Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 9:15 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Global Lottery Solutions (G.L.S)

Topic closed. 195 replies. Last post 7 years ago by StrikeSentinel.

Page 1 of 14
2.76
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
UK
United Kingdom
Member #9650
December 15, 2004
222 Posts
Offline
Posted: December 31, 2009, 2:26 pm - IP Logged

  I have posted the following in Canadian forum so I thought you might be interested in this new information too! I am sure the quality of posts would be a lot better here than the other forum simply because I can copy and paste from Microsoft Word without any hassle! This new info is divided to two parts, first part is the copy of my letter to Lottery Commission and second part is the universal lottery database compatible to 98 numbers!

Part one

<<<<<Two years ago today I have started the Master Lottery Software thread and I have decided to release the new findings on the second anniversary of this thread!

In order to build any desirable and practical lottery software at first we must have full understanding about the lottery rather than just guessing! The understanding usually begins with questions, as we find the answers to our questions then we’ll become more familiar that how to plan and to layout the foundations for the lottery software build-up!
The very first question is if the lottery is random as they claim?
We must be seriously naive and brain-dead to think it is random; why? I have an easy answer for it by suggesting “if it is ongoing business then there must be advanced plans and calculations as if there is no calculation that business will fall in short period of time!” As yet I have not heard of any major lottery going bust in recent years! The lottery operator that falls is the one genuinely random!
Lottery would be exactly the same scenario as the scratch cards based on business logic which of course is profits, 100% tickets sales - 35% winners = 65% gross profits or indeed the
losers, so lottery is no exception to scratch cards which there has to be an advanced and calculated losers in order to create business reward or profits for the operators!
The second question is; why there must be calculations?
When one company facing up to a nation then the slightest mistake can be very catastrophic for that company especially if it is supported by the government, this is why there has to be calculations and advanced knowledge involved in order to safeguard profits as well as the government’s dignity!
Imagine the possibility of one nation of about 50 million people or more go to one casino and everybody plays the same game at the same time, what do you think will happen and what is the chances of that house (casino) make any profit?
Better example still; imagine 50 million people go to
ala-card restaurant without advance booking as total surprise (the same as the lottery’s selected lines by people, choosing their numbers from menu) how do you think the chef (Camelot or others) will cope? Let me tell you this if there are more than 30 people in your family and decide to dine outside but you have not booked your table most restaurants will refuse you at door-step never mind 50 million people!
So, how can one restaurant (Camelot) can take up 50 million people and more under their roof and give everyone a menu with list of 14 million dishes to choose from and still claim their chef can cope even without advanced booking?! ..Therefore prior knowledge (software) is the only solution to lottery!

After years of thoughts in
Master Lottery Software thread I have proposed the idea of how lottery numbers are generated from the loop. But there is something missing in loop theory and not quite right about it because lottery result can only take match 4s and 5s and hardly any match 6s but never match 7s to the loop so the theory might be true but not 100%correct until the time that some solution is found for match 6s and 7s to lottery results!
However, if we search inside the old results we can also find match 3s and 4s but never match 6or 7s either! Now the question is, if lottery is fixed then is there a system in place which prevents match 6s and 7s from happening or being repeated?
We all know the reasons why the repeat of match 6s and 7s are almost impossible simply because the odds of one person winning the jackpot twice in two separate occasions with the same numbers amongst of 50 million nation is so microscopic and well beyond statistical theories!
Indeed if this situation ever occurs it will cause more embarrassments and raise more questions about the integrity of lottery which will put the operators under spotlights! So if the match 6s and 7s are blocked by the system then we must find out how?
If I think carefully by putting my jigsaw puzzle pieces together then I might find the answer or perhaps the solution in multiple lotteries!
I know the lottery starts off by Saturdays and sometime later it follows by Wed draw and then with other games however that the top prize is much lesser attractive as the main lotto!
..So, if these lesser attractive games are not designed to increase the revenue for the operator then it would be safe to assume that they are designed for other reasons such as breaking up patterns or loops or even exchange information! Perhaps the solution could be in minimum of two separate files or loops one for Wed draws and one for Sat draws which prevents match 6s and 7s from happening!
If I am correct on this then I have to go back to day one when lottery started in UK and find as many pieces as possible to complete my puzzle which I did! Based on new findings I send this letter to Lottery Commission but of course after all tests proved that my theory is 100% true! The reply from this office was very amusing as usual which did ignore every point raised to him however that I am sure he reads this post!

  The Chief Executive of                                                                                         

Lottery Commission                                                                                             

101 Wigmore Street                                                                                                                   

London                                                                                                                       

W1U 1QU                                                                                           

  01 Aug 2008

Re; National Lottery

  Dear Mr Harris 

Over the past ten years I forwarded you some various analysis of the UK lottery followed by evidences which suggested the followings;

  • ·        UKlottery cannot be random and reasons are provided therefore all rollovers to current date were deliberate whilst there were jackpot winners!
  • ·        The number of prize winners as Camelot claims in all prize categories is totally untrue!
  • ·        The Dream Number game is still remain an unlawfulgame for several reasons a) there is not play-slip tickets produced at any retail shops within UK but instead Camelot created only folders for this game to cover the empty hole on the stands b) the players cannot choose their own selections of numbers where as the numbers for this game are generated on the top of the Lotto game play-slips, c) if a person decide to play the dream number game then the only choice is to play the number on the top of the Lotto play-slip this reduces the odds from 10 million to one to the actual amount of the Lotto play-slips tickets which are provided on the stand about 200, d) players which use the lotto play-slip but won’t play the Dream Number the combinations on the top of that play-slip will be out of circulations or trashed, e) in order to make an unlawfulDream Number game to lawfulthen every retail shop must provide at least 10 million play-slips on their stands with the entire combinations which this will be neither feasible for the Camelot nor practical for the retailers so why did Camelot introduce this game? Well, the one and only reason for Dream Number game is the result of my previous mail to you which I never received a reply for it!
  • ·        All the numbers generated for all of the draws including lotto, Thunder ball, Extra, Daily, Euro and even the Monday play game (Chariot) which now is forwarded from Monday to Friday are created by single software and they are all linked one to another to provide an opportunity for Camelot to switch numbers between the draws or in other words they are created to protect the lotto main draw game!
  • ·        The distributions for all the prize winners for bothLotto game and Dream number are in ascending orders whilst the lotto prize dividend categories are based on the permutation of the wheels Any three from 6, Any four from 6, Any five from 6, Any five plus Bonus Ball from 7 but in Dream Number game is based on first three from 7, First four from 7, First five from 7, First 6 from 7! This is a huge mathematical error and shamefully this has not been picked up by any university throughout of UK or the members of the Royal Statistical of Society as both of the breakdowns or the distribution cannot be correct, the dividends for the Dream Number game is correct BUT in lotto game the breakdown is totally false and imaginary!
  • ·        When the prize categories are based on the permutation of the wheel then the control of the prize funds will be impossible and therefore Camelot won’t be in position to estimate the prize funds prior to event or indeed put cap on how much they will pay out and how much they will keep in!
  • ·        Permutation of the wheel in lottery has various possibilities which means the numbers of people matching jackpot numbers can exceed to the number of people matching three numbers, this scenario applies for all prize categories which has never happened in history of UK lottery so there is no way of guessing or predicting the prize fund by Camelot especially when there is a minimum prize of £10 guaranteed!
  • ·        When the prize dividends are based on permutation of the wheel then matching three numbers doesn’t necessary mean £10 win whereas number of people matching three numbers can be much lesser than matching 4,5,6 or 5 and Bonus Ball! 
  • ·        Adding the Bonus Ball to lotto game not only increasing the odds from 14 millions to 86 millions to one but also by choosing six numbers from 7 there is remaining empty space or unused number which has a mathematical reasons for linking one draw to another but how?

This is the explanation how the remaining number can link the draws;

There are proximately 86 million combinations if we select 7 numbers from 49; 

01 02 03 04 05 06 07

01 02 03 04 05 06 08

01 02 03 04 …..………09…….. 

…. 43 44 45 46 47 48

43 44 45 46 47 48 49 (86 million combinations like these head to toe)

All 86 million combinations are sorted from low to high as above!

The very first lotto play-slip setting was as follows; 

01 02 03 04 05

06 07 08 09 10

11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30

31 32 33 34 35

36 37 38 39 40

41 42 43 44 45

46 47 48 49 xx 

This was a clever and deliberate move featuring the play-slip in that format because Camelot knew that the first lottery draw is going to be a major hit in UK and the play-slip in this format will forces the players who are unfamiliar to lottery to select the most common sets such as

01 02 03 04 05 06 (easy set)

As each easy set of numbers were selected from the 86 millions of combinations those sets will be removed and trashed! By 19:30 of the Sat of 19th of Nov 1994the very first UK lottery draw most of the combinations which were selected by people immediately removed from 86 millions of combinations and with the remaining combinations which were not selected the lottery software kept them as “Bankers” and divided them in two halves one half for the Sat and the other half for the future Wed draws and from those halves they have produced the first set of UK lottery number, three numbers from Sat group and three numbers from Wed group!

19/11/1994, 30,03,05,44,14,22,10

For the past several years I was finding it difficult to understand how can Camelot do such speedy calculations by going through millions of selected combination in space of half an hour just to select a profitable numbers but now I understand that the software is selecting the numbers from small group of sets which are not selected by the players from day one or the “Bankers”! This not only provide enough calculation time but also it is an opportunity to select the rollover set of numbers if desired whereas all the bankers sets are the UNSELECTED sets or in fact the rollover numbers!

This software is basically select three numbers from the bankers of Wed draw and three numbers from the bankers of Sat draw which means if we add or mix the Sat draw numbers to Wed draw number then we will have one match 6 in old history draws or indeed creating one of the Bankers set!

As the years went by and people got more familiar with lottery and the experts developed software with almost accurate predictions then Camelot introduced new games such as Extra draw, Thunder ball draw, Daily draw, Euro draw or even Monday or Chariot draw which Camelot denies totally owning it in order to exchange or switch numbers so that they can compete with accurate predictions and still produce one or two or even none jackpot winners however that the Thunder ball and Euro draws are in different formats and different prize levels from lotto 5/34 thunder ball draw and 5/50 euro with two lucky stars instead of 6/49 but all these draws including Chariot produce match 6 in history of all draws or creating the Bankers!

 

In case you’re wondering how this information will help to predict the future draws then let me put it this way, if you search for all match threes for the latest Sat draw and all match threes for the latest Wed draw and by sliding one against another the match 6 for the new draw will be produced which means is either the jackpot prize or Bonus Ball prize guaranteed along with 100s of other smaller prizes and the total cost for this prediction will depend of the existence of match threes of the low key numbers (01 to 27) in daily draw where the most of exchanging numbers takes place which is about 130 to 170 matches inside of 4500 draws the total draws for all lotteries!

So, winning the lotto jackpot it is not 14 million to one anymore and it is 130/170 x 130/170 maximum before any filtering system come in to the consideration! 

Well, I think enough said but let’s put this information in to the test, below are the latest five draws; 

25/07/2008, 05,06,22,26,37,44,02    M021 Monday (Ex lotto Extra draw)

25/07/2008, 29,07,15,24,11,07,02    0233 Euro

26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

26/07/2008, 05,26,30,24,01,03       0778 Thunder Ball

26/07/2008, 23,16,03,11,07,12,24    1514 Daily

28/07/2008,09,05,18,22,26,14,25     1515  D 2

 

At first I would like you to notice the duplicated numbers which are repeated in all draws or the link numbers

 

03,11,24                                Lotto

03,11,24                                Daily

07,11,24                                Euro

07,11,24                                Daily

xx xx 24,03          Lotto

xx xx 24,03          Thunder

xx xx 24,03          Daily

 

First test(lotto against daily)

 

26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

26/07/2008, 23,16,03,11,07,12,24    1514 Daily 

Total unique numbers   03 35 19 11 24 33 09 23 16 07 12 = two match 6s in Daily draw

26/04/2004, 11,03,19,23,13,09,12    0186 

13/08/2005, 09,04,07,12,19,03,11    0592

Second test(lotto against thunder ball) 

26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

26/07/2008, 05,26,30,24,01,03       0778 Thunder Ball 

Total unique numbers 03 35 19 11 24 33 09 05 26 30 01 = two match 6s in Daily draw

  30/08/2004, 11,26,03,19,09,13,05    0294 

22/09/2004, 24,15,19,01,03,09,11    0314 

Third test(lotto against euro) 

26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

25/07/2008, 29,07,15,24,11,07,02    0233 Euro 

Unique = 03 35 19 11 24 33 09 29 07 15 02 = three match 6s in lotto and daily 

09/07/2008, 02,26,29,15,03,09,19    1309  (26 is the link in Thund)

16/02/2005, 11,02,20,19,15,03,07    0439

22/09/2004, 24,15,19,01,03,09,11    0314 

Forth test(lotto against Chariot) 

26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

25/07/2008, 05,06,22,26,37,44,02    Monday lottery 21 

Unique = All 14 numbers = 9 match 6s in Daily draw and one in old extra, absolutely amazing! 

15/03/2008, 02,03,24,19,11,20,26    1401 D

15/10/2007, 06,05,27,02,19,11,26    1272 D

12/06/2007, 26,06,08,05,11,24,19    1165 D

15/08/2006, 19,26,24,14,05,02,06    0907 D

15/03/2006, 09,02,06.03,16,19,26    0776 D

28/12/2005, 19,03,02,13,05,11,09    0710 D

21/09/2004, 24,05,06,27,26,22,09    0313 D

30/08/2004, 11,26,03,19,09,13,05    0294 D

30/03/2004, 09,06,24,22,19,20,26    0163 D

03/05/2003, 14,24,44,22,02,33,37    0258 E

There are two of the each link, two x 20, two x 27, two x 14, two x 13 

Fifth test(Sat against Wed)

26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

23/07/2008, 39,35,40,33,15,17,49    1313  WED 

Unique = 12 numbers 033519112433093940151749 = One match 6 for this 314 of Daily 

22/09/2004, 24,15,19,01,03,09,11    0314 D 

Sixth test(Chariot and Tues daily) 

25/07/2008, 05,06,22,26,37,44,02    M021

29/07/2008, 22,15,07,19,06,20,17    1516 = four match 6s in Daily

 

13/10/2007, 03,07,20,19,15,22,05    1271

06/10/2004, 19,20,05,15,24,26,22    0326

17/08/2004, 15,19,02,05,16,26,17    0283

20/01/2004, 07,02,12,15,22,19,17    0103 

As the tests above prove all these lotteries are introduced to create an opportunity for Camelot to divert or switch numbers to avoid the huge number of winners or indeed make a rollover if desired and one reason for all these match 6s are created is because all data produced are delivered from the same environment or a single software as I mentioned it before in my previous posts!

For additional piece of mind if we do the same search for the very first two lotto draws then there are number of match 6s for them too, below 

19/11/1994,30,03,05,44,14,22,10     01

26/11/1994,16,06,44,31,12,15,37     02 

Unique = 30 03 05 4414 22 10 16 06 xx 31 12 15 37 = 13 numbers

 

18/07/2008,16,14,44,10,29,06,05     0232 of Euro

15/08/2005,12,14,05,26,10,22,06     0593 of Daily

19/01/2007,16,26,06,12,14,22,03     1041 of Daily

08/05/2007,02,03,06,12,14,15,16     1135 of Daily

19/09/2007,14,10,05,15,06,21,16     1250 of Daily

07/05/2008,09,12,10,31,16,30,03     1291 of Lotto 

As I mentioned above all the lotteries including Lotto, Extra, Thunder, Euro, Daily and even the Chariot are introduced to switch numbers from one to another and as result all brand new combinations will be created for example if we have 01 02 03 04 05 06 in the first lotto draw and by switching 03 04 to Extra draw the chain of the numbers will change to 01 02 05 06 and when the next draw introduced 02 05 will be shifted to Thunder draw and the new chain will be 01 06!

In order to find out the reality of this theory I put all combinations for all draws (lotto, thunder, extra, daily, euro and chariot) in drawn order in one large wheel and the findings were outside of statistical theories as I am extracting data out! All the drawn order numbers are transformed to ascending order, what mathematical theory can explain this? Below are some examples from what it is suppose to be drawn order sequences but indeed they are sorted from low to high!   

16/05/2007, 01,02,03,12,13,21,23    Daily 1142

15/07/2000, 01,02,07,39,44,35,11    lotto 0476

24/05/2007, 01,02,11,16,17,20,23    daily 1149

22/05/2007, 01,02,12,14,19,22,26    daily 1147

18/12/2007, 01,02,18,07,06,20,05    daily 1327

01/07/2005, 01,02,22,12,26,27,16    daily 0555

12/05/2007, 01,03,04,05,13,25,26    daily 1139

20/10/2005, 01,03,05,10,17,09,27    daily 0650

30/09/2005, 01,03,06,07,09,21,26    daily 0633

11/06/2007, 01,03,06,08,17,13,16    daily 1164

25/03/2005, 01,03,06,08,23,26,27    daily 0471

24/11/2005, 01,03,22,14,04,13,05    daily 0681

29/09/2006, 01,03,24,06,18,05,08    euro 0138

28/08/2004, 01,03,43,18,05,02,36    extra 0396

17/03/2001, 01,03,45,15,26,46,48    lotto 0546

07/10/2005, 01,04,07,09,10,18,20    daily 0639

08/04/2006, 01,04,07,33,14,14,12    Thund 0538 

05/11/1997, 01,04,09,06,32,38,46    lotto 0195

04/03/2008, 01,04,10,05,21,19,12    daily 1391

24/04/2007, 01,04,12,15,16,19,25    daily 1122

05/08/2006, 01,04,15,06,24,03,08    daily 0925

07/03/2006, 01,04,21,11,18,25,22    daily 0769

15/07/1995, 01,04,43,20,31,41,38    lotto 0035

22/05/2004, 01,04,46,05,34,25,12    lotto 0878 

It appears to be that the repeat numbers are based on the first two digits and growing to three or possible four repeated digits and as it grows the division or tree route begins which means the choice of software increases to select what number for which draw!

I’ll give you one tree-route example by taking the last from the top   

22/05/2004, 01,04,46,05,34,25,12    lotto 0878  search for 04 46

19/01/2000,   04,46,43,17,16,48,05       lotto 0425

26/07/2003,       46,43,17,45,25,34,23    extra 0282  (46 43 x4 =T-R)

23/03/2007,          43,17,05,40,13,03,01 euro 0163

 

10/10/2001,       46,43,22,41,05,49,25    extra 0095

03/09/1997,          43,22,14,38,10,30,25 lotto 0177

 

14/06/2003,       46,43,37,03,12,29,11    lotto 0780

09/09/2006,          43,37,15,21,02,46,36 lotto 1118

10/03/2004,          43,37,34,17,11,14,22 lotto 0857

11/12/1999,          43,37,46,05,27,09,28 lotto 0414 

19/08/2000,       46,43,38,34,22,05,09    lotto 0486

24/10/2001,          43,38,08,39,44,40,03 lotto 0609 

As the example above shows there are 4 possible tree routes for 46 43 which from this point it would be the software choices to select the next digit out of 17 or 22 or 37 or 38 which every one of these four has it’s own route with multiple diversions which pushes my predictions for lotto draw in to thunder ball draw and the predictions in thunder draw will come up in daily or other draws!

To my estimate I have lost over 100 million pounds over past two years just because Camelot switched numbers! I therefore enclosed small collections of the very latest results and some tickets which by rights should have been major prize winners but my rights denied because of the switched numbers! 

Draws 

25/07/2008,05,06,22,26,37,44,02     Chariot

25/07/2008,29,07,15,24,11,07,02     Euro

23/07/2008,39,35,40,33,15,17,49     Lotto

23/07/2008,10,08,06,16,28,06        Thunder

25/07/2008,26,23,18,19,24,06,09     Daily 

My Euro ticket for July 25 ref no (207 – 14653593 – 25462) line D of this ticket 

1518 23 37 49 02 06

15 02      = Euro

18 23 06 = Daily

37           = Chariot

49           = Lotto

The jackpot for this Euro draw was 11.83 million pounds with no winners whilst I managed to get all seven numbers correct (but thanks to switching didn’t win anything) 

Sat 26th of July (next again day of Euro draw) 

25/07/2008,05,06,22,26,37,44,02     Chariot

25/07/2008,29,07,15,24,11,07,02     Euro

26/07/2008,03,35,19,11,24,33,09     Lotto

26/07/2008,05,26,30,24,01,03        Thunder

26/07/2008,23,16,03,11,07,12,24     Daily 

My hot pick 3 and 4 (only three lines played on one ticket)

Ticket reference number 208 – 02769177 – 08984

A.            03 19 30                                two numbers in lotto and one in thunder ball

B.            03 19 23 30          two numbers in lotto and one in thunder ball and one in daily 

These tickets are proving the facts that I can select the correct numbers for the lotto quite confidently but sadly numbers are switched! 

Wed 23rd of July for Thunder ball draw (ref 205 – 15177818 – 08207)

23/07/2008,39,35,40,33,15,17,49     Lotto

23/07/2008,10,08,06,16,28,06        Thunder

23/07/2008,19,04,16,20,21,14,03     Daily 

C.            08 14 26 28 33 - 04 

So near but so far away and I lose again! I have collected over 300 unfortunate tickets which every one of them should have been a major prize winner but they either won small prize or nothing at all! 

Now my question to you is what do you intend to do about it? 

At the end I would like to emphasize that the above information is only tiny section of the whole study and there are many untold tales!

I will wait two weeks from the post mark for your reply. 

With Thanks 

Regards, 

M. R. Kashani

    Avatar
    Kentucky
    United States
    Member #32652
    February 14, 2006
    7297 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: January 1, 2010, 2:07 pm - IP Logged

      I have posted the following in Canadian forum so I thought you might be interested in this new information too! I am sure the quality of posts would be a lot better here than the other forum simply because I can copy and paste from Microsoft Word without any hassle! This new info is divided to two parts, first part is the copy of my letter to Lottery Commission and second part is the universal lottery database compatible to 98 numbers!

    Part one

    <<<<<Two years ago today I have started the Master Lottery Software thread and I have decided to release the new findings on the second anniversary of this thread!

    In order to build any desirable and practical lottery software at first we must have full understanding about the lottery rather than just guessing! The understanding usually begins with questions, as we find the answers to our questions then we’ll become more familiar that how to plan and to layout the foundations for the lottery software build-up!
    The very first question is if the lottery is random as they claim?
    We must be seriously naive and brain-dead to think it is random; why? I have an easy answer for it by suggesting “if it is ongoing business then there must be advanced plans and calculations as if there is no calculation that business will fall in short period of time!” As yet I have not heard of any major lottery going bust in recent years! The lottery operator that falls is the one genuinely random!
    Lottery would be exactly the same scenario as the scratch cards based on business logic which of course is profits, 100% tickets sales - 35% winners = 65% gross profits or indeed the
    losers, so lottery is no exception to scratch cards which there has to be an advanced and calculated losers in order to create business reward or profits for the operators!
    The second question is; why there must be calculations?
    When one company facing up to a nation then the slightest mistake can be very catastrophic for that company especially if it is supported by the government, this is why there has to be calculations and advanced knowledge involved in order to safeguard profits as well as the government’s dignity!
    Imagine the possibility of one nation of about 50 million people or more go to one casino and everybody plays the same game at the same time, what do you think will happen and what is the chances of that house (casino) make any profit?
    Better example still; imagine 50 million people go to
    ala-card restaurant without advance booking as total surprise (the same as the lottery’s selected lines by people, choosing their numbers from menu) how do you think the chef (Camelot or others) will cope? Let me tell you this if there are more than 30 people in your family and decide to dine outside but you have not booked your table most restaurants will refuse you at door-step never mind 50 million people!
    So, how can one restaurant (Camelot) can take up 50 million people and more under their roof and give everyone a menu with list of 14 million dishes to choose from and still claim their chef can cope even without advanced booking?! ..Therefore prior knowledge (software) is the only solution to lottery!

    After years of thoughts in
    Master Lottery Software thread I have proposed the idea of how lottery numbers are generated from the loop. But there is something missing in loop theory and not quite right about it because lottery result can only take match 4s and 5s and hardly any match 6s but never match 7s to the loop so the theory might be true but not 100%correct until the time that some solution is found for match 6s and 7s to lottery results!
    However, if we search inside the old results we can also find match 3s and 4s but never match 6or 7s either! Now the question is, if lottery is fixed then is there a system in place which prevents match 6s and 7s from happening or being repeated?
    We all know the reasons why the repeat of match 6s and 7s are almost impossible simply because the odds of one person winning the jackpot twice in two separate occasions with the same numbers amongst of 50 million nation is so microscopic and well beyond statistical theories!
    Indeed if this situation ever occurs it will cause more embarrassments and raise more questions about the integrity of lottery which will put the operators under spotlights! So if the match 6s and 7s are blocked by the system then we must find out how?
    If I think carefully by putting my jigsaw puzzle pieces together then I might find the answer or perhaps the solution in multiple lotteries!
    I know the lottery starts off by Saturdays and sometime later it follows by Wed draw and then with other games however that the top prize is much lesser attractive as the main lotto!
    ..So, if these lesser attractive games are not designed to increase the revenue for the operator then it would be safe to assume that they are designed for other reasons such as breaking up patterns or loops or even exchange information! Perhaps the solution could be in minimum of two separate files or loops one for Wed draws and one for Sat draws which prevents match 6s and 7s from happening!
    If I am correct on this then I have to go back to day one when lottery started in UK and find as many pieces as possible to complete my puzzle which I did! Based on new findings I send this letter to Lottery Commission but of course after all tests proved that my theory is 100% true! The reply from this office was very amusing as usual which did ignore every point raised to him however that I am sure he reads this post!

      The Chief Executive of                                                                                         

    Lottery Commission                                                                                             

    101 Wigmore Street                                                                                                                   

    London                                                                                                                       

    W1U 1QU                                                                                           

      01 Aug 2008

    Re; National Lottery

      Dear Mr Harris 

    Over the past ten years I forwarded you some various analysis of the UK lottery followed by evidences which suggested the followings;

    • ·        UKlottery cannot be random and reasons are provided therefore all rollovers to current date were deliberate whilst there were jackpot winners!
    • ·        The number of prize winners as Camelot claims in all prize categories is totally untrue!
    • ·        The Dream Number game is still remain an unlawfulgame for several reasons a) there is not play-slip tickets produced at any retail shops within UK but instead Camelot created only folders for this game to cover the empty hole on the stands b) the players cannot choose their own selections of numbers where as the numbers for this game are generated on the top of the Lotto game play-slips, c) if a person decide to play the dream number game then the only choice is to play the number on the top of the Lotto play-slip this reduces the odds from 10 million to one to the actual amount of the Lotto play-slips tickets which are provided on the stand about 200, d) players which use the lotto play-slip but won’t play the Dream Number the combinations on the top of that play-slip will be out of circulations or trashed, e) in order to make an unlawfulDream Number game to lawfulthen every retail shop must provide at least 10 million play-slips on their stands with the entire combinations which this will be neither feasible for the Camelot nor practical for the retailers so why did Camelot introduce this game? Well, the one and only reason for Dream Number game is the result of my previous mail to you which I never received a reply for it!
    • ·        All the numbers generated for all of the draws including lotto, Thunder ball, Extra, Daily, Euro and even the Monday play game (Chariot) which now is forwarded from Monday to Friday are created by single software and they are all linked one to another to provide an opportunity for Camelot to switch numbers between the draws or in other words they are created to protect the lotto main draw game!
    • ·        The distributions for all the prize winners for bothLotto game and Dream number are in ascending orders whilst the lotto prize dividend categories are based on the permutation of the wheels Any three from 6, Any four from 6, Any five from 6, Any five plus Bonus Ball from 7 but in Dream Number game is based on first three from 7, First four from 7, First five from 7, First 6 from 7! This is a huge mathematical error and shamefully this has not been picked up by any university throughout of UK or the members of the Royal Statistical of Society as both of the breakdowns or the distribution cannot be correct, the dividends for the Dream Number game is correct BUT in lotto game the breakdown is totally false and imaginary!
    • ·        When the prize categories are based on the permutation of the wheel then the control of the prize funds will be impossible and therefore Camelot won’t be in position to estimate the prize funds prior to event or indeed put cap on how much they will pay out and how much they will keep in!
    • ·        Permutation of the wheel in lottery has various possibilities which means the numbers of people matching jackpot numbers can exceed to the number of people matching three numbers, this scenario applies for all prize categories which has never happened in history of UK lottery so there is no way of guessing or predicting the prize fund by Camelot especially when there is a minimum prize of £10 guaranteed!
    • ·        When the prize dividends are based on permutation of the wheel then matching three numbers doesn’t necessary mean £10 win whereas number of people matching three numbers can be much lesser than matching 4,5,6 or 5 and Bonus Ball! 
    • ·        Adding the Bonus Ball to lotto game not only increasing the odds from 14 millions to 86 millions to one but also by choosing six numbers from 7 there is remaining empty space or unused number which has a mathematical reasons for linking one draw to another but how?

    This is the explanation how the remaining number can link the draws;

    There are proximately 86 million combinations if we select 7 numbers from 49; 

    01 02 03 04 05 06 07

    01 02 03 04 05 06 08

    01 02 03 04 …..………09…….. 

    …. 43 44 45 46 47 48

    43 44 45 46 47 48 49 (86 million combinations like these head to toe)

    All 86 million combinations are sorted from low to high as above!

    The very first lotto play-slip setting was as follows; 

    01 02 03 04 05

    06 07 08 09 10

    11 12 13 14 15

    16 17 18 19 20

    21 22 23 24 25

    26 27 28 29 30

    31 32 33 34 35

    36 37 38 39 40

    41 42 43 44 45

    46 47 48 49 xx 

    This was a clever and deliberate move featuring the play-slip in that format because Camelot knew that the first lottery draw is going to be a major hit in UK and the play-slip in this format will forces the players who are unfamiliar to lottery to select the most common sets such as

    01 02 03 04 05 06 (easy set)

    As each easy set of numbers were selected from the 86 millions of combinations those sets will be removed and trashed! By 19:30 of the Sat of 19th of Nov 1994the very first UK lottery draw most of the combinations which were selected by people immediately removed from 86 millions of combinations and with the remaining combinations which were not selected the lottery software kept them as “Bankers” and divided them in two halves one half for the Sat and the other half for the future Wed draws and from those halves they have produced the first set of UK lottery number, three numbers from Sat group and three numbers from Wed group!

    19/11/1994, 30,03,05,44,14,22,10

    For the past several years I was finding it difficult to understand how can Camelot do such speedy calculations by going through millions of selected combination in space of half an hour just to select a profitable numbers but now I understand that the software is selecting the numbers from small group of sets which are not selected by the players from day one or the “Bankers”! This not only provide enough calculation time but also it is an opportunity to select the rollover set of numbers if desired whereas all the bankers sets are the UNSELECTED sets or in fact the rollover numbers!

    This software is basically select three numbers from the bankers of Wed draw and three numbers from the bankers of Sat draw which means if we add or mix the Sat draw numbers to Wed draw number then we will have one match 6 in old history draws or indeed creating one of the Bankers set!

    As the years went by and people got more familiar with lottery and the experts developed software with almost accurate predictions then Camelot introduced new games such as Extra draw, Thunder ball draw, Daily draw, Euro draw or even Monday or Chariot draw which Camelot denies totally owning it in order to exchange or switch numbers so that they can compete with accurate predictions and still produce one or two or even none jackpot winners however that the Thunder ball and Euro draws are in different formats and different prize levels from lotto 5/34 thunder ball draw and 5/50 euro with two lucky stars instead of 6/49 but all these draws including Chariot produce match 6 in history of all draws or creating the Bankers!

     

    In case you’re wondering how this information will help to predict the future draws then let me put it this way, if you search for all match threes for the latest Sat draw and all match threes for the latest Wed draw and by sliding one against another the match 6 for the new draw will be produced which means is either the jackpot prize or Bonus Ball prize guaranteed along with 100s of other smaller prizes and the total cost for this prediction will depend of the existence of match threes of the low key numbers (01 to 27) in daily draw where the most of exchanging numbers takes place which is about 130 to 170 matches inside of 4500 draws the total draws for all lotteries!

    So, winning the lotto jackpot it is not 14 million to one anymore and it is 130/170 x 130/170 maximum before any filtering system come in to the consideration! 

    Well, I think enough said but let’s put this information in to the test, below are the latest five draws; 

    25/07/2008, 05,06,22,26,37,44,02    M021 Monday (Ex lotto Extra draw)

    25/07/2008, 29,07,15,24,11,07,02    0233 Euro

    26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

    26/07/2008, 05,26,30,24,01,03       0778 Thunder Ball

    26/07/2008, 23,16,03,11,07,12,24    1514 Daily

    28/07/2008,09,05,18,22,26,14,25     1515  D 2

     

    At first I would like you to notice the duplicated numbers which are repeated in all draws or the link numbers

     

    03,11,24                                Lotto

    03,11,24                                Daily

    07,11,24                                Euro

    07,11,24                                Daily

    xx xx 24,03          Lotto

    xx xx 24,03          Thunder

    xx xx 24,03          Daily

     

    First test(lotto against daily)

     

    26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

    26/07/2008, 23,16,03,11,07,12,24    1514 Daily 

    Total unique numbers   03 35 19 11 24 33 09 23 16 07 12 = two match 6s in Daily draw

    26/04/2004, 11,03,19,23,13,09,12    0186 

    13/08/2005, 09,04,07,12,19,03,11    0592

    Second test(lotto against thunder ball) 

    26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

    26/07/2008, 05,26,30,24,01,03       0778 Thunder Ball 

    Total unique numbers 03 35 19 11 24 33 09 05 26 30 01 = two match 6s in Daily draw

      30/08/2004, 11,26,03,19,09,13,05    0294 

    22/09/2004, 24,15,19,01,03,09,11    0314 

    Third test(lotto against euro) 

    26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

    25/07/2008, 29,07,15,24,11,07,02    0233 Euro 

    Unique = 03 35 19 11 24 33 09 29 07 15 02 = three match 6s in lotto and daily 

    09/07/2008, 02,26,29,15,03,09,19    1309  (26 is the link in Thund)

    16/02/2005, 11,02,20,19,15,03,07    0439

    22/09/2004, 24,15,19,01,03,09,11    0314 

    Forth test(lotto against Chariot) 

    26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

    25/07/2008, 05,06,22,26,37,44,02    Monday lottery 21 

    Unique = All 14 numbers = 9 match 6s in Daily draw and one in old extra, absolutely amazing! 

    15/03/2008, 02,03,24,19,11,20,26    1401 D

    15/10/2007, 06,05,27,02,19,11,26    1272 D

    12/06/2007, 26,06,08,05,11,24,19    1165 D

    15/08/2006, 19,26,24,14,05,02,06    0907 D

    15/03/2006, 09,02,06.03,16,19,26    0776 D

    28/12/2005, 19,03,02,13,05,11,09    0710 D

    21/09/2004, 24,05,06,27,26,22,09    0313 D

    30/08/2004, 11,26,03,19,09,13,05    0294 D

    30/03/2004, 09,06,24,22,19,20,26    0163 D

    03/05/2003, 14,24,44,22,02,33,37    0258 E

    There are two of the each link, two x 20, two x 27, two x 14, two x 13 

    Fifth test(Sat against Wed)

    26/07/2008, 03,35,19,11,24,33,09    1314 Lotto

    23/07/2008, 39,35,40,33,15,17,49    1313  WED 

    Unique = 12 numbers 033519112433093940151749 = One match 6 for this 314 of Daily 

    22/09/2004, 24,15,19,01,03,09,11    0314 D 

    Sixth test(Chariot and Tues daily) 

    25/07/2008, 05,06,22,26,37,44,02    M021

    29/07/2008, 22,15,07,19,06,20,17    1516 = four match 6s in Daily

     

    13/10/2007, 03,07,20,19,15,22,05    1271

    06/10/2004, 19,20,05,15,24,26,22    0326

    17/08/2004, 15,19,02,05,16,26,17    0283

    20/01/2004, 07,02,12,15,22,19,17    0103 

    As the tests above prove all these lotteries are introduced to create an opportunity for Camelot to divert or switch numbers to avoid the huge number of winners or indeed make a rollover if desired and one reason for all these match 6s are created is because all data produced are delivered from the same environment or a single software as I mentioned it before in my previous posts!

    For additional piece of mind if we do the same search for the very first two lotto draws then there are number of match 6s for them too, below 

    19/11/1994,30,03,05,44,14,22,10     01

    26/11/1994,16,06,44,31,12,15,37     02 

    Unique = 30 03 05 4414 22 10 16 06 xx 31 12 15 37 = 13 numbers

     

    18/07/2008,16,14,44,10,29,06,05     0232 of Euro

    15/08/2005,12,14,05,26,10,22,06     0593 of Daily

    19/01/2007,16,26,06,12,14,22,03     1041 of Daily

    08/05/2007,02,03,06,12,14,15,16     1135 of Daily

    19/09/2007,14,10,05,15,06,21,16     1250 of Daily

    07/05/2008,09,12,10,31,16,30,03     1291 of Lotto 

    As I mentioned above all the lotteries including Lotto, Extra, Thunder, Euro, Daily and even the Chariot are introduced to switch numbers from one to another and as result all brand new combinations will be created for example if we have 01 02 03 04 05 06 in the first lotto draw and by switching 03 04 to Extra draw the chain of the numbers will change to 01 02 05 06 and when the next draw introduced 02 05 will be shifted to Thunder draw and the new chain will be 01 06!

    In order to find out the reality of this theory I put all combinations for all draws (lotto, thunder, extra, daily, euro and chariot) in drawn order in one large wheel and the findings were outside of statistical theories as I am extracting data out! All the drawn order numbers are transformed to ascending order, what mathematical theory can explain this? Below are some examples from what it is suppose to be drawn order sequences but indeed they are sorted from low to high!   

    16/05/2007, 01,02,03,12,13,21,23    Daily 1142

    15/07/2000, 01,02,07,39,44,35,11    lotto 0476

    24/05/2007, 01,02,11,16,17,20,23    daily 1149

    22/05/2007, 01,02,12,14,19,22,26    daily 1147

    18/12/2007, 01,02,18,07,06,20,05    daily 1327

    01/07/2005, 01,02,22,12,26,27,16    daily 0555

    12/05/2007, 01,03,04,05,13,25,26    daily 1139

    20/10/2005, 01,03,05,10,17,09,27    daily 0650

    30/09/2005, 01,03,06,07,09,21,26    daily 0633

    11/06/2007, 01,03,06,08,17,13,16    daily 1164

    25/03/2005, 01,03,06,08,23,26,27    daily 0471

    24/11/2005, 01,03,22,14,04,13,05    daily 0681

    29/09/2006, 01,03,24,06,18,05,08    euro 0138

    28/08/2004, 01,03,43,18,05,02,36    extra 0396

    17/03/2001, 01,03,45,15,26,46,48    lotto 0546

    07/10/2005, 01,04,07,09,10,18,20    daily 0639

    08/04/2006, 01,04,07,33,14,14,12    Thund 0538 

    05/11/1997, 01,04,09,06,32,38,46    lotto 0195

    04/03/2008, 01,04,10,05,21,19,12    daily 1391

    24/04/2007, 01,04,12,15,16,19,25    daily 1122

    05/08/2006, 01,04,15,06,24,03,08    daily 0925

    07/03/2006, 01,04,21,11,18,25,22    daily 0769

    15/07/1995, 01,04,43,20,31,41,38    lotto 0035

    22/05/2004, 01,04,46,05,34,25,12    lotto 0878 

    It appears to be that the repeat numbers are based on the first two digits and growing to three or possible four repeated digits and as it grows the division or tree route begins which means the choice of software increases to select what number for which draw!

    I’ll give you one tree-route example by taking the last from the top   

    22/05/2004, 01,04,46,05,34,25,12    lotto 0878  search for 04 46

    19/01/2000,   04,46,43,17,16,48,05       lotto 0425

    26/07/2003,       46,43,17,45,25,34,23    extra 0282  (46 43 x4 =T-R)

    23/03/2007,          43,17,05,40,13,03,01 euro 0163

     

    10/10/2001,       46,43,22,41,05,49,25    extra 0095

    03/09/1997,          43,22,14,38,10,30,25 lotto 0177

     

    14/06/2003,       46,43,37,03,12,29,11    lotto 0780

    09/09/2006,          43,37,15,21,02,46,36 lotto 1118

    10/03/2004,          43,37,34,17,11,14,22 lotto 0857

    11/12/1999,          43,37,46,05,27,09,28 lotto 0414 

    19/08/2000,       46,43,38,34,22,05,09    lotto 0486

    24/10/2001,          43,38,08,39,44,40,03 lotto 0609 

    As the example above shows there are 4 possible tree routes for 46 43 which from this point it would be the software choices to select the next digit out of 17 or 22 or 37 or 38 which every one of these four has it’s own route with multiple diversions which pushes my predictions for lotto draw in to thunder ball draw and the predictions in thunder draw will come up in daily or other draws!

    To my estimate I have lost over 100 million pounds over past two years just because Camelot switched numbers! I therefore enclosed small collections of the very latest results and some tickets which by rights should have been major prize winners but my rights denied because of the switched numbers! 

    Draws 

    25/07/2008,05,06,22,26,37,44,02     Chariot

    25/07/2008,29,07,15,24,11,07,02     Euro

    23/07/2008,39,35,40,33,15,17,49     Lotto

    23/07/2008,10,08,06,16,28,06        Thunder

    25/07/2008,26,23,18,19,24,06,09     Daily 

    My Euro ticket for July 25 ref no (207 – 14653593 – 25462) line D of this ticket 

    1518 23 37 49 02 06

    15 02      = Euro

    18 23 06 = Daily

    37           = Chariot

    49           = Lotto

    The jackpot for this Euro draw was 11.83 million pounds with no winners whilst I managed to get all seven numbers correct (but thanks to switching didn’t win anything) 

    Sat 26th of July (next again day of Euro draw) 

    25/07/2008,05,06,22,26,37,44,02     Chariot

    25/07/2008,29,07,15,24,11,07,02     Euro

    26/07/2008,03,35,19,11,24,33,09     Lotto

    26/07/2008,05,26,30,24,01,03        Thunder

    26/07/2008,23,16,03,11,07,12,24     Daily 

    My hot pick 3 and 4 (only three lines played on one ticket)

    Ticket reference number 208 – 02769177 – 08984

    A.            03 19 30                                two numbers in lotto and one in thunder ball

    B.            03 19 23 30          two numbers in lotto and one in thunder ball and one in daily 

    These tickets are proving the facts that I can select the correct numbers for the lotto quite confidently but sadly numbers are switched! 

    Wed 23rd of July for Thunder ball draw (ref 205 – 15177818 – 08207)

    23/07/2008,39,35,40,33,15,17,49     Lotto

    23/07/2008,10,08,06,16,28,06        Thunder

    23/07/2008,19,04,16,20,21,14,03     Daily 

    C.            08 14 26 28 33 - 04 

    So near but so far away and I lose again! I have collected over 300 unfortunate tickets which every one of them should have been a major prize winner but they either won small prize or nothing at all! 

    Now my question to you is what do you intend to do about it? 

    At the end I would like to emphasize that the above information is only tiny section of the whole study and there are many untold tales!

    I will wait two weeks from the post mark for your reply. 

    With Thanks 

    Regards, 

    M. R. Kashani

    You posted some interesting information but my problem is when you said "We must be seriously naive and brain-dead to think it is random". How can we give your math any credibility when you ignored the simple math of lotto/gambling games? Don't you know the odds always favor the house?

    The cash value of the next Mega Millions drawing will be around $16 million but that includes $37.8 million already collected from the two previous drawings plus another estimated $20 million that will be played in tonight's drawing. When lotto operators can make about 50 cents on every dollar wagered, why would they need to do anything to manipulate the drawing?

    If you're talking about the jackpot rolling, you have to consider the odds of it being hit. With only about 20 million possible combinations played, there is better than an 88% chance it won't be hit. In 2009 there were only 3 times when there was close to a 50/50 chance and only twice during the $333 million jackpot run where it exceeded it. But in all 5, the lotteries had already made a profit of over $200 million dollars.

    "As yet I have not heard of any major lottery going bust in recent years! The lottery operator that falls is the one genuinely random!"

    The odds on almost every gambling game favors the house and so the profits of any gaming business are based on volume of play. Several state lotteries had raffles over the holidays and I know for a fact the Florida raffle sold at least 970,000 tickets at $20 a pop. So they took in about $19.4 million and will payout $10 million. In this example the profits are 47% of the volume and when you can get that much volume of sales in only 47 days of sales, why would Florida or any other lottery risk that much profit by not holding a genuine random drawing?

    You also mentioned scratch-off games where the profits average around 35% and in most lotteries scratch-offs account for the most volume. A lottery operator would have to be the village idiot to go bust.

      Hans's avatar - Lottery-029.jpg
      Monte Carlo
      France
      Member #55589
      October 9, 2007
      1181 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: January 2, 2010, 3:33 pm - IP Logged

      excellent explination of the lottery,and great solution for the bankers.If they could be more accurate to define how to catch each 3 bankers in each 20,that would be a great progress.I call prediction as cutting cakes.You can cut them in more pieces more equally,you can more accurately predict lottery.Its a pity that people tend to get bankers in greedy attempt  to catch them in limited numbers,how could that be logic and natural?A system lack fairness and equality will always be a dead end while a fair minded,perfectly blanced,and fully thought system is on the way to win!

      Strive to predict 8 tickets for 12 numbers with Max ROI for Pick6!

        Avatar
        UK
        United Kingdom
        Member #9650
        December 15, 2004
        222 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: January 3, 2010, 4:43 pm - IP Logged

        You posted some interesting information but my problem is when you said "We must be seriously naive and brain-dead to think it is random". How can we give your math any credibility when you ignored the simple math of lotto/gambling games? Don't you know the odds always favor the house?

        The cash value of the next Mega Millions drawing will be around $16 million but that includes $37.8 million already collected from the two previous drawings plus another estimated $20 million that will be played in tonight's drawing. When lotto operators can make about 50 cents on every dollar wagered, why would they need to do anything to manipulate the drawing?

        If you're talking about the jackpot rolling, you have to consider the odds of it being hit. With only about 20 million possible combinations played, there is better than an 88% chance it won't be hit. In 2009 there were only 3 times when there was close to a 50/50 chance and only twice during the $333 million jackpot run where it exceeded it. But in all 5, the lotteries had already made a profit of over $200 million dollars.

        "As yet I have not heard of any major lottery going bust in recent years! The lottery operator that falls is the one genuinely random!"

        The odds on almost every gambling game favors the house and so the profits of any gaming business are based on volume of play. Several state lotteries had raffles over the holidays and I know for a fact the Florida raffle sold at least 970,000 tickets at $20 a pop. So they took in about $19.4 million and will payout $10 million. In this example the profits are 47% of the volume and when you can get that much volume of sales in only 47 days of sales, why would Florida or any other lottery risk that much profit by not holding a genuine random drawing?

        You also mentioned scratch-off games where the profits average around 35% and in most lotteries scratch-offs account for the most volume. A lottery operator would have to be the village idiot to go bust.

        Hi Stack47

        How can "we" give your math any credibility when you ignored the simple math of lotto/gambling games?

        What do you mean by "WE", who is WE?

        You could not discredit the information supplied so you decided to discredit the messenger!

        I was hoping the two examples that I provided from different field such as ala card restaurant will give you clear picture in mind that if the possibility of so called “in favour of the house” is impossible in this fields to happen then it is impossible in lottery to happen too?

        My post was about facts which are happening in lotteries provided with examples and tests and it was not about my math or my understanding of math! You have bypassed all that facts and immediately talking about the odds being in favour of the house?

        Guess what? This was what Lottery Commission reaction in his reply towards my letter which bypassed the all the facts and replied about his job and the integrity of the lottery!! Are you sure that you are not that Lottery Commission yourself?

        You must have heard the odds are being in favour of the house from somebody else and now brag it to me, let me tell you this then;

        If you take your dollar to any casino and place a bid on any game which is 40 to one pay back and if that game is 100 possibilities to win then you are standing a chance of 100 to one to win $40 so that casino is in favour to win you by 99 times possibilities, true? In order to win $40 you have to play $100 and cover all possibilities so when you win, you would be $60 out of your pocket!

        If one hundred of your friends go to the same casino with you and play the same game as you and 60 of them decide to put their one dollar on one specific number and if that number comes up then that casino will be out of pocket as they have to pay 60 x $40 = $2400 back whilst they only earned $100!!! So, what part of this example which makes it so difficult that you don’t understand or how can you reject this possibility from happening?

        When they say the odds are in favour of the house to win is basically calculated against the odds against ONE individual or the members of the house which usually is smaller or lesser than the odds of one game to win but as the number of persons grow more than the actual odds then the favour will change from casino to players!

        In lottery 649 the odds of winning is 14 million to one so you expect a minimum of 14 million people to play lottery so that one person can win the jackpot! If 50 millions of people playing lottery then it is also expected to have at least 3 jackpot winners if no more but there was a time that 128 millions of tickets sold in UK and nobody won the jackpot which this situation cannot be approved by statistics! Go and have a think about it and put your lottery in to the same test and then speak out if my theory is not true! 

        Moses

          Avatar
          UK
          United Kingdom
          Member #9650
          December 15, 2004
          222 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: January 3, 2010, 4:54 pm - IP Logged

          excellent explination of the lottery,and great solution for the bankers.If they could be more accurate to define how to catch each 3 bankers in each 20,that would be a great progress.I call prediction as cutting cakes.You can cut them in more pieces more equally,you can more accurately predict lottery.Its a pity that people tend to get bankers in greedy attempt  to catch them in limited numbers,how could that be logic and natural?A system lack fairness and equality will always be a dead end while a fair minded,perfectly blanced,and fully thought system is on the way to win!

          Hi Hans 

          Thanks for your support, right now and as it stands bulk predictions can get you major prize plus smaller prizes if you have the spare cash and the program which can create the new combinations from old! I would like you to do the same test with your lottery to find out if this scenario is the same for you too!

          Moses

            Avatar
            Kentucky
            United States
            Member #32652
            February 14, 2006
            7297 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: January 4, 2010, 1:04 pm - IP Logged

            Hi Stack47

            How can "we" give your math any credibility when you ignored the simple math of lotto/gambling games?

            What do you mean by "WE", who is WE?

            You could not discredit the information supplied so you decided to discredit the messenger!

            I was hoping the two examples that I provided from different field such as ala card restaurant will give you clear picture in mind that if the possibility of so called “in favour of the house” is impossible in this fields to happen then it is impossible in lottery to happen too?

            My post was about facts which are happening in lotteries provided with examples and tests and it was not about my math or my understanding of math! You have bypassed all that facts and immediately talking about the odds being in favour of the house?

            Guess what? This was what Lottery Commission reaction in his reply towards my letter which bypassed the all the facts and replied about his job and the integrity of the lottery!! Are you sure that you are not that Lottery Commission yourself?

            You must have heard the odds are being in favour of the house from somebody else and now brag it to me, let me tell you this then;

            If you take your dollar to any casino and place a bid on any game which is 40 to one pay back and if that game is 100 possibilities to win then you are standing a chance of 100 to one to win $40 so that casino is in favour to win you by 99 times possibilities, true? In order to win $40 you have to play $100 and cover all possibilities so when you win, you would be $60 out of your pocket!

            If one hundred of your friends go to the same casino with you and play the same game as you and 60 of them decide to put their one dollar on one specific number and if that number comes up then that casino will be out of pocket as they have to pay 60 x $40 = $2400 back whilst they only earned $100!!! So, what part of this example which makes it so difficult that you don’t understand or how can you reject this possibility from happening?

            When they say the odds are in favour of the house to win is basically calculated against the odds against ONE individual or the members of the house which usually is smaller or lesser than the odds of one game to win but as the number of persons grow more than the actual odds then the favour will change from casino to players!

            In lottery 649 the odds of winning is 14 million to one so you expect a minimum of 14 million people to play lottery so that one person can win the jackpot! If 50 millions of people playing lottery then it is also expected to have at least 3 jackpot winners if no more but there was a time that 128 millions of tickets sold in UK and nobody won the jackpot which this situation cannot be approved by statistics! Go and have a think about it and put your lottery in to the same test and then speak out if my theory is not true! 

            Moses

            "We" would be anybody that has first hand knowledge of the gaming industry.

            "If one hundred of your friends go to the same casino with you and play the same game as you and 60 of them decide to put their one dollar on one specific number and if that number comes up then that casino will be out of pocket as they have to pay 60 x $40 = $2400 back whilst they only earned $100!!! So, what part of this example which makes it so difficult that you don’t understand or how can you reject this possibility from happening?"

            Part of being a good casino operator is knowing such a thing is possible and that would be factored in when they offered the game. If there was such a game you're correct, the casino would lose $2300 on that single spin but a good casino operator would know there were and would be thousands of other single spins and have a 60% edge on everyone of them. Casinos measure their profits over a year and not on any one single spin. They know how many many spins there will be in a year and have a rough estimate on how much will be wagered on each spin. With a 60% edge, they should expect to profit at the least 20% on the total wagers. If any game continues to lose money, they simply shut it down.

            It's not much different than pick-3 games where lotteries give payoffs of $500 to $1. There are probably many drawings a year when more is paid out than was wagered but over an entire year probability kicks in and why most lotteries show profits of 46% or more at the end of the year.

            "In lottery 649 the odds of winning is 14 million to one so you expect a minimum of 14 million people to play lottery so that one person can win the jackpot!"

            I wouldn't expect that because I know lottos are not raffles where all the possibilities are covered and using your other example of 60 out of 100 players all playing the same number, I would expect less than a 40% chance the jackpot would be won. I gave an example of how much is wagered on Mega Millions before the jackpot was hit so you could clearly see the lotteries' "take" is roughly 50%. Simply put if the payout is $14 million, the players wagered about $28 million.

            In how many drawings were $14 million or more tickets sold and of those drawings, how many jackpots were hit? 

            "there was a time that 128 millions of tickets sold in UK and nobody won the jackpot which this situation cannot be approved by statistics!"

            That certainly raises an eyebrow but since most RNGs are programed to pick one or more combinations out of all the possibilities and not just out of all the possibilities not already chosen, it would depend on many random possibilities are needed to generate all 14 million combinations. I really don't know how to calculate how many it would take but if 70% were QPs, 89.6 million certainly weren't enough for that drawing.

            To rig the drawing they need to know which combinations weren't sold (including around 38 million player picks) and still have enough time to manipulate the drawing. How much would they have to pay someone to do that and keep their mouth shut?

            "Are you sure that you are not that Lottery Commission yourself?"

            Nope, I'm just an average lottery player who after checking my losing Powerball tickets hopes nobody hit the jackpot so I'll have a chance to win an even higher jackpot in the next drawing. Was the volume $128 million because the same players wagered more, new players jumped in, or a combination of both because the jackpot was so high?

            I believe your point is that lotteries substantially benefit when large jackpots roll and are manipulating the drawings so nobody wins. In the USA, the states benefit from lottery revenues so for there to be an investigation by a higher authority, we would need more evidence than a statistical anomaly. And I'm pretty sure that's what happened when you presented your evidence to your Lottery Commission.

              Avatar
              UK
              United Kingdom
              Member #9650
              December 15, 2004
              222 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: January 4, 2010, 3:06 pm - IP Logged

              "We" would be anybody that has first hand knowledge of the gaming industry.

              "If one hundred of your friends go to the same casino with you and play the same game as you and 60 of them decide to put their one dollar on one specific number and if that number comes up then that casino will be out of pocket as they have to pay 60 x $40 = $2400 back whilst they only earned $100!!! So, what part of this example which makes it so difficult that you don’t understand or how can you reject this possibility from happening?"

              Part of being a good casino operator is knowing such a thing is possible and that would be factored in when they offered the game. If there was such a game you're correct, the casino would lose $2300 on that single spin but a good casino operator would know there were and would be thousands of other single spins and have a 60% edge on everyone of them. Casinos measure their profits over a year and not on any one single spin. They know how many many spins there will be in a year and have a rough estimate on how much will be wagered on each spin. With a 60% edge, they should expect to profit at the least 20% on the total wagers. If any game continues to lose money, they simply shut it down.

              It's not much different than pick-3 games where lotteries give payoffs of $500 to $1. There are probably many drawings a year when more is paid out than was wagered but over an entire year probability kicks in and why most lotteries show profits of 46% or more at the end of the year.

              "In lottery 649 the odds of winning is 14 million to one so you expect a minimum of 14 million people to play lottery so that one person can win the jackpot!"

              I wouldn't expect that because I know lottos are not raffles where all the possibilities are covered and using your other example of 60 out of 100 players all playing the same number, I would expect less than a 40% chance the jackpot would be won. I gave an example of how much is wagered on Mega Millions before the jackpot was hit so you could clearly see the lotteries' "take" is roughly 50%. Simply put if the payout is $14 million, the players wagered about $28 million.

              In how many drawings were $14 million or more tickets sold and of those drawings, how many jackpots were hit? 

              "there was a time that 128 millions of tickets sold in UK and nobody won the jackpot which this situation cannot be approved by statistics!"

              That certainly raises an eyebrow but since most RNGs are programed to pick one or more combinations out of all the possibilities and not just out of all the possibilities not already chosen, it would depend on many random possibilities are needed to generate all 14 million combinations. I really don't know how to calculate how many it would take but if 70% were QPs, 89.6 million certainly weren't enough for that drawing.

              To rig the drawing they need to know which combinations weren't sold (including around 38 million player picks) and still have enough time to manipulate the drawing. How much would they have to pay someone to do that and keep their mouth shut?

              "Are you sure that you are not that Lottery Commission yourself?"

              Nope, I'm just an average lottery player who after checking my losing Powerball tickets hopes nobody hit the jackpot so I'll have a chance to win an even higher jackpot in the next drawing. Was the volume $128 million because the same players wagered more, new players jumped in, or a combination of both because the jackpot was so high?

              I believe your point is that lotteries substantially benefit when large jackpots roll and are manipulating the drawings so nobody wins. In the USA, the states benefit from lottery revenues so for there to be an investigation by a higher authority, we would need more evidence than a statistical anomaly. And I'm pretty sure that's what happened when you presented your evidence to your Lottery Commission.

              Stack47

              Have you every heard of casinos or bookies losing money in general? If NO then google it as I just did and see how many casinos or bookies have lost millions over some silly bids!!

              Now, have you ever heard of any lottery losing any money? The answer is NO! In fact lotteries are taking their profit before the game starts and well in advance, so if you cannot digest this massive difference then you have a major problem!

              I am asking you again, go and test pilot the information I gave you with your lottery and be brave about it and if I am incorrect or the theory does not work or is untrue then come back and argue! I am using Patrick 123 software and is very fast, get a copy of his program and dump your old results in it, as easy as that!

              Good luck

              Moses

                x1kosmic's avatar - neptune vg2.gif

                United States
                Member #48046
                December 7, 2006
                1699 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: January 4, 2010, 5:10 pm - IP Logged

                I've noticed in these computer generated games that little combo's will re-play themselves

                 last three draws     6- 11- 12- 35- 39

                                                15- 22- 23- 26- 30

                                                11- 12- 15- 17- 33             note the 11 and 12

                It happens all the time, thats just a small example

                 I've also noticed that a last digital (or more than one) will get  on a roll and NOT go for 4 or 5 draws

                   so sometimes I get lucky and kinda 'know' what not to pick

                  LadyMylena's avatar - avatar6 1.jpg
                  Kansas
                  United States
                  Member #83963
                  December 19, 2009
                  347 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: January 4, 2010, 7:07 pm - IP Logged

                  I've noticed in these computer generated games that little combo's will re-play themselves

                   last three draws     6- 11- 12- 35- 39

                                                  15- 22- 23- 26- 30

                                                  11- 12- 15- 17- 33             note the 11 and 12

                  It happens all the time, thats just a small example

                   I've also noticed that a last digital (or more than one) will get  on a roll and NOT go for 4 or 5 draws

                     so sometimes I get lucky and kinda 'know' what not to pick

                  I have noticed this, too, not only with the big jackpots, but with the smaller ones, also. It does happen OFTEN.

                  Luck is  ** believing  ** you're lucky.” ~Tennessee Williams

                  Money is neither my god nor my devil. It is a form of energy that tends to make us more of who we already are, whether it's greedy or loving.  ~ Dan Millman


                    marcie's avatar - Lottery-060.jpg
                    Ohio
                    United States
                    Member #49980
                    February 21, 2007
                    34117 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: January 4, 2010, 9:42 pm - IP Logged

                    I have noticed this, too, not only with the big jackpots, but with the smaller ones, also. It does happen OFTEN.

                    I have to get out of here it is too complicated for me. wish you luck though! I will take a shot with your numbers in the Mega million Tues, and Fri. Thanks!

                    http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/233413    Sun Smiley Popular numbers

                    12345

                    67890

                    Use Mirror #'s Use prs. with your  Key* numbers the most Vivid thing in your dream go up or down on #'s.  Flip  6=9 `9=6  Bullseyes  0 or 1 for Pick 4 and the P. 5  Play the other part of doubles.  Do the Whole nine yards for a P. 4* P. 5*  or 0 thur 9  for P. 4  P. 5 from my dreams or hunches good Luck.. Write your Dreams down Play for 3 days.  Good Luck All.

                      Todd's avatar - Cylon 2.gif
                      Chief Bottle Washer
                      New Jersey
                      United States
                      Member #1
                      May 31, 2000
                      23260 Posts
                      Online
                      Posted: January 4, 2010, 9:57 pm - IP Logged

                      @Moses:

                      I had a couple of briefs comments I wanted to bring to your attention:

                      1. I removed the copyright notice you posted in your initial message.  There is no ability to retain a copyright to anything posted on the forums.  That's true for posting on other sites too (other than your own site, of course).
                      2. Please avoid posting any news stories on the forums.  There are reasons for this rule I will not go into here, but if you have a news story suggestionfor Lottery Post to post in the news section, please use the News Story Suggestion form.

                      Thanks!

                       

                      Check the State Lottery Report Card
                      What grade did your lottery earn?

                       

                      Sign the Petition for True Lottery Drawings
                      Help eliminate computerized drawings!

                        RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                        mid-Ohio
                        United States
                        Member #9
                        March 24, 2001
                        19817 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: January 5, 2010, 1:07 pm - IP Logged

                        Moses Kashani is old news at LP.  He was mentioned in a LP thread six years ago. http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75492

                        I would have thought he would have won a lottery jackpot some where in the world by now if any of his theories had merits.

                         * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                           
                                     Evil Looking       

                          Avatar
                          UK
                          United Kingdom
                          Member #9650
                          December 15, 2004
                          222 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: January 5, 2010, 2:49 pm - IP Logged

                          Moses Kashani is old news at LP.  He was mentioned in a LP thread six years ago. http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/75492

                          I would have thought he would have won a lottery jackpot some where in the world by now if any of his theories had merits.

                          The house that you are staying in its build brick by brick and that is what Moses Kashani is doing building the lottery software piece by piece! You cannot inject knowledge into someone’s brain and it takes time to learn, sometimes it takes a life time to learn!

                          Moses Kashani had always been Moses Kashani and always will be but what about you Mr RAJO in this forum and Mr OJRA in others, scared of your own identity!

                          I’ll take it that you have tested this information against your lottery and did not work, is that right Mr RAJO? If so, could you pass me your results so I can test it too for the accuracy please!

                          Moses

                            RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                            mid-Ohio
                            United States
                            Member #9
                            March 24, 2001
                            19817 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: January 5, 2010, 8:29 pm - IP Logged

                            The house that you are staying in its build brick by brick and that is what Moses Kashani is doing building the lottery software piece by piece! You cannot inject knowledge into someone’s brain and it takes time to learn, sometimes it takes a life time to learn!

                            Moses Kashani had always been Moses Kashani and always will be but what about you Mr RAJO in this forum and Mr OJRA in others, scared of your own identity!

                            I’ll take it that you have tested this information against your lottery and did not work, is that right Mr RAJO? If so, could you pass me your results so I can test it too for the accuracy please!

                            Moses

                            Sorry, I don't have time to test other folk theories, I hardly have time to test my own.  If your theories and information work for you, then fine I wish you the best of luck.  I don't play those European games so the data and theories you developed playing them can't help me since I only play the games available locally like MegaMillions, Ohio Rolling Cash5 and Classic Lotto.

                             * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                               
                                         Evil Looking       

                              Avatar
                              UK
                              United Kingdom
                              Member #9650
                              December 15, 2004
                              222 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: January 6, 2010, 3:27 am - IP Logged

                              Sorry, I don't have time to test other folk theories, I hardly have time to test my own.  If your theories and information work for you, then fine I wish you the best of luck.  I don't play those European games so the data and theories you developed playing them can't help me since I only play the games available locally like MegaMillions, Ohio Rolling Cash5 and Classic Lotto.

                              That's what I thought, I just knew it! BUT if you would have gave me time or read my post, in part two when I release the database with that you can play any lottery that you want including your MegaMillions!

                              Moses

                                 
                                Page 1 of 14