Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 10:50 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Should a winning system be posted on the LP?

Topic closed. 392 replies. Last post 3 years ago by helpmewin.

Page 9 of 27
4.49
PrintE-mailLink

Should a winning system be posted on the LP?

Don't post a winning system? [ 41 ]  [34.75%]
Post your winning system? [ 77 ]  [65.25%]
Total Valid Votes [ 118 ]  
Discarded Votes [ 11 ]  
Avatar
Kentucky
United States
Member #32652
February 14, 2006
7295 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 11, 2013, 1:13 am - IP Logged

"Stack47",

You asked, "In your mind because of your Delusions of Grandeur, do you believe the membership is waiting for your next response like a child on Christmas Eve waiting for Santa?"

Based on the frequency and promptness of his replies to my posts, it would appear that is clearly the case for a member named "Stack47."

--Jimmy4164

I replied 13 hours after you posted and you replied to mine 13 minutes later.

LMAO @ the promptness of my replies. LOL

Maybe if you could resist "responding any more here", maybe my responses to your posts addressed to me would be less frequent. Didn't any of your math sources explain logic?


    United States
    Member #93947
    July 10, 2010
    2180 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: May 11, 2013, 4:00 am - IP Logged

    I replied 13 hours after you posted and you replied to mine 13 minutes later.

    LMAO @ the promptness of my replies. LOL

    Maybe if you could resist "responding any more here", maybe my responses to your posts addressed to me would be less frequent. Didn't any of your math sources explain logic?

    "I replied 13 hours after you posted and you replied to mine 13 minutes later."

    I see you make the same kind of mistakes evaluating post exchanges as you do selecting your lottery plays; you look back at recent history (in this case one exchange,) and draw conclusions.  It doesn't occur to you that there is an element of randomness at play, since neither one of us appears to be monitoring these Forums 24 hours a day.

    You are responding to me no less than I'm responding to you.  The difference is that you are obviously intent on discrediting anything I say and often respond with no useful purpose.  For some unexplained reason, you find it intolerable for someone to have the last word when they make a good point supporting the quote in my current signature line.

    If I knew that you had credentials that give you standing to debate with me, perhaps I would be willing to compromise.  But since you appear to have a need to hide your qualifications, if any, I believe it is your place to bow out.

    Click Here to help save LP Disk Space.

      Avatar
      Kentucky
      United States
      Member #32652
      February 14, 2006
      7295 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: May 11, 2013, 3:15 pm - IP Logged

      "I replied 13 hours after you posted and you replied to mine 13 minutes later."

      I see you make the same kind of mistakes evaluating post exchanges as you do selecting your lottery plays; you look back at recent history (in this case one exchange,) and draw conclusions.  It doesn't occur to you that there is an element of randomness at play, since neither one of us appears to be monitoring these Forums 24 hours a day.

      You are responding to me no less than I'm responding to you.  The difference is that you are obviously intent on discrediting anything I say and often respond with no useful purpose.  For some unexplained reason, you find it intolerable for someone to have the last word when they make a good point supporting the quote in my current signature line.

      If I knew that you had credentials that give you standing to debate with me, perhaps I would be willing to compromise.  But since you appear to have a need to hide your qualifications, if any, I believe it is your place to bow out.

      Click Here to help save LP Disk Space.

      "The difference is that you are obviously intent on discrediting anything I say and often respond with no useful purpose."

      Nobody needs to discredit you because you're doing a fine job by yourself. For instance you said I promptly reply to your posts, but the facts show it was 13 hours later. And on that post, you replied to me in 13 minutes. You forced me to reply because what you said was untrue.

      I'm not saying simulations are useless, but the majority of yours don't simulate anything useful, therefore making the data you compile useless. If you're going to present a simulation showing it's possible to make a profit buying a limited five $1 QPs every drawing for five years, don't say it's impossible for unlimited playing and betting strategies to show a profit.

      Unless of course it is to discredit yourself.

      Just saying.


        United States
        Member #116268
        September 7, 2011
        20244 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: May 12, 2013, 11:17 am - IP Logged

        "The difference is that you are obviously intent on discrediting anything I say and often respond with no useful purpose."

        Nobody needs to discredit you because you're doing a fine job by yourself. For instance you said I promptly reply to your posts, but the facts show it was 13 hours later. And on that post, you replied to me in 13 minutes. You forced me to reply because what you said was untrue.

        I'm not saying simulations are useless, but the majority of yours don't simulate anything useful, therefore making the data you compile useless. If you're going to present a simulation showing it's possible to make a profit buying a limited five $1 QPs every drawing for five years, don't say it's impossible for unlimited playing and betting strategies to show a profit.

        Unless of course it is to discredit yourself.

        Just saying.

        Nobody needs to discredit you because you're doing a fine job by yourself.

        I agree Stack.......


          United States
          Member #116268
          September 7, 2011
          20244 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: May 12, 2013, 11:17 am - IP Logged

          "I replied 13 hours after you posted and you replied to mine 13 minutes later."

          I see you make the same kind of mistakes evaluating post exchanges as you do selecting your lottery plays; you look back at recent history (in this case one exchange,) and draw conclusions.  It doesn't occur to you that there is an element of randomness at play, since neither one of us appears to be monitoring these Forums 24 hours a day.

          You are responding to me no less than I'm responding to you.  The difference is that you are obviously intent on discrediting anything I say and often respond with no useful purpose.  For some unexplained reason, you find it intolerable for someone to have the last word when they make a good point supporting the quote in my current signature line.

          If I knew that you had credentials that give you standing to debate with me, perhaps I would be willing to compromise.  But since you appear to have a need to hide your qualifications, if any, I believe it is your place to bow out.

          Click Here to help save LP Disk Space.

          In the post above it sounds like Jammy is asking you to produce "credentials" while using a quote in his signature as his own "credentials"..... Jammy is so twisted in his own logic, he doesn't perceive his folly.


            United States
            Member #116268
            September 7, 2011
            20244 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: May 12, 2013, 11:20 am - IP Logged

            "I replied 13 hours after you posted and you replied to mine 13 minutes later."

            I see you make the same kind of mistakes evaluating post exchanges as you do selecting your lottery plays; you look back at recent history (in this case one exchange,) and draw conclusions.  It doesn't occur to you that there is an element of randomness at play, since neither one of us appears to be monitoring these Forums 24 hours a day.

            You are responding to me no less than I'm responding to you.  The difference is that you are obviously intent on discrediting anything I say and often respond with no useful purpose.  For some unexplained reason, you find it intolerable for someone to have the last word when they make a good point supporting the quote in my current signature line.

            If I knew that you had credentials that give you standing to debate with me, perhaps I would be willing to compromise.  But since you appear to have a need to hide your qualifications, if any, I believe it is your place to bow out.

            Click Here to help save LP Disk Space.

            Click Here to help save LP Disk Space.

            What are you suggesting Jammy?

            I thought we already concluded that LP uses data storage NOT disk space????


              United States
              Member #116268
              September 7, 2011
              20244 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: May 12, 2013, 11:27 am - IP Logged

                Avatar
                Kentucky
                United States
                Member #32652
                February 14, 2006
                7295 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: May 12, 2013, 9:06 pm - IP Logged

                In the post above it sounds like Jammy is asking you to produce "credentials" while using a quote in his signature as his own "credentials"..... Jammy is so twisted in his own logic, he doesn't perceive his folly.

                Not just any old credentials, but credentials that give me standing to debate with him. I'm wondering how much he did lose gambling and telling that story makes more sense than saying don't play lottery games because the odds are terrible.

                I asked Dictionary dot com to consider placing a picture of him next to their definition of "Delusions of Grandeur".

                  SergeM's avatar - slow icon.png
                  Economy class
                  Belgium
                  Member #123700
                  February 27, 2012
                  4035 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: May 13, 2013, 12:54 pm - IP Logged

                  Hi,

                    I got a bit of a shock last week. I posted a thread on the LP and within minutes I recieved a reply from a lottery official. It confirmed my long suspicion that the lotteries are paying attention to what is posted on the LP.

                    That would bring a question as to wether or not you would want to post a winning system on the LP (assuming you had/have one). Asuming a winning system is posted, it would be a key for the lotteries to change up what they are doing (pre-draws....etc), so that a system is no longer a winning one.

                    It has been aa long ongoing discussion at the LP why people don't/won't post thier systems or secrets. Maybe, they are playing smart by not posting thier winning systems and secrets.

                  Should a winning system be posted on the LP?

                  Don't post a winning system?
                  Post your winning system?
                  Discard Vote

                  After you register your vote the current poll results will be displayed.  Select "Discard Vote" to see the results without voting (your vote is discarded permanently).

                   

                  ...

                  Strange poll.

                    helpmewin's avatar - dandy
                    u$a
                    United States
                    Member #106665
                    February 22, 2011
                    19743 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: May 13, 2013, 6:15 pm - IP Logged

                    Should a winning system be posted on the LP?

                    Don't post a winning system?
                    Post your winning system?
                    Discard Vote

                    After you register your vote the current poll results will be displayed.  Select "Discard Vote" to see the results without voting (your vote is discarded permanently).

                     

                    ...

                    Strange poll.

                    I Agree!   Strange poll Green laugh

                    Let it Snow Snowman


                      United States
                      Member #128790
                      June 2, 2012
                      5431 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: May 13, 2013, 8:48 pm - IP Logged

                      I Agree!   Strange poll Green laugh

                      What's so strange about this poll?

                      The poll's question is, " Should a winning system be posted on the LP? "

                      It's a yes or no. The two options cover every angle. The first option allows you to vote NO. The second option asks you to show your system considering you're an advocate of posting systems. The OP is encouraging it.  What's the problem? ROFL

                      Green laugh 

                       

                                                                   Banana

                        helpmewin's avatar - dandy
                        u$a
                        United States
                        Member #106665
                        February 22, 2011
                        19743 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: May 13, 2013, 11:36 pm - IP Logged

                        What's so strange about this poll?

                        The poll's question is, " Should a winning system be posted on the LP? "

                        It's a yes or no. The two options cover every angle. The first option allows you to vote NO. The second option asks you to show your system considering you're an advocate of posting systems. The OP is encouraging it.  What's the problem? ROFL

                        Green laugh 

                         

                                                                     Banana

                        It's a yes or no.

                        what if it was Maybe White Bounce

                        Let it Snow Snowman


                          United States
                          Member #124493
                          March 14, 2012
                          7023 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: May 14, 2013, 12:59 am - IP Logged

                          Hi,

                            I got a bit of a shock last week. I posted a thread on the LP and within minutes I recieved a reply from a lottery official. It confirmed my long suspicion that the lotteries are paying attention to what is posted on the LP.

                            That would bring a question as to wether or not you would want to post a winning system on the LP (assuming you had/have one). Asuming a winning system is posted, it would be a key for the lotteries to change up what they are doing (pre-draws....etc), so that a system is no longer a winning one.

                            It has been aa long ongoing discussion at the LP why people don't/won't post thier systems or secrets. Maybe, they are playing smart by not posting thier winning systems and secrets.

                          Hello JKING, I appreciate your "daring" and ability to push the envelop in regards to lottery matters.

                          Just thought I would post again because I think that there is nothing really to fear at all.

                          #1) If you are in shock from being contacted from a Lottery Official, then probably you have never felt the shock of your analyzed numbers being drawn.

                          #2) If you were advantageous enough to search for a system, then you might find that MANY winning systems have ALREADY been posted and are percolating within the LP Archives.

                          #3) The only reason you were contacted by an "official" is because if you keep educating the "masses" in California, then California might have another "riot" on their hands, and they wouldn't even need any cops to crack a black mans skulls to instigate it.

                          #4)  "Within minutes"?  I think you may have been exxagerating here.  I dont think anybody is stalking you, no matter how much self importance you may want to believe.  It probably was a 'coinkydink".  Until you can hit the PB JP every ten draws like clockwork, then I think the powers that be will leave you alone.


                            United States
                            Member #93947
                            July 10, 2010
                            2180 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: May 14, 2013, 1:11 am - IP Logged

                            What's so strange about this poll?

                            The poll's question is, " Should a winning system be posted on the LP? "

                            It's a yes or no. The two options cover every angle. The first option allows you to vote NO. The second option asks you to show your system considering you're an advocate of posting systems. The OP is encouraging it.  What's the problem? ROFL

                            Green laugh 

                             

                                                                         Banana

                            OnlyMoney,

                            "What's the problem?"

                            Assume the following was submitted as a poll question somewhere:

                            Should a Street Legal 500 Horsepower 1992 Studebaker be allowed to compete in Formula One races?

                            ___  YES

                            ___  NO

                            Now, if you knew that Studebaker never produced a Street Legal 500 Horsepower car and didn't produce ANY cars after 1966, how would you vote?

                            The hypothetical poll question above is a "Loaded Question,"  as is the poll question in this thread.

                            --Jimmy4164

                              Avatar
                              Kentucky
                              United States
                              Member #32652
                              February 14, 2006
                              7295 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: May 14, 2013, 1:35 am - IP Logged

                              OnlyMoney,

                              "What's the problem?"

                              Assume the following was submitted as a poll question somewhere:

                              Should a Street Legal 500 Horsepower 1992 Studebaker be allowed to compete in Formula One races?

                              ___  YES

                              ___  NO

                              Now, if you knew that Studebaker never produced a Street Legal 500 Horsepower car and didn't produce ANY cars after 1966, how would you vote?

                              The hypothetical poll question above is a "Loaded Question,"  as is the poll question in this thread.

                              --Jimmy4164

                              It's obvious the only reason you say there is no winning system is because you want to see one. Has it occurred to you some of the people voting yes just want to see a winning system posted too without adding all the BS you post?

                              Just saying.

                                 
                                Page 9 of 27