Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 2, 2016, 11:40 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

is anyone making an income from lottery

Topic closed. 629 replies. Last post 4 years ago by Stack47.

Page 38 of 42
4.76
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #93947
July 10, 2010
2180 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 8, 2013, 7:28 pm - IP Logged

Stack47,

You said, "you created a condition so any type of bet on those numbers depends on your condition being met."

Seriously, I can't wait to learn what I "created!"

What I thought did was select my alloted set of 10 numbers based on a simple "criteria," which had nothing whatsoever to do with WHAT state they were going to be bet in, nor WHEN.

So, what "condition" must be met before I pull the trigger with these numbers in all 50 states the next time?

--Jimmy4164

    Avatar
    Kentucky
    United States
    Member #32652
    February 14, 2006
    7295 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: May 8, 2013, 9:24 pm - IP Logged

    Stack47,

    You said, "you created a condition so any type of bet on those numbers depends on your condition being met."

    Seriously, I can't wait to learn what I "created!"

    What I thought did was select my alloted set of 10 numbers based on a simple "criteria," which had nothing whatsoever to do with WHAT state they were going to be bet in, nor WHEN.

    So, what "condition" must be met before I pull the trigger with these numbers in all 50 states the next time?

    --Jimmy4164

    "What I thought did was select my alloted set of 10 numbers based on a simple "criteria," which had nothing whatsoever to do with WHAT state they were going to be bet in, nor WHEN."

    We've already had a discussion on your inability to think clearly so let's not go there.

    "So, what "condition" must be met"

    The same type of conditions Ronnie bet on when he matched 5 out of 28 numbers.


      United States
      Member #93947
      July 10, 2010
      2180 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: May 9, 2013, 3:04 am - IP Logged

      "What I thought did was select my alloted set of 10 numbers based on a simple "criteria," which had nothing whatsoever to do with WHAT state they were going to be bet in, nor WHEN."

      We've already had a discussion on your inability to think clearly so let's not go there.

      "So, what "condition" must be met"

      The same type of conditions Ronnie bet on when he matched 5 out of 28 numbers.

      "There you go again!"

      https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/260532/3056557

        Avatar
        Kentucky
        United States
        Member #32652
        February 14, 2006
        7295 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: May 9, 2013, 9:17 am - IP Logged

        If you're having fun predicting 10 lines of numbers for all states, I won't rain on your parade. Why is it when others are having fun discussing systems and strategies, you try to rain on their parades?


          United States
          Member #93947
          July 10, 2010
          2180 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: May 9, 2013, 11:50 am - IP Logged

          If you're having fun predicting 10 lines of numbers for all states, I won't rain on your parade. Why is it when others are having fun discussing systems and strategies, you try to rain on their parades?

          Stack47 says, "If you're having fun predicting 10 lines of numbers for all states, I won't rain on your parade."

          Go ahead and rain on my parade.  I had hoped you WOULD explain to everyone how/why my P3/P4 Predictions do as well as anyone else's after 140,000 picks.  Be my guest.

          Stack47 asks, "Why is it when others are having fun discussing systems and strategies, you try to rain on their parades?"

          Why?  I've answered this question many times.  Here's just one example...

          https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/257404/2936678

          --Jimmy4164

            Boney526's avatar - NjlpLogo
            New Jersey
            United States
            Member #99032
            October 18, 2010
            1439 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:05 pm - IP Logged

            Jimmy, this one sentence sums up why you should give up here.  (In terms of arguing with Stack.)

             

            "I hope Boney doesn't notice your pick-4 lifetime prize ratio exceeds the house edge."

             

            I've spent a long time trying to explain to Stack WHY this happens, and yet he obviously didn't read what I wrote because he read "it's normal for results to deviate randomly" as "everyone loses at exactly the house edge all the time."

             

            Pretty obvious that Stack only cares to argue for the sake of argument.  Especially because he always asks rhetorical questions that we've already answered, but that he ignores.


              United States
              Member #93947
              July 10, 2010
              2180 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:10 pm - IP Logged

              Jimmy, this one sentence sums up why you should give up here.  (In terms of arguing with Stack.)

               

              "I hope Boney doesn't notice your pick-4 lifetime prize ratio exceeds the house edge."

               

              I've spent a long time trying to explain to Stack WHY this happens, and yet he obviously didn't read what I wrote because he read "it's normal for results to deviate randomly" as "everyone loses at exactly the house edge all the time."

               

              Pretty obvious that Stack only cares to argue for the sake of argument.  Especially because he always asks rhetorical questions that we've already answered, but that he ignores.

              I agree!


                United States
                Member #116268
                September 7, 2011
                20244 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:12 pm - IP Logged

                Jimmy, this one sentence sums up why you should give up here.  (In terms of arguing with Stack.)

                 

                "I hope Boney doesn't notice your pick-4 lifetime prize ratio exceeds the house edge."

                 

                I've spent a long time trying to explain to Stack WHY this happens, and yet he obviously didn't read what I wrote because he read "it's normal for results to deviate randomly" as "everyone loses at exactly the house edge all the time."

                 

                Pretty obvious that Stack only cares to argue for the sake of argument.  Especially because he always asks rhetorical questions that we've already answered, but that he ignores.

                Sounds like you and Jammy have come together as a real nice team against the innumerate lottery players?


                  United States
                  Member #116268
                  September 7, 2011
                  20244 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:14 pm - IP Logged

                  I agree!

                  Have you boys thought about dating Jammy?

                    rcbbuckeye's avatar - Lottery-043.jpg
                    Texas
                    United States
                    Member #55889
                    October 23, 2007
                    5588 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:32 pm - IP Logged

                    jimmy insists that anyone here that likes to discuss systems and strategies has an agenda, and is trying to lead newbies astray. For some reason, he just can't believe there are people here that enjoy trying different strategies and therefore feels like he must rain on anyone's parade that he disagrees with.

                    If I disagree with a system or strategy, I just let it go. Who am I to tell that person or people they are wrong or they have an "agenda"?

                    I don't know why jimmy just can't let people have their discussion on strategies and go away. Maybe he was mistreated as a child.

                    CAN'T WIN IF YOU'RE NOT IN

                    A DOLLAR AND A DREAM (OR $2)


                      United States
                      Member #116268
                      September 7, 2011
                      20244 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:33 pm - IP Logged

                          +

                                                                                         

                      jimmy4164jimmy4164's avatar - andy warhol.jpg             
                         =              Love
                        rcbbuckeye's avatar - Lottery-043.jpg
                        Texas
                        United States
                        Member #55889
                        October 23, 2007
                        5588 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:41 pm - IP Logged

                            +

                                                                                           

                        jimmy4164jimmy4164's avatar - andy warhol.jpg             
                           =              Love

                        Awwww. So sweet.

                        LOL.

                        CAN'T WIN IF YOU'RE NOT IN

                        A DOLLAR AND A DREAM (OR $2)


                          United States
                          Member #116268
                          September 7, 2011
                          20244 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:46 pm - IP Logged

                          Awwww. So sweet.

                          LOL.

                          Thanks, very creative I thought. Everyone here knows Jammys true agenda is Communism. His core purpose is to spread doubt, and question anything that smacks of creative design or personal achievement.


                            United States
                            Member #116268
                            September 7, 2011
                            20244 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:47 pm - IP Logged

                            That's why I call Jammy an Idiot. And he considers it a compliment.


                              United States
                              Member #116268
                              September 7, 2011
                              20244 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: May 9, 2013, 12:51 pm - IP Logged

                              That's why I call Jammy an Idiot. And he considers it a compliment.

                              Razz

                                 
                                Page 38 of 42