-945-056-167-278-389
384-495-506-617-728-839-940-051-162-273-384
385-496-507-618-729-830-941-052-163-274-385
343-454-565-676-787-898-909-010-121-232-343
349-450-561-672-783-894-905-016-127-238-349
344-455-566-677-788-899-900-011-122-233-344
345-456-567-678-789-890-901-012-123-234-345
393-404-515-626-737-848-959-060-171-282-393
399-400-511-622-733-844-955-066-177-288-399
394-405-516-627-738-849-950-061-172-283-394
395-406-517-628-739-840-951-062-173-284-395
303-414-525-636-747-858-969-070-181-292-303
309-410-521-632-743-854-965-076-187-298-309
304-415-526-637-748-859-960-071-182-293-304
305-416-527-638-749-850-961-072-183-294-305

883-994-005-116-227-338-449-550-661-772-883
889-990-001-112-223-334-445-556-667-778-889
884-995-006-117-228-339-440-551-662-773-884
885-996-007-118-229-330-441-552-663-774-885
843-954-065-176-287-398-409-510-621-732-843
849-950-061-172-283-394-405-516-627-738-849
844-955-066-177-288-399-400-511-622-733-844
845-956-067-178-289-390-401-512-623-734-845
893-904-015-126-237-348-459-560-671-782-893
899-900-011-122-233-344-455-566-677-788-899
894-905-016-127-238-349-450-561-672-783-894
895-906-017-128-239-340-451-562-673-784-895
803-914-025-136-247-358-469-570-681-792-803
809-910-021-132-243-354-465-576-687-798-809
804-915-026-137-248-359-460-571-682-793-804
805-916-027-138-249-350-461-572-683-794-805

983-094-105-216-327-438-549-650-761-872-983
989-090-101-212-323-434-545-656-767-878-989
984-095-106-217-328-439-540-651-762-873-984
985-096-107-218-329-430-541-652-763-874-985
943-054-165-276-387-498-509-610-721-832-943
949-050-161-272-383-494-505-616-727-838-949
944-055-166-277-388-499-500-611-722-833-944
945-056-167-278-389-490-501-612-723-834-945
993-004-115-226-337-448-559-660-771-882-993
999-000-111-222-333-444-555-666-777-888-999
994-005-116-227-338-449-550-661-772-883-994
995-006-117-228-339-440-551-662-773-884-995
903-014-125-236-347-458-569-670-781-892-903
909-010-121-232-343-454-565-676-787-898-909
904-015-126-237-348-459-560-671-782-893-904
905-016-127-238-349-450-561-672-783-894-905

DDD DDM DDS DDU DMD DMM DMS DMU DSD DSM DSS DSU DUD DUM DUS DUU
MDD MDM MDS MDU MMD MMM MMS MMU MSD MSM MSS MSU MUD MUM MUS MUU
SDD SDM SDS SDU SMD SMM SMS SMU SSD SSM SSS SSU SUD SUM SUS SUU
UDD UDM UDS UDU UMD UMM UMS UMU USD USM USS USU UUD UUM UUS UUU

D=Down (Last Draw Digit Minus 1)
S=Same (Last Draw Digit)
U=Up (Last Draw Digit Plus 1)
M=Mirror (Last Draw Mirror Digit)

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1531 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:47 pm - IP Logged

Hi All,

Sorry to disappoint  the naysayers...lol BUT, KOLA'S METHOD STRIKES AGAIN IN OHIO.

Of the 64 permutations of yesterday evening's 705, 890 was at the TOP of the "UDM" column. Once again this column was "unwrapped" and the Ohio mid-day was...yep you guessed it, 089.

kudos to kola!

Thanks Bomberos.

Like I said there is something to that 1st row. I once did an extended workup

where I noticed that many of the numbers that fell were in the first row of DSUM.

When I used doubles and mirrored numbes like 831 or 613. they hardly fell in the

first row. And if I can recall, certain numbers unique numbered digits didn't fall in

the first row. I think they were numbers like 158, 153. i think...It was a while ago. I

couldn't figure out why. And there is a good, and not so coincidental reason why

many numbers were falling in the first row. if the wrap is done properly many of the

numbers will fall in that first row there. Needs more testing for accuracy though. I

got the sensation that they were occupying the shell or orbit for reason. I now

have more tools to test my hunches.  Good Winnings to you!

United States
Member #1987
August 5, 2003
8968 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:49 pm - IP Logged

Hi All,

Sorry to disappoint  the naysayers...lol BUT, KOLA'S METHOD STRIKES AGAIN IN OHIO.

Of the 64 permutations of yesterday evening's 705, 890 was at the TOP of the "UDM" column. Once again this column was "unwrapped" and the Ohio mid-day was...yep you guessed it, 089.

kudos to kola!

WTG bomberos!!!!!!!!!! I hope you got a huge chunk-a-change using Kola's method. CONGRAT\$\$\$\$\$\$\$\$\$\$

Poway CA (San Diego County)
United States
Member #3489
January 25, 2004
14120 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:50 pm - IP Logged

Kola said:

CalifDude, I so promise you I will. I can't wait. It would be fun. I haven't  don't so because I could not on a super consistent basis  reproduce the hits everytime. Again I'm testing some new and very, very promising revelations. After I'm done i will happily start posting. I'm hopeful it will be very soon.

So now the latest mutation (I think this is #5) is that the number is not always there all of the time.  In the last 4 mutations the main differences were that it went from 640 numbers to 460 numbers to 210-240 numbers and down to 64 numbers.  Even with the 64 numbers you said the number was always there but not a straight like you started with at the beginning.  NOW, it is ... well it doesn't always work.  Hmmmmmmm.

If you can give me 64 numbers that will ALWAYS contain the winning number, even in box form, I can stop playing blackjack for a living and make a very nice living from Pick 3.

If I bet 64 numbers @ \$1 box and always get a win of at least \$150 that is a profit of \$86.  Multiply that by say 55 draws a day and that is an income of \$4730 PER DAY.  I can live on that.

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1531 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 1:59 pm - IP Logged

Hi All,

Sorry to disappoint  the naysayers...lol BUT, KOLA'S METHOD STRIKES AGAIN IN OHIO.

Of the 64 permutations of yesterday evening's 705, 890 was at the TOP of the "UDM" column. Once again this column was "unwrapped" and the Ohio mid-day was...yep you guessed it, 089.

kudos to kola!

What does this mean, that now one has to play all states and hopes that one of them turns out correct?

Never mind, i will just wait for the rules of this system to be posted, and if kola then wants, i'll turn it into a program for everyone to use.
Every system has rules on which things obey, otherwise it is not a system but a random event, and even that must have some rules according to Stephen Hawking...

Well hopefully something will be produced that you will find useful. Take care

Blundering Time Traveler

United States
Member #28945
December 25, 2005
1531 Posts
Offline
 Posted: May 20, 2006, 2:22 pm - IP Logged

Kola said:

CalifDude, I so promise you I will. I can't wait. It would be fun. I haven't  don't so because I could not on a super consistent basis  reproduce the hits everytime. Again I'm testing some new and very, very promising revelations. After I'm done i will happily start posting. I'm hopeful it will be very soon.

So now the latest mutation (I think this is #5) is that the number is not always there all of the time.  In the last 4 mutations the main differences were that it went from 640 numbers to 460 numbers to 210-240 numbers and down to 64 numbers.  Even with the 64 numbers you said the number was always there but not a straight like you started with at the beginning.  NOW, it is ... well it doesn't always work.  Hmmmmmmm.

If you can give me 64 numbers that will ALWAYS contain the winning number, even in box form, I can stop playing blackjack for a living and make a very nice living from Pick 3.

If I bet 64 numbers @ \$1 box and always get a win of at least \$150 that is a profit of \$86.  Multiply that by say 55 draws a day and that is an income of \$4730 PER DAY.  I can live on that.

Hey  Califdude,

I think you misunderstood what I said.

What I was saying is that being that we know that the one number in the 220

combos is always the winning combo, we just need a pointer to guide us to the

correct string to play. There are only 10 possible strings . One of those strings

has the winning number. A string only has 64 numbers. A strong pointer will

help to identify the string. IF we are guided to the correct string to play then of

course the number will be there everytime. It would help at least some people to

see an accurate DSUM Pattern.

Raven thanks for your attempt but it wasn't accurate. The arrangement was off. .

With the DSUM setup and template as an aid My focus is now directed

toward finding the correct number. Ah we'll see...

In the meantime I will draw a DSUM diagram using Mazie789's and

Brenda33's numbers. I haven't forgotten about both of you thanks or being patient.

 Page 11 of 36