Milky Way Spiral United States
Member #28,944
December 25, 2005
1,635 Posts
Offline
You seem confused, tntea... lol
Oh I am..
What part is confusing?
I am having problems picking out which part isn't..
You play 220 combos and win each time..
There is a profit to be made?
Where?
LOL!
The Lottery Profits: Of Course!
Friends you don't play 220 combos. Why would there be a bother talking about a system where you play all possible combos? If you hover around this it may be a little challenging to really delve into my posts, and contribute to finding the pattern and using the power of permutation to reduce your plays to 64 or less numbers. And in the 64, the winning number is thereall the time. You have to work it out manually to really see a possible pattern. The generous program that was given by Paurths removes the elegance in the way the numbers line up. Lets work together.
Well said Kola, you have to see it in the long hand form first, at least perform the operations once for your state. I guarantee once you have actually gone through the exercises in the mind & physically with a writing instrument & paper you will see more clearly how this all fits together. Automation is great, but one has to first go through the workings of a system in order to see how the parts link up to each other.
Please do not divide Kola so that he has to respond to criticisms & the like, if one is generally interested in how this all pans out go with him on this wholeheartedly. Do not go against the grain on this one, go with the grain. The harvest will be even greater than you could have ever imagined.
As usual: You don't know what you are talking about!
United States
Member #5,344
June 30, 2004
23,639 Posts
Offline
I often use DSUM and match it against the pattern the has been falling in my particular state. I then play that string.
Maybe this is where the confusion is.. Show how you narrow the 220 combos to only 10 numbers according to pattern that is falling. With this being 100% accurate.. it is worth checking out..
Great if you do use it.
I didn't say i could narrow my 220 to 10.
Not yet anyway. Somethin's brewin' though.
I was quoting you here..
I often use DSUM and match it against the pattern the has been falling in my particular state. I then play that string.
You did mention that you do not play the 220 combos but instead look to see the pattern of that state and then play only that string.. which earlier you mentioned each of the 64 strings had 10 numbers That is is where I got the 10 numbers.
I think it is fantastic that one keeps plugging to find the system that will produce the most hits with fewer numbers. I have recently moved from pick 3 to pick 4 using the vtracs to narrow down some great hits. The pay out has been fantastic.. and completely unbelievable.
With every system, one starts with the 220 combos.. Using the system is to narrow down the field to as few as possible. This is why I could not see any difference in this system than any other.
Let's work this with only one state.. Your choice.. and give it a week.. Hopefully you pick a state with two draws per day.. That will be 14 great hits for everyone interested.. Deal? Thanks.
New Jersey United States
Member #17,842
June 28, 2005
180,983 Posts
Offline
Kola said:
CalifDude, I so promise you I will. I can't wait. It would be fun. I haven't don't so because I could not on a super consistent basis reproduce the hits everytime. Again I'm testing some new and very, very promising revelations. After I'm done i will happily start posting. I'm hopeful it will be very soon.
So now the latest mutation (I think this is #5) is that the number is not always there all of the time. In the last 4 mutations the main differences were that it went from 640 numbers to 460 numbers to 210-240 numbers and down to 64 numbers. Even with the 64 numbers you said the number was always there but not a straight like you started with at the beginning. NOW, it is ... well it doesn't always work. Hmmmmmmm.
If you can give me 64 numbers that will ALWAYS contain the winning number, even in box form, I can stop playing blackjack for a living and make a very nice living from Pick 3.
If I bet 64 numbers @ $1 box and always get a win of at least $150 that is a profit of $86. Multiply that by say 55 draws a day and that is an income of $4730 PER DAY. I can live on that.
Hey Califdude,
I think you misunderstood what I said.
What I was saying is that being that we know that the one number in the 220
combos is always the winning combo, we just need a pointer to guide us to the
correct string to play. There are only 10 possible strings . One of those strings
has the winning number. A string only has 64 numbers. A strong pointer will
help to identify the string. IFwe are guided to the correct string to play then of
course the number will be there everytime. It would help at least some people to
see an accurate DSUM Pattern.
Raven thanks for your attempt but it wasn't accurate. The arrangement was off. .
With the DSUM setup and template as an aidMy focus is now directed
toward finding the correct number. Ah we'll see...
In the meantime I will draw a DSUM diagram using Mazie789's and
Brenda33's numbers. I haven't forgotten about both of you thanks or being patient.
Gee! That's funny, you didn't say that it was inaccurate the last time I posted it!
I made a 3 digit permutation of 4 items then sorted the permutation alphabetically: What should it look like?
Milky Way Spiral United States
Member #28,944
December 25, 2005
1,635 Posts
Offline
You seem confused, tntea... lol
Oh I am..
What part is confusing?
I am having problems picking out which part isn't..
You play 220 combos and win each time..
There is a profit to be made?
Where?
LOL!
The Lottery Profits: Of Course!
Friends you don't play 220 combos. Why would there be a bother talking about a system where you play all possible combos? If you hover around this it may be a little challenging to really delve into my posts, and contribute to finding the pattern and using the power of permutation to reduce your plays to 64 or less numbers. And in the 64, the winning number is thereall the time. You have to work it out manually to really see a possible pattern. The generous program that was given by Paurths removes the elegance in the way the numbers line up. Lets work together.
Well said Kola, you have to see it in the long hand form first, at least perform the operations once for your state. I guarantee once you have actually gone through the exercises in the mind & physically with a writing instrument & paper you will see more clearly how this all fits together. Automation is great, but one has to first go through the workings of a system in order to see how the parts link up to each other.
Please do not divide Kola so that he has to respond to criticisms & the like, if one is generally interested in how this all pans out go with him on this wholeheartedly. Do not go against the grain on this one, go with the grain. The harvest will be even greater than you could have ever imagined.
As usual: You don't know what you are talking about!
New Jersey United States
Member #17,842
June 28, 2005
180,983 Posts
Offline
You seem confused, tntea... lol
Oh I am..
What part is confusing?
I am having problems picking out which part isn't..
You play 220 combos and win each time..
There is a profit to be made?
Where?
LOL!
The Lottery Profits: Of Course!
Friends you don't play 220 combos. Why would there be a bother talking about a system where you play all possible combos? If you hover around this it may be a little challenging to really delve into my posts, and contribute to finding the pattern and using the power of permutation to reduce your plays to 64 or less numbers. And in the 64, the winning number is thereall the time. You have to work it out manually to really see a possible pattern. The generous program that was given by Paurths removes the elegance in the way the numbers line up. Lets work together.
Well said Kola, you have to see it in the long hand form first, at least perform the operations once for your state. I guarantee once you have actually gone through the exercises in the mind & physically with a writing instrument & paper you will see more clearly how this all fits together. Automation is great, but one has to first go through the workings of a system in order to see how the parts link up to each other.
Please do not divide Kola so that he has to respond to criticisms & the like, if one is generally interested in how this all pans out go with him on this wholeheartedly. Do not go against the grain on this one, go with the grain. The harvest will be even greater than you could have ever imagined.
As usual: You don't know what you are talking about!
Poway CA (San Diego County) United States
Member #3,489
January 25, 2004
14,120 Posts
Offline
Kola you said that I had done the California Midday wrong because I was going mid to mid and that you would show me that there was a winner in every one of the 7 Midday draws instead of the 3 I mentioned. I know you have been busy so I understand your not showing me the wins, but I have taken the time to do it as you suggested. Here are the results. I have shown the 64 base numbers for each result of your method:
Milky Way Spiral United States
Member #28,944
December 25, 2005
1,635 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by tntea on May 20, 2006
Quote: Originally posted by Kola on May 20, 2006
Quote: Originally posted by tntea on May 20, 2006
I often use DSUM and match it against the pattern the has been falling in my particular state. I then play that string.
Maybe this is where the confusion is.. Show how you narrow the 220 combos to only 10 numbers according to pattern that is falling. With this being 100% accurate.. it is worth checking out..
Great if you do use it.
I didn't say i could narrow my 220 to 10.
Not yet anyway. Somethin's brewin' though.
I was quoting you here..
I often use DSUM and match it against the pattern the has been falling in my particular state. I then play that string.
You did mention that you do not play the 220 combos but instead look to see the pattern of that state and then play only that string.. which earlier you mentioned each of the 64 strings had 10 numbers That is is where I got the 10 numbers.
I think it is fantastic that one keeps plugging to find the system that will produce the most hits with fewer numbers. I have recently moved from pick 3 to pick 4 using the vtracs to narrow down some great hits. The pay out has been fantastic.. and completely unbelievable.
With every system, one starts with the 220 combos.. Using the system is to narrow down the field to as few as possible. This is why I could not see any difference in this system than any other.
Let's work this with only one state.. Your choice.. and give it a week.. Hopefully you pick a state with two draws per day.. That will be 14 great hits for everyone interested.. Deal? Thanks.
Hi Tntea.
Yes a lot of these system are similar. They all spring from one matrix anyway. That
one would be great to find. Working on it...longer term goal.
I see where you may have misunderstood me. In my original posts on this threadI
claim that DSUM comes from doing a wrap down method of the last draw. You
would then have a column of 10 numbers.
You know...say your last draw was 752 - you then wrap it
641
752
863
974
085
196
207
318
429
530
You would then DSUM each number across going from left to right. At the end of it
all you will have 10 rows going from top to bottom, and then all 64 possible
combinations going from left to right on each row.
Result would be 10 rows of 64 columns. Your winning numbers is always found in
on of those rows of 64 numbers.
I agree Tntea that many systems are similar. While that may be, it may get to the
point where the most winning version of the various systems is the one that has
been efficiently and comprehensively laid out. That way you can possible see the
pattern. Thats the clincher with all these systems-is the pattern. It really helps to
lay it out. You can clearly see the participating variables.
Yes I will take you up on your suggestion to work on a state with two draws. Not
yet though. I was telling CaliDude that I was not ready to post, but will very,
Milky Way Spiral United States
Member #28,944
December 25, 2005
1,635 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Raven62 on May 20, 2006
Quote: Originally posted by Kola on May 20, 2006
Quote: Originally posted by CalifDude on May 20, 2006
Kola said:
CalifDude, I so promise you I will. I can't wait. It would be fun. I haven't don't so because I could not on a super consistent basis reproduce the hits everytime. Again I'm testing some new and very, very promising revelations. After I'm done i will happily start posting. I'm hopeful it will be very soon.
So now the latest mutation (I think this is #5) is that the number is not always there all of the time. In the last 4 mutations the main differences were that it went from 640 numbers to 460 numbers to 210-240 numbers and down to 64 numbers. Even with the 64 numbers you said the number was always there but not a straight like you started with at the beginning. NOW, it is ... well it doesn't always work. Hmmmmmmm.
If you can give me 64 numbers that will ALWAYS contain the winning number, even in box form, I can stop playing blackjack for a living and make a very nice living from Pick 3.
If I bet 64 numbers @ $1 box and always get a win of at least $150 that is a profit of $86. Multiply that by say 55 draws a day and that is an income of $4730 PER DAY. I can live on that.
Hey Califdude,
I think you misunderstood what I said.
What I was saying is that being that we know that the one number in the 220
combos is always the winning combo, we just need a pointer to guide us to the
correct string to play. There are only 10 possible strings . One of those strings
has the winning number. A string only has 64 numbers. A strong pointer will
help to identify the string. IFwe are guided to the correct string to play then of
course the number will be there everytime. It would help at least some people to
see an accurate DSUM Pattern.
Raven thanks for your attempt but it wasn't accurate. The arrangement was off. .
With the DSUM setup and template as an aidMy focus is now directed
toward finding the correct number. Ah we'll see...
In the meantime I will draw a DSUM diagram using Mazie789's and
Brenda33's numbers. I haven't forgotten about both of you thanks or being patient.
Gee! That's funny, you didn't say that it was inaccurate the last time I posted it!
I made a 3 digit permutation of 4 items then sorted the permutation alphabetically: What should it look like?
Hi Raven.
Yes you are right. the first time you posted you were accurate. You had posted the
formula without the actual numbers. The part that was inaccurate with you second
posting of numbers is just your layout. The numbers were correct. Just that the
proper layout can help to identify certain patterns, if any. To clearly see numbers in
a string helps to get a better feel for any kind of synchronicities that may be taking
place on the page in connectin 3. Although, laying it out the way you did, you could
Milky Way Spiral United States
Member #28,944
December 25, 2005
1,635 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by CalifDude on May 20, 2006
Kola you said that I had done the California Midday wrong because I was going mid to mid and that you would show me that there was a winner in every one of the 7 Midday draws instead of the 3 I mentioned. I know you have been busy so I understand your not showing me the wins, but I have taken the time to do it as you suggested. Here are the results. I have shown the 64 base numbers for each result of your method:
Quote: Originally posted by CalifDude on May 19, 2006
Out of the last 7 California Midday draws there were only 3 hits.
Drawing Date
Midday
Evening
Fri, 19 May 2006
3-6-4 (13th)
4-5-4 (14th)
Thu, 18 May 2006
6-3-2 (11th)
3-8-8 (12th
Wed, 17May 2006
4-9-6 (9th)
2-4-5 (10th)
Tue, 16 May 2006
4-8-9 (7th)
1-0-1 ( 8th)
Mon, 15May 2006
6-2-7 (5th)
8-4-5 ( 6th)
Sun, 14 May 2006
6-8-6 (3rd)
1-7-1 (4th)
Sat, 13 May 2006
8-6-6 (1st)
4-4-7 ( 2th)
To find the next winning number, take the last draw and apply DSUM or
permutation: Lets start from the first number in the above list. Its 866.
Now wrap it. This first column of permutation or DSUM is the original base 10
column, and is where all 10 rows or strings will be permutated from the D to S to U
to M This first column or wrap of 866 is really the first set called DDD
I have numbered the above numbers from (1) - (14).
(1st) 866
755--Apply DSUM ACROSS
866--Apply DSUM--
977--Apply DSUM
088--Apply DSUM
199--Apply DSUM
200--Apply Dsum
311--Apply DSUM
422--APPLY DSUM
533--APPly DSUM
644--Apply DSUM and the set of USS-up, same same yields the (2nd) 744
(2th) 744
633---APPLY DSUM TO ALL ROWS ACROSS
744
855--Apply DSUM and the set of SDD-same,down,down yields the (3th) 866
966
077
188
299
300
411
522
(3th) 686
575
686-Apply DSUM and the set of MDM-mirror,down,mirror becomes the (4th) 171
797
808
919
010
121--Apply DSUM and the set of SMS-same,mirror,same Becomes(4) draw 171
232
343
494
505
616-APPLY DSUM and the set of MSM-Mirror, Same, Mirror yields (4th) draw 171
(4th) 171
060
171---The set MDU-Mirror Down Up yields the (5th) draw 672
282
393
405
516
627--the Set SSS is perfect and is equal to the help (5) draw 672
748
859
961
(5th) 672
672
783
894--The DSUM set is SMU-same, mirror, up ---to yield the (6th) draw 845
016
127
238
349-- The DSUM set is UUD-up,up down health (6th) draw 845
450
561
(6th) 845
734--DSUM set of UUM-up,up,mirror, permutates into next win number (7th) 849
845--DSUM set of SMD-same,mirror,down, permutates into next number (7th) 894
956
067
178
289
390
401
512
623
(7th) 489
378
489
590--Apply set MUU-mirror,up,up to get the (8th) winning number of 101
601--Apply set MSS-mirror,same,same to get the (8th) Winning of 101
712
823
934
045
156--Apply set SSM-mirror,same,same to get next draw's answer of 101
267
(8th) 101
090
101
212
323
434
545--Apply set DMU, gives you the winning hand of 496 then bright againg
656
767
878
989
(10th) Draw 496
387
498
509
610
721
832
943--The set MUD will yield the (10th) winning number which is 452
053
163--The set UDU will yield the (10th) winning number which is 452
273
(10th) 245
134--The set MDD will yield the (11th) winning number 623
245--The set SDU will yield the (11th) winning number 236
356--
467--The set DSM will yield the (11th) winning number 362
578
689
790
801
912
023
(12) 632
521
632
743--The set UDM will yield the (12th) winning number of 838
854
965
076
187
298
309
410
(12) 388
277
388
499
500
611
722
833
944
055
166
Aha Very Important. This particular wrap does not yield the number all the time.
I will try to tell you why. This particular wrap is special, and rare. It is rare to
have a triple in the pick 3 or even a quadruple in a pick 4. When it does
occur... Anyway i will get back to this afer I finish up the last workup for
Califdude.
The draw after the Pick 3 triple is the (13th) 364. So...
(13th) 364
253
364--Apply the set UDS to yield the winning (14th) number of 454
475
586
697
708
819
920
031
142
There you have it Califdude. All of the numbers had hits except that rare and special triple. I'll throw some plausible ideas as why it didn't .
So DSUM will give you winning number 99.5%. Insteadof 100 % of the time. Ironclad. I don't know how you could have come up with only a few hits.
Califdude, I found this on page 4 of this thread. I believe Kola was showing the hits for CA here.
He is showing how the winning number is in the 640 as a box. Sorry, that really doesn't help me. He is also changing the number to use for the next draw to the number that was in his workout. I thought we would just use the actual draw each time. Rules have changed again! And I have shown the actual numbers and draws. As always, if you look hard enough and switch a few things, you can find a win!!
Milky Way Spiral United States
Member #28,944
December 25, 2005
1,635 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by CalifDude on May 20, 2006
Kola you said that I had done the California Midday wrong because I was going mid to mid and that you would show me that there was a winner in every one of the 7 Midday draws instead of the 3 I mentioned. I know you have been busy so I understand your not showing me the wins, but I have taken the time to do it as you suggested. Here are the results. I have shown the 64 base numbers for each result of your method:
Poway CA (San Diego County) United States
Member #3,489
January 25, 2004
14,120 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Kola on May 20, 2006
Quote: Originally posted by CalifDude on May 20, 2006
Kola you said that I had done the California Midday wrong because I was going mid to mid and that you would show me that there was a winner in every one of the 7 Midday draws instead of the 3 I mentioned. I know you have been busy so I understand your not showing me the wins, but I have taken the time to do it as you suggested. Here are the results. I have shown the 64 base numbers for each result of your method: